Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hamlet's sanity
How does Shakespeare present the idea of madness in Hamlet
Evidence of Madness in Hamlet by William Shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hamlet's sanity
Shakespeare's Hamlet: Investigating Hamlet's Insanity
Hamlet is one of Shakespeare's most famous plays, and hardest to
perform. The reason it is so hard to perform is because of the main
character Hamlet. Hamlet is an easily liked character that must revenge his
father's death. He is forced to act insane in order to find out the truth
of his father's death. Hamlet does an excellent job of acting insane, so
good, in fact, that it is questioned if he was acting insane or if he
actually was. Hamlet's madness is an important part in the play. It is an
important role that recurs throughout the play. The question to his
insanity lies in the reasons for his insanity. He is constantly betrayed
throughout the play by everyone he loves and holds dear except for one
person who sticks by him throughout his ordeal, Horatio.
Hamlet first shows his passion and how upset he is by his father's
death when his mother and the king enter the room and question him on his
grief for his father. His mother mentions that his grief seems common.
Hamlet replies:
“Seems, madam! nay it is; I know not 'seems.'
'Tis not alone my inky cloak, good mother,
Nor customary suits of solemn black,
Nor windy suspiration of forced breath,
No, nor the fruitful river in the eye,
Nor the dejected 'havior of the visage,
Together with all forms, moods, shapes of grief,
That can denote me truly: these indeed seem,
For they are actions that a man might play:
But I have that within which passeth show;
These but the trappings and the suits of woe.”(1.2)
Here Hamlet shows his unstable mind. He is screaming at his mother telling
her how his actions are honest and he is not pretending to grieve, but that
he is truly saddened by his father's death. He has become offended by his
mother's inference that Hamlet is not actually upset by his father's death..
She uses the term "Seems" which pushes Hamlet to this rage.
Hamlet is so saddened by his father's death that he begins to think
of suicide. "O, that this too too solid flesh would melt / Thaw and resolve
itself into a dew!”(1.2.129-130). He is wishing that his flesh would melt
away or “Or that the Everlasting had not fix'd / His canon 'gainst self-
slaughter!”(131-132). He then reveals the first part to his madness: ”But
two months dead: nay, not so much, not two: / So excellent a king; that
was, to this, / Hyperion to a satyr; so loving to my mother”(138-140).
Granted that according to Will, the Southern Presbyterians believe that “what is to be is to be,” this belief on predestination becomes evident when Cretia and Looly, a covey of Presbyterian ladies, visit Will after his survival in the train- trestle incident and begin to express their predestination, saying that God spared Will because it was not his time to die, and it was God’s will that this boy should be alive. This expression makes Will puzzle with a question: is he alive because of God’s will? When he puts forth this question to his Grandpa, Rucker Blakeslee, Rucker replies Will that God gave him a brain that he could use wisely; therefore, he lied down betwixt the tracks to save himself. Eager to know more about predestination and God’s will, Will further asks his Grandpa whether it was God’s will that Bluford Jackson should die of Tetanus. On hearing Will’s question, Rucker explains that Bluford’s carelessness while bursting crackers was not God’s fault in anywa...
that they had seen a ghost during the night watch. Hamlet was shocked at the
of Death. When a young boy is asked what happened to a man who had just
The king was murdered, and Hamlet's mother, Gertrude, progresses immediately over her husband's death. Then she gets courted to Hamlet's uncle to maintain her crown. The love Hamlet has for his father never diminishes unlike his mother who weds after two months. Young Hamlet declines to recognize that his dad's death was from unnatural causes. Hamlet cannot make out what to do with his life. He declares
Hamlet: Hamlet's Sanity & nbsp; & nbsp; “Great wits are sure to madness near allied, and thin partitions do. their bounds divide.” Though John Dryden's quote was not made in regard to William Shakespeare's Hamlet, it relates very well to the argument of whether or not Hamlet went insane. When a character such as Hamlet is under scrutiny, it can sometimes be difficult to determine what state he is in at. particular moments in the play.
...on the matter, that Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet is most certainly of sound mind. He appears insane merely as an act to throw his would-be enemies off his trail and suffers the same pangs of despair any sane person would in his situation. Branagh has clearly put significant effort into the part, and his portrayal is evident of nothing less.
Intelligence is often mistaken for brilliance, and conversely genius is mistaken for madness. Some of the greatest minds have been misconstrued in there time, and it is not until their whole life is taken into observance from the outside looking in, that their genius is realized and appreciated. Websters dictionary defines madness as "the act of being foolish or illogical." Ironically this form of thought has prompted some of the greatest advancements in government, science, and technology. It was the thought that every common man and woman should be included in his or her respective governments that prompted Democracy, a form of government unheard of before the signing of the Magna Carta. It was scientists and inventors thinking outside of the lines that inspired the cure for Small Pox and the invention of the computer. It can clearly be seen that serious thought is often the by-product of irrational thinking, this is also true for literature. It is while in madness, both feigned as well as sincere, that the characters in William Shakespeare's Hamlet are able to practice true mental clarity and express themselves in a manner free of treachery and falsehood.
Shakespeare's tragic hero, Hamlet, and his sanity can arguably be discussed. Many portions of the play supports his loss of control in his actions, while other parts uphold his ability of dramatic art. The issue can be discussed both ways and altogether provide significant support to either theory. There are indications from Hamlet throughout the play of his mind's well being.
One of the most analyzed plays in existence is the tragedy Hamlet, with its recurring question: "Is Hamlet’s 'antic disposition' feigned or real?" In truth, this question can only be answered by observing the thoughts of the main characters in relation to the cause of Hamlet real or feigned madness. In the tragedy Hamlet, each of the main characters explains Hamlets madness in their own unique way. To discover the cause behind the madness of Hamlet, each character used their own ambitions, emotions and interpretations of past events. Characters tried to explain Hamlet's "antic disposition" by means of association to thwarted ambition, heartbreaking anguish, and denied love. In the workings of their thoughts, the characters inadvertently reveal something about their own desires, emotions and experiences to the reader.
Shortly after giving up his power, the father realizes that he is nothing without it and appears to be slowly becoming insane. In both instances, the father, in a crazed moment, wanders off and puts himself in a life-threatening situation. In the end the youngest daughter comes to the fathers' rescue.
Meursault also only speaks when he feels as if he has too and has no interest in having connections/emotion relationships with others. When asked by Marie, his girlfriend, if he loved her he simply replied by explaining that “it didn’t mean anything and that [he] didn’t think so” (Camus 35) which shows the lack of care and/or interest in his relationship. This can also be seen when he is having a conversation with Raymond Sintes, his neighbor. When asked to be pals Meursault “didn’t say anything, and [Raymond] asked [him] again…[He] said it was fine” (Camus 29).
“I ask you for this man’s head… the horror I feel when I look into a man’s face and all I see is a monster” (Camus 102). The prosecutor’s harsh judgement gives powerful intel into the narrator’s indifferent character. The focus of the trail shifts from the actual murder to Meursault's beliefs and attitudes, specifically his lack of grief at his mother’s funeral and atheism go against the social norm and label him as an outsider. As sentenced to death and deemed unfit for society, Meursault begins to draw metaphoric conclusions as he awaits his deathbed. In his eyes, those sentenced to death are viewed as patients.
At the beginning of the novel, Marie, Meursault’s significant other, asks him to marry her, and Meursault responds by saying, “ it didn’t make any difference to me and that we could if she wanted to”(41). This quote reveals that MEursault already knows that there is no meaning to life, so why should he make one. He knows that he will die eventually and says yes to marrying Marie because there is no reason for him to not marry her. When Marie tells Meursault that marriage is a serious thing, Meursault responds by saying no, it’s not important to him. He realizes that absurdity of doing anything that will make him happy because he knows the end will always be
Efforts to engage Meursault in secular structures of meaning are equally futile. When Meursault's boss offers Meursault a position in Paris, he expects Meursault to embrace the opportunity for career advancement. Meursault, though, lacks all ambition and turns down the boss' offer without considering it. As a student, Meursault recalls, "I had lots of ambitions…But when I had to give up my studies I learned very quickly that none of it really mattered." When Marie asks Meursault whether he wants to marry her, she expects him to take the institution of marriage seriously. Yet Meursault is indifferent towards it, thinks "it didn't mean anything" to love a person, and agrees to marry Marie simply because she wants to marry him. Though he grows fond of her, he doesn't cultivate any attachment to her more meaningful than superficial attraction. Throughout his trial, Meursault is equally bemused by the meaninglessness of the justice system and finds its attempts to impose rational, meaningful structure on his actions ridiculous. He considers the guilty verdict he eventually receives entirely arbitrary, and describes its "certainty" as "arrogant."
At first, it will seem there is no benefit in Marie staying with someone who claimed to not love her back. However, it is Meursault's character that ironically allures Marie. His allegiance to Marie is indefinite - there will be no fickle moods, no falling out of love, and he is compliant enough to marry her (Camus 41). In addition, Meursault is shown to be reasonable enough to honor commitments such as his job. Such a man will be a secure and practical choice to father her children: stable, simple, agreeable. Criticism might follow - what if Meursault no longer finds her attractive and cheats? What if he abandons the child because it is intolerable to his senses; or worse, murders it? Yet these questions are only valid when his oddness overshadows the honest integrity of his character. He is a man who live in his own world, but is faithful to those who involve him in theirs and has proven his loyalty. To Marie, he is a good man with flaws, and that is all. Therefore, it is these traits that allow the presumption that their relationship is partially based on him being an appropriate partner to reproduce