Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Henry VIII's impact on the history of England
The effect of King Henry VIII on history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Henry VIII's impact on the history of England
Louis XIII and Richelieu were both ambitious for France and fearful for her position within Europe with powerful forces sharing large borders with her. These borders were dominated by the Habsburgs, the family who ruled the Holy Roman Empire and the Spanish Throne. Habsburg is the name of the family which sprang the Dukes and archdukes of Austria after 1282. They became kings of Hungary and Bohemia after 1526, and emperors of Austria after 1804. They were Holy Roman Emperors from 1430 to 1806 and kings of Spain from 1516 to 1700, and held many other titles. In the time of Louis XIII and cardinal Richelieu Ferdinand II (1578-1637) and Ferdinand III(1608-1657) as holy Roman emperor and Philip IX(1605-1665) in Spain. Louis XIII was from the Valois-Bourbon linage in France who had been rivals of the Habsburgs for generations. (EN Brit Vol 11 p 59) Among Richelieu’s Main aims on coming to power were to make the royal power, his power, absolute and supreme at home, for France to become a wealthy thriving nation encouraging companies to establish colonies in America Africa and the West Indies and to protect Frances sovereignty and her borders most especially from the Powerful Habsburgs. One of the first issues Richelieu tackled was to subdue the French Huguenots, the name given to the Protestants of France (the name being a nickname ref Henri Éstienne Apologie d’Herodote) who as a result of concessions granted under the edict of Nantes had a formidable armed presence. They were especially strong in the west and south of France. Richelieu opposed them not just for their religion, but for their political views and organisation and their control of the best Atlantic ports this thwarted Richelieu’s dream of making the king powerful at ... ... middle of paper ... ...onflict with the emperor which the Swedish armies desired. France however by becoming ensnared in this political manoeuvre had the opportunity to be seen as saviour of the German Princes a protector of German liberties and not as an invader into Germany as others would have wished them to be seen. This proved to be a strategic move by Richelieu and Louis XIII. Further to this northern Italy could also claim the protection of France in so far as Pinerolo and Casale were occupied by French forces and neutralised the Milanese whereby the Spanish forces there couldn’t attach other states in the area. In July 1635 the Treaty of Rivoli was agreed between the French and the dukes of Savoy and Parma strengthening France’s power in the region even though she didn’t quite get the anti-Spanish league she had hoped for across northern Italy.(p 330 France under Rich & Louis.)
The Edict of Nantes had given Protestants, or Huguenots, in France the ability to practice their religion without fear of violence or persecution. Enacted in the late 1500s in an effort to resemble France after the destruction of the French Wars of Religion, the Edict of Nantes served as a means to unite the French population and end the violence that often accompanied religious persecution. Louis’ decision to revoke such a peace-promoting edict, in an effort to homogenize his country and align his subjects with his own beliefs, clearly illustrates his giving of priority to his own agenda, as opposed to that which would best benefit his country. However, while the claim that the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes was detrimental to French society, seems to be disproven by Doc 6, which essentially asserts that the king’s revocation has resulted in the rapid conversion of “whole towns” and describes the king as “the invincible hero destined to… destroy the terrible monster of heresy”, the author’s inherently biased point of view must be addressed. This description, which could be used as evidence to support the fact that Louis did act in interest of the state, must be taken with a grain of salt as the author himself, a member of the Assembly of the Clergy, does not even have the best interest of the state in mind; rather, he is
nation. In order to become a true absolute ruler Louis xiv needed to make sure
The reading depicted the surprising visit of King Louis XIV, together with six hundred nobles and thousands of court servants at Chantilly in 1671. The host Prince de Condé and his most trusted headwaiter Francois Vatel was given fifteen days to be prepared for the arrival of the gigantic royal party. A spontaneous event of mis-arrangements during the preparation has gradually built up the stresses on Vatel which ultimately broke down his stress threshold and led to his tragic ending. Madame de Sévigné who was a talented letter writer in 17th century decided wrote down the tragic story of a courtier in her letter, even though she was never there to see it in person.
For the first portion of his quote, “one king”, Louis consolidated his power in many ways. France, as well as many other countries throughout the middle ages and early renaissance, had their power balanced between the nobles and the dynastic ruling class, where nobles controlled their individual provinces and the king would have to rely on his nobles to spread his royal decrees. This was highly demonstrated throughout the Holy Roman Empire during the 16th and parts of the 17th century, where the polygot of cultures, religions, and languages lead Charles V to have to rely on the nobles, confederacy, and a decentralization of government to rule. Because of these sacrifices, Charles V never really ruled his country, nor did he achieve any of his goals. He died a white haired old man, giving his domains to his son and brother. Louis XIV actually achieved his goal in a very different way, by defeating the power of the noble class, while strenghening the middle class, or the bourgeois. Louis built an internal beauracracy within France, and believed that a countries power came from it’s unification and military prowess. These beliefs were largely based on the early years of his rule. Louis XIV became king when he was only 5 years old, so his mother. Anne of Austria, and Cardinal Mazarin, rumored to be her lover, ruled in his place as a child. Mazarin was the ideological heir to Richelieu, w...
that contributed to the rise and fall of the French Monarchy. The ideas of the
King Louis XIV was one of the most influential rulers of France during the 17th and 18th century. However, despite the fact that he believed his actions were intended to help the state prosper, he ruled arbitrarily and selfishly in his own interests overall. By using money to fund wars, dispersing political power, and revoking the Edict of Nantes, Louis left France struggling to reclaim order. His economic, political, and religious decisions eventually led to the devastation of France and its people because he was acting for himself and not for France.
Louis XIV controlled France’s economy. He began to heavily tax to support the military reforms. Louis agreed not to tax the nobility, therefore taking away the right for the upper class to have a say in where the taxation money was spent. This gave more and more power to the king. He could spend the money that he was getting from the poor and middle class in any way he pleased without upsetting the nobility. Unfortunately for Louis, the poor could not provide the money he needed. Soon, with the help of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Louis introduced mercantilism in Europe. He regulated the flow of trade, making sure that France was exporting more than it was importing. To accomplish this, he raised the taxes on imports and lowered those on goods made in France. He encouraged skilled workers and craftsmen to immigrate to France, offering them goods and privileges.
King Louis XIV created a legacy for himself and his family that would last for centuries to come. The King built an empire around himself, created a magnificent and unprecedented estate at Versailles, indulged himself in the most exquisite and unique ways of life (even for a king), and kept his country in relative check from imploding on itself. However, his reign was not without flaws and setbacks as he drove France into an extreme amount of debt through the many wars he had begun or by the lavish lifestyle through which he lived. As King, Louis had multiple events impact his way of conducting himself and his country in the future, some of which would lead to the debt of France and others that would leave the King with a unique mark on history.
Louis XIV had a strong sense of nationalism that showed clearly through his politics and decisions. In fact, two of the things that Louis practiced which turned other European countries against France were expansionism and mercantilism. Louis XIV practiced expansionism for two reasons. First, according to the author of Louis XIV, Vincent Cronin, when Louis took reign of France, Spain began to decrease in power. This encouraged other countries to expand and take Spain’s land. Seeing these other European nations grow in size and power, Louis decided that he needed to join in the race for land. Driven by want of power, Louis XIV decided to begin practicing expansionism.
Louis XIV was a Catholic who felt that all of France should have one religion. Unlike previous French kings, he did not tolerate Protestants. He felt that,"religious unity was essential to his royal dignity and to the security of the state" (Textbook 471). He rescinded the Edict of Nantes and passed a law that insisted that Huguenots give up their Protestant faith and convert to Catholicism. The Huguenots who did not convert were forced to leave the country. Louis XIV answered to nobody but God, but he was wise enough to know that he did need to appease the Nobles. Louis XIV kept a close eye on the Nobles by having many of them live with him at massive palace, Versailles. He made Versailles the center of the political, social and cultural life in France and Nobles feared rebelling against the king since,"he controlled the distribution of state power and wealth, nobles had no choice but to obey and compete with each other for his favor at Versailles" (Textbook 472). Louis XIV had a lot of wealth to distribute to keep his subjects happy and obedient to him. Louis also controlled those under him by moving the court and government outside of Paris to his palace,Versailles where he could oversee all
His mother appointed Cardinal Mazarin to be his tutor and mentor. In Mazarin’s teaching, he made young Louis write down, repeatedly, “Homage is due to kings. They do as they please.”(Stokes 10). As Mazarin tries to instill Divine Right Theory in Louis, there begins a widespread unhappiness for the idea of royal power being extended to Mazarin. There begins these civil wars called Frondes. Soon the Nobles, bourgeoisie, and the workers start to rise against this expansion of power. The first Fronde starts when Louis is ten, but the second one, starts actual riots. The nobles and ‘middle class’ start fighting in the streets and barricades. These were the one of the few starting grounds for the The French Revolution. Leo Gershoy, a history professor, says, “The Fronde was the last attempt before the Revolution to promulgate a charter limiting royal absolutism, and its failure assured the triumph of the doctrine of absolutism in the long personal reign of Louis XIV.” (Gershoy
Of all the absolute rulers in Europe, by far the best example of one, and the most powerful, was Louis XIV of France. Although Louis had some failures, he also had many successes. He controlled France’s money and had many different ways to get, as well as keep his power, and he knew how to delegate jobs to smart, but loyal people.
According to the Merriam –Webster dictionary, a king is “a paramount chief or male monarch of a major territorial unit; especially: one whose position is hereditary and who rules for life.” The concept of kings has been around for thousands of years, and has played a major role in both ancient and modern societies. In this paper, I will discuss the role of the kings in the societies of seventeenth century France, fifteenth century Inka, and the Classic Maya. In each of these societies, kings use ancestry and certain symbols in order to assert and validate their power.
However, in 1610, Henry IV was murdered by a fanatic monk who believed him to be a menace to the Catholic Church. With the symbol of a strong government dead, the nobility rallied and demanded a meeting of the Estates General. The incapable assembly was unable to accomplish anything, and Marie de’Medici, widow of the late Henry, gradually shifted power to Cardinal Richelieu, chief Minister. Richelieu filled the void of a strong king-like figure in the government, as he further centralized the government by restraining the power of militant nobles, creating the intendant system to collect taxes, and stripping protestants of their political rights to avoid civil war. Henry may have laid the foundation for the absolutist trend in French Monarchs, but his strength in life left a void in death. In the absence of a strong central governmental figure, the nobility became restless and when the assembly failed to accomplish anything, Richelieu, did. By filling the vacuum left by Henry IV, he secured the absolutist destiny of the French Monarchy. Louis XIV, Henry’s grandson, who ascended to the monarchy in 1638, capitalized on this destiny. He personally ruled the kingdom from his temple of vanity at Versaille, from which he