Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A critique of taming of the shrew
Characterization of women in Shakespeare
A critique of taming of the shrew
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A critique of taming of the shrew
Have you ever had to act a certain way to get what you wanted? Imagine acting a different way for such a long time that eventually that becomes the norm. William Shakespeare showed this in the play The Taming of the Shrew, this idea became reality for Katherina. Beginning the story as a shrewish, and callous, Katherina would undergo various challenges that would eventually change her into a superior women. Petruchio would take up the task of taming her to better himself and everybody around her. Despite some people believing that Kate was no actually tamed I believe because of Petruchio’s remorseless tests, Katherina was infact tamed into a pleasant women. Right from the start Petruchio made it clear with Katherina in what he was going be undertaking …show more content…
Petruchio argued until Katherina said that the sun is the moon. This is something Katherina would have originally never have agreed with, she would have bickered with Petruchio forever that the sun was actually the sun and not a moon. Katherina agreeing with Petruchio here helps show how her as a person is changing. Shortly after she gives in even further to Petruchio, finally showing major signs of change; “But sun it is not/ when you say it is not,/ and the moon changes even as your mind,/ what you will have it named, even that is/ and so it shall be for Katherine.” Katherina declared that whatever Petruchio says is reality. Some people may argue that she is just faking all this to get what she wants. People believe that she doesn’t actually mean all this but I think she does. Days earlier in the play you would never expect Katherina to be so obedient, she would always be arguing and living life how she wanted to no matter what people thought of …show more content…
“...gentlewomen wear such caps as these,” says Katherina, “When you are gentle, you shall have one too,/ and not till then.” (198) Petruchio puts his foot down on Katherina, forcing her to be tame. Petruchio’s tactics may be inhumane but they get to Katherina. Katherina has never lived such a poor quality of life and now Petruchio is making it happen until her attitude on life is changed. Because Katherina is smart she knows that if she actually does change the way she acts she will be able to live life happily. If she behaves well enough she knows that Petruchio can treat her rightly and make her happy. All the more reason in which she wants to change, to be able to please Petruchio and inreturn heightening the quality of her own
In William Shakespeare’s play The Taming of the Shrew, Petruchio acts as a master tamer by depriving Katherine of her necessities, being a mirror image of her, and making her agree with him. Petruchio displays the qualities of a master tamer by making her agree with all of his opinions. Acting as a mirror image, Petruchio proves he holds the role of a master tamer and will do whatever he wants. In order to be a master tamer to Katherine, Petruchio deprives her of all her basic needs and necessities.
Consequently, in the play The taming of the Shrew and the sources of author Elizabeth Hutcheon, Marion Perrett and Dale Priest they have ideas amongst those sources and my three other sources have the common theme of women being objectifified and therefore the idea between those sources is that women’s roles become reversed when they let themselves be shrewed like the character Katherine did when it came to Petruchio. Amongst the first source the moral of it is one that Linda Boose argues that “Shrew and similar terms were transposed from their origin as contemptuous expressions for lower-class males into terms that gendered such hostility, displacing it away from the threat of male class revolt which remained real throughout the era and redirecting
Taming of the Shrew, had a great story line, which can be related to several movies that exist today i.e. Othello, 10 Things I Hate about You, and The Lion King. In William Shakespeare's play, The Taming of the Shrew, the shrew played by Katherine, had a terrible perspective on life and just about everything else. Her negativity was caused by her younger, more pulchritudinous sister Bianca. Bianca wanted to get espoused. She had all of the men's hearts, Katherine retained none. If Katherine got espoused then Bianca could get espoused. She authentically was a shrew who needed to be tamed.
In William Shakespeare's comedy, The Taming of the Shrew, one follows an intricate play within a play of two sisters in a dilemma. The younger sister, Bianca cannot marry one of her many suitors until her older, brash sister Kate who is considered a shrew. Bianca's suitors then find a man to marry Kate, so that they may have a chance at Bianca. Throughout the play, one can see Kate undergo a change in her behavior and attitude, therefore making her a dynamic character.
In Taming of The Shrew Petruchio yells at a tailor “ 'tis lewd and filthy: Why, 'tis a cockle or a walnut-shell”. Petruchio in this example says how Katherine's dress is hideous and that no lady should ever where even though she likes it. Throughout the Play he does multipole things like this until in the end she ends up conforming to how a woman should be because he breaks down her spirits. In ten things Patrick is asked to take Kat out for money to which he states “50 bucks and we’ve got a deal, Fabio.” Patrick agrees to receive payment for taking out Kat so other men might have a chance with her sister.
Shrewish Katherine and uncaring Petruchio were transformed into, what the writers believed to be, the modern equivalent of the plays characters. Although most of the characters are quite alike to one another there are still significant differences. Kat and Katherine both end up giving in to their suitors Patrick and Petruchio but in very different ways and different reasons. Kat forgives Patrick hoping that he actually has feelings for her and will continue to see her without the monetary compensation as she wants love. Whereas Katherine is the opposite, she gives guarantees and stamps them with powerful and theatrical words of submission.
The taming of the shrew displays sexism through gender stereotyping, patriarchy, and power. The play has set a certain stereotype on how women should act and be. For example, Petruchio tames his wife Kate, who was a shrew, in order for her to become obedient and follow his rule. Taming is discrimination rather than discipline because it does not allow women to be themselves.
Furthermore, she was tricked because Petruchio didn’t want to marry her at all, it was all about convenience for Bianca. The two relationships in this play that were supposed to be romanticized, are awfully sorrowful in many ways Moreover, Petruchio only has a financial interest in women in general, which is shown many times during this play. Petruchio makes his objectives obvious when he asks Hortensio if he knows of a suitable bachelorette with a rich dowry: “If thou know / One rich enough to be Petruchio’s wife, / As wealth is burden of my wooing dance… / I come to wive it wealthily in Padua; / If wealthily, then happily in Padua.” (1,2.). For Petruchio, it is all about the dowry he is about to inherit, further proving that this play is upmost
In the play Taming of the Shrew, the characters Katherine and Petruchio portray how society treated women during the 16th century, as well as what its expectations were for women’s behavior. Katherine in Taming of the Shrew presents many of these social standards women had to live up to during Shakespeare’s time. For example, when coming back from speaking to her father about the marriage, Petruchio approaches Katherine. They begin to argue back and forth, Katherine exclaims, "Get out of here fool, and give orders to your servants, not me" (2.1.99). In the 16th century, women were conventionally dictated by male figures, as Katherine is by Petruchio.
The wedding that takes place between Kate and Petruchio in The Taming of the Shrew is far from the expected service for a daughter of high social status. Petruchio, the groom makes his appearance to his own ceremony late. When Lucentio (disguised as Tranio) is questioned by Baptista about the humiliation that he is enduring by the tartness of the groom he is more worried about what the people in the town will say, then the feelings of his oldest daughter. Baptista and many other characters in the play write Kate off as some deranged shrew and even on her wedding day her emotional anguish is
In this act, Petruchio usurps the bride’s traditional delayed entrance and refocuses the center of attention to himself, as every eye turns to his outlandish attire. Weddings traditionally have the bride as the focal point being honored on what is often referred to as “her day,” and Petruchio’s actions make Katherine not the object of honor, but of mockery by turning “her day” into “his day.” By inverting wedding traditions in this punishment, Petruchio conveys his unchallenged power and male authority over Katherine. This ideological framework that outlines a patriarchal culture allows Petruchio to act out these punishments in a comic, unchallenged manner. At the end of the wedding ceremony, Petruchio further shames Katherine by psychically carrying Katherine away, mocking gallantry, shouting, “Fear not, sweet wench, they shall not touch thee, Katherine” (Shakespeare, 133).
Instead of hurling insults at Petruchio, by the end of the play, Katherine tells her sister and Hortensio’s new wife that “thy husband is thy lord, thy life, thy keeper, thy head, thy sovereign, one that cares for thee” (V. ii. 162, 163). This abrupt change of attitude brought on by constant abuse by Petruchio in the form of denying Katherine food and sleep demonstrates the problematic nature of one of the main relationships within the
Petruchio’s eventual wife is originally seen as a shrew precisely when she continuously “strikes” her future husband over a frivolous argument (TTS 2.1.54). Shakespeare uses Katherine’s initial idiosyncrasies to contrast her transformation to a lady after living with Petruchio. Initially, Katherine portrays her anger towards Petruchio by exclaiming how he married her then “famish[ed]” her (TTS 4.3.100). Despite Petruchio’s horrible actions toward Katherine, she is transformed by Petruchio as she delivers a speech a woman’s duty to “obey” her husband (TTS 5.2.141). Through this transformation from a shrew to a lady, Shakespeare illustrates how despite Petruchio’s destructive behavior toward Katherine, men will have consistent control over
When the couple journeys back to Katherine’s home, Petruchio initiates a debate. Previously, Katherine likely would have argued, but her demeanor has been altered through her treatment. To please him, she agrees, saying “be it the moon, or sun, or what you please,” (4.5.15). After arriving, Katherine completely abandons her typical actions, criticizing other women for acting as she once had, telling them to “Unknit that threat’ning unkind brow, and dart not scornful glances from those eyes,” (5.2.152-153). Petruchio’s treatment of Katherine has altered her into someone almost unrecognizable from Act 1.
...ironic use of manipulation before and after the wedding, Petruchio is able to tame Kate. Or so he thinks. The only real change is that Kate agrees with him, but she only does this to get her way. Therefore she is manipulating him by pretending that he has been able to tame her. He has not tamed her, because she also utilizes the art of manipulation. Before, Kate’s only defense against patriarchy is to be outspoken; now, she negotiates her own sense of power within patriarchy by using manipulation. Shakespeare’s critic of the patriarchal social structure is therefore just, because not only are women denied the same legal power as men, but their manipulative power is also disregarded and considered a weakness. Therefore women are not to be blamed for utilizing this powerful form of control, because that is what the patriarchal social structure forces them into.