Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversial issues pertaining to legalization of marijuana
Debate on legalization of marijuana
Debate on legalization of marijuana
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The series “High Profits” demonstrates the works and restrictions of the United States government regarding the issue of legalizing recreational marijuana. Breckenridge Cannabis Club business owners, Caitlin Mcguire and Brian Rogers, demonstrate both the struggles and profits of this up and coming industry. This series portrays virtually every viewpoint possible by including opinions from an array of political actors who discuss the influence of the government on this topic and the impact this topic has on the general public.
With the various political figures who are shown in this video, a variety of interests and opinions are bound to come forth, often conflicting with one another. There are many figures who support Brian and Caitlin’s
…show more content…
business and the state-voted legalization of recreational marijuana.
One of the most important is John Warner, mayor of Breckenridge, Colorado. While he did vote in favor of recreationlized marijuana, he does belong to the council who decided that the business would have to be relocated to Airport Road due to the lack of tourists in that area. Investment banker, Larry Charles is in favor of legalization because he believes we should see marijuana as a commodity, just like any other profit making item. Another person who supports the legalization of marijuana is town council member, Mark Burke. He addresses the fact that when a tourist comes to Colorado, they probably are already aware of the legalization of marijuana, so there is no point in hiding the business and pretending it doesn’t exist. With the many people who support Brian and Caitlin’s business, there are several people who believe it should not be in the face of tourists, for fear it will give the town a bad reputation. Officer Shannon Hayes states that a lot of residents don’t want to see a cannabis shop on Main street. Local realtor, Karyn …show more content…
Contino as well as boutique owner, Susan Manis, believe that Breckenridge has a family and tourist friendly reputation to withhold and fear that a recreational marijuana business on Main street has the potential to ruin this reputation. That being said, Gary Freese worries that this shops will trigger other illegal activities in the currently peaceful town. The various opinions about this issue from a variety of people, both political and not, demonstrate just how much the government is able to influence the businesses in its country. This video highlights the influence of government institutions on several occasions.
To begin, there is a 24% tax on all cannabis sales. In just a few days of sales, Breckenridge Cannabis Club has given $120,000 of tax money to the same people in the council who voted to move the location of the shop. This relates to the universal American value of consent of the governed. The locals have elected the government officials who ultimately decide what they can and cannot do, the amount they are taxed on what they can do, and how and where one is allowed to run a business. This proves that even when a business is making money for the government, they still are essentially under the control of those who rule their town, state, and country. The idea of federalism is a major factor in the general legalization of marijuana. Each states has a right to legalize recreational marijuana even though it is still federally illegal. That being said, there are several federal restrictions that come with these freedoms due to the supremacy clause that gives the federal government supreme law of the land. For example, the states who choose to legalize marijuana are required to sell only to those over the age of 21 and have a proper ID, as well as only allowing people to smoke in private. Another issue Brian and Caitlin discovered was the inability to join a local bank since their business is considered a federally illegal profit. While the value of individual freedom is technically fulfilled
by allowing recreational marijuana, there are several restrictions that are put in in place by the federal government. Brian and Caitlin’s business, as well as the general legalization of marijuana has left a huge impact on the greater community. One of the major factors mentioned in the video is the fact that people want to be involved with legalization because they want to be a part of history. Additionally, Mayor John Warner suggests that legalization has the ability to eliminate the criminal act of buying marijuana which would leave an extremely positive impact on the community. Illegal dealers will be put out of business which will, consequently, reduce gangs and cartels and replace them with legitimate and legal businesses like Breckenridge Cannabis Club.
A strong healthy dog is pulling a wagon of a pretty bag of dog food that looks healthy and tasty. The dog food sets perfect and looks great in the wagon. The little puppy is pulling this big wagon of dog food up a steep winding road, to show his strength from eating Beneful dog food. The wagon with the dog food in it says “Incerdibites Bring out the incredible in your small dog. The advertisers attended audience is anyone who owns a small dog. The ad also says “it’s not the size of your tail it’s how you wag it. That statement is saying even though it’s a small puppy. It’s how they wag it by being happy if they eat the right dog food. This ad uses a lot of detail and color, which really makes it stand out. They use a very pretty back ground setting very dark green grass, a dark blue sky, with a pretty yellow sun, and clouds, a very pretty tree that’s very colorful and destruct! The ad really sticks out by all the detail and color. The advertisers are trying to show if your little dogs eat Beneful dog food, they can pull this wagon up this steep road too and they will be top of the l...
A highly controversial topic within the United States is whether or not the use, either for recreational or medicinal purposes, of marijuana should be legal. Renee Jacques, a writer for The Huffington Post, strongly believes that marijuana is completely harmless and includes the many reasons why in her article, “This is Why Marijuana Should Be Legal Everywhere.” The article was published on January 23, 2014, and at this time The United States was going through legalization changes. Jacques includes eight reasons why she believes marijuana should be legal; the main idea of these points being that everyone partakes in the use of marijuana and it is in no way, shape, or form harmful. Jacques introduces her article by including how Washington
In the 2015 article “What will Federal Marijuana Reform Look Like?”, Alex Kreit states how the current stance towards marijuana has changed. For this reason, a need for a new policy is necessary, as the present strategy of implementing laws on federal marijuana prohibition is no longer sustainable. This shift of mindset towards legalization of marijuana leads Kreit to say that legalization is inevitable. As an illustration, in 1996, the Drug Enforcement Administration and Congress opposed California’s approval of medical marijuana. In contrast, the year 2013 was when the Department of Justice announced new guidance to deprioritize enforcement of marijuana laws. Because of this shift, Kreit propose that efforts should go to crafting marijuana
Lately it seems that drug policy and the war on drugs has been in the headlines quite a lot. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the policies that the United States government takes against illegal drugs are coming into question. The mainstream media is catching on to the message of organizations and individuals who have long been considered liberal "Counter Culture" supporters. The marijuana question seems to be the most prevalent and pressed of the drugs and issues that are currently being addressed. The messages of these organizations and individuals include everything from legalization of marijuana for medical purposes, to full-unrestricted legalization of the drug. Of course, the status quo of vote seeking politicians and conservative policy makers has put up a strong resistance to this "new" reform lobby. The reasons for the resistance to the changes in drug policies are multiple and complex. The issues of marijuana’s possible negative effects, its use as a medical remedy, the criminality of distribution and usage, and the disparity in the enforcement of current drug laws have all been brought to a head and must be addressed in the near future. It is apparent that it would be irresponsible and wrong for the government to not evaluate it’s current general drug policies and perhaps most important, their marijuana policy. With the facts of racial disparity in punishment, detrimental effects, fiscal strain and most importantly, the history of the drug, the government most certainly must come to the conclusion that they must, at the very least, decriminalize marijuana use and quite probably fully legalize it.
The controversy of legalizing marijuana has been raging for quite a while in America. From some people pushing it for medical purposes to potheads just wanting to get high legally. Marijuana has been used for years as a popular drug for people who want to get a high. All this time it has been illegal and now it looks as if the drug may become legal. There has been heated debate by many sides giving there opinion in the issue. These people are not only left wing liberals either. Richard Brookhiser, a National Review Senior editor is openly supportive of medical marijuana yet extremely conservative in his writing for National Review (Brookhiser 27). He is for medical marijuana since he used it in his battle with testicular cancer. He says "I turned to [marijuana] when I got cancer because marijuana gives healthy people an appetite, and prevents people who are nauseated from throwing up. "(Brookhiser 27) Cancer patients are not the only benefactors from the appetite enhancer in marijuana, but so are any other nauseous people. Arizona and California have already passed a law allowing marijuana to be used as a medicinal drug. Fifty Six percent of the California voters voted for this law. "We've sent a message to Washington," says Dennis Peron. "They've had 25 years of this drug was, and they've only made things worse." (Simmons 111) The Arizona proposition garnished an even wider margin of separation between the fore's an against in a sixty five percent support tally. Ethan Nadelmann insists that " these propositions are not about legalization or decriminalization. They're about initiating some non radical, commonsense approaches to drug policy." General Barry McCaffery disagrees saying, "I...
The current issues about legalizing Cannabis in California are, if California legalizes Cannabis it still does not mean that federally it is legal. Since Colorado and Washington have legalized Cannabis the owners of the dispensaries are not protected like other businesses. Such as when time comes to transport money to banks the owners of the dispensaries have to us...
Cannabis, since its discovery, has been used for recreational and medical purposes. It was seen as a drug that was “safe” and did put the body at risk but benefited it. However, this is not the case anymore because the government under I Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970 law banned the use of the narcotic and has the right to persecute anyone who attains the substance. Nonetheless, the question is not whether the drug is “safe” to use but whether the States should have the power to regulate marijuana or the federal government should continue having the control over the drug. Since 1996, 23 states including Washington D.C have passed laws that have legalized the medical use of marijuana, yet the federal government does not protect or even recognize the rights of users or possessors. The debate over marijuana has picked up momentum and many would agree that all this uprising conflict can be traced back to the constitution and the flaws it presents. The constitution is blamed for not properly distributing the States and Federal powers. Although the federal government currently holds supremacy over marijuana, States should have the power to regulate the drug because under the 10th amendment the federal government only has those powers specifically granted in the constitution, Likewise the States have the right to trade within their own state under the Commerce Clause.
The Ontario star editorial writer presents a firm opinion by analysing the pot-selling consequences that evidently lead up to a number of serious matters and issues that are to be solved. The author displays multiple premises in support to his/her claims that seem to be mainly in attack to the present illegal sales of marijuana in the streets of Toronto.
Legalization or decriminalization of marijuana is opposed by a vast majority of American’s and people around the world. Leaders in Marijuana prevention, education, treatment, and law enforcement adamantly oppose the substance, as do many political leaders. However, pro-drug advocacy groups, who support the use of illegal drugs, are making headlines. They are influencing decision making thru legislation and having a significant impact on the national policy debate here in the United States and in other countries. The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) is the oldest drug user lobby in the U.S.
Ever since the federal criminalization of marijuana in the United States in 1937, there has been a large underground drug market (Paul). Much like how the prohibition of alcohol simply forced imbibers underground, those who chose to partake in marijuana are forced to stay away from the prying eye of the law because of present marijuana laws. This means the drug world is concealed from the average citizen, hiding the dangers of drug deals gone wrong, police shootings, and other dangerous occurrences. In a way this allows the government to mask the fact that their well-funded ‘War on Drugs’ is ineffective, a ‘War’ with a budget of roughly twenty billion dollars; which is not profoundly effective in the curbing the use of drugs (Jillette). If the average citizen does not know what is happening, in the eyes of the American zeitgeist, it is not happening. Criminalizing a harmless drug to cut down on its use simply turns its users into criminals, making the crime rate go up and clogging prisons with non-violent criminals. Marijuana is less harmful than alcohol and tobacco and the laws pertaining to it should reflect that.
admits that at Whole Foods they struggle with the debate of where to draw the line. He specifically states “ if donating 5 percent of profits is good, wouldn’t 10 percent be even better?” (Rottenberg).
Choosing two profitable stocks amongst a myriad of potential alternatives is a daunting task to say the least. In order to narrow my choices from thousands to two, I examined several aspects of companies I was interested in. Among these were, company overview, alpha and beta ratings, price ratios, price charts, and company headlines. After evaluating this information, I chose Intuit INC (INTU) listed on the NASDAQ and Johnson and Johnson (JNJ) listed on the NYSE.
Charles Stimson’s “Marijuana Should Not Be Legalized” is an essay that argues against the legalization in California, as well as the common arguments that “pro-marijuana activist” use to further their agenda. He insists, “Marijuana is a dangerous substance that should remain illegal under state law.” as well as asserting that most marijuana activists simply do not understand what decriminalization will entail. In his argument, he identifies the five arguments activist use and attempts to refute them one by one, calling them “bold claims”. The false or disputed claims he list activist as believing are that marijuana is safe and nonaddictive, marijuana and alcohol comparisons, criminalization of marijuana has not worked, government efforts could be best served doing something else, and marijuana sales taxes would be a good thing, regardless of the “social costs”.
Colorado is the latest state to approve the sale of marijuana for recreational use. This topic has been tossed around by the officials for years now. Legislators in Colorado have “considered excise and sales taxes on marijuana of up to 30 percent combined” (Frosch, 2013). With the rapidly growing market and marijuana industry, rules and regulations had to be put into place. Even this tax charge needs to be implemented and enforced.
I prepared a summary of The Circle of Profit, a book by Anik Signal. Who is Anik Signal? He sold many digital products, together worth over 100 million dollars. BusinessWeek has listed him in the top 3 best American entrepreneurs under the age of 25.