Hamlet's Madness Research Paper

844 Words2 Pages

The Truth Behind Hamlet’s Madness

In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Hamlet: The Prince of Denmark, most characters assume that Hamlet has indeed gone mad due to the constant tragedy that surrounds him. Hamlet’s apparent madness is so convincing that it leaves everyone wondering if Hamlet actually insane, or if his madness is just feigned. On one hand, Hamlet recently suffered the sudden death of his father, the hasty remarriage of his mother to his uncle, and the rejection of his love. On the other hand, the manner in which Hamlet deals with every situation, the way he shows rationality, and how he plots his revenge for his father’s murder suggests that he is not truly mad. However, neither one of these conclusions is absolute, which leads to the supposition that Hamlet suffers from neurosis, but not necessarily psychosis. …show more content…

One of the most persuasive arguments for Hamlet’s being actually mad is that “of the feigned madness of Hamlet there appears no adequate cause, for he does nothing which he might not have done with the reputation of sanity” (Crawford). It was never necessary for Hamlet to act mad. He could have plausibly set up the play under the guise of sanity to determine if Claudius’s was actually guilty of his father’s death. Also, he could have secretly killed Claudius as Claudius did to his father without anyone knowing and without ruining his reputation by feigned madness. Additionally, the state that Hamlet mind that Hamlet sees Ophelia in after speaking with the Ghost of his father the first time speaks to the lack of self awareness that the Prince of Denmark had. Hamlet confronts Ophelia shaking, under clothed, and soiled (Shakespeare 79). There is no logical reason that a prince, raised to uphold social pretense, would go see his former flame in an unrefined state no matter what

Open Document