The Strengths And Weaknesses Of Henry VIII 1509-1515
There are many differing views of Henry VIII, some people see him as a
scholar and others as a jovial and merry king. Each of these opinions
views different characteristics of Henry VIII that contributed to his
strengths and weaknesses. Henry, when he succeeded the throne had
several problems that he had to address. There was also much
expectation of him as his father had been viewed as a miser and a
repressor and people saw the need for dramatic change. Ian Dawson says
that at the change of monarch there was a "sense of breaking free from
imprisonment" so much was the relief of Henry VIII 's succession.
One of the most obvious strengths Henry had was this enthusiasm to his
reign, people supported him and there was no threat or opposition to
his coronation. He was a young man coming up to the age of 18. He was
intelligent and dynamic and keen on kingly sports such as jousting,
which have contributed to a popular image of him. Thomas More said of
him "our king does not wish for gold or gems or precious stones, but
virtue, glory and immortality. This knightly image of him would have
done much to inspire confidence in him reigning the country.
Another strength would be the kingdom his father had left him. The
Crown of England was solvent and had benefited from Henry VII 's close
financial scrutiny. The Kingdom of England was respected amongst the
European powers and was a much sought after ally. Thus foreign courts
would have wanted Henry VIII' s favour. In 1510 despite Henry's wishes
of going to war with France he signed a peace treaty with the French.
However he went to war ...
... middle of paper ...
...as not afraid
to go to an all out war, which he demonstrated. His tactics to the
nobles was drastically different, his father had taken away some of
their power and decreased the nobility numbers, the opposite of this
can be seen in Henry VIII. One thing they were very similar on was the
desire to secure the dynasty through a male heir.
In 1515 Henry is a king who has made an impression very quickly on
England by going to war and being the reverse of his father in
financial matters. He is a king who has secured support from powerful
figures amongst the English nobles and also amongst the foreign states
such as Spain and the Holy Roman Empire. Henry has put himself in a
strong position because of this and this is what makes his rule one
that stretches over four decades, he did not have great amounts of
opposition.
“The key factor in limiting royal power in the years 1399-1509 was the king’s relationship with parliament.”
Prestige Rather than National Security was the Main Concern of Henry VIII's Foreign Policy from 1529-1547
For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".
The Challenges to Henry VII Security Between 1487 and the end of 1499 Henry VII faced many challenges to his throne from 1487 to the end of 1499. These included many rebellions and pretenders to his throne. To what extent was the success he dealt with them differs although the overriding answer is that by the end of his reign he had secured his throne and set up a dynasty, with all challengers removed. Lambert Simnel challenged Henry’s security when Richard Symonds passed him off as Warwick. Simnel was taken to Ireland, which had become the centre of Yorkist plotting.
training when he came to power in 1485, had managed in the time he was
her outer appearance. Is there a similarity in the early modern English and present day
When we look at Henry as a king we have to look in the context of
Peace of London in 1518, the Field of the Cloth of Gold and the Calais
honorble ruler. Henry IV was king of France between 1589 and 1610. He was supported
Henry V is not a simple one as it has many aspects. By looking into
then when your next in line for the throne, to bare the weight of a
Henry VI had a lot of weaknesses with foreign policy, his inability to make decisions, patronage, Richard duke of York, finance and evil council. With foreign policy he showed weakness in defending his country, after his father Henry VII had conquered land in France, he lost it. He lost Normandy and Gascony in 1451 due to defeat in France. This affected morale and the incomes of nobles because they had lost, reducing their reputation, especially as they had lost some of their own land, and the incomes went down because money was spent on war, so less money was available to give as income. This could have been a reason for the outbreak of conflict because the people would not have been happy with their situation. Henry's next weakness was his inability to make decisions.
Passage Analysis - Act 5 Scene 1, lines 115-138. Shakespeare’s ‘King Henry IV Part I’ centres on a core theme: the conflict between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal’s inner conflict, the country’s political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of certain values exists on many levels, and so is both a strikingly present and an underlying theme throughout the play.
In the late 1400’s the House of York fought the House of Lancaster for the English crown. Because Lancaster’s heraldic badge
his life. I hope to change this flaw in the history books by telling you as