On April 15, 2015, Brian F. Guillot, Esq., of Metairie Louisiana, contacted Office of the Bar Counsel regarding Ernest A. Solomon, Esq. Guillot has been retained by the family of Elmore Charles Desvigne, Sr., to assist in the execution of Desvigne Sr.’s estate. On January 18, 2011, Desvigne, Sr., named Solomon as the executor of his Last Will and Testament, his appointment was confirmed by the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans; approximately two years later Desvigne, Sr., passed away. Solomon has never been admitted to the bar of Louisiana, and his appointment was solely to act as an executor.
Shortly after Desvigne, Sr., passed away Solomon traveled to New Orleans to read the Will of the testator and handle his estate. At the
…show more content…
Guillot asserts that Lisa began to review Desvigne Sr.’s bank records and discovered that Janet Desvigne, Desvigne Sr.’s power of attorney, had given Solomon an additional $17,000.00 before the testator passed away. As a result, Guillot filed a “Motion for Accounting” to determine what happened with said funds. Janet was never officially deposed but informed counsel that the funds were allegedly placed in Janet’s personal bank account; Janet then forwarded a payment of $17,000.00 to Solomon. Guillot doesn’t recall if Janet explained why Solomon asked for the money. To date Solomon has failed to respond to Guillot’s and bar counsel’s inquiry regarding the $17,000.00. Guillot was able to provide this office with a copy of the check Janet wrote out to Solomon on September 16, 2013. The check was made out to “Solomon Law Order” on September 16, 2013 for $17,000.00
At this time it is unclear what account Solomon deposited the money into, this subpoena is for Solomon’s IOLTA bank records, records that pertain to as “Estate of Elmore Charles Desvigne, Sr.,” and any other accounts in Solomon’s name from March 16, 2013 through present day. These records will be evidence of the fact that Solomon mishandled the Desvigne
Doris Reed bought a house for $76,000.00 from Robert King. Mr. King and his real estate agent failed to disclose to Mrs. Reed that a murder had taken place in the home ten years ago. Neighbors told Mrs. Reed about the murders and the stigma associated with the house after she moved in. The property appraised in the amount of $65,000.00 with reference to the history of the house. Reed sued King on allegations of misrepresentation for the purchase of the home seeking rescission and damages to terminate the contact.
Maria had spoken with Eva over the phone concerning the correct total amount of $60,000 for rendering decorating services provided by Eva. Maria had sent a letter of the telephone conversation stating that Eva agreed to take $60,000 in full satisfaction obligation under the contract. Although Eva, changed her mind when depositing the check in the bank, she legally entered a mutual agreement over the telephone where it resulted in a unliquidated debt, payment is lower than actual.
Rita Crundwell was the trusted comptroller and treasurer of Dixon, Illinois with a passion for horses. She took advantage of her trust and responsibility to commit the largest known municipal fraud in the history of the United States. This fraudster has surprised and astounded people around the world by the amount of the fraud and for how long it went. Rita served the small town of Dixon from 1983 to 2012 until sentenced to nearly twenty years in federal prison for embezzling an astonishing $53.7 million. The story of this Dixon Commissioner shocked her small town and is studied by auditors all over.
In the pleadings, a complaint needs to be filed by the plaintiff with the court and the defendants. In this case, the complaint was filed for wrongful death and injunctions. The complaint was given to both companies on May 14, 1982. Then, the defendants must answer within twenty-four hours of receiving the complaint to the summon or risk losing the case by default of the court. W.R. Grace denied the allegations against them. Also, their other defenses was that the complaint didn’t state any cause of action, in the complaint the company named was misnamed, the company followed the due of care at all times and acted in “good faith,” and the claims against them are barred. The next step is the methods of discovery.
Problem: Norma has been a “doll” all her life. She has taken on others problems and kept her thoughts and feelings all to herself. It is now time for Norma to explain herself and deal with the facts. Norma forged her father’s signature on an I.O.U for two hundred and fifty pounds. She tries to do anything she can so her husband will not find out. Her husband just received a job at the bank; therefore, he could easily find out about the fo...
Facts of the Case: “The defendant Anthony Faretta was accused of grand theft in Los Angeles, CA. Prior to the trial, the defendant requested permission to represent himself” (Gardner, 2000). Mr. Faretta stated that he had once represented himself in a criminal case and that he believed that his court order attorney could not efficiently advise him due to other priorities.
Charles Keating Jr. was born December 4, 1923, in Cincinnati, Charles was a trained navy fighter pilot during WWII. Receiving a degree in law Keating began practicing law with his brother William Keating, where he was later discovered and hired as an executive by Carl Lindner Jr. Charles later married his wife in 1949 she bore six children. - Keating wasn’t the only Savings and Loan owner who was committing fraud, of the twenty percent that failed was triggered by fraud and/or insider trading. The failure of the Lincoln Savings and Loan and forced the country into a recession, $126 billion dollars of tax payers money was used for this bailout. All of this came to a climax during the first year George H.W. Bush was in the oval
Defendant Hartford continues to dodge the fact that Service Master of Saint Cloud did not properly handle, and disposed, of the insureds personal property. Trey Swanson and Shaun Hickman contradicted each other during their testimony. Trey Swanson testified that Service Master would dispose of items but take an inventory. However, Mr. Hickman, his supervisor, stated that Service Master would not throw anything away without taking an inventory first. Nothing would be thrown away without the authorization of the insured, now the executor, RoxAnn Gendron. There is no testimony or evidence that there was any contact with Ms. Gendron.
In questioning one of the colonia residents, it became apparent that property ownership and systematic records had become a problem. She indicated that she had previously been making payments on the property but had ceased to do so. She went on to say that the person she was paying had not been the rightful owner of the property and that she was told to stop paying. When asked who had told her to stop paying she indicated that it was an attorney who was going around trying to help the people of the colonias.
Fourteen years later, twenty-three-year-old Jane was selling furniture at the Sitka market. Jane was on her way to go take out money from the local bank, on arrival she gave her name and soon discovered her parents had kept a safe deposit box. She was granted permission to look at its content. When she opened it papers tumbled out and landed on her feet. One stood out from the rest. It was the original deed to her parents
This investigation conveyed that equine DNA or horse meat was found in beef burgers sold in a company well known Tesco. It was manufactured as displayed above by Silvercrest plant in Monaghan. This 29% of horse DNA or equine DNA should not be in this product. The investigation continued some of the burgers were Tesco’s own brand everyday value beef burgers. There was 8 burgers in this packet. Horse DNA was found in beef burgers in the UK and Irish supermarkets. This horse meat controversy lead to the Tesco supermarket removing all frozen burgers for sale to consumers from its shop shelves quite quickly and immediately whether they had been found to contain horse meat or not. The group technical director of Tesco made it clear that the presence
I allowed James R. Boucher to view each transaction recorded from the Wal-Mart store. James R. Boucher identified and confirmed that James Roy Boucher was the perpetrator in each transaction. Each transaction made by James Roy Boucher at the Wal-Mart store was a check stolen from the victim, James Frank Boucher.
...ation of the videos, the prosecutor or testifier should explain that this money was not included in the cash deposits and each incident represents theft of cash proceeds. Testimony should conclude: that based on ticket voids and when compared with the security tapes that approximately $2014 was stolen.
This issue of money all began when Mr. Jennings, being the gullible person he was, hired a land surveyor, not a lawyer to write his will. The sneaky land developer intentionally made John’s grandfathers’ will to be extremely vague and ill written. Mr. Jennings real wishes were obscured and open to interpretation.
Internet auction fraud is the use of the internet for an online transaction between a buyer and a seller to use deceptive means to defraud the buyer which includes failure to deliver merchandise, intentionally delivering defective merchandise, or delivering merchandise that was promised or purchased of lesser quality than mentioned. Auction fraud can happen on places such as Ebay, where the potential auction fraud is high. Especially for sellers over-seas. I have even been a victim of auction fraud. If one is not careful and is able to research who they are buying from to confirm they are a legitimate seller, then they are subjecting themselves to fraud. Some of the things, such as Ebay, has in process is a strong investigative team to investigate any cases of fraud reported, though it takes time. Other things in place are disclaimers warning people of fraud and what to do if they find themselves in a fraudulent situation.