Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Henry v and saint joan's perspective
Analysis of Henry v and saint joan's perspective
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of Henry v and saint joan's perspective
The plays Henry V by William Shakespeare and Saint Joan by George Bernard Shaw take place in Europe during the Hundred Years War. They illustrate the opposing sides of the war. Henry V paints a picture of the English’s journey through the war, while Saint Joan displays the strong desire of the French to beat the English. Both plays are told from the hero’s point of view. Henry V is told from King Henry V’s point of view and Saint Joan is told from Joan of Arc’s point of view. King Henry and Joan won pivotal battles for their countries in the war, earning them much respect. Although King Henry V and Joan of Arc are both heros, their success and influence differed due to their class.
King Henry V motivated his army throughout the play with passion and power. He used his knowledge of being a leader to instill a desire to achieve greatness in each of his men. In many of Henry’s speeches he expresses extreme amounts of passion. An example of this comes from the speech Henry gave before the battle of Agincourt, “We few, we happy few, we band of brothers; For he to-day that sheds his blood with me Shall be my brother,” (Shakespeare 4.3. 60-62). At this point in Henry’s speech he is appealing to the emotion of his
…show more content…
men. Henry exudes confidence while giving this speech and instills hope in his men. Also, by comparing his men and his relationship as brothers, Henry, shatters the stigmas of class. He convinces them they are all equal regardless of their class and are united as one, sharing a special bond. The result of Henry’s speech leads to the eventual English victory at Agincourt. Similar to Henry, Joan must attempt to unite the nobles and peasants of France to succeed in the war. It is Joan’s mission to save France from England, and she is willing to do anything she can to do complete her mission. Despite being a peasant, Joan is not afraid of confronting the nobles about issues. When the nobles were apprehensive about continuing to fight the English, Joan called them out on their flaw, “And if it was, do you think men that are fighting for France and for God will stop to bargain about ransoms, as half your knights live by doing? No: they will fight to win; and they will give up their lives out of their own hand into the hand of God when they go into battle, as I do. Common folks understand this” (Saint Joan Act 5 n.pg.). Joan insults the nobles for their lack of dedication to the war effort. She implies that they do not understand hard work because they are wealthy, whereas peasants have to work for everything, so they always try their hardest. Joan speaks with emotion throughout her entire speech in hopes of inspiring the nobles to join Joan and her followers in their battle against the English. The emotion shown by Joan in the speech is frustration and hope. Unfortunately, her frustration out weighs her hope and leaves the nobles skeptical of Joan’s mission. The amount of success Henry and Joan had was affected by the class which they came from.
Henry has a large advantage over Joan because he comes from a royal, wealthy background, while Joan comes from a poor, uneducated background. Due to his authority, Henry garners a lot of respect from his country and army. With this respect he is able to get his point across easily and earn support. Unfortunately for Joan, being a peasant decreases her chances of receiving respect and support. Joan must work harder to achieve as much success as Henry. If Joan were a noble or royalty she would be able to share her thoughts as easily as Henry. And, if Henry were a peasant he would have to work much harder to get his point across as well as he can as a
king. The most effective leaders give compelling speeches and come from a wealthy class. It is difficult to be a top leader with only one of these traits. Joan in the play Saint Joan is an influential leader and hero of the French during the Hundred Years War, however she struggles with overcoming being a peasant. Similar to Joan, Henry in the play Henry V is an inspirational leader and hero for his country, however he is a king so he does not have to struggle to be the most effective leader he can be. Joan and Henry are both successful leaders, but due to class, Henry is a more effective leader.
I side with Loades on this as despite resentment from the nobles, after the Perkin Warbeck imposture there were no more serious uprisings which strongly support the success of Henry’s policies. Whilst most nobles would see his methods as unjust (especially the wide of use bonds and recognisances) Henry succeeded in increasing the crown’s standing at the expense of the nobility, securing his position whilst weakening the nobles. Through most of his policies Henry was successful in limiting the powers of nobility. Henry sought to restrict the noble’s power and yet at the same time needed them to keep order and represent him at local levels, therefore Henry sought not to destroy the nobles but to weaken them enough that they did not pose a threat, he needed a balance of control over the nobles and strong nobility.
After letting the church convince him to go war something changed in henry. His mood changes because he was ready for war after the unexpected gift of tennis balls from the Dauphin. Henry stated whatever happens it’s the will of God. Yes, the childish gift from the Dauphin offends him but instead of conquering France out of anger. The Church influences him to fight with God on his side and God will lead him to victory. As Henry put all his trust in God that demonstrated another characteristic of an ideal Christian king. Regardless of what he might face, he has no fear because he knows that God is with him.
Henry excites fear by stating he is passionately ready to sacrifice for his country. This play towards pathos, or appealing to the audience’s emotions, is an effective way of trying to convince the House to go to war against Britain. This pathos, combined with the logic of Henry’s speech, makes for a convincing argument. Logically taking the House step by step from stating that because he has an outlook on their situation, he should express it to them, to stating his argument before the House, to saying that lacking freedom is worse than death, then taking it full circle pronouncing he would prefer to be “give[n] death” then to have his freedom taken away by the British.
Rather than a sense of patriotism, it is clear to the reader that Henry's goals seem a little different, he wants praise and adulation. "On the way to Washington, the regiment was fed and caressed for station after station until the youth beloved that he must be a hero."
For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".
In Shakespeare’s “The Life of King Henry V,” set in England in the early fifteenth century, with the famous and heroic English King, Henry V, claiming his “rights” to the French throne. This claim caused complications and the declaration of war on both English and French soil. This political war, then turn into a route of complicated negotiations, after King Henry’s terrifying forces had successfully defeated French forces. As the result of the war, a peace treaty was made, and part of that agreement was the marriage between King Henry V and the daughter of the King of France, Katherine of Valois. An analysis of the both King Henry’s and Katherine’s relationship reveals that both had conflicting perspectives of one another, which resulted as a marriage in political unions of two powerful nations rather than a union of two lovers.
Persuasive Techniques Used by Henry in Act Four Scene Three in Shakespeare's Henry V Henry's speech is well prepared; he uses various key features in a persuasive leader. Before Henry starts of he is able to turn weakness into strengths. He immediately identifies what is wrong with his soldiers, the larger French army. King Henry commences by giving his soldiers confident advice, he says 'if we are marked to die, we are enough to do our country's loss.' Essentially this means that the fewer who die the better for our country, because the less loss of lives.
The Hundred Years’ War (1337-1453) consisted of numerous small raids between local armies in which the French suffered many losses. Two of these losses included the battles at Crecy and Poitiers. However, over time, the French rebounded after the victory at the battle in Orleans in 1429, which was led by 17-year old French peasant, Joan of Arc. Before going into battle, Joan sent a letter to the English demanding that they leave France. Joan’s letter to the king of England in 1429 and her role in the battle at Orleans played a symbolic role and affected the French’s success in the Hundred Years’ War by increasing French spirits and showing the weakness of the English.
In Shakespeare’s “The Life Of King Henry V,” the setting of England in its early fifteenth century, with a famous heroic English King, claiming his “rights” to the French throne, which causes complications and the declaration of war between both England’s and France’s soil. This political war, then turn into a route of complicated dealings, after the fact that King Henry had successfully defeated France’s forces, and one of them was the marriage between King Henry and the daughter of the King of France, Katherine. An analysis of the both King Henry’s and Katherine’s relationship reveals that both had conflicting perspectives on one another, which results of their marriage as a political union of two powerful nations rather than a union of two lovers.
... version of Henry's court and Henry's camp, the dramatic effect constituted, in its way, a reasonably accurate depiction of Henry's achievement in England." (Pilkington 1-2) I believe that Shakespeare's Henry V contains more charm and less fanaticism than the true Henry V. Shakespeare has created a fairly accurate depiction of life in this time period, altering only what he saw fit for his own lifetime.
On the eve of the Battle of Agincourt, he disguises himself and walks amongst his men in order to gauge the sentiment amongst them. To Pistol, he insults ‘the King’, but to Williams and Bates, he praises ‘the King’ and justifies the war (4.1). Depending on the men’s pre-existing opinions, Henry changes his attitude to convince his men of the validity of the war as well as the range of his responsibility. When he speaks to Katharine to woo her, he becomes the perfect suitor, full of sweet words and clumsy enough to be charming as he attempts to speak French. He tells Katharine before this attempt that the language “…will surely hang upon [his] tongue like a newly-married wife upon her husband’s neck…”, but it is more likely that as the King of England Henry is fluent in French and is lying. In front of the nobility of his court, Henry is fully and completely a strong leader. This can be seen from the second scene of the play, where he calls the bishops into the throne room and asks him “May I with right and conscience make this claim [to France]?” (H5. 1.2. 96-97) He gets the bishops, who have their own motivations, to proclaim in front of the whole court that he does, in fact, have a solid claim to the French throne. The bishops’ lengthy and rambling explanations contrasted by Henry’s pinpoint questioning and conclusion highlight his assertive and commanding nature. He changes for each situation, sometimes drastically, becoming an
For the simple fact that when Henry VI was younger and not allowed to take an active role in leading England, he did not really care about running the country. Henry was such a spiritually deep man that he lacked the worldly wisdom necessary to allow him to rule effectively (Wikipedia). Henry was more of an indecisive pushover.
The play Henry V by William Shakespeare is about the history story of the young king Henry V and how did he win the war. The mean characters in this play are Duke of Gloucester, Henry V, Duke of Bedford, King’s bother, Princess Katharine, etc.
Joan was born into the hundred year war, but her father didn’t fight in the war. He was a farmer with his wife and daughter and was very church oriented. This gives insight as to who her father was. This background formed Joan of Arc’s life. For example, reading and writing was not allowed for the women, but Joan didn’t listen. She learned anyways. “She was born to a tenant farmer Jacques d’Arc” (“Joan of Arc”). Joan of Arc was the only female to read and write, and she was teaching others girls to also read and write. She was a Catholic church girl who didn't go to school. She then learned to read from her father’s books, and he taught her to write. Her father was a farmer and her mother, Isabelle Romee, wasn't really known in Joan’s life's story, but she was still present in Joan’s life she also taught her to be pious.Joan of Arc’s
Saint Joan by Bernard Shaw illustrates the story of Saint Joan; a young woman who took charge of the French Armies during the Hundred Years' War. Joan is set on this course through voices that she believes come from a heavenly source. Although Joan is guided to victory, she is ultimately burned at the stake because many religious and secu-lar officials are threatened by the power Joan holds. The officials try to legitimize her death by reasoning that Joan disregarded many of the beliefs and customs of The Church, therefore making her a heretic. However, Joan was not only burned for being a supposed heretic, but also for political reasons tied to The Church and feudal hierarchy.