In the United States, the Renaissance had a great influence on modern art because it was a natural way in which artistic expression was extended. During this period, human beings were shifting from the dominant religious ideas to the realism aspect, which was highly reflected in the work of art. This clearly indicates that the work of art during the renaissance and modernist era were very distinct. To this end, this assignment has a purpose of comparing two works of art, which are selected from the Museum of Fine Arts based in Houston. In particular, the comparison will consider the way the nineteenth-century artists began to embrace the current urban spaces in modernity from the old academic works. The two artworks being compared are the Berthe …show more content…
Morisot, The Basket Chair, and the Gustave Caillebotte, The Orange Trees, 1878, which are both placed in room 222 of the museum. Therefore, the comparison discusses that the male artists were more effective at this time. In this painting, it is clear that the style being adopted is that of impressionism. This is a style in painting, which originates from France during the 1870s. The style was based on expressing the emotion or experience by trying to depict a particular scene accurately. An impressionistic painter normally uses a very distinct method and providing distinct qualities that help the artists reflect him or herself. In reference to The Basket Chair and The Orange Tress, one realizes that they are impressionist works made up of oils on canvas. When compared, both works juxtapose each other in many ways. While making the comparison, one realizes that the differences results from each artist’s level in the society. Also, modernism has a role in each piece, which also influences the way the composition has been executed. In the present and past society, it is known that personal status usually contribute to gender and class. In this regard, it becomes possible to realize the difference in the way people of different classes and genders made their work distinct. In the two paintings, the artists’ social status was very helpful in developing their subject matter. For instance, Berthe Morisot’s painting was influenced by her social status. During her time, she was one of the few female painters; at that time, painting was a rare occupation for females. In particular, females were dominant in domestic chores like managing their household and caring for their children. Interestingly, the presence of a child in the painting together with the paint chair also reveals the place of a woman. The paint reflects what any woman would do or be close to, a child. Also, her social status plays a significant role in enabling her to be a painter. At the time, her father was a high-ranked government official and also her grandfather was an influential painter. Her sister, too, was a painter. Although at this time women had not found it easy to partake in painting, Berthe social status was significant in helping her earn respect from her talent. When compared to Gustave, Berthe’s work is not that much interesting. The former is a male. Interestingly the two were members of the social class ranging from middle to bourgeoisie. However, the female painters were not enjoying similar freedom when related to that of men. In different instances, women were to have the company of a man or it was thought they were prostitutes. Women’s rights were less when compared to that of men. When it came to men, they had the ability to flaunter, but for women, doing this gave the perception of wanting sex. Such inequalities provide the maple painters in France with the chance of developing paint with a diversified range of subject matter. This resulted in their works being more stimulating and providing different possibilities. Relating to the painting by these two artists, the result of male superiority has favored the quality of Gustave’s subject matter in his painting, The Orange Trees. This painting is more interesting when compared with that of Morisot, The Basket Chair. The quality of Gustave’s work is achieved through orderliness.
In Morisot work, there is a sleeping woman who is not clearly observed. There is a watering can in front of the child. This can be an illusion of the importance of watering a child to flourish. This painting is different from that of Gustave’s. The later has a garden that is pruned. The trees are also manicured and appear to be swaying with the breeze. The flowers are tightly collected in a corner. Such arrangement demonstrates order, and purpose. Orderliness manifests status and class by linking coordinately. Each arrangement indicates class and status and hence represents the corners of the life. Ranging from tables to chairs and clothes worn by man and the well enclosed tress that are sparkling white and well-polished, orderliness among males is revealed. Conversely, The Basket Chair reveals a different theme. It indicates that life is disorderly, undeveloped, and that the females are still developing. This is contrary to “The Orange Trees,” which reveals a fully developed stage. With the “Basket Chair,” life is portrayed as a continuing growth and that it is untidy because it was never finished. The flowers compare to roses, while the other roses have overly matured and hence, they will die. The child will later grow into a woman and die too. Precisely, the two paints differentiate the development in a men life and that of women. The life of males is well developed than that of females, which is disorderly and
unfinished. The experience of modernism is different for males and females (Metropolitan Museum of Art and Moffett 200). At the time this painting was being done, modernism was taking place in France. The country was adopting new technologies like the car and train. At this time, women could not have a sense of modernity. If they were to experience it, it was likely that they would be disregarded. Through modernism a broad subject was opened in painting. This was fortunate for men and but not for women, who remained on one side of the window. Men had the freedom in their subject matter. Through modernism, more barriers were built for women to withhold them. It also connected society by ensuring that classes were integrated. The clarity of the paintings indicates how modernism was favoring men. As women still portray their lives us unfinished during the modernism era, the live of men was already finished. The way the painters have executed composition is also the most significant in their works. Through composition, different pieces have been tied together with other factors that have been used in communicating the personal views. Also, it is through composition that the painter’s characteristics have been portrayed. Impressionist is used to lay the colors side by side on their canvas. This was done with the aim of developing an appearance of blending colors. Gustave’s use of pure colors helps in ensuring that he shines his vibrancy. This attribute makes his work better. On the other hand, the female painter’s work does not blend the pure colors making the work appear unattractive and hence portraying inferiority of females. Morisot’s painting utilizes colors like blue green, yellow, and orange. The paint is used thinly in a big brush making her color look dull. The manner of hatching the brush across, results in a shadow revealing the depth of the foreground. In her piece, there is evidence of dry brush strokes. The figure entices the viewer to stare at the onlooker. The painting appears very freeing indicating what she longs for. Her painting is like a sketch for a quality painting. Conversely, Gustave’s painting uses different colors that appear more vibrant. The viewer is easily enticed to appear in painting because there is space to be occupied. The paint used is thick to portray detail. In this way the painting has easily captured the theme of modernism, particularly in refining the leisure activities. The set up in the museum is well organized. It flows nicely because the painting display is in one room. The paintings are hung opposite to each other. The walls are orange in color and hence, resemble the sun. The coloring of the wall enhances the works in the room. The colors also increase the warm feeling and allows for natural light to penetrate through. To sum up, the displaying methods and execution, Gustave’s painting, “The Orange Trees” results a stronger piece because it has no limitations experienced by Morisot. The latter is a female who was compiled to paint like other females. This was usually in home interiors. Gustave’s execution method is cleaner and enticing and hence his piece is very successful when compared to that of Morisot.
In the Florence and the early renaissance, we have the greatest master of art like Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Sandro Botticelli and others. In this period of time the painters almost never show their emotions or feelings, they were more focused on indulging the churches and the wealthy people. In The renaissance period the art provides the work of art with ideal, intangible qualities, giving it a beauty and significance greater and more permanent than that actually found in the modern art. Florence and the early renaissance, the art become very valued where every artist was trying to create art forms consistent with the appearance of the beauty or elegance in a natural perspective. However, Renaissance art seems to focus more on the human as an individual, while Wayne White art takes a broader picture with no humans whatsoever; Wayne, modern three dimensional arts often utilizes a style of painting more abstract than Renaissance art. At this point in the semester these two aspects of abstract painting and the early renaissance artwork have significant roles in the paintings. Wayne White brings unrealistic concepts that provoke a new theme of art, but nevertheless the artistic creations of the piece of art during early renaissance still represent the highest of attainment in the history of
Contextual Theory: This painting depicts a portrait of life during the late 1800’s. The women’s clothing and hair style represent that era. Gorgeous landscape and a leisurely moment are captured by the artist in this work of
The painting depicts a mother and her four children, who are all leaning on her as she looks down solemnly, her tired, despondent expression suggests she felt trapped in her roles as being a mother and a wife. The woman and her children are clearly the focal point of the artwork as the bright colours used to paint them stand out impeccably against the dull, lifeless colours of the background. This painting appears to be centred around the ideology that women are home-keepers, whose main role is to satisfy and assist her husband while simultaneously minding the children and keeping the home tidy and ready for his return. The social consequences of this artwork could have been that the woman could have been berated for not taking pleasure out of being a mother and raising her children, as a woman should. She could have been made redundant as her husband may have felt as though she is no longer useful if she couldn’t adequately adhere to her roles as a mother and a
... study for the overall concept they appear rather as abstract patterns. The shadows of the figures were very carefully modeled. The light- dark contrasts of the shadows make them seem actually real. The spatial quality is only established through the relations between the sizes of the objects. The painting is not based on a geometrical, box like space. The perspective centre is on the right, despite the fact that the composition is laid in rows parallel to the picture frame. At the same time a paradoxical foreshortening from right to left is evident. The girl fishing with the orange dress and her mother are on the same level, that is, actually at equal distance. In its spatial contruction, the painting is also a successful construction, the groups of people sitting in the shade, and who should really be seen from above, are all shown directly from the side. The ideal eye level would actually be on different horizontal lines; first at head height of the standing figures, then of those seated. Seurats methods of combing observations which he collected over two years, corresponds, in its self invented techniques, to a modern lifelike painting rather than an academic history painting.
She did not want people to feel uncomfortable or displeased with her art, she wanted them to feel content, orderly, and natural. Berthe Morisot’s The Dress Making Lesson; Le lecon De Couture (1884), depicts a mother teaching her child how to sow. “Morisot’s representation of women’s lives in the suburb of Passy play their part in establishing and maintaining the meanings of such social systems” (Adler). Teaching a child to sow is living within the society’s boundaries of what women are supposed to do and know, and that is exactly what Morisot wanted to portray. Morisot maintained her motherhood paintings very traditional and eye
The Renaissance, the time period in European history following the Middle Ages, was a period of cultural and artistic renewal that began in Florence, Italy and spread across Europe between the 14th and 17th centuries. It was a revival of education, science, art, literature, and music. However, the Renaissance era is mostly famous for its art, which includes some of the most iconic and beautiful pieces of all time. The Renaissance was filled with incredible artists, with Michelangelo being remembered as one of the most famous artists of the period.
Though the Renaissance era included all of Europe, Italy was the cradle of the movement. The cities of Florence, Rome and Venice were of great importance to this period. Major artists created art mainly in these three. As the center of Italy, Rome held the residence of the Pope and many other important factors. Throughout history, the Roman Catholic Church was very insistent on promoting their ideas. During this time, they used artists and their creativity to promote the Bible and other aspects of their beliefs. Artists were paid, or commissioned by patrons (often the Pope) to create art they wanted. One of the most ambitious patrons was Pope Julius II, who realized the impact visual images had on people’s ideas (Kleiner, 599). Pope Julius II was called the warring Pope, because he often went and involved himself in wars. He also held very humanistic ideas. Because of this, Michelangelo’s relationship to Pope Julius II was very different from his relationship with Pope Leo X, who succeeded Julius II. Julius, because of his adaptions to humanistic thoughts, he let Michelangelo express himself to the fullest, even when forcing him to paint the Sistine Chapel. Leo X, however, was very critical of everything Michelangelo set out upon. This resulted a strained relationship, and eventually abandonment of projects that were supposed to be completed. It is clear that Pope Julius II had a liking for Michelangelo, while the Medici’s looked on him as a type of lowly artist subject to their will.
For my analytical essay I've chosen the Renaissance art movement. I choose this movement because it played such a monumental part in European history. Basically, the Renaissance, also known as the rebirth, was a cultural movement that started an artistic transformation and started the scientific revolution. This time period also links the transition from the end of the Middle Ages to the beginning of the Modern Age. The Renaissance started in Italy in the 14th century and spread to northern Europe by the 16th century.
Art regulars during the 1300’s and 1600’s demanded art that displayed delight in human beauty and life’s enjoyment. Art from this period was more lifelike than art from the middle ages. The word renaissance was coined in during the 1800’s by the French, to show the level and angle of perspective and variations that artistes during this era used. Accordingly, the art pieces composed by these artistes portrayed depth in the feelings meant to be depicted by the observers (Stokstad, Michael and Asher, 2010, p. 38). The following paper reviews the categories of renaissance art within this era, based on the artistic trends, location, amongst other factor.
During my second time visiting the museum, I looked at paintings from the 15th and 19th centuries. Two of the art works that I choose is “The Story of Joseph” from the Renaissance period and “The Marketplace” from the modern art period. Both of these paintings were from different time periods but they were also very similar in content and style.
The Italian Renaissance and the Baroque era are two major periods in art history, some of the types of art in those periods were painting, sculpting, and architecture. During these periods, many artist gained enormous fame from creating wonderful pieces of work that represented their beliefs and artistic thinking. This essay will analyze and evaluate two pieces from those major art periods. Rembrandt 's painting The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp and the sculpture David, by Michelangelo. These two masterpieces shed light of their significance in art history. David represents the Italian Renaissance for it being a strong symbol of the new republic, The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp depicts the focus on human progression.
The Renaissance was a time characterized by a curiosity about human experience and the world around Renaissance thinkers. A main focus of the Renaissance was ancient Rome and Greece, which people studied in order to get a better understanding of their world. Artists and writers were able to express the ideals of the Renaissance by using an element of realism in their work that people of the time could easily relate to and understand.
The two pieces in which this paper will discuss will be The Doge’s Palace and Grand Canal (c.1710) created by Luca Carlevarijs as well as Spring on West 78th Street (c.1905) by Childe Hassam. Although these two works are separated by just shy of three hundred years they share a great number of similarities in trying to portray a busy section of their respected urban centers. Carlevarjis portrays the avenue separating the Doge Palace and the Grand Canal of Venice, an area that had plenty of foot traffic from both locals and visitors alike. While in comparison, Hassam represents a busy street in urban American during a time of transition when cities were beginning to become dominated by high rises and growing populations in smaller spaces. However,
Ever since I can remember fashion has always been a great interest for me. So much that this plain and boring scenario made me think of how art plays into our everyday lives and attire. Artists like Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and Andy Warhol have influenced our world’s architecture, clothes, technology, and modern art. Without some of these greatest artists we would be living in white simple attire and driving a white box car. The Italian Renaissance is a great time period that marks of how art greatly influenced European culture and society. Along with other forms of liberal art developments, Renaissance art was known to be elaborate. Today we still see the influence of Renaissance art by its decorative lines in furniture and architecture,
demonstrated in the work of Le Corbusier, Walter Gropius, Mies van der Rohe and others.