Facts: Eva and Maria entered into a written contract pursuant (a legal document) with Maria for rendering decorating services for a total price of $75,000. A dispute over whether services has been performed correctly arose. Eva claimed full amount was due, but Maria argued that only $50,000 is worth of services performed. Serval weeks later, Maria sent a check for $60,000 to Eva, where Maria wrote “Payment in full for decorating services”. a) Given that Eva and Maria entered a written contract supported by a legal document for a price agreed on $75,000 for rendering decorating services, there is consideration. Both parties agree upon a price and this contract verifies validity. Judgement for Maria. Since Eva endorsed the check without making any further notations …show more content…
Maria had spoken with Eva over the phone concerning the correct total amount of $60,000 for rendering decorating services provided by Eva. Maria had sent a letter of the telephone conversation stating that Eva agreed to take $60,000 in full satisfaction obligation under the contract. Although Eva, changed her mind when depositing the check in the bank, she legally entered a mutual agreement over the telephone where it resulted in a unliquidated debt, payment is lower than actual. 8. Facts: Digna and Cecelia entered into a valid loan agreement, which means the two parties agreed that Cecelia owed $10,000. On September 1st, Cecelia informed Digna that she was unable to pay this day. a) Notes: $8,000 and Digna’s stamp collection is orally accepted by Cecelia as a payment of $10,000. Cecelia will accept the this form of payment if it is done by September 10th. Digna payed $8,000 and gave her stamp collection to Cecelia on September 8th, two days before the acceptance date that Cecelia agreed on. 7 days later, Cecelia found out the stamp collection had a market value of $1,000 and demands an amount of $1,000 to be payed because so far, Digna has payed
The contract between the Alvarez Companies and Laduzinski carried the certain elements of a basic contract since there was an offer, an acceptance, and a consideration. Perez offered plaintiff a position with the Alvarez companies, adding that the company was interested in obtaining plaintiff's contacts to have
Maria Sanchez is the service user that is immediately involved in the situation at hand. She is 91 years old and lives in a city-run long-term care facility where she is very sociable and engages in all the activities that are offered at the facility. Judging by her name, we may be able to assume that she is of Spanish descent. Although she has no immediate family, her distant cousin Paola Sanchez and his wife, Margarita, visit her weekly with sweets which brings Maria great joy. It is discovered that Maria is in need of new clothing as hers are old and ragged, therefore, I, the social worker, must now explore her financial arrangements, never doing so before because Maria’s needs have always been met. Maria receives the
Yet this was done by the late Madam C.J Walker. . .She made and deserved a fortune, and gave it much of it away generously.” (Bundles 103).
3. What does Alma’s plan for the twenty dollar bill show about her? What does the discussion about both the money and the paperboy indicate about their own
Fourteen years later, twenty-three-year-old Jane was selling furniture at the Sitka market. Jane was on her way to go take out money from the local bank, on arrival she gave her name and soon discovered her parents had kept a safe deposit box. She was granted permission to look at its content. When she opened it papers tumbled out and landed on her feet. One stood out from the rest. It was the original deed to her parents
He confirmed that the show was on hold until further notice. In 2013, he said former Arts of Multiculturalism Minister Winston “Gypsy” Peters had promised $5 million to cover the cost of prizes but he only received a cheque for $1.8 million. With arrears of $3.2 million, he said several service providers are yet to be paid while last year’s winner Raymond Ramnarine is still owed $200,000 out of his $1 million winning.
Client agrees to payment terms and conditions in Exhibit A, which is incorporated into this agreement.
“Number 124. From Columbia.” The girl adjusted the label on her. Standing on the auction platform, head bowed, she looked seemingly young. 13 years old. With ruffled hair and caramel complexion, just like any other girls. Except, her eyes, staring at the ground, were overwhelmed with nothing but lost hope. Her stoned face, spoke a thousand words. Her soul, was long gone. “Twenty thousand!! Forty thousand!! Calling once…calling twice…. SOLD!!!” At that very moment, tears streamed down her cheeks. At that very moment, she was devastated. At that very moment, a life is lost.
When Jennifer paid back her first loan early, we said ‘yes’ to a second loan. This time for $10,000. To make these two loans over a two-year period, 435 lenders in our community and beyond, said ‘yes’ to Jennifer too.
No one at the address could ever remember signing any letter, tracking this number shows that it was "undeliverable" and delivered back to your Merrick office on April 28th. Which I must assume since they received the letter sometime later, a person in your office dropped it in her mailbox and then claimed it was sent certified mail.
When Emily’s father died, he left her no money, only the house. The mayor pitied her situation and allowed her a tax exemption. To make Emily feel better about receiving this exemption, he made up an excuse that her father had loaned money to...
Records from the case presented that Sereno received at least $336,287.66 or more than P16 million for the legal service. This contains attorney's fees in the case, which has raised to the Court of
Sorry by quantity of scheduling, but we are working in clarification of all the doubt´s. Before to do the payment.
This is the total completion of accepting the terms of the contract from both parties without having any legal restrictions or any other discrepancies in doing so.
Occasionally there may be misunderstandings made by individuals/parties in differentiating between a simple contract and a speciality contract. From what is understood, a speciality contract may be; “illustrated by reference to gifts”, as stated by (Richards, 2009).