Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short essay on gender based violence
Gender - based violence
Gender - based violence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short essay on gender based violence
Gender-based violence refers to violence that occurs as a result of the normative role expectations. It is often the result of gendered power inequalities that exploit distinctions between the two genders. Although gender-based violence, mainly targets females as victims, males are also vulnerable victims. There has been growing visibility of men’s violence against other men throughout society. Men’s violence against men is demonstrated through multiple forms of violence, ranging from subtle verbal putdowns to physical assaults and murder. This is due to the patriarchal gender regimes where males belong to the social category that is associated with power. The reading “Youth Violence and Hegemonic Masculinity among Pacific Islander and Asian …show more content…
Based on Connell’s hierarchy of masculinities, there are four different types of masculinity; hegemonic, complicit, marginalised, and subordinate. Hegemonic masculinity is placed at the top of the hierarchy of masculinities. It is socially supported as a normative ideology about being a man given within a dominant society. In order to fit the concept of hegemonic masculinity, men must exhibit a number of features. This includes being white, heterosexual, physically tough, emotionless and economically successful. The remaining three masculinities are placed below the hegemonic masculinity in the hierarchy. Complicit masculinity consists most men in society, who do not adhere to hegemonic masculinity, but who are compliant with its standards. (CEO). Marginalised masculinity refers to men who support the hegemonic masculinity, but they are prevented due to their ethnic, class, and race. (Poor, men of colour). Subordinate masculinity refers to men who exhibits the opposite values of hegemonic masculinity. (Gay men). Each hierarchy holds different structural orders of power in the male construction. Since most men cannot fit the ideal hegemonic masculinity, men conducting violence is a way to enact hypermasculinity to raise their power. Those who fall under the hegemonic masculinity in the hierarchy tend to experience violence and suffer …show more content…
Social learning theory was developed by Albert Bandura, it emphasis how individuals learn through observing others and how the social environment makes them act in certain ways. With regards to men’s violence against men, males learn through the socialization of their surrounded upbringing. For example, men can pursue violence through childhood witnessing of their male peer violence against other males or exposure to violence in their family. This is known as the intergenerational cycle of
The topics that Joe Ehrmann uses as framework for his Building Men for Others program are quite intriguing and make you really question masculinity. The first topic, rejecting false masculinity, can be interpreted a few different ways. In the book, it states: “As young boys, we’re told to be men, or to act like men” soon followed with “we’ve got all these parents say ‘be a man’ to boys that have no concept of what that means. I completely agree with the statement of Joe Ehrmann and often question the definition of ‘being a man’. Many boys and men will reject the idea of a man being anything other than being big and strong or having power.
The concept of masculinity is considered as the qualities and characteristics of a man, typical what is appropriate to a man. In this article, A Community Psychology of Men and Masculinity: Historical and Conceptual Review, The author Eric S. Mankowski and Kenneth I. Maton, analyze four main themes: "Men as gendered beings, the privilege and damage of being a masculine man, men as a privileged group, and men’s power and subjective powerlessness. The second and fourth themes are described as
Jensen provides evidence throughout the text for three assumptions on why masculinity must be terminated from pertaining to just males. It is proposed that masculinity is harmful for both men and women, that men are surrendering their humanity by conforming with masculinity, and
She taught at universities both in Australia and the United States. Connell highly disagreed that the ideas about what established masculinity are ethically definite. In other words, masculinity is important to whom is referred to. For example, “if women are seen as weak, passive and emotional, then men are supposed to be strong, aggressive, and rational” (Seidman, 221). Additionally, masculinity is based on how people interact with each other in which correlates with their race, class, and sexuality. With this said, Connell said, “to recognize diversity in masculinity: relations of alliance, dominance and subordination… This is a gender politics within masculinity” (Seidman, 223). To point out Connell’s theorizing masculinity, she believes that diversity defines masculinity has its own relationships with authorities. In our text, Seidman gave a brief example of how the roles carry out to the social authority such as President, Senator, CEO, General, media executive, or surgeon. It is stated that while there are many senators, executives, or CEOs who are women, it is definite identify as masculinity because people think those high authorities is only for a male role. In our text, Connell has mentioned that “every society has a dominant or a “hegemonic” type of masculinity” (223). This means that she believes men has the power or control type of their masculinity in the
This shows that the idea of being the most masculine is embedded deep inside and is almost like a disease whose symptoms can become domestic violence.
The documentary Tough Guise reveals that the cause of violence traces back to cultural codes on masculinity and societal expectations rooted from such codes. Prior to watching the documentary, it was difficult to understand how culture played a part in men’s violence—it was thought to be more of a natural phenomenon linked to men’s biological traits. The documentary, however, disproves this: men’s violence in America is “made” by the society, not “given”, and thus cultural implications should be explored to understand where the violence really comes from.
Masculinity is described as possession of attributes considered typical of a man. Hegemonic masculinity is a form of masculine character with cultural idealism and emphasis that connects masculinity to competitiveness, toughness, and women subordination. Masculinity hegemonic is the enforcement of male dominion over a society. Masculine ideology dates back to the time of agrarian and the industrial revolution in Europe when survival compelled men to leave their homesteads to work in industries to earn a living for their families while women remained at home to take care of family affairs (Good and Sherrod 210). Women did not work in industries then because industrial labor was considered too physical beyond their capacity. This led to definition of roles which placated the position of men in a society while condemning women as mere subordinates who cannot do without men. The critics of gender stereotypes in America describe the following five hegemonic features of masculinity: frontiersman ship, heterosexuality, occupational achievement, familial patriarchy, and physical force and control (Trujillo 4). The advent of the 20th century led to sweeping changes in American masculinity.
his Essay will analyse, introduce, and discuss the terms Hegemonic Masculinity and Emphasized femininity, if it still applies in modern times and the use of these concepts to comprehend the role of the man and female in Eastern Asia, in relation to post-war Japan. In order to present a clear and linear argument I will divide this essay into three parts: In the first part I will define the term hegemonic masculinity, the common traits and the influence that it has in society; the essay will continue then in explaining and outlining the term emphasized femininity. The second part will analyse the impact of the notions of hegemonic masculinity and emphasized femininity in relation to post war Japan has. The last part will briefly identify some
The rest of the article went on to elaborate on how the American attachment to "dominance models of manhood," according to Amanda Marcotte of Salon, is a significant factor as to why or culture has such high levels of violence. Supporting aggressiveness, physicality, and anger within masculinity makes it toxic and harms
The first study looks at the different types of masculinity and such as hegemonic masculinity and how it relates to the hierarchy masculinities. The researchers observed male student’s attitudes in male dominance, such as power and violence. They further examine Connell’s social theory of gender by looking at two different schools and studying the relationships between the boys (Lusher, Robins, 2010). This theory is widely used to explain the hierarchical behavior in the use of masculine power, such as complicit, dominant, and subordinate masculinities (Lusher, Robins, 2010). Their methods involved studying the schools, which are religious, based and are all boy schools ...
Part one, “The Framework of Violence against Women,” sets the blueprint for what drives individuals, particularly men, to act on their impulses of violence triggered by an underlying fear or loathing, especially those instances of sexual depravity. Sex is comparable to power, creating power over others and thus creating a sense of power within. Violence is introduced at an early age, found in children’s cartoons, television shows, and popular video games. Society has become numb to the objectification of women to the point that violence has become accepted, and the behaviors are not only justified by the oppressor, but also believed by
In the views of Micheal Kimmel “hegemonic masculinity” is a socially constructed process where men are pressured by social norms of masculine ideals to perform behaviors of a “true man” and its influence on young male’s growth. It is the ideology that being a man with power and expressing control over women is a dominant factor of being a biological male. The structure of masculinity was developed within the 18th to 19th century, as men who owned property and provided for his family with strength related work environments was the perfect example of being a generic “American man.” Kimmel introduces Marketplace Manhood and its relation to American men. He states, “Marketplace Masculinity describes the normative definition of American masculinity.
National data gives us an indication of the severity of this issue. When 1 in 5-woman report being victims of severe physical violence (NISVS, 2010), we must ask ourselves if enough is being done to prevent this from occurring. From a historical point, there has always almost been a distinction from men on woman violence. Based on the disparity of cases reported, male inflicted violence on females is much higher and prevalent. When the perpetrators of DV, and IPV are predominately males, we can no longer dismissed this issue as a cultural, or
The concept of hegemonic masculinity, as described by R. W. Connell, is becoming more applicable than ever, namely in the world of sport. This notion was developed nearly twenty-five years ago, yet remains highly influential in the social construction of gender roles. In current Western societies, there is an automatic assumption that women involved in sports are all lesbians, and men posses more masculine traits than one who is not involved in sports. This double standard emphasizes the inequalities within the athletic community. The emphasis on masculinity brings forth different consequences for men and women, where men are regarded as strong and powerful, while women are intrinsically seen as more masculine (Baks & Malecek,
This means that men who fail to conform to the ideal standard set by the dominant group of masculinity are accordingly subordinated as well. An example would be that of homosexual men, who are “subordinated to straight men” through “political and cultural exclusion, cultural abuse… legal violence, street violence, economic discrimination and personal boycotts” (Connell, 1995/2005, p.78). As homosexuality is more easily associated with femininity rather than masculinity, this leads to a greater ability to view homosexuality as a deviance from the ideal, dominant form of masculinity, thus contributing to its subordination. Here, Connell introduces subordination as a part of one of the relationships needed to analyze hegemonic masculinity – the relationship of “hegemony, subordination and complicity” (1995/2005, p.81). In this essay, however, I will be primarily using Connell’s other framework: marginalization and authorization, to consider hegemonic masculinity and its link to