Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic depression hitler's rise to power
Adolf hitler's leadership style
Adolf hitler's leadership style
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Economic depression hitler's rise to power
A.J.P. Taylor believes that Hitler did not plan or desire for a world war to occur. Many historians have judged Hitler’s intentions when preparing his military as deliberate proof of his strategizing for an expansive war. The justification for Hitler's military plans according to Taylor, was that he viewed other countries as a threat to him and the restoration of Germany. As a result, both sides believed the other was preparing aggressively against them. Germany, Britain, and many other countries directed their generals to prepare for war. Taylor uses this to prove that Hitler’s preparation was not peculiar, or specific to only Germany; everyone during that time was preparing for a possible war. Taylor holds that although Hitler did not have the intentions to start a worldwide war, he was aware and did expect one to eventually transpire. According to Taylor, Hitler’s intent was never for a world war, rather he solely wanted to strengthen Germany from the economic crisis it was going through during that time. Hitler Hauner argues that Hitler had an entire strategy and step by step plan to achieving world domination, and in Hitler’s Second Book, Hitler discussed his calculated plan for Germany’s future role in the world. Hauner writes that the first step of Hitler’s plan was obtaining control over the Eastern continent. To ensure Hitler had a free hand in his desire for Eastern expansion, he had to win Britain’s connivance. To do this he was willing to compromise, which Hauner explains was why Hitler restrained Germany’s claims over African colonies, and accepted the reduction of Germany’s naval rearmament in the Anglo-German Naval Treaty of 1935. Hitler’s second stage was fighting with the American Empire, and the subsequent elimination of Britain and Japan. The third and final step of Hitler’s plan was the total elimination of the United States as a world
In order to stop the fighting between countries, Europe needed to put some actions into effect because appeasement was not working. Germany proved that by disregarding the Versailles Treaty. According to Hitler after disregarding the Versailles Treaty, “I look upon this day as marking the close of the struggle for German equality status…the path is now clear for Germany’s return to European collective cooperation” (Document 3, 1936) This quote explains a vast difference between Hitler’s and the other European countries' views. With Hitler’s affirmation to make Germany equal and even more powerful than the other European countries, the other European countries would have to set up collective security because they would have very little insight on what Hitler would be planning; leading to more destruction. Now, Europe would be more prepared if Hitler decided to attack. A quote from Winston Churchill explaining why collective security is the right answer is, “…I think all of the opportunities to stop the growth of Nazi power which have been thrown away. The responsibility must rest with those who have control of our political affairs. They neither prevented Germany from rearming, nor did they rearm us in time…Thus they left us in the hour of trial without a strong national defense or system of international security” (Churchill). That quote explains how collective security is the best answer to stop war and the destruction Hitler is
with Hitler, which allowed him to increase his Navy by thirty – five percent than
]Haffner, is a book which is hard to define. Only 165 pages long, Haffner has crammed more relevant information into this book than many twice its length. He observes Hitler's roller coaster ride through life and the country that he eventually took along. From Hitler's private life to the complete betrayal of Germany, Haffner evaluates the conditions and impetus for Hitler's accomplishments and failures. These include not only Hitler's psyche, but also the political arena of post World War I Europe.
The reason why he is responsible for the outbreak of WWII is because Hitler clearly stated in his book that he wanted to destroy the Treaty of Versailles, create a Greater Germany, which meant a space where all Germans were welcome, and to conquer
Hitler used propaganda and manufacturing enemies such as Jews and five million other people, to prepare the country for war. This shows Hitler’s attempt of genocide toward the Jewish race and other races.
1. Germany was prepared to launch the First World War in order to become a great power.
Hitler's Aims and Actions as the Cause of World War II When considering the reasons for the outbreak of war in 1939 it is easy to place the entire blame on Hitler’s aggressive foreign policy in the late 1930s. One British historian, writing a few years after the end of the war, claimed that ‘the Second World War was Hitler’s personal war, in that he intended it, he prepared for it, he chose the moment for launching it.’ In this assignment it is my intention to show that Hitler’s foreign policy was a major factor in causing the conflict but that other reasons, both long term and short term, need to be recognised as well. Probably the first factor that need considering is the Treaty of Versailles, of 1919.
Hitler got everything he wanted for so long, without even having to resort to force. Lukacs describes Hitler as ''being an amateur at generalship, but he posessed the great professional talent applicable to all human affairs: an understanding of human nature and the understanding of the weaknesses of his opponents. That was enough to carry him very far''(3). Lukacs wants to make that a point in all of his readers' minds; that Hitler could manipulate people so he could get what he wanted without resorting to violence. Of course, the threat of violence was always present but Hitler was smart enough that he could scare his enemies enough that they would not want to engage in combat.
Examinations of Hitler's role in the formulation of Nazi foreign policy and his goals of that foreign policy leads to questions of the limits of his goal of Lebensraum. This introduces the debate between 'globalists' and 'continentalists'. Expanding on Trevor-Roper's emphasis on Hitler's goals of Lebensraum, historian Gunter Moltmann argued that Hitler's aims were not confined to Europe but at world domination. Andreas Hillgruber expands on this idea with his concept of a three-stage plan he calls the Stufenplan as the basis for Nazi foreign policy. This plan involved Germany gaining mastery over Europe, followed by the Middle East and British colonial territory, and later the USA and with that the entire world.
Studying history through his lens of objectivism, Taylor’s theory is that Hitler’s design wasn’t one of world domination; rather his methods, especially his foreign policies, didn’t differ from his predecessors. However, when confronted with a strict policy of appeasement, by both the French and the English, the stage was set for a second World War. Taylor constructs a powerful and effective argument by expelling certain dogmas that painted Hitler as a madman, and by evaluating historical events as a body of actions and reactions, disagreeing with the common idea that the Axis had a specific program from the start.
The supreme present of militarism, "a policy of aggressive military preparedness" , in this period of time gave all countries great reason to feel the heavy weight of an oncoming war. Great Britain's naval policy (to always be twice as big as the next two largest navies put together), along with the predominate feeling of war provided countries with a strong reason to try and create an incredibly strong military force. This led to an arms race, which made the impending war seem inevitable. The military planning in some countries also caused an increased fear of war. Since military machines were being developed, each country was appointing a general staff of experts. The greatest problem with this was that there was a fear that "some chief of staff, in order to maintain the schedule on his 'timetable', might force an order of mobilization and thus precipitate war." These two factors also led, in part, to the alliance system. If two or more countries are allied with each other then they have a better chance of defeating their common enemy if war is declared.
Hitler's Foreign Policy in the years 1933-39 When looking at Hitler's foreign policy it is difficult to pin point one particular year as a turning point through which Hitler's actions change from cautious to aggressive. When looking at this statement it is therefore assuming to describe the years leading up to 1937 as a period of pure restraint and caution as the Hitler's actions before 37' suggest he employed tactics that were both restrained and provocative. It is far easier to speculate a mix of aggression and caution in Hitler's actions both before and after 1937. In order to agree or disagree with this statement as a summary of Hitler's foreign policy in the years 1933 to 1939 we must compare his cautious actions before 1937 and his aggressive actions after 1937 with his aggressive actions before 37' and his actions of restraint after 37'. In agreement with this statement there are various examples of Hitler's caution in foreign policy before 1937.
He believed that the Germans were the 'master race'. Going around saying this will make people feel inferior and think the Germans have no authority over them, this caused conflicts. Hitler thought that the Treaty of Versailles should be cancelled and land taken from Germany must be returned. This led to problems as they were demanding land, which not only is against the Treaty's wishes, but will make then a lot stronger when or if future wars do happen. He said that all people of German blood, including many in Austria and Czechoslovakia, must be allowed to live in Greater Germany.
Adolf Hitler conquest began with the takeover of Austria, so the state can become part of Germany once more. Hitler’s policy was to unite the German people into a world power Germany and to transform the nation to an economic self-sufficiency for the German race. As time ran out, Hitler used military action to begin his conquest of Europe before other countries become too powerful to overtake. There was also appeasement all over Europe as countries cannot afford another war which led to Hitler demanding everything he wanted to keep the peace. As he expanded across Europe, France and Britain noticed Hitler's intent and sign a pact to aid Poland if Germany invaded. Hitler then formed an alliance with Italy called the Pact of Steel
He knew exactly what he wanted to accomplish and made it happen. Hitler began his career in the lower levels of the military, and by the time his career was finished, he had become the dictator of Germany throughout the entire Second World War. Hitler made sure that he paid careful attention to detail in every plan that he made. When Hitler made the decision to rise to political power, he knew exactly where he wanted to be in power. Although he was Austrian-born, he wanted to rise to power and have control over Germany. He knew the Anglo-Saxon community was now going to be his enemy because they were one of the only communities that could ultimately prevent Germany’s ability to rise as the ultimate world power at that time