Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Heathrow terminal 5 project purpose aims and objectives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The list for recent engineering marvels in the UK’s air travel industry perhaps ought to mention the expansion as a major project. The mega infrastructure status of the Heathrow Airport, involving Terminal 5 project targeted additional capacity for the airport to reach the 35 million passengers mark annually. Built before the current air travel engineering and related technologies, Heathrow has been transformed in bits over the years, to take up the obstacle of handling air travel demand. As Brady and Davies (2010) observed, the airport has over the years found it inevitable to accommodate bigger aircraft models witnessed for this age and civilianization. “Here was a mega- project that was on schedule and on budget since construction had begun, bucking all the trends of previous mega-projects...” (Brady and Davies 2010, p. 151)
In terms of innovativeness, the bulk of the project included several innovative construction and safety installations to match with the best standards in the world. At the scale of £4.3 billion, the stature and the 19-year duration of the Terminal 5 project exceeded ordinary mega projects, making the project one of the biggest across industries (Brady and Davies 2010). Some of the project improvement areas targeting travel experience included the following innovative components.
According to Coop et al. (2007), the Heathrow Terminal 5 mega project had to incorporate huge runway reconstruction component for improved traffic handling. Using modern technology, the construction required advanced assessment of the runway foundation to ensure lasting engineering works. Perhaps the most outstanding innovation noted by the authors refers to the investigation of runway stability attributes, through elaborate tests ...
... middle of paper ...
... the allocated budget but also saved public money. “T5 is already a testament to the skill and hard work of the thousands of people, including architects, planners, construction workers, airport and airline staff, who have together made the building happen,” (Brady and Davies 2010, p. 152). As mentioned, the involvement of government agencies and the highest office in the country facilitated security in securing funding needs of the megaproject (Fugeman et al. 2008). Involvement of efficient integrated management systems, the T5 project saved up to £200 million. Integrating every project component ensured that nearly every component was delivered in time, with only a small fraction of incompleteness reported at the time of launch. When obstacles emerged, the T5 integration score enabled the management to bring the operations of the airport into control within hours.
The series of events as shown in the ABC documentary with the application of PMBOK in complex projects will be evaluated in the following report. The Federation Square project was launched in March 1996 then embarked in 1998 and was opened in October 2002, two years behind schedule however with all manufacturing still not complete (Vic Auditor-General 2003) requiring considerable post-completion maintenance and support and further wasting of valuable resources. This was the culmination of six years hard work coupled with two different political parties and involved thousands of contract personal costing $473.3million (Report on Public Sector Agencies, May 2003 2.232). As well as been constantly besieged with issues and heavy criticism from the general public the project is an example of the major problems that can impede a project that is outside the total control of the project
Reducing unit costs and increasing the volume of units. By changing the airplane fleet to have bigger planes they increased the volume of seats by 70%.
Challenged by an old, obsolete airport, the city of Denver decided on not only doing an expansion but ultimately building a fully dedicated facility in an entirely new location. Twice the size of Manhattan, the airport was to be the largest in the United States and was specially designed to handle concentrated hubbing traffic (Montealgre et al, 1996, p.4). The master plan encompassed a fast tracked build-design scheme that called for utmost operational efficiency which would consequently attract large airlines to choose DIA as their main Southwestern hub (Nice, n.d.). Dominance of the DIA would fuel an economic boom in Denver, but for this to take place—a fast passenger turnover would be required, leading to the perception that they had to implement an airport-wide automated baggage handling system in spite of the known risks. This critical piece of the airport wou...
As airline industry is a competitive marketplace, the airline companies use new technologies to improve their efficiency and decrease the overhead costs, including ‘advanced aircraft engine technology, IT solutions, and mobile technology’ (Cederholm 2014). The technology changes including technology improvement, new innovation and disruptive technology. The disruptive technology need to meet the characteristics of ‘simplicity, convenience, accessibility and affordability’ (Christensen 1995). The technology changes would bring both opportunities and threats to airline companies. Since Labour cost and fuel costs occupy 50% of most airlines operating cost (Groot 2014). Therefore, if new technologies could be disruptive in the two aspects, there will be important changes to current airline
Initial projections show that the current schedule will take 50 weeks to finish with a final budget estimate of $3.152 million. Although the project estimate comes in under budget, the time frame for completion extends beyond the acceptable 45 weeks. Therefore, the following discussion takes a closer look at the project's conditions by developing a project priority matrix, project network, and a Gantt chart to help Bjorn Ericksen and his team reduce the project duration. The author then offers a project closure approach.
"It was the jet Boeing didn't build that averted what could have become one of the worst crash landings in the company's 91-year history--and cleared Boeing to conquer the skies again."(Masters, 2007). Boeing's Management team's work hard to plan what project's will be best for customers, lead to the largest returns to shareholders, and keep a reputation of being a world leader in the aviation industry. "In October 2002, executives of the aircraft manufacturer met with a group of global airline representatives at a conference center on the Seattle waterfront. The executives were trying desperately to figure out what to build next to hold off a soaring Airbus."(Masters, 2007) Boeing had made plans to build a high speed jetliner prior to this meeting. Through careful planning and expert decision making Boeing officials found that the world was more interested in comfort and efficiency. Boeing's high speed aircraft would have been a huge economic let down because of the huge price tag and expensive operating costs. After that meeting Boeing changed plans to make the Dreamliner which is a more cost effective and comfortable aircraft that has enough orders to keep Boeing busy building the aircraft for customers until the year 2015. While Boeing has spent many resources planning what to build, Boeing is now faced with the problems of how to meet customer demands of the new aircraft.
The project used numerous resources which included manpower and money to achieve the set targets. But evaluation upon its completion shows that there were some positive aspects and also negative outcomes of the project. Hence it is fair to compare both the negatives and the positives so as to come up with an overall verdict and conclusion on the success achieved and the failures/challenges encountered...
Projects are widely used by many organizations and government institutions in the course of conducting their business. One of the reasons for this is because they have been proven to be effective in initiating change and translating strategic programs into daily activities. However, it has been established that most projects fail to deliver on time, budget, and customer specifications. In most cases, this failure is caused by over-optimism by the project management team. This over-optimism commonly referred to as optimism bias can simply be defined as overestimating the projects benefits and conversely underestimating its cost and duration time. Research have portrayed that this is often caused by failure to properly identify, understand, and manage effectively the risk associated with the project therefore putting its success at jeopardy(Mott McDonald, 2002). Fortunately, this biasness can be detected and minimized during the project gateway process.
Airport planning, once carried out utilizing a single future forecast, failed to account for the complexity and uncertainty of the aviation industry. Today, it is widely assumed airport success can only be met through the utilization of a flexible, integrated planning approach that sees forecasts as incorrect.
Political · The expansion of the European Union (EU)· BAA’s proposed Stanstead expansion· CAA’s new regulations on airport charges
A project of the magnitude of the Dallas Cowboy's Stadium would have anyone excited and anxious to see it begin. As excited as they may have been, the project manager seemed very well prepared and used various tools and processes to have a plan in place and complete the project. One of the benefits of planning is that it improves efficiency (Wysocki, R., P. 145). "By doing tasks concurrently, you shorten the duration of the project" (Wysocki, R., p. 145). Many times throughout the project a lot of the work was done simultaneously. For example, in the course of the roof construction, the project manager developed a plan that included having an air space coordinator to have 17 cranes work together. Additionally, “at peak construction, nearly
London Heathrow Airport is one of the major airports owned and operated by privatized company formerly known as British Airport Authority (BAA plc), now Heathrow Airport Holdings. Heathrow Airport Holdings owns and operates four major airports in the UK, including London Heathrow, Aberdeen, Glasgow and Southampton. However, in this case study, London Heathrow would be the writer’s main interest as to look at the effect of its privatization and find the possible impacts that it might have on the economy and society in general.
The heart begins racing the moment the car pulls into the airport parking lot. The smell of jet fuel, automobile exhaust, and hot tarmac combine to assault the senses with images of exotic escapes and the kind of freedom that can only come from airports. I feel the thrum of the engines at takeoff and the vibration of the plane during the flight in my skin. I see people listening to MP3s and playing video games. I hear the couple behind me chatting about the weather in Florida and the possibility of rain. I recognize the smell of fading perfume that women are wearing. Chanel, Windsong and White Diamonds clash with the smell of popcorn and Quizno sandwiches.
There was a huge and a high pressure government project which had to be completed in a short span of time. It had several teams associated with different
In this process, it was important for me to establish the sense of urgency as well as the vision of the project. I accomplished this by meeting and working with the stakeholders, securing their consensus and working with the technical team to develop technical...