Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyses of Agatha Christie's works
Analyses of Agatha Christie's works
Analyses of Agatha Christie's works
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyses of Agatha Christie's works
They call her the “Queen of Crime.” By her, one can only imagine that it is Agatha Christie. As Joan Acocella once said, “This mystification game is a standard device of suspense literature, but nobody did it quite like Christie” (Acocella 21). Christie’s ability to create suspenseful literature helped portray her unique mysterious works. Two fine examples of her suspenseful literature are “A Christmas Tradgey” and “The Strange Case of Sir Andrew Carmichael.” These two works not only portray how Christie was an excellent crime writer, but also portray a past side of her that brings the short stories to life. Agatha Christie’s past life experiences contributed to her formation of short stories with similar characters, plot, and theme. Picture this. A mother who reads her daughter bedtime stories every night, only to realize that these stories were shaping how her daughter felt about stories. Every time …show more content…
Her first detective work was The Mysterious Affair at Styles. The production of this work was mainly due to the fact that he sister told her she could not write a good detective story. In reality, her sister did not like the path of writing Christie was going for, so she wanted to make a bet with her so she could change her writing genre. At the start of her career, a writer named Eden Philpotss offered shrewd advice: “The artist is only the glass through which we see nature, and the clearer and more absolutely pure that glass, so much the more perfect picture we can see through it. Never intrude yourself” (About Agatha Christie). This mentor was expressing the idea that no matter how you feel about a particular situation, as long as you stay true to yourself people will understand your point of view. That is what Agatha Christie was able to accomplish. Though her sister’s bet did not have the best intentions, it allowed Christie to find her dedication for writing detective
How W.W. Jacobs, H.G. Wells and Charles Dickens Create Suspense in their Gothic Horror Stories
Susan Elizabeth George is a competent British author with a rich background. She wrote many distinguished books and won numerous awards, which all began when she was a teacher at El Toro High School. She writes mystery murders, which gained widespread popularity. From an article from The New York Times, Mel Gussow described George as ''a master of the English mystery, with an ear for local language and an eye for the inner workings of Scotland Yard'' (Gussow). George has a productive and fulfilling life accompanied by her many successful novels and awards.
To what extent do the detective fiction stories looked at imitate The Murders in the Rue Morgue in terms of the character and the creation of tension? Question: To what extent do the detective fiction stories looked at imitate 'The Murders in the Rue Morgue' in terms of the character and the creation of tension? This essay will explain, discuss and examine the effects of Edgar Allen Poe's 'The Murders in the Rue Morgue' had on other authors writing detective stories during the 19th century. ' The Murders in the Rue Morgue' was a new kind of story and Edgar Allen Poe had many authors imitate him.
The plot is entertaining and suspenseful which allows it to hold up to the standards of the list. Foreshadowing maintains interest, and is a prominent part of the suspenseful nature of the plot. After the first murder of Mrs. Ascher, Hastings believed that the crime is a singular event, but Poirot stated, “This is only the beginning” (Christie 22). The author uses a delightful example of foreshadowing to hint to the later murders. This keeps the plot suspenseful which makes one want to continue reading. After discussing possible coincidences on the day of the murder with the victims’ friends and families, Poirot realized, “I tell you my friends, it cannot be a coincidence. Three crimes---and every time a man selling stockings and spying out the land” (Christie 211). The finding of clues allows the plot to continue, thus maintaining the reader’s interest and preventing the story from becoming too tedious to enjoy. While Monsieur Poirot finished pronouncing the name of the murderer, the narration stated, “Two detectives...
“The ABC Murders” is about a detective by the name of Poirot who has to find clues on a killer who is killing people whose names are in alphabetical order. It started off with Alice Ascher from Andover. Then it went to Betty Barnard from Bexhill and then to Sir Carmichael Clarke from Churston. Each time the murderer committed a crime he would leave an ABC Train Map by the victim. The murderer was an experienced criminal who left no trace of his identity. He goes by the name of ABC. Before each murder ABC would send Poirot a letter saying the date and town the murder would happen. The relatives of the victims came together with Poirot to help try and get ahead of the criminal. In the ending Poirot reveals that the brother of Sir Carmichael Clarke, Franklin Clarke committed the crimes to draw away attention from him wanting to inherit his brothers treasures. He had to kill him so he couldn’t marry Thora Grey and not get the money. Franklin Clarke tried to frame the murders on Mr. Cust who is a travelling salesman.
Murder is the most sinister of any crime you can commit as you are taking life away from someone who isn't ready to go. It is especially irrational when murder is carried out with no motive. This could only be the work of a madman. With crime people seek justice and will make their best efforts to achieve it. In the ABC Murders by Agatha Christie we explore the mystery of not one, but four murders carried out meticulously and with proper planning. In this novel we get to see the solving process of an interesting murder case through two private detectives who have gotten back together after some time apart in retirement. We get to see how they are able to think like a murder and determine the motives and planning behind the crimes.
Christie, Agatha. "The Witness for the Prosecution." MASTERPIECES OF MURDER. New Work: Kodd, Mead and Co. 1977.
The most important of Ronald Knox’s “10 Commandments of Detective Fiction” is the first commandment: “The criminal must be someone mentioned in the early part of the story, but must not be anyone whose thoughts the reader has been allowed to follow.” Rendell and Christie somewhat abide by Knox’s first commandment, and introduce the criminal at the beginning of their respective novels. However, both novelists defy Knox’s commandment by allowing the reader access to the guilty criminal’s mind. While Christie and Rendell allow access to the minds of the criminals in two different ways, their access allows the reader insight to the minds of these criminals and allows them to view the events that have taken place from the criminal’s perspective, and understand the reasons why each criminal committed their crimes. This provides an interesting and exciting twist to the novel that would not be present if Christie and Rendell had conformed to Knox’s first commandment.
People tend to like a good mystery, and authors know that. That’s why they have an abundance of tricks up their sleeves used to fool and engage their readers. Mystery writers are able to catch the attention of their audience by using literary elements introduced by pioneers of the genre like Agatha Christie. Christie is known as one of the first authors to publish popular mystery stories and establish techniques that have evolved into today’s modern mysteries. She used these techniques to hook readers and create suspense in her novels.
In The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, Agatha Christie proves that good will always overcome evil through the unsatisfied curiosity of Caroline Sheppard. Caroline Sheppard has the uncanny ability to sniff out any gossip that is going on and will not rest until she has found the answers to every question she may have. Her brother James says, “she can do any amount of finding out [information] by sitting placidly at home.” Caroline collects every detail she hears whether they are facts, rumors, opinions, or even police reports. She is relentless in her search to know everything she can about everyone in her town. Much of the information she discovers “is completely unimportant” but she claims, “That is why it is so interesting.” Caroline has a way of turning “one piece of misdirection into a great solution” that no one else could ever discover. “When she goes out, it is not to gather information, but to spread it.” Caroline does not believe that she causes harm when she is constantly “repeating everything indiscriminately” because she feels it is her duty and “people ought to know things.” She also shares her insight with others because when she is discussing the information aloud, it helps her to compose numerous conclusions in her head. These conclusions are usua...
The essay “Enduring the Appeal of Agatha Christie” presents readers with great insight of Agatha Christie’s novels, using a strong introduction followed by arguments that are supported by evidence and leave readers with a conclusion that keeps them thinking. An interesting hook attracts the reader’s attention from the very beginning with a compelling question: “Who does not enjoy a good mystery story?” The introduction then provides interesting background information of mystery novels. Then it delves into more specifics and introduces Christie. The thesis statement includes the topic along with the opinion of the writer and the arguments.
Author- Agatha Christie was born in 1890 in England and raised by a wealthy American father and English mother. Her books have sold over a billion copies in English and another billion in 44 foreign languages. She is the author of 78 crime novels and was made a dame in 1971. She was married twice, her second husband being an archeologist whom she often traveled with on his archeological exhibitions to the Middle East. This gave her an understanding of that part of the world, which she used in this story. Agatha Christie died in 1976 in her home in England.
Agatha Christie wrote most of her books with the same recurring themes. One of the themes that Christie has in her books is feminism. The definition of feminism is the belief in the need to protect rights, and opportunities for women to be equal to those of men. It is also saying they can go through life without having a man in their lives and living as independent women. Anti-feminism is the opposite of feminism and says women are all the same and do need a man in their life. Christie uses feminism and anti-feminism to view women during the twentieth century in the three books.
With over 4 billion copies of her novels sold, written in at least 56 different languages, only the Bible is known to have outsold Agatha Christie. With her series of 80 complex, plot-driven whodunits, Agatha Christie created a name for herself in the world of authors. Her many accomplishments include creating the only fictional character, Hercule Poirot, who had an obituary in the New York Times and having the longest running play in the world, The Mousetrap, with over 23,000 performances. She has been named the best-selling book writer of all time and the best-selling writer of any kind by the Guinness Book of World Records.
Nothing is ever what it seems in this in Agatha Christie’s novel, the limitations between reality and fiction or rather truth and deceit are blurring and real. The acclaimed novel The Murder of Roger Ackroyd integrates the subtle techniques of hidden meaning from the narrator by means of which a special narrator-reader connection is created and trust is assumed from the narrator by the reader. This coalition has the reader enter a novel where deductions, details and misleading pathways play a starring role. The most misleading pathway would be that of the idea of truth. The truth in this novel, while being the main goal, is subjective and is able to be twisted while not actually becoming a false statement by the narrator while his partner