Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of motivation in the workplace
Theory of motivation
Personality characteristics positively affect interpersonal work relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of motivation in the workplace
It is a known fact that our society and our workforce continues to change, however the same question of increasing worker productivity continues to be asked by organizations and managers alike. That is one reason why the topic of motivation is so prevalent and importance continues to increase in management research. It is believed that if organizations or managers can find the key to motivate individuals, then the company will be able to increase productivity, therefore increasing their bottom line.
Theoretical Framework
Over the years, researchers have tested numerous theories of motivation. Hertzberg’s Two Factor Theory of Motivation states that there are two types of motivators: the first has to do with an individual’s inward motivation, which includes achievement, recognition, and responsibility, while the other has to do with external sources of motivation such as salary, environment, policies, and administration. While external factors, or hygiene factors, will influence job satisfaction negatively, they have little influence on creating a positive influence on increasing personal productivity. However, internal factors, or motivators, have a tendency to have both a positive and negative affect on job satisfaction and performance (Sledge, Miles, & Coppage, 2008).
Personality is another reason considered for increases in motivation and productivity. According to Yang, Kim, and McFarland (2011), “personality traits exert an indirect effect on performance through more proximal individual difference variables, including self-efficacy (an individual’s belief in his or her capabilities to achieve performance objective)” (p. 372). Many researchers have studied the affects of personality on work behavior, performance, jo...
... middle of paper ...
...s culture play? A look at motivation and job satisfaction among hotel workers in Brazil. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1667-1682. DOI: 10.1080/0958519080295157
St. Claire-Ostwald, B. (2012). How to coach generation y. Coaching at work, 7(6), 54-55. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=26&sid=93a3a120-4d33-4f30-ac78-30c6d38fb64d%40sessionmgr111&hid=119
White, M. (2011). Rethinking generation gaps in the workplace: Focus on shared values. Kenan-Flagler Business School. Retrieved from http://www.execdev.unc.edu
Yange, B., Kim, Y., & McFarland, R. G. (2011). Individual differences in sales performance: A distal proximal mediation model of self-efficacy, conscientiousness, and extraversion. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 31(4), 371-382. DOI: 10.2753/P550885-3134310401
P.J. (2004). Personality: Theory and Research. USA: Wiley. SMITH. T. W. and WILLIAMS.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132-153.
Kroeger, O., Rutledge, H., & Thuesen, J. M. (2002). Type talk at work: How the 16 personality types determine your success on the job. New York, NY: Dell Publishing.
The big 5 personality traits model measures the five largest dimensions of a person’s personality. The first one is openness, which measures a person’s level of creativity as well as their desire for knowledge and new experiences (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). The second trait is conscientiousness, which determines an individual’s level of care in their life and work. If they have high conscientiousness, they are very organized and thorough they make plans and follow those plans (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). The third trait is extraversion/introversion. In addition, extroversion person is outgoing and sociable and in introversion person is quiet and work well alone (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). The fourth is agreeableness and looks at a person’s level of friendliness or kindness to others as well as their level empathy and whether or not they synthesize with others (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). The last is natural reactions and can be referred to as a person’s emotional state ability, which measures how people react to situations (O’Neill & Allen, 2011). All five of these traits have an impact on how people react in teams and how team members react to
Murnoe, S. (2014). "How Personality Affect Work Behavior". Available: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/personality-affects-wor-behavior-45940-html. Last accessed 18th February, 2014.
Discussed below are different researchers’ arguments and explanations on how personality predicts employee performance. This essay will explore both negative and positive ways in which personality can predict the performance, as well as explaining what personality is. Past research has “demonstrated that personality constructs are associated with work performance, with some traits like conscientiousness predicting success around jobs. Other linked with specific occupations e.g. extraversion correlates with success in sales and management as well as training performance supporting”, (Barrick et al., 2002, 87: p.43).
As with any theory, the motivator-hygiene theory has its share of criticisms. Among them is the lack of consideration for individual differences. Herzberg’s theory only takes into account internal organizational factors and does not consider personal attitudes and beliefs of one’s work. Moreover, the two-factor theory assumes that high job satisfaction equates to performance at work. This, however, does not hold true in many situations.(insert example) A highly satisfied, content, and happy worker is not necessarily the hardest worker in an organization.
Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (5th ed). Boston , MA, USA: Pearson
This two-factor theory determines if an employee is satisfied or dissatisfied on his or her work. He developed the motivation-hygiene theory to explain these results. He called the satisfiers motivators and the dissatisfiers hygiene factors, using the term "hygiene" in the sense that they are considered maintenance factors that are necessary to avoid dissatisfaction but that by themselves do not provide satisfaction. Herzberg theory will be helpful to the researcher because it determines from the data that the motivators were elements that enriched a person's job; he found five factors in particular that were strong determiners of job satisfaction: achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, and advancement.
Klobucher, T 2011, Characteristics of Generation 2020: Generations at Work, The Great Workplace Revolution, accessed 11 November 2013, http://www.thegreatworkplacerevolution.com/characteristics-of-generation-2020-generations-at-work/
Employee motivation has always been a central problem in the workplace, and, as an individual in a supervisory position, it becomes one’s duty to understand and institute systems that ensure the proper motivation of your subordinates. Proper motivation of employees can ensure high productivity and successful workflow, while low worker motivation can result in absenteeism, decreased productivity rates, and turnover. A large body of research has been produced regarding motivation, and much of this research is applicable to the workplace. Due to the nature of man, motivation varies from individual to individual, and, because of this, there is no one system that is the best for ensuring worker motivation in every organizational situation, and, as a product, many theories have been created to outline what drives people to satisfactorily complete their work tasks. Throughout the course of this document, the three main types of these motivational theories will be outlined and examples of each, as well as how these theories can be used to further strengthen and sustain worker motivation....
Huang, J., Palmer, A., Ryan, A., & Zabel, K. (2013). Personality and Adaptive Performance at Work: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 162-179. doi: 10.1037/a0034285
Motivation is the force that transforms and uplifts people to be productive and perform in their jobs. Maximizing employee’s motivation is a necessary and vital to successfully accomplish the organization’s targets and objectives. However, this is a considerable challenge to any organizations managers, due to the complexity of motivation and the fact that, there is no ready made solution or an answer to what motivates people to work well (Mullins,2002).
“Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences.” Business Horizons, vol. 60, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 45–54. ScienceDirect, doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.08.011.
In the recent year, many researchers has shown the model of personality – the ‘Big Five’ model – uses five distinct scales to describe personality: conscientiousness (the extent to which one is reliable, responsible, dependable, persistent, and achievement oriented), emotional stability (one’s calmness and self-control), extraversion (a measure of sociability, ambition and narcissism), agreeableness (the degree to which one is good-natured, cooperative, and trusting), and openness to experience (a measure of imagination, sensitivity and curiosity) (Robbins, Judge, Millett, & Boyle, 2014). It is obvious that individuals has unique combinations of these big five model, so the personality traits affects to the work performance differently in term of motivation and employee selection. Firstly, it determines how and why we’re motivated to achieve certain goals – for example, people who score high on extraversion are more motivated to achieve a goal if there’s a reward involved such as money or raise; or some people are motivated by being recognized by their colleagues, so they want to be celebrated their success in the staff luncheon (Bailey, 2014). Secondly, according to the research by Barrick & Mount (1991), the relationship between the big five model and job performance can predict the work performance via the job selection. For instance, in customer