Henry V Leadership Analysis

1655 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Henry VIII strengths and weaknesses

Baby ducklings are young, and unaware of the environment that they live in- if left unchecked they could wander around aimlessly and place themselves into real danger. The mother duck is the leader of that group of ducklings that keeps order and provides safety to her hatchlings. If earning the title of “leader”, one must display wisdom, kinship, strength, and diplomacy in order to lead their subordinates successfully in war. In the play Henry V, Shakespeare portrays Henry’s growth through his disciplinary actions toward his old friends, leadership in the battlefield, and by abandoning his past as a childish prince; Shakespeare is illustrating that the role as king comes with the role as the leader, leading Henry to show his dominance by sentencing whoever committed a crime to death. This portrays that moving up in the hierarchical chain requires leadership which requires obtaining obedience from the people through a cause and effect motive. Henry displays the traits of a successful and effective leader by displaying his diplomacy, strength, wisdom, and kinship in the Battle of Agincourt.
The expression “brains vs. brawn” represents Henry since he’s able to use both; the wisdom he displays in the play represents the quality of an effective leader by not only using sheer force, but strategy. Kristin Benzio’s article “Personating Leadership: Shakespeare's Henry V and Performative Negotiation” reflects the role Henry portrays as a king that learns during his reign. The “paradoxical interpretation of Shakespeare’s most successful king” is based on how he behaved before with just brawn and to now analyze battle tactics when the odds are against him and his army (Benzio 2). The purpose of Benzio starting off with a “paradoxical interpre...

... middle of paper ...

...istakes of his past as prince. He shifted from a drinking delinquent who caused trouble and soiled the family name to a respectable king who kept his legacy until his son claimed the throne as an infant because Henry died at a young age.
Shakespeare displayed character development in Henry by giving him the throne of King in the play. The transition of a troublesome prince to a respectable King was obtained by Henry’s acceptance toward the responsibilities that he was given. Kinship toward his men, strict rule in the war, ability to learn the mistakes from his past and to grow from it- gave Henry the ability to rule in his reign and to portray his growth and development. Henry’s qualities of an effective leader is displayed in the battlefield and is caused by an epiphany, which allowed him to realize his position in the hierarchical chain after his father died.

Show More
Related

  • King Henry Iv Part 1

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Through characterization, Shakespeare explores moral conflict, and passage three is a prime example of Falstaff’s enduring moral disorder. By this stage in the play, Hal has ‘reformed’, moved away from his former mentor Falstaff and become a good and honourable prince. Hal’s remark to his father indicates a strong, independent mind, predicting that Douglas and Hotspur will not accept Henry’s offer because of their love for fighting. Henry’s reply, in turn, indicates a change in attitude towards his son, a newfound respect. Acknowledging Hal’s prediction, the king orders preparations to begin, and we see he has his own set of solid moral values: knowing that their ‘cause is just’ helps him to reconcile with his highly honourable conscience that there is indeed cause for war.

    Read More

  • Justifying The Mirror of All Christian Kings

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    When we look at Henry as a king we have to look in the context of

    Read More

  • Henry Vi's Weaknesses

    473 Words  | 1 Pages

    However, he didn't listen to the duke of york who desperately wanted a say. This could have been another reason for the outbreak of conflict because the people didn't think he always made the right decision and the duke of York didn't like not being listened to. Another problem was with patronage, as Henry was overgenerous, but only to some people, he would give lots of patronage to Somerset and Suffolk but none to York. This was even worse because he had borrowed from York and instead if paying him back, gave patronage to others. He gave away more and more money and land so that there wasn't much left for important times like war and to make people happy or come onto his side.

    Read More

  • Free Henry V Essays: Hierarchies And Social Class

    552 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Henry V, Shakespeare uses the English Hierarchy to shine light on the juxtaposition between the upper and lower classes through the use of the Chain of Being, the stereotypical relationships between yeoman and nobles and

    Read More

  • Henry V Christian King Essay

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the play Henry V written by Shakespeare. Henry was presented as the ideal Christian king. His mercy, wisdom, and other characteristics demonstrated the behavior of a Christian king. Yet at the same time he is shown to be man like any other. The way he behaves in his past is just like an ordinary man. But in Henry’s own mind he describes himself as “the mirror of all Christian kings” and also a “true lover of the holly church.

    Read More

  • The Strengths And Weaknesses Of Henry VIII 1509-1515

    972 Words  | 2 Pages

    his coronation. He was a young man coming up to the age of 18. He was

    Read More

  • Henry V, An Ideal Machiavellian Ruler

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".

    Read More

  • Qualities and Weaknesses of Shakespeare's Henry V as a King

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    Henry V is not a simple one as it has many aspects. By looking into

    Read More

  • The Appalling Leadership of King Henry V

    1259 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Henry V, the actions of King Henry portray him as an appalling leader. Among Henry's many negative traits, he allows himself to be influenced by people who have anterior motives. This is problematic because the decisions might not be the best decisions for the country, or neighboring countries. The bishops convinced Henry to take over France because they would be able to save land for the Church. Henry doesn't have the ability to accept responsibility for his actions, placing the blame on others. Before Henry begins to take over a French village, he tells the governor to surrender or risk having English troops terrorize civilians. This way, if the governor declines, it would be the governor's fault for the atrocities that would occur. Henry has gotten his troops to go along with the take over by manipulating them. He tells the soldiers that what they're doing is noble, and that they should be proud. In fact, they're attacking another country in order to conquer it. Henry's character comes off as coldhearted and careless. Henry shows ruthlessness towards civilians, threatening them with atrocities. He's careless with his soldiers, thoughtlessly allowing their executions, or playing hurtful games with them.

    Read More

  • The Transformation of Henry Fleming in The Red Badge of Courage

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

      Henry's final step in maturation was finally made through the sacrifice of his companions, and their pressuring him to lead the charge. The reaction of one soldier to another is the basis of war, as camaraderie is the methodology by which wars are won.   Henry gave witness to the horrors of war, the atrocities of battle, the deaths of his friends, and later a life of victory.   The ultimate transformation in Henry's character leading to a mature temperament was found by finding himself in the confusion of war and companionship.

    Read More

  • Father/Son Relationships in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part One

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    The relationship between a father and his son is an important theme in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part One, as it relates to the two main characters of the play, Prince Hal and Hotspur. These two characters, considered as youths and future rulers to the reader, are exposed to father-figures whose actions will influence their actions in later years. Both characters have two such father-figures; Henry IV and Falstaff for Prince Hal, and the Earl of Northumberland and the Earl of Worcester for Hotspur. Both father-figures for Hal and Hotspur have obvious good and bad connotations in their influence on the character. For example, Falstaff, in his drinking and reveling, is clearly a poor influence for a future ruler such as Prince Hal, and Worcester, who shares Hotspur's temper, encourages Hotspur to make rash decisions. The entire plot of the play is based on which father-figure these characters choose to follow: had they chosen the other, the outcome would have been wholly different.

    Read More

  • Prince Henry Rite Of Passage

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the play, Prince Henry develops from a rascal to a responsible adult and by doing so, earns the respect and acceptance from his father King Henry IV. In act one, Shakespeare introduces the idea that Prince Henry is an inadequate heir to the throne. The play

    Read More

  • Henry VI of England

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    For the simple fact that when Henry VI was younger and not allowed to take an active role in leading England, he did not really care about running the country. Henry was such a spiritually deep man that he lacked the worldly wisdom necessary to allow him to rule effectively (Wikipedia). Henry was more of an indecisive pushover.

    Read More

  • Leadership in William Shakespeare's Henry V

    3282 Words  | 7 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... In conclusion, the character of Henry dominates the play throughout. overshadowing the other characters in the story. He is a religious man, reinforced.

    Read More

  • Hero in Shakespeare’s Henry V and The Hero by Siegfried Sassoon

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    Shakespeare’s Henry’s most remarkable and heroic quality is his resolve; once Henry has his mind set on accomplishing something he uses every tool at his disposal to see that it is achieved. ‘If we may pass, we will; if we be hinder’d we shall your tawny ground with your red blood discolour’ Henry meticulously presents himself as an unstoppable force to which his enemies must choose to react; although his methods are morally questionable they a...

    Read More

More about Henry V Leadership Analysis

Open Document