Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fledgling book analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Murder is the most sinister of any crime you can commit as you are taking life away from someone who isn't ready to go. It is especially irrational when murder is carried out with no motive. This could only be the work of a madman. With crime people seek justice and will make their best efforts to achieve it. In the ABC Murders by Agatha Christie we explore the mystery of not one, but four murders carried out meticulously and with proper planning. In this novel we get to see the solving process of an interesting murder case through two private detectives who have gotten back together after some time apart in retirement. We get to see how they are able to think like a murder and determine the motives and planning behind the crimes.
This
…show more content…
This puppet was a man named Alexander Bonaparte Cust, who was an epileptic war veteran who had lapses in memory. This was the perfect man to use in Franklin Clarke's evil plan. His end goal was to make Cust seem like a madman by killing random people in alphabetical order while killing his brother when he got to the letter c. He wanted Cust to get caught in the end so there was no chance for Franklin Clarke to be caught for his crimes. It was a pretty ingenious plan as a matter of fact. However there were loopholes that Poirot was able to exploit in the end. Such as forgetting that even though Cust was mental that he had no motive and was not that clever to carry out a plan quiet as sophisticated as the one Franklin Clarke thought up. When Franklin Clarke was caught in the end Poirot had one final victory over him when Franklin tried to kill himself. The pistol that Franklin tried to use was empty by Poirot’s doing. Poirot wanted Franklin to suffer as he was going to let Cust suffer, living out the rest of his days in …show more content…
This lead to the next major theme, which is motive. Throughout most of the novel the motive was unclear until the very end when it is revealed who the killer is. This is because their was no connection between the people who were dying other than their names and locations. It turned out that Franklin Clarke had no motive for the murders of the victims other than his brother, but than just sticking to his plan. His motive for killing his brother sir Carmichael Clarke was from jealousy and greed. He wanted to obtain his brother’s wealth rather than have his brother live and
On June 7th 2008, Sarah May Ward was arrested for the murder of Eli Westlake after she ran him over in a motor vehicle in St. Leonards. Prior to the incident the offender had been driving the wrong way down Christine Lane which was a one way street. Whilst this was occurring she was intoxicated, under the influence of marijuana, valium, and ecstasy and was unlicensed to drive. The victim and his brother who were also intoxicated, where walking down the lane and where nearly hit by the offender. This prompted the victim to throw cheese balls at the car and make a few sarcastic remarks regarding her driving ability. After a brief confrontation between the two parties the victim and his brother turned away and proceeded to walk down Lithgow Street. The offender followed the victim into the street and drove into him while he was crossing a driveway.
“Killings", written by Andre Dubus in 1979, involves several aspects such as revenge, morality, and murder. Elements, such as the story’s title, the order of events, and the development of the characters, are very unique. It successfully evokes emotion and suspense as the plot unfolds in sequence. Though it seems easily overlooked, the title “Killings” is very important due to the fact that the thrill of suspense is left in the mind of the reader. The title encourages readers to question who and what. It is also an intricate setting for the plot’s mood. It implies that a murder has taken place, but that is all the reader knows. The chronology of the story uses a style called "in media res”, a term used to describe the common strategy of beginning a story in the middle of the action or entering on the verge of some important moment (Meyer 2198). In this story, the readers are shown that murder not only takes a life, but it can also take away a living persons sense of self worth, their spirit.
The analysis showed that Shirley’s and Thomas’s work matched in a way that both the stories reflect identity crises and the psyche of a killer. The notable use of typical fictional horror elements such as tragic backstories, harbingers, unseen forces causing chaos and dreadfulness, terror and above all unrealistically portrayed personality disorders makes the stories a baroque blend of supernatural fantasy and moral reality.
Compare the ways in which Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope and Donna Tartt’s The Secret History explore the idea of the philosophy, crime and justice.
The book, The Murder of Mary Bean and Other Stories, written by Elizabeth A. De Wolfe, is composed of two parts. Part one, The Death of Berngera Caswell, analysis’s the social history of the mid 1800’s to explore a mill girl’s life. This text makes use of general trends and factual information to support and provide an explanation of the murder of Mary Bean. Part two is composed of two stories, Mary Bean, The Factory Girl and Life of George Hamilton. This text explores the cultural history of the mid 1800’s using fictional newspapers, articles, and novels as support. The Murder of Mary Bean does not only provide the reader with the gruesome detail of one murder, this book issues an understanding of the complications
Forensics is a scientific method of gathering and examining information about a crime. It is used in the law for figuring out when, where, and what happened at the scene of the crime. Mystery writers must use forensics when writing about crime solving. This draws in the readers because of how realistic the mystery seems. In Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s short story “The Red-Headed League,” the author shows his perspective on justice while exemplifying his linear and detailed style, with the main character depicting the story in chronological order and the detective using deductive reasoning to solve the crime.
As the mists of tension fall around Indian Island and cold bodies settle into their resting places, blood does not run as a masked murderer skulks throughout a party of ten already guilty murderers. In Agatha Christie’s novel, And Then There Were None, Christie created her own ultimate justice system that examines the extremes required to break social stratification. Variant from the traditional justice structure, Christie creates a system that erases the human err commonly faced in criminal justice, such as bias towards a specific class or false judgement of a person’s character; however, the previous flaws are replaced by greater sin in the ultimate justice system established within the novel. Thus, the social constructs upheld by judgement and privilege are shown blatantly within
Well pronounced throughout the novel, the theme hold up to the measures placed up on it by Stanford’s Suggested Reading List. The theme that was greatly defined was the conquering of good over evil. Inspector Crome announced to Poirot, after Poirot’s stocking forewarning proved to be correct, “Congratulations. Your hunch was right” (Christie 255). Poirot, the reputable detective, prevailed over “ABC,” the horrendous serial killer. Poirot, finally discovering the man who committed all of these murders, declared, “I had no further doubt in my mind---ABC, the man who wrote the letters and committed the crimes, was Franklin Clarke” (Christie 322). Poirot defeated Clarke by eventually discovering that it was he who committed the murders.
Morals are principles which help people to behave rightly. Also, they need to protect the rules. However, in Agatha Christie’s novel, Murder on the Orient Express, the characters act dishonestly: twelve passengers on the Orient Express murder Cassetti, they lie to the Belgian private detective, Hercule Poirot and the protagonist overlooks the passengers. Agatha Christie wrote these intensions fairly. From Murder on the Orient Express, the readers can learn that some set of morals are endorsed.
“The ABC Murders” is about a detective by the name of Poirot who has to find clues on a killer who is killing people whose names are in alphabetical order. It started off with Alice Ascher from Andover. Then it went to Betty Barnard from Bexhill and then to Sir Carmichael Clarke from Churston. Each time the murderer committed a crime he would leave an ABC Train Map by the victim. The murderer was an experienced criminal who left no trace of his identity. He goes by the name of ABC. Before each murder ABC would send Poirot a letter saying the date and town the murder would happen. The relatives of the victims came together with Poirot to help try and get ahead of the criminal. In the ending Poirot reveals that the brother of Sir Carmichael Clarke, Franklin Clarke committed the crimes to draw away attention from him wanting to inherit his brothers treasures. He had to kill him so he couldn’t marry Thora Grey and not get the money. Franklin Clarke tried to frame the murders on Mr. Cust who is a travelling salesman.
Zig Ziglar once said, “With integrity, you have nothing to fear, since you have nothing to hide. With integrity, you will do the right thing, so you will have no guilt”. Integrity, or lack thereof, is a major theme is Agatha Christie’s novel, And Then There Were None. In the novel, ten guests are sent to an island that seems luxurious but holds a dark secret.
Donna Tartt’s debut novel The Secret History is an enthralling contemporary murder mystery novel for many reasons, including its furtiveness, beauty, and archaic values. One particular facet that makes it unique from other mystery novels is its shocking introduction; a murder has been committed, and the culprits are the victim’s friends and main characters. What makes the novel so fascinating is the lack of details leading up to the murder, which are slowly revealed as the narrator retells this story several years after the crime. The entire novel is a flashback of the months prior to the murder and the later consequences the main characters must endure.
The Murder of Roger Ackroyd was first published in 1926, and is one of many of Christie’s Hercule Poirot Mystery novels. In this novel, we obtain a deeper understanding of the impact social standings has and the influence it has on how people perceive you. The mystery takes place in an era where social class was extremely divided, and it is shown throughout the novel how a character’s social class can hinder or help. Even when the characters are faced with a crime, and the person who did it is unknown, social class still plays a magnificent role in unraveling the explanation of who would have committed something as dreadful as murdering a man. The Murder of Roger
Author- Agatha Christie was born in 1890 in England and raised by a wealthy American father and English mother. Her books have sold over a billion copies in English and another billion in 44 foreign languages. She is the author of 78 crime novels and was made a dame in 1971. She was married twice, her second husband being an archeologist whom she often traveled with on his archeological exhibitions to the Middle East. This gave her an understanding of that part of the world, which she used in this story. Agatha Christie died in 1976 in her home in England.
“Orient Express is arguably her most enduring work as far as the average reader goes, due to the daring gimmick the author was able to pull off: they all did it ("Murder on the Orient" 155). This critical comment made by Greg Wilson gives an accurate depiction to the mystery that Agathe Christie builds up in her book. The Murder on the Orient Express has many aspects that played big roles in creating the novel. The way the author uses the aspects, such as plot, setting, the author 's style, and the characters are what made the book suspenseful and intriguing to the reader.