Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nationalism in 19th century Europe
Essay the origins of nationalism in europe
Essay the origins of nationalism in europe
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nationalism in 19th century Europe
“I am the state”. While it is debated whether Louis XIV actually said this or not, this quotation accurately illustrates his philosophy. Viewing himself as being placed in the position of king by God, Louis de Dieudonne took an absolutist approach to ruling France. Each decision Louis made shaped France in a different way. It is debated whether this shaping was for the better or for the worse. This is most likely due to the fact that when most people look at his policies, they merely look at the individual accomplishments he achieved. In order to see how Louis XIV truly affected France, however, one must evaluate all of his policies and their consequences as a collective whole. Only then is the truth revealed to the researcher. The polices …show more content…
Louis XIV had a strong sense of nationalism that showed clearly through his politics and decisions. In fact, two of the things that Louis practiced which turned other European countries against France were expansionism and mercantilism. Louis XIV practiced expansionism for two reasons. First, according to the author of Louis XIV, Vincent Cronin, when Louis took reign of France, Spain began to decrease in power. This encouraged other countries to expand and take Spain’s land. Seeing these other European nations grow in size and power, Louis decided that he needed to join in the race for land. Driven by want of power, Louis XIV decided to begin practicing expansionism. Another reason Louis XIV practiced expansionism was that, as historian and author John Rickard explains, Louis felt that his Spanish wife had a right to the Spanish Netherlands as her inheritance. With this thought in mind, Louis XIV took it upon himself to claim the Spanish Netherlands for France. Other European powers noticed the French beginning to advance on this land. In an attempt to keep Louis XIV in check, the Dutch decided to form the “Triple Alliance” with England and Sweden. Thus, Louis’s policy of expansionism was the first one that began to pit other countries against …show more content…
The lack of trust Louis had for nobility benefited the poor for a short while. Cronin asserts that Louis XIV made the nobility pay taxes as well. Although this pleased the poor, it incensed the nobility. This change from earlier tradition did not last, however, once the wars began. Then, the tables once again turned to solely rely on the poor to repay the debts of the country, condemning the poor to extreme poverty and famine. Ashley also brings to light that although the occupations Louis created by trying to make his country self sufficient opened more positions to be filled by Frenchmen, most of them did not last, leaving many citizens unemployed. Therefore, Louis XIV’s policies turned both the poor and the wealthy against
Louis had a controller of general finances named Colbert, and he “reduced the annual treasury deficit by economies and more equitable, efficient taxation, although tax exemptions for the nobility, clergy, and some members of the bourgeoisie continued. Louis led many military attacks and wars to expand his territory and build up his economy. He started to tax the people and use this money to build palaces and other architectural structures. Louis added nobles to his army so they would not think that their power was declining. This also helped to strengthen his army and thus he led several military attacks to build his state. In the War of “Devolution (1667-1668) he claimed that those provinces had "devolved" by succession to his Spanish wife rather than to her half brother Charles II, who had inherited the Spanish crown.” By doing this, he received some valuable towns, and this helped to expand his territory. But Louis did not always win battles, there were a few times where his army was defeated. In 1683, Colbert died and several disasters happened thereafter. After several defeats, Louis XIV decided to settle down to a more “sedate
Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, was an absolutist monarch of France who sought to heavily suppress the power of novels while simultaneously promoting the ideals of a “divine right monarchy”. A man notorious for his incredible spending on various personal ventures, such as the extremely costly construction of a new palace at Versailles, Louis XIV was often the subject of criticism and mockery, especially from the nobles who hoped to discredit him and his absolutist regime. Overall, Louis XIV did predominantly act in a manner with his own personal agenda in mind, as seen through his Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, occurring as a result of his desire to have his country fall in line with his own beliefs, his unrelenting expenditures
Louis fought his early wars for defensive purposes— to secure France’s northern border and to remove the Spanish from strategic towns. However, the Sun King pursued many subsequent wars to increase his power and influence. For example, Louis believed that if France had once historically controlled a region, France was justified in winning the region once again. Louis believed, as a divine right ruler, that he had the authority to break truces at will. Consequently, Louis made many enemies out of nearby countries, including Spain, England, and the Netherlands. After Louis won the Campaign in the Franche-Comte region in 1668, Europe was not interested in having France become the preeminent power in Europe. Louis believed that trade would generate wealth and by keeping trade within his own colonies, he could capture the profits that would have been otherwise outside of his control. By reorganizing the administrative and financial aspects of his kingdom and developing trade and manufacturing, he improved the prosperity of his empire. Louis sought to finance his military objectives from this new income stream, but ultimately, it was not enough. Louis XIV’s many wars, and the lavish life at Versailles, exhausted France of funds. Since only the lowest French classes such as the farmers paid the
nation. In order to become a true absolute ruler Louis xiv needed to make sure
Strayer, Robert W. French State Building and Louis XIV. Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2013. 657-58. Print.
Much like Britain and their need for money, King Louis XVI needed money due to causing France to become bankrupt with his costly
...s was from a military stand point, which was rare for him. In 1667, Louis attacked a portion of the Netherlands that was owned by the Spanish. This resulted in the gaining of 12 towns, which encouraged Louis to attack the Dutch Netherlands, which did gain him a few wealthy port towns, before ending in disaster. Louis’ last great success was the building of the Palace of Versailles, which as described earlier was a feat never before matched by a ruler.
... move, defunding any revolts they might plan, and preoccupying their time with petty social matters instead of matters of the state. If Louis’ reign was not supported by the enabling qualities of the Palace of Versailles, his reign would certainly not be as absolute as it was.
At the beginning of the 17th century, France was a place of internal strife and bickering bureaucrats. The king, Louis XIII, had come to the throne in 1610 at the age of nine, leaving the running of the kingdom to his mother, Marie de Medici. One of her court favorites, Armand de Plessis de Richelieu, rose through the ranks, eventually gaining the title of Cardinal and becoming one of Louis’ key advisors and minister. His political manifesto, Political Testament, was a treatise for King Louis XIII that offered him advice mainly concerned with the management and subtle subjugation of the nobles and the behavior of a prince. Beneath all of the obeisant rhetoric, Richelieu was essentially writing a handbook for Louis XIII on how to survive as a king in a political landscape increasingly dominated by the aristocracy. Richelieu’s ideology shows a pragmatic attitude reminiscent of The Prince, a political work by 15th century Florentine politician Niccoló Machiavelli.
In the book Travels in France by Arthur Young, he states that “There is an injustice in levying the amount each person must pay. Lands held by the nobility are taxed very little. Lands held by commoners are taxed heavily…”. This line is important because yes, it is easy to see that only the middle class but Arthur is English, not French. From the website Encyclopedia Britannica they state he is an “English writer on agriculture, politics, and economics. Besides his books on agricultural subjects, he was the author of the famous Travels in France. The book is especially valued for its vivid descriptions of the French Revolution and of the conditions that produced it”. If an English man can see that French have a financial crisis because the king is in debt, then there is a financial crisis. The clergy and the nobles were not being taxed even though they had lots of money. Even the nobility went against their own people, the website Bastille Day and The French Revolution state that “Faced with all these problems, Louis XVI needed more funds to govern is country. His financial advisers, inspired by Turgot, decided to turn to the nobility and tried to pass a law that would make them pay more taxes. The nobility opposed the king 's decision. By a clever game of persuasion, they even rallied part of the third estates at their side to denounce the power of the King”. As can be seen taxes were
It is often debated whether or not the reign of King Louis XIV had a positive or negative effect on France. Although there were improvements during his reign in transportation, culture, and national defense, there were far more negative aspects. He depleted the national treasury with his liberal spending on personal luxuries and massive monuments. His extreme fear of the loss of power led to poor decision making, which caused the court to be of lower quality. King Louis XIV’s disastrous rule brought about a series of effects that influenced the French Revolution in the following century.
Louis XIV controlled France’s economy. He began to heavily tax to support the military reforms. Louis agreed not to tax the nobility, therefore taking away the right for the upper class to have a say in where the taxation money was spent. This gave more and more power to the king. He could spend the money that he was getting from the poor and middle class in any way he pleased without upsetting the nobility. Unfortunately for Louis, the poor could not provide the money he needed. Soon, with the help of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, Louis introduced mercantilism in Europe. He regulated the flow of trade, making sure that France was exporting more than it was importing. To accomplish this, he raised the taxes on imports and lowered those on goods made in France. He encouraged skilled workers and craftsmen to immigrate to France, offering them goods and privileges.
Prior to the revolution, King Louis XVI was at the top of the ancien régime, the social, economic, and political structure in France, which means he had absolute power. When he received the throne in 1774, it came along with insoluble problems. The people were split into three estates which divided social class. The first estate consisted of 100,000 tax exempt nobles who owned 20% of the land. The second estate consisted of the 300,000 tax exempt clergy who owned 10% of the land. The third estate consisted of the remaining 23.5 million French people who were 90% peasants. The third estate was the only estate that paid taxes. Their taxes ensured the financial well-being of the clergy, state, and nobles (French Revolution Overview 6).
During the French Revolution of 1789 imperialism took a smaller scale, individual companies began to monopolize their profession and expanding to crush their competitors. France expanded internally as well as externally. Jules Ferry believed he could sway people to expand using facts, he said “In the area of economics, I am placing before you, with the support of some statistics, the considerations that justify the policy of colonial expansion…” (Robinquet 167) expressing the many ways people tried to convince others to expand. France and Great Britain split the majority of the world through their settlements and territories. Great Britain’s most valuable and profitable territory was India, which had multiple trade outpost for Cotton, Silk, Opium, Indigo Dye, and most importantly Tea. Great Britain controlled the markets trying to expand more. This fast expansion caused all other European countries to try to compete with Britain’s ever growing empire. In his writing Rise of our East African Empire document Lugard stated that “To allow other nations develop fields, and to refuse to do so ourselves, is to go backward”
An Analysis of the Absolute Monarchy of France in the 17th Century This historical study will define the absolute monarchy as it was defied through the French government in the 17th century. The term ‘absolute” is defined I the monarchy through the absolute control over the people through the king and the royal family. All matters of civic, financial, and political governance was controlled through the king’s sole power as the monarchical ruler of the French people. In France, Louis XIII is an important example of the absolute monarchy, which controlled all facts of military and economic power through a single ruler. Udder Louis XIII’s reign, the consolidation of power away from the Edicts of Nantes to dominant local politics and sovereignty