Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hitler popular policies
Appeasement Policy was a foreign policy that was adapted by Britain and
France in the 1930’s towards Germany. Britain and France let Hitler have
whatever they considered necessary to preserve peace in Europe, as they
merely wanted to focus on domestic issues, such as economy and
unemployment . They believed that Hitler had certain aims and that once he had
achieved these, he would be satisfied. So they allowed him to re-arm, invade the
Rhineland (1936), and complete the Anschluss of Austria (1938) followed by the
Sudetenland. Appeasement assumed Hitler would keep his side of the bargain,
however it did not. Adolf Hitler proves that he is ruthless, a risk taker, and
anti-Semitist throughout the Policy of Appeasement.
The Policy first started out in 1935 when Britain signed a naval agreement
with Hitler, which allowed him to increase his Navy by thirty – five percent than
that of Britain’s Navy. Following in 1936, when Hitler sent out troops to the
demilitarized zone – Rhineland, in-turn this intentionally violated the terms ...
...ows that because of Hitler’s previous actions that made him overconfident he started a World War.
Hitler's Aims and Actions as the Cause of World War II When considering the reasons for the outbreak of war in 1939 it is easy to place the entire blame on Hitler’s aggressive foreign policy in the late 1930s. One British historian, writing a few years after the end of the war, claimed that ‘the Second World War was Hitler’s personal war, in that he intended it, he prepared for it, he chose the moment for launching it.’ In this assignment it is my intention to show that Hitler’s foreign policy was a major factor in causing the conflict but that other reasons, both long term and short term, need to be recognised as well. Probably the first factor that need considering is the Treaty of Versailles, of 1919.
build up a name for himself, as well as, to get to know people in high
Hitler was not some all mighty God that was able to just snap his fingers and the youth
Hitler and the Road to War At this time Germany was becoming too populated for her own stability. Her population had come to a level that Germany could not longer feed and support them without huge imports. She a lack of resources anyway and with the further deduction of land after Versailles this became even more of a problem. When Hitler laid out his plans, in his book; Mein Kampf, he showed that he understood the problems Germany faced. He wrote what he believed was to be their solution; "Germany must find the courage to gather our people and their strength for an advance along the road that will lead this people from its present restricted living space to new land and soil, and hence also free it from the danger of vanishing from the earth or of serving others as a slave nation.
aggressive added to the expansion in his forces. These reasons lead to the World War 2.
Hitler got everything he wanted for so long, without even having to resort to force. Lukacs describes Hitler as ''being an amateur at generalship, but he posessed the great professional talent applicable to all human affairs: an understanding of human nature and the understanding of the weaknesses of his opponents. That was enough to carry him very far''(3). Lukacs wants to make that a point in all of his readers' minds; that Hitler could manipulate people so he could get what he wanted without resorting to violence. Of course, the threat of violence was always present but Hitler was smart enough that he could scare his enemies enough that they would not want to engage in combat.
as a historian it is clear that in the years of 1941 and 1942 things
Throughout history, negotiation has been a powerful tool used by world leaders to avoid violence and solve conflict. When negotiation succeeds all parties can feel that that have achieved their goals and met their expectations, but when negotiations go awry countries and relationships can be damaged beyond repair. The Munich Agreement of 1938 is a primary example of this type of failure, which was one of the catalysts to the start World War II and Czechoslovakia’s loss of independence. The Czech people were greatly overlooked during this agreement process, which still in some instances affects the country today. The 1930s were a challenging time for Europe and the powers within it due to the aftermath of WWI and the worldwide economic depression. Meanwhile, Fuhrer Hitler and the Nazi party were continuing their domination of Europe and threatening to invade Czechoslovakia, which many felt would most likely incite another World War. To prevent this England, France, Italy and Germany entered into an agreement, which would allow Germany to seize control of Sudetenland and is today known as the ‘Munich Pact’. Sudetenland had a large German population and its borders were in strategically strong areas for the German military. For negotiations to be successful there are many components that one must be aware of such as personalities of all parties, end goals of each person and the history from the country. England led the process with an appeasement policy as an attempt to mollify Hitler and the Nazi party and prevent war, which this pact did not. The Munich Pact is a perfect example of how negotiation can fail when all of the pieces do not fall correctly into place.
Support for the Nazi party was due to the growing belief that it was a
This essay analyses the responsibility of Neville Chamberlain and his highly controversial Appeasement theory which hypothetically prevented the outbreak of the Second World War. The policy of Appeasement epitomised by the Munich agreement, is a pact signed in 1938 between Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy, which allowed Hitler to annex Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland (area along Czech borders) to prevent the onset of a major war. Appeasement has been drastically criticised since it ended in a “humiliating failure” when Germany attacked Poland in 1939 (McDonough, 2002). This essay also evaluates two significant appraisals of the Munich agreement, described in McDonough’s (2002) exhaustive book: a first, which asserts that it was an utterly unwholesome policy of despicable capitulation and a second, instigated by the ‘revisionist historians’ — exemplified by Taylor’s (1963) controversial book — which comprehends it as an elaborated policy enabling Chamberlain to prevent an imminent war while he was opportunely preparing for it (McDonough, 2002). This essay concurrently criticises and evaluates these assessments of Chamberlain’s contentious acts, since each of them imply one consequent solution which could have impeded the suddenly onset of the war. Two core solutions are therefore criticised below: first that Chamberlain should have initially constrained Hitler’s desire for Lebensraum — German desire to enlarge their living space — and second, that Chamberlain should have maintained his appeasement policy (McDonough, 2002).
...med that violence was the cure to all his problems because he had experienced positive feedback when violence was presented as a behavior to gain his success. Another situation that explains Hitler’s actions is the following: he wanted to be part of the Austrian army, but was denied because he failed his medical exam; thence, he got accepted into the Germany army and was wounded several times. While he was recovering Germany surrendered; as a consequence, once again his positive actions were insignificant. Adolf Hitler was evil and malicious, but according to the social learning theory his behavior was a result of his attention, retention, reproduction and motivation. Hitler was tentative when his father was beating him so he retained that violence was the key to success, and then as a result he replicated those actions because he had more than enough motivation.
Because of the state of Germany’s economy, Hitler portrayed himself as the saviour of Germany, the man that was going to restore the respect that their forefathers had earned & installed. However, under no uncertain terms was he going to do it alone, he pr...
* Saarland was under LN control and after 15 years the people could vote if they wanted to belong to Germany or France
The first of which is the drive for a single race Germany. Most of the