Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of agatha christie's female characters
Social themes in agatha christie novels
Critical commentary on the abc murders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Agatha Christie depicts a descriptive, fictional murder mystery in the novel ABC Murders. With the help of the narrator, Captain Arthur Hastings, Hercule Poirot solves the murders of four victims who are killed in alphabetical order by Franklin Clarke, more commonly known as ABC. The story elicits copious high points but the rare low point as well. Examples of these aspects can be found within the plot, setting, characters, conflict, and theme of the book. According to Stanford’s Suggested Reading List, the book is considered a “must read.” ABC Murders definitely holds up to the reputation placed upon it by Stanford and would be a favorable choice for anyone wishing to read a well written novel. The plot is entertaining and suspenseful which allows it to hold up to the standards of the list. Foreshadowing maintains interest, and is a prominent part of the suspenseful nature of the plot. After the first murder of Mrs. Ascher, Hastings believed that the crime is a singular event, but Poirot stated, “This is only the beginning” (Christie 22). The author uses a delightful example of foreshadowing to hint to the later murders. This keeps the plot suspenseful which makes one want to continue reading. After discussing possible coincidences on the day of the murder with the victims’ friends and families, Poirot realized, “I tell you my friends, it cannot be a coincidence. Three crimes---and every time a man selling stockings and spying out the land” (Christie 211). The finding of clues allows the plot to continue, thus maintaining the reader’s interest and preventing the story from becoming too tedious to enjoy. While Monsieur Poirot finished pronouncing the name of the murderer, the narration stated, “Two detectives... ... middle of paper ... ...ng back” (Christie 249). This time “ABC” was not cautious by making the mistake of accidentally murdering the wrong person. Well pronounced throughout the novel, the theme hold up to the measures placed up on it by Stanford’s Suggested Reading List. The theme that was greatly defined was the conquering of good over evil. Inspector Crome announced to Poirot, after Poirot’s stocking forewarning proved to be correct, “Congratulations. Your hunch was right” (Christie 255). Poirot, the reputable detective, prevailed over “ABC,” the horrendous serial killer. Poirot, finally discovering the man who committed all of these murders, declared, “I had no further doubt in my mind---ABC, the man who wrote the letters and committed the crimes, was Franklin Clarke” (Christie 322). Poirot defeated Clarke by eventually discovering that it was he who committed the murders.
In last resource that the author used to create suspense was foreshadowing. Foreshadowing was used because at the end of the story Mr.Atkinson began to sharpen his knives late night while James was writing down of what happened to him that day. Does that seem that Mrs.Atkinson wanted to kill James. For me thats weird.” The leg is cracked, and Atkinson, who seems handy man with his tools, is going to mend it as soon as he has finished putting an edge on his chisel.” I choose this quote for the reason that explains what Atkinson was doing at the time when everything was going
Josh Pachter’s “Invitation to a Murder” uses passage of time, inference gaps, and foreshadowing to add suspense. Dramatic irony, inference gaps and red herrings create suspense in “Lamb to the Slaughter” by Roald Dahl. “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle uses mystery elements of many possible suspects, accumulation of clues and hidden evidence as catalysts for suspense. All three authors cleverly created anticipation in their work with mystery elements that kept the potential to hold captive their reader’s attention until the very last
In the short story “Time and Again” by the author, Breece D’J Pancake recounts the story of a veteran farmer who is a snow plow driver for a living. The nameless narrator is a widower and his son disappeared. Reading the short story for the first time it is apparent that the author makes it a challenge for their reader to understand the story. The story at first is confusing and leaves the reader questioning the character. After a second or third read, it is noticeable that the author sets clues and makes it more obvious that this is a story of a murderer. The author often uses clues and the use of syntax to expose who the narrator is as a character and how that influences his actions.
Today people such as Agatha Christie have carried on the crime genre which in my opinion is successful. The use of technology in the art of forensic science in Doyle’s books is why, in my opinion, they are successful because in those days the technology had just started and they were intrigued by it.
The narrator murders an old man who he is meant to be taking care of. He claims to have nothing against the man and says that he loves him. Regardless of this, he finds the mans filmy, vulture-like eye to be disturbing and thinks this is a valid enough reason to kill him. Montresor feels insulted by his colleague, Fortunado and believes that it is now his duty to end his life. Both claim to not have anything against his victim other than one small detail, being either and eye or an insult, and feel that they are justified in wanting them dead.They both meticulously plan out what they are going to do to their victim long before they carry out their actions. Neither the old man or Fortunado had any idea that their murderer had any reason to want them dead and had no way of anticipating what was doing to happen to them. The narrator smothers the old man with his mattress, chops up his body, and stuffs him in the floorboards. Montresor leads a very d...
What the author is doing is letting the reader foreshadow. A technique which creates suspense, a vital element in any action story. The author then explained what was being hinted at;
It was extremely heavy and sometimes obvious with the amount of foreshadowing. It starts on the first lines of the story. “Penistone Road, Clapham, 20th August, 19-” (Harvey 385). The year being missing gives a clue to a major point later in the story. With good analytical skills, the reader can (correctly) assume that the end of the story will be the narrator writing about himself writing the story. The narrator most likely did not include the year because he wanted the reader to figure out that it was not supposed to be a year, but another date. The way the story is told is like a diary entry. The missing date at the end helps the reader determine the end for himself. In the end it is suggested that the character dies. However if the character does die, he does it after the story ends. This piece of foreshadowing shows that the narrator most likely dies. The story was finished being wrote close to midnight. If the character did in fact live, he would have made it to the next day and the date for the next day would have been written. Since the date is not there, the reader can assume that the character died, which fills in the missing pieces that the narrator leaves the reader to figure out. The foreshadowing continues on the same page. The main character, Withencroft draws a sketch depicting a criminal, who he meets later that day. Three pages later comes the next case of foreshadowing. The criminal that
Charles Dickens is a very well known English write who lived from 1812 to 1870. One of Dickens’ most famous novels is titled A Tale of Two Cities. This novel takes place during the period of the French Revolution which plays a huge part in Dicken’s foreshadowing. Foreshowing is a very important aspect in writing because it is a literary device in which the writer can explain to the reader significant plot development details that may be introduced later in the novel. In this specific novel, Charles Dickens illustrates the idea of foreshadowing with diligence and also specific, concrete information. Sidney Carton’s conversation with Lucie Manette, knitting, and the wine cask scene all exemplify and emphasize the idea of foreshadowing in A Tale of Two Cities.
A well told mystery with no conclusive ending always leaves room for a listener to form their own conclusions. As an active participant in society, we subconsciously pick up on small details to form conclusions about a situation. Especially in the form of written mysteries, the most miniscule of details make all the difference in the world to the reader. In the excerpt, "The Curse of the Poisoned Pretzel", the author strongly suggests that Skidmore is guilty of murdering his brother, Manchester, through the use of emphasizing their differences, stating that most everyone assumed his hatred, as well as indicating the massive family fortune was involved.
This article describes the search for pattern in the detective process which is metaphorically represented by the abbey's library. William's misconception of the importance of the clues leads him to realize that although clues are meant to help to get at the truth of matters, they do not necessarily fall into a pattern that leads to the truth. Like there is no correct way to go through a labyrinth to its centre, there is no correct way to follow clues and signs to the truth. In the end, although the murderer is discovered, trying to link all the clues to lead him to a final answer, William is led astray in his investigation.
Murder is the most sinister of any crime you can commit as you are taking life away from someone who isn't ready to go. It is especially irrational when murder is carried out with no motive. This could only be the work of a madman. With crime people seek justice and will make their best efforts to achieve it. In the ABC Murders by Agatha Christie we explore the mystery of not one, but four murders carried out meticulously and with proper planning. In this novel we get to see the solving process of an interesting murder case through two private detectives who have gotten back together after some time apart in retirement. We get to see how they are able to think like a murder and determine the motives and planning behind the crimes.
The suspense is created by the different characters and many mysterious setting. In this story suspense is presented in a way to keep the reader engaged in the story. The main suspense begins with Helen Stoner telling her story to Sherlock Holmes. Helen told Holmes about the mysterious and strange events that occurred. The events such as, whistling in the middle of the night, as well as her sister’s mysterious death. Doyle describing the dark bedroom that Watson spend the night in, made the reader feel the suspense as if they were in the same room. He uses descriptions such as “...This is very interesting. You can see now that it is fastened to a hook just above where the little opening for the ventilator is” as well as “Holmes as we sat together in the gathering darkness” (Conan Doyle) made the reader more engaged into the story. Foreshadowing is also created in the story to give clues that suggest events that will occur later in the story. Foreshadowing is seemed to be seen when the pole rope was connected to a ventilator and the ventilator went to the next room. The poisonous snake was the weapon used to kill the daughter, by traveling through the
Christie, Agatha. "The Witness for the Prosecution." MASTERPIECES OF MURDER. New Work: Kodd, Mead and Co. 1977.
The point of view in The Murder on the Orient Express is third-person omniscient, which is crucial to the book. The reader can see an example when Christie first introduces Mrs. Debenham. Christie tells all about Mrs. Debenham’s adventure up until that point and also gives a brief description of her thoughts and feelings about Hercule (Christie 6). Christie does not, however, reveal any of Mrs. Debenhams involvement in the murder. Knowing the thoughts of the characters is very important in keeping the reader interested and trying to figure out the murder without giving away. Critics supports this idea by saying, although the thoughts and feelings of all characters are given, the restricted information Christie leaves out, gives the readers a dramatic effect ("Murder on the Orient" 152). Christie’s style in The Murder on the Orient Express also included some stereotyping of individuals on the train. This stereotyping was shown when it was decided that the stab wounds seemed to be inflicted by a woman based on the lack of intensity (Christie 56). Another place stereotyping was concerned was when Antonio was suspected solely based on his Italian nationality (Christie 122). The stereotyping Christie includes in her book shows importance to the plot by distracting the readers from more valid evidence. This distraction is another tactic used to keep the reader intrigued in the story. Greg Wilson comments about Christie’s insensitive remarks and says she might use these shallow, stereotypical comments about the characters as a crucial part of the murder plot ("Murder on the Orient" 155). The author’s style draws the reader in by utilizing distracting elements to elude them from the
Poe was a man so devoted to concealment and deception and unraveling and detection that it was only natural for it to be displayed in his writings. He managed to manipulate setting, character, and dialogue to lead the reader inescapably to the emotional state most appropriate for the perfect murder. Poe does not allow the reader to merely sit back and observe, but makes the reader accompany the detective toward the solution and apply his own powers of logic and deduction alongside those of the detective. Although a crime usually has been committed, the reader's attention is diverted to the baffling circumstances surrounding the crime rather than to the event itself. The tale's climax is the solution of the puzzle, and the bulk of the narrative concerns the logical process by which the investigator follows a series of clues to this solution. Very often the "detective" solves the mystery by means of deductive reasoning from facts known both to the character and the reader.