Honor In Henry V's Speech

566 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The effect of King Henry VIII on history

Within Henry V’s St. Crispin's day speech, Henry V displays common ground within all soldiers so they feel valued. He covers three varying points in the speech, each geared toward various types of people. He starts out technical, though he briefly covers this, he states that their presence alone is a positive outlook on their country. As he moves through his speech he speaks mainly of honor and pride, which reaches across the majority of men. Henry V then ends on comparing the soldiers to a family. “If we are mark’d to die, we are enow”, is the first sentence in this Monologue. Henry begins his sentence with stating “If we are to die, we are enough”. He then continues, ”To do our loss; and if to live, The fewer men, the greater share of honour. God’s will! I pray thee, wish not one man more”. The basis of what Henry V says in these particular lines relate to making them increasingly accepting of death. This translates (in modern language) into “If we are to die, the fewer the better for our country, if we are to live, the fewer to live, the greater the honor; I beg to never wish for another man to die”. Henry V discloses that if they die, it is superior if there are less, but suppose they live, there is extra honor for those to remain. The subject of honor, …show more content…

Henry V tells the soldiers that on that day, those who shed blood with him, are his brothers in spirit. This one line excited and hyped up the soldiers to run into battle. One line inside an approximate forty-seven line speech, increased the purpose incredibly and sent out the optimal message. Henry V used honor and pride as his main ways to achieve the goal of making the soldiers feel useful and excited to fight. However, he ends the speech by calling them brothers, a family. The speech makes points that are feasible to rise excitement out of the majority of the

Show More
Related

  • King Henry Iv Part 1

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hal’s remark to his father indicates a now strong, independent mind, predicting that Douglas and Hotspur will not accept Henry’s offer because of their love for fighting. Henry’s reply in turn indicates a change in attitude towards his son, a newfound respect. Acknowledging Hal’s prediction, the king orders preparations to begin, and we see he has his own set of solid moral values: knowing that their ‘cause is just’ helps him to reconcile with his highly honourable conscience that there is indeed cause for war. Still maintained is the conflict between the very format of the text, with Hal and Henry’s conversation held in formal verse typical of the court world, in which Hal is now firmly embedded. Falstaff, however, sustains his equally typical prose speech, which indicates to the audience the enduring division between the court and tavern worlds.

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry's Speech To Virginia

    330 Words  | 1 Pages

    At the Virginia convention in 1775 Patrick Henry spoke out anonymously about standing up to the British monarchy and gaining independence. His simple use of language and emotionally captivating passages inspired many to fight for a republic. Persuading the devout and loyal colonies to pull away from their mother country took courage.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Patrick Henry

    442 Words  | 1 Pages

    The first appeal that Henry uses in his speech is ethos which appeals to ethics. Evidence from the text is, “fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country” (lines 13-14). This shoes that God has credibility. It also shows that you need to respect God over Britain. The next piece of evidence that I found in the speech is whenever the text said, “…and of an act of disloyalty towards the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings” (lines 16-17). This is saying that you should respect God above man. That is two ways how Henry used the ethical appeal, ethos.

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry Speech Tone

    669 Words  | 2 Pages

    Patrick Henry’s speech is very powerful and yet emotional at the same time. There is an urgent need in reacting to the British as there is “no time for ceremony,” and the Americans must resist their “insidious smile.” Henry is appealing to pathos because this is not the time to let down their guard and to pay attention to what the British are really doing. He is also referring to the lack of positive responses like “a snare to your feet” from the petitions that were sent to the British, an image of a trap ready to capture the

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry's Famous Speech

    882 Words  | 2 Pages

    Patrick Henry's Famous Speech Give me liberty or give me death. These famous words were uttered by Patrick Henry on March 23, 1775, as a conclusion to his speech delivered to the Virginia House of Burgesses. Within his speech, he uses the three rhetorical appeals (ethos, logos, and pathos) to convey a feeling of urgency toward the changes occurring in policy within the Americas implemented by the British government. He cleverly uses these appeals to disrupt the paradigm that Great Britain is going to let the American people have any liberty. The purpose of this speech is to gain support for a freedom movement from the British government.

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry Speech In The Virginia Convention

    760 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1775, the American colonists were faced with a question that would lead to everlasting consequences on their newly developing nation. Due to the several unjust taxes Great Britain had forced them to pay, colonial America was torn into two. Those who sided with Great Britain became known as loyalists; however, those believed the colonies should declare independence became known as the patriots. Patrick Henry, a passionate American patriot, advocates to declare war upon the tyrannical nation of Great Britain in the speech “Speech in the Virginia Convention” that he delivers to the delegates at the Virginia Convention. Patrick Henry’s purpose in writing this speech is to inform the delegates that war with Great Britain is necessary and to encourage

    Read More

  • Henry V Christian King Essay

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the English were facing great defeat in the Battle of Agincourt, Henry tells him mean that it is up to God’s will. This is a great act of faith and trust in God and it emphasizes his noble Christian qualities. Also Henry displays mercy when he gave those who “Hath no stomach to fight” the option to leave. He did not force them to fight in the battle of Agincourt he trusted in God because all his men left him. This is the Kind of wisdom that we often see displayed by kings in the

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Speech To Virginia Convention And The Declaration Of Independence

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    Such as parallelism he states, “We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostated” in this quote henry is trying to really emphasize that they have tried everything to which no avail. He wants to silence the people’s speculation and by repeating “we have” and using the same verb tense his point only comes across stronger. Another rhetorical device he uses is logical appeal saying, “And judging by the past I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years.” Here he is explaining that the British have done nothing for them in such a long time so what would they have to gain by staying loyal. He is stating the facts to which no one can argue and this is what makes his speech strong. Lastly he is most famously known for the line “I know not what course others may take but as for me give me liberty or give me death.” The emotion he uses at the end of his speech only heightens to the climax and leaves people to think long after he is

    Read More

  • Analysis of Patrick Henry's Speech to the Virginia Convention

    844 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...e colonial leaders, by stating he is ready to die for his cause. This would make the members of the house introspective and look into their hearts to see if they are ready to die for their cause. Henry excites fear by stating he is so passionately ready to sacrifice for his country. This play towards pathos, or appealing to the audience’s emotions, is an effective way of trying to convince the House to go to war against Britain. This pathos combined with the logic of Henry’s speech, makes for a convincing argument. Logically taking the house step by step from stating that because he has an outlook on their situation, he should express it to them, to stating his argument before the House, to saying that lacking freedom is worse then death, then taking it full circle pronouncing he would prefer to be “give[n] death” then to have his freedom taken away by the British.

    Read More

  • Patriotism In 'The Red Badge Of Courage'

    391 Words  | 1 Pages

    Henry is somewhat naïve, he dreams of glory, but doesn't think much of the duty that follows. Rather than a sense of patriotism, it is clear to the reader that Henry goals seem a little different, he wants praise and adulation. "On the way to Washington, the regiment was fed and caressed for station after station until the youth beloved

    Read More

  • Henry V, An Ideal Machiavellian Ruler

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".

    Read More

  • Persuasive Techniques Used by Henry in Act Four Scene Three in Shakespeare's Henry V

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    Persuasive Techniques Used by Henry in Act Four Scene Three in Shakespeare's Henry V Henry's speech is well prepared; he uses various key features in a persuasive leader. Before Henry starts of he is able to turn weakness into strengths. He immediately identifies what is wrong with his soldiers, the larger French army. King Henry commences by giving his soldiers confident advice, he says 'if we are marked to die, we are enough to do our country's loss.' Essentially this means that the fewer who die the better for our country, because the less loss of lives.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Empathy In The Harlem Renaissance

    925 Words  | 2 Pages

    “If we must die, let not be like hogs hunted and penned in an inglorious spot, while round us bark the mad and hungry dogs, making their mock at our accursed lot. If we must die, O let us nobly die, So that our precious blood may not be shed In vain; then even the monsters we deft Shall be constrained to honor us though dead! O kinsmen! We must meet the common foe! Though far outnumbered let us show us brave, And for their thousand blows deal one deathblow! What though before us lies the open grave? Like men we’ll face the murderous, cowardly pack, pressed to the wall, dying, but fighting back!”

    Read More

  • King Henry V's Tennis Ball Speech

    693 Words  | 2 Pages

    In The Life of King Henry the Fifth, Shakespeare presents the reader with the “tennis balls” speech, given by King Henry V. The speech has two different intended purposes for the different speakers, though. King Henry V uses the “tennis balls” speech to prove his understanding of the nature of the insult not only showing his maturity to the public but also his power and rightfulness to be king. Furthermore, Shakespeare uses King Henry V’s metaphor of war as a tennis match to suggest to the audience of the play that war can viewed as a competition, similar to a tennis match or other sporting event.

    Read More

  • The Flawed King in Shakespeare's Henry V

    1567 Words  | 4 Pages

    To turn Henry V into a play glorifying war or a play condemning war would be to presume Shakespeare's intentions too much. He does both of these and more in his recount of the historical battle of Agincourt. Although Shakespeare devotes the play to the events leading to war, he simultaneously gives us insight into the political and private life of a king. It is this unity of two distinct areas that has turned the play into a critical no man's land, "acrimoniously contested and periodically disfigured by opposing barrages of intellectual artillery" (Taylor 1). One may believe that Henry is the epitome of kingly glory, a disgrace of royalty, or think that Shakespeare himself disliked Henry and attempted to express his moral distaste subtly to his audience. No matter in which camp one rests, Henry V holds relevance for the modern stage. Despite containing contradictions, Henry is also a symbol as he is one person. This unity of person brings about the victory in the battle of Agincourt.

    Read More

More about Honor In Henry V's Speech

Open Document