Defendant Hartford continues to dodge the fact that Service Master of Saint Cloud did not properly handle, and disposed, of the insureds personal property. Trey Swanson and Shaun Hickman contradicted each other during their testimony. Trey Swanson testified that Service Master would dispose of items but take an inventory. However, Mr. Hickman, his supervisor, stated that Service Master would not throw anything away without taking an inventory first. Nothing would be thrown away without the authorization of the insured, now the executor, RoxAnn Gendron. There is no testimony or evidence that there was any contact with Ms. Gendron. Hartford cannot escape the fact that they used their own in house and highest depreciation rate for the property.
Doris Reed bought a house for $76,000.00 from Robert King. Mr. King and his real estate agent failed to disclose to Mrs. Reed that a murder had taken place in the home ten years ago. Neighbors told Mrs. Reed about the murders and the stigma associated with the house after she moved in. The property appraised in the amount of $65,000.00 with reference to the history of the house. Reed sued King on allegations of misrepresentation for the purchase of the home seeking rescission and damages to terminate the contact.
4. Facts: It was the time of August in 1986, when William Geringer with his family was on vacation at the Wildhorn Ranch Resort located in Teller County, Colorado. Due to some defective Paddleboating boat two of the family members (William Geringer and his minor son Jared Geringer) were drowned. Mr. Watters, a defendant, was formerly the owner of the resort, but he stated that he handed over the possession to Wildhorn Ranch Inc. “The other defendant, Les Bretzke, was a contractor with an autonomous company that endow with repair services and repair construction to the resort.” During the whole trial the main focus was on the maintainability issues of
The facts surrounding this case were obtained from both Reilly, and Zisko. It should be noted that Reilly failed to explain in his complaint how he was connected to the probate matter for which Zisko subpoenaed his employment records. The underlying matter that this complaint is related to is the “post-divorce case Elaine C. Menice vs. Jeffrey L. Menice, Plymouth Probate & Family Court Docket No. PL11D2044JP.”
Have you ever thought how much research and effort a company has done to make their product appeal to you? A company will conduct surveys, record human responses to specific images, and adhere to government regulations not to mention all the different designs produced, just so that you will want to buy their product over their competitors. In Thomas Hine’s essay, What’s in a Package, Hine discusses the great length the response that a consumer should have when looking at a product’s packaging, the importance of manufactures’ marketing campaign, the importance of packages depending on the culture, then finally to why designs will change over time.
Recommendations: It is recommended that our law office regretfully deny service to Ms. Carry based upon the precedent in Kentucky. Based upon the analysis the issue, it is apparent that Ms. Carry would not receive a promising conclusion to her situation. Due to the facts involved and the cases discussed (which are somewhat on point) Ms. Carry does not make a claim in which relief can be granted.
The Court signed an Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Leave to File a Late Notice of Claim on March 2, 2018. The Plaintiffs served the Late Notice of Claim upon the City of New York on March 2, 2018. The City of New York conducted an examination of Mrs. Griswold, Ty Webb, Officer Frank Poncello, and Officer Jon Baker on March 12, 2018. The Plaintiffs then commenced an action against the City of New York by serving and filing a Summons and Complaint dated April 2, 2018. The City of New York filed its Answer with the Court on April 16, 2018 and filed and served a Notice of Issue on April 30, 2018. The City now moves for Summary Judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212, and dismissal of the Summons and Complaint and such other and further relief as the Court deems
There were 22 workers at Elliott Construction at the time of the deposition: laborers, supervisors, machine operators, admin assistant, and bookkeeper. Elliott Construction provides training and all the employees took the training. He cannot recall when or what company gave the training, but all of the employees received certificates. The classes were trenching and shoring classes. Mr. Elliott has also taken safety classes, a six or seven hour TEEX shoring class. He does not remember when and where he took the class.
Guillot asserts that Lisa began to review Desvigne Sr.’s bank records and discovered that Janet Desvigne, Desvigne Sr.’s power of attorney, had given Solomon an additional $17,000.00 before the testator passed away. As a result, Guillot filed a “Motion for Accounting” to determine what happened with said funds. Janet was never officially deposed but informed counsel that the funds were allegedly placed in Janet’s personal bank account; Janet then forwarded a payment of $17,000.00 to Solomon. Guillot doesn’t recall if Janet explained why Solomon asked for the money. To date Solomon has failed to respond to Guillot’s and bar counsel’s inquiry regarding the $17,000.00. Guillot was able to provide this office with a copy of the check Janet wrote out to Solomon on September 16, 2013. The check was made out to “Solomon Law Order” on September 16, 2013 for $17,000.00
...r: The Case for a Structural Injunction to Improve Indigent Defense Services” The Yale Law Journal 101.2 (1991): 481-504.
In this law brief, I will discuss two cases that all stem from one series of incidents. First, Greene Jewelry Company sued its former employee, Jennifer Lawson, for breach of confidentiality. Ms. Lawson is countersuing her former company for wrongful termination. In order to discuss all aspects of the cases against Greene Jewelry, I will address the aspects of the case individually.
State Farm had been accused for breach of contract by its policy holder, Jennifer Mangiamelle on 14 December at Court of Common Pleas, Allegheny as Jennifer did not received the policy proceeds left by her late husband. The plaintiff stated that the firm had wrongly filed a claim for life insurance left by her husband Dwayne Mangiamelle. Jennifer reveals that she was the beneficiary of the policy of her late husband.
If you watch the news you’ve probably heard all of the tension between us and North Korea with the nuclear arms. Well I have some knowledge to share with you. The first H bomb test and its predecessors, The components of the first H bomb and how it explodes. The science behind the H bomb is long and confusing, but I've simplified it enough to the point to make it understandable and interesting I hope.
In analyzing Hick’s argument, there were some weaknesses as well and strengths of the logic in his argument. The weaknesses that I found were in how he related the freedom of humans and soul-making to God. He says in his last premise that I mentioned in the summary that much of the suffering humans feel is caused from their own decisions. How then does this relate to the relationship we cultivate with God? One could answer that in this suffering we draw closer to the theistic God but if that were God’s intention wouldn’t that be taking away some of humans free will. If he planned for the evil to cause to draw to him he is in a sense forcing that outcome so that draw from free will. Another flaw I found in the logistics of his argument was that he said that suffering is caused from human’s own decisions. But
They were painful. They forced people to do them. They served one main purpose. The effects of the Nazi Medical Experiments lasted for years. Although the experiments were very helpful in the end, the people, who were mostly Jews, were forced into doing these horrible projects. These Jews were exposed to harsh, frigid weather conditions, so that the doctors who were conducting these experiments could see the effects of hypothermia on a human. In addition, these very painful experiments were repeated several times on a single prisoner to produce a solid result. Most of these people later died, to the severity of the situation they were thrown into.
Part 1-The Burner - Familiarize yourself with the gas burner. Recognize all parts and learn how to operate them properly. Learn how to safely light the gas burner, and control the flame. Clean up the lab station when finished.