Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The divine right theory
Louis XIV
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The divine right theory
The Sun King, Louis XIV, born in 1638, becomes king at the young age of four years old. Though a troublesome child, his advisors knew him to be a natural born leader (Biography.com). When he comes into power, Louis was too young to really run an entire country. His mentor and tutor, Cardinal Mazarin, helps him and teaches him. When a huge civil war breaks out over Cardinal Mazarin, Mazarin starts getting Louis to really take on the idea of the Divine Right Theory. As Louis grows older in his politics, his policies starts change with him. Louis XIV believed that there should be some type of hierarchy in the military, that people should abide by Divine Right Theory, that instead of fixing the huge flaws in the taxes, France should just switch to mercantilism, and that France should expand itself overseas. These things pushed themselves into what people see as the French Revolution. Louis XIV’s policies on …show more content…
His mother appointed Cardinal Mazarin to be his tutor and mentor. In Mazarin’s teaching, he made young Louis write down, repeatedly, “Homage is due to kings. They do as they please.”(Stokes 10). As Mazarin tries to instill Divine Right Theory in Louis, there begins a widespread unhappiness for the idea of royal power being extended to Mazarin. There begins these civil wars called Frondes. Soon the Nobles, bourgeoisie, and the workers start to rise against this expansion of power. The first Fronde starts when Louis is ten, but the second one, starts actual riots. The nobles and ‘middle class’ start fighting in the streets and barricades. These were the one of the few starting grounds for the The French Revolution. Leo Gershoy, a history professor, says, “The Fronde was the last attempt before the Revolution to promulgate a charter limiting royal absolutism, and its failure assured the triumph of the doctrine of absolutism in the long personal reign of Louis XIV.” (Gershoy
Louis XIV is considered the “perfect absolutist” and he has been said to have been one of the greatest rulers in France’s history. He came up with several different strategic plans to gain absolute
King Louis nation had a massive reaction focused on the King’s plight and return. The Reaction was not only seen in Paris alone but also on the other provinces, where a widespread phobia caused by foreign invasion led to the utter news of the King’s escape. Nevertheless, Tackett identifies the royal family plight to flee France as one of the most critical moments in the history of the French revolution. The king’s flight opens a window to the whole of the French society during the revolution. The purpose of the Kings flight was to offer freedom of action in terms of power and this was in regards to the King’s power and rule. The royal couple together with their advisers had unclear political agenda for their nation. Similarly, it is in the vent of these unclear goals factored by the Kind’s technical knowhow of not making decisive decisions that led to the stoppage of the royal family at Varennes and thereafter their return to Paris. The consequence of their return to Paris was the onset of the constant possibility of the end of the Monarch reign. On the same case, it is as a result of the royal family escape attempt and failure necessitated the integrity of the King as a constitutional monarch. On a much more political notion, The King’s hope of survival is mitigated
Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, was an absolutist monarch of France who sought to heavily suppress the power of novels while simultaneously promoting the ideals of a “divine right monarchy”. A man notorious for his incredible spending on various personal ventures, such as the extremely costly construction of a new palace at Versailles, Louis XIV was often the subject of criticism and mockery, especially from the nobles who hoped to discredit him and his absolutist regime. Overall, Louis XIV did predominantly act in a manner with his own personal agenda in mind, as seen through his Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, occurring as a result of his desire to have his country fall in line with his own beliefs, his unrelenting expenditures
Both Louis XIV and Peter the Great aimed to subjugate the powerful nobility, but did so using very different approaches. Louis XIV experienced a Fronde rebellion, a revolt of the nobles, as a child, which caused him to flee Paris and resent the nobles ever since. Peter the Great experienced a similar situation, also as a young man. While Peter was visiting western Europe to learn from his neighbors, the Russian military commanders of the streltsy, made up of politically powerful nobles, led an uprising and caused chaos. Like Louis’s Fronde rebellion, for Peter, the streltsy Uprising left a lasting impression on Peter affecting his policies during his reign. In response to their countries’ respective rebellions by the aristocracy, each ruler
nation. In order to become a true absolute ruler Louis xiv needed to make sure
Louis XIV was an absolute monarch in France from 1643 to 1715. His father died when he was just four years old, making Louis XIV the throne’s successor at a very young age. Because of this, he ruled for seventy-two years, which made him “the longest monarch to rule a major country in European history” (Eggert). But it was when he was twenty-three years old when he decided to rule without a prime minister, believing it was his divine right. Translated by Louis de Rouvroy, Duc de Saint-Simon, the author of the book The Memoirs of Louis XIV: His Court and The Regency, King Louis XIV wrote, “The royal power is absolute. The royal throne is not the throne of a man, but the throne of God himself. Kings should be guarded as holy things, and whoever
Of all the absolute rulers in European history, Louis XIV of France was the most powerful, and the best example because of his successes, being able to continue his complete control even after failures, his ability to be able to use France’s money in any way he wanted, such as the Place of Versailles, taking away the nobles power, and his ability to delegate impotant jobs to smart yet loyal people.
At the beginning of the 17th century, France was a place of internal strife and bickering bureaucrats. The king, Louis XIII, had come to the throne in 1610 at the age of nine, leaving the running of the kingdom to his mother, Marie de Medici. One of her court favorites, Armand de Plessis de Richelieu, rose through the ranks, eventually gaining the title of Cardinal and becoming one of Louis’ key advisors and minister. His political manifesto, Political Testament, was a treatise for King Louis XIII that offered him advice mainly concerned with the management and subtle subjugation of the nobles and the behavior of a prince. Beneath all of the obeisant rhetoric, Richelieu was essentially writing a handbook for Louis XIII on how to survive as a king in a political landscape increasingly dominated by the aristocracy. Richelieu’s ideology shows a pragmatic attitude reminiscent of The Prince, a political work by 15th century Florentine politician Niccoló Machiavelli.
Louis XIV’s self-entitlement as the Sun King reflects his belief of his power as absolute, since everything revolves around the sun. This fact mostly defines French absolutism at the time. Spielvogel describes absolutism as the sovereign power resting in the hands of the king, who rules by divine right and uses Louis XIV’s reign as the best example of absolute monarchy in the seventeenth century (444). Spielvogel also says that one of the reasons for his power was his ability to restructure the central policy-making machinery of the government (446). Molière’s Tartuffe is an accurate depiction of the power structure during King Louis’s absolutism. Since the king was Molière’s playwright, the moral of the story and its plot are pleasing to the king because it depicts the nobility just as the king intended them to be; important and noble members of the society, whose powers however, are lessened by the king. Spielvogel explains, “Instead of using the high nobility and royal
Louis XIV (Figure 1), the absolute monarch of France from 1643 to 1715, was a model of other European monarchs. Louis was born on 5th of September 1638 in Saint-Germain-en-Laye, where located outside of Paris in north central France, and died in 1715 at an age of seventy-seven. After the death of his father Louis XIII in 1963, his mother Anne of Austria and the chief minister Cardinal Jules Mazarin were appointed regent while Louis XIV was young. For the throne, Louis was allowed to attend councils of st...
O: Rage and revolt can describe the country of France at the time of the Revolution faced because of turmoil and struggle they faced. Different estates were formed based on what you did and your class in society. The people of society wanted more say in the government and decisions that King Louis XVI made. The public didn't approve with much of what King Louis did. His lack of ability to be a strong king and leader affected his reputation to the public eye. King Louis was tried for committing treason to the country of France. Treason is the attempt to kill a sovereign and overthrow the government. Some of the reasons were his attempt to flee to Varennes, living in Versailles which was not in Paris, and reforms he passed as a ruler. These actions performed by King Louis isn’t what a King does, but that doesn’t prove any
When Louis the XIV began his rule in 1643, his actions immediately began to suggest and absolute dictatorship. Because of the misery he had previously suffered, one of the first things he did was to decrease the power of the nobility. He withdrew himself from the rich upper class, doing everything secretly. The wealth had no connection to Louis, and therefore all power they previously had was gone. He had complete control over the nobles, spying, going through mail, and a secret police force made sure that Louis had absolute power. Louis appointed all of his officials, middle class men who served him without wanting any power. Louis wanted it clear that none of his power would be shared. He wanted "people to know by the rank of the men who served him that he had no intention of sharing power with them." If Louis XIV appointed advisors from the upper classes, they would expect to gain power, and Louis was not willing to give it to them. The way Louis XIV ruled, the sole powerful leader, made him an absolute ruler. He had divine rule, and did not want to give any power to anyone other than himself. These beliefs made him an absolute ruler.
During the eighteenth century, France was one of the most richest and prosperous countries in Europe, but many of the peasants were not happy with the way France was being ruled. On July 14, 1789, peasants and soldiers stormed the Bastille and initiated the French Revolution. This essay will analyze the main causes of the French Revolution, specifically, the ineffectiveness of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, the dissatisfaction of the Third Estate, and the Enlightenment. It will also be argued that the most significant factor that caused the French Revolution is the ineffective leadership of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette.
Power- something so potent, yet so easy to misuse. Not everyone can obtain power, however those who possess it often acquire arrogance. Louis XIV held total control of France, abusing his dominance. Louis called himself ‘the Sun King’, believing that everything revolved around him. His pompousness led him to making foolish decisions, as he considered himself to be superior. If you don’t use your brain, you will ultimately lose it, as Louis was beheaded by the determined citizens of France. Likewise, in Antigone, King Creon is the ruler of Thebes. Creon makes an arbitrary ruling, swearing the ‘disloyal’ Polyneices should never be buried. When Antigone goes against this, Creon is infuriated. Creon lets his arrogance take over, and continuously makes unwise decisions. Power simply creates narcissism, as Creon’s pride causes him to commit foolish actions.
People like King James I thought that the kings had the same power of God (James I). King James believed that that the kings could judge anyone and do anything without being held accountable for it. Just like God, they could create and destroy anything, they could kill or grant life to anyone. If they are not followed, if the members of the government do not follow their leaders’ orders, then they are worthy of death (Bossuet). The monarchs believed that whatever they did was right. They did not treat people with the respect they deserved. People at that time did not have the right to change anything in the government. Louis XIV made it possible for some of the nobles to have a voice in the government by building the Palace of Versailles where he would be able to control more of the