In Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad, Marlow’s journey across Africa is seen as a journey inwards into the truths of imperialism. Through literary devices such as paradox, syntax, and antithesis, Conrad is able to delineate Marlow’s realization of the realities of European colonialism as he ventures deeper into the African jungle. Marlow’s journey up the Congo River is described in a strange way that suggests an air of haziness and blurriness of the surrounding atmosphere. Through repetition of “unearthly,” Conrad reinforces the idea that Marlow and his men are entering a “prehistoric earth,” where they are out of reach from their civilized customs. Additionally, the use of “earth” in the opening paragraph is deliberately antithetical to “unearth,” where the juxtaposition serves to highlight Marlow’s disquieting and unnatural …show more content…
The shackles he refers to isn’t literal chains, instead, the “conquered monster” symbolizes the powers of conquest. By saying that “we are accustomed to look upon the shackled form of a conquered monster,” Marlow inherently admits that he is accustomed to the idea of a conquered earth, where he holds authority over the land. This sense of entitlement is prevalent among all Europeans coming into Africa. However, by the break in thought portrayed by the dash and by saying “but there,” Marlow understands that the place he is in cannot be classified as the same as where he is from. Instead, he realizes that his initial impression of this place is discordant with memory of it, and that the land here is an entity that cannot be conquered by civilization. In this “prehistoric earth,” the nature and the environment is a power, or an unshackled monster, that the “pilgrims” have no authority over. The dominating forces of the river, the jungle, and the climate all highlight the futility of the European attempts to “civilize” the
In the short story, “The Story of An Hour”, written by Kate Choppin, a woman with a heart trouble is told her husband had passed away in a railroad disaster. Mrs. Mallard was depressed, then she came to a realization that she was free. Back in the day this story was written, women did not have many rights. They were overruled by their husband. As she became more aware of how many doors her husband death would open, she had passed away. The doctors had said she had died of heart disease--of the joy that kills. The irony in the situation was that as she was dying, her husband walked through the door, alive.
Truman Capote showcases his very distinct style of writing in his true crime novel, In Cold Blood. Capote intentionally frames ruthless murderer Perry Smith as a relatable, well-intentioned human throughout the whole novel, and employs various rhetorical devices to show us that Perry is not just a stone cold killer. Specifically, Capote uses diction comprised of complex words, interviews conducted by Capote personally in which he interacted with the suspects and their loved ones, and sentence structure that came off as very to the point, in order to illustrate Perry’s dynamic and unique personality, opposed to the one dimensional heartless murderer many made him out to be.
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
In the novel The Stranger by Albert Camus, the narrator’s monotonous tone makes the reader experience a lack of emotion and feeling. The novel starts off describing Mersault’s current job and how he must go on leave in order to attend his mother’s funeral. He and his mother have been disconnected for some time as they had come to a mutual agreement with her staying in an elderly home. Mersault, the main protagonist, did not have the money or time to tend to his mother. The elderly home was the best option for the both of them. When he returns home from the funeral, Mersault gets caught up in external affairs he should not be in. He ends up writing a break up letter to Raymond’s girlfriend, which drives the rest of the story. Raymond beats his
Marlow sympathizes with the natives when he sees the violence and physical torture they endure at the hand of the Europeans. The colonizers seem merciless shown by Conrad’s writing, “I 've seen the devil of violence, and the devil of greed…” One of the ways that the Europeans rationalize their inhumane treatment of the natives was to dehumanize them by describing the Africans as “shadows” or “shapes.” Additionally, Kurtz is more than just a cruel abuser, but his character is also developed into a hypnotizing story teller, an academic, and an empowering orator. Marlow describes him saying,”…Kurtz was a remarkable man. He had something to say.” Although Marlow does show this admiration for Kurtz, he is still critical about Kurtz’s treatment over the native Africans and thinks his violence is unnecessary. In the novella, Kurtz is the symbol of European colonialism because his approach to keeping order and producing profits are brutal. This cruelty is symbolized in the heads of the rebels placed on spikes surrounding Kurtz’s cabin. Marlow disrespects Kurtz for abusing the natives rather than educating and civilizing them as they were supposed
In the present era of decolonization, Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness presents one of fictions strongest accounts of British imperialism. Conrad’s attitude towards imperialism and race has been the subject of much literary and historical debate. Many literary critics view Conrad as accepting blindly the arrogant attitude of the white male European and condemn Conrad to be a racist and imperialists. The other side vehemently defends Conrad, perceiving the novel to be an attack on imperialism and the colonial experience. Understanding the two viewpoints side by side provides a unique understanding that leads to a commonality that both share; the novel simply presents a criticism of colonialists in Africa. The novel merely portrays a fictional account of British imperialism in the African jungle, where fiction offers maximum entertainment it lacks in focus. The novel is not a critique of European colonialism and imperialism, but rather a presentation of colonialism and the theme of darkness throughout the novel sheds a negative light on the selfishness of humanity and the system that was taking advantage of the native peoples. In Joseph Conrad’s novel, Heart of Darkness, Conrad presents a criticism of British imperial colonization not for the purpose of taking sides, but with aims of bettering the system that was in place during Conrad’s experience in the African Congo. Conrad uses the character of Marlow and his original justification of imperialism so long as it was efficient and unselfish that was later transformed when the reality of colonialism displayed the selfishness of man, to show that colonialism throughout history displaces the needs of the mother country over the colonized peoples and is thus always selfish.
Civilization is not as advanced as first assumed. Joseph Conrad asserts this disheartening message in his novel, Heart of Darkness. The novel follows a European man reliving his journey to the Congo through story telling to his shipmates. Through Marlow’s journey, Conrad reveals the stark contrasts between European civilization and African savagery. Heart of Darkness explores the struggles of different societies with an intention to expose the weaknesses of a complicated imperialistic ideal.
Conrad’s shifting setting introduces new environments and attitudes for Marlow to cope with. Marlow begins the novel in “a narrow and deserted street in deep shadow, [with] high houses, innumerable windows with venetian blinds, a dead silence, grass sprouting right and left, [and] immense double doors standing ponderously ajar” (Conrad 45). Nearly all of the surroundings have intimidating connotations, which surprisingly fight Marlow into a comfortably safe and secure standing. Marlow notices the map in the office, and examines it to see just where his travels will take him. After observing the map, he points out that he was not going to the points of Africa that seem welcoming but he “was going into the yellow. Dead in the centre. And the river was there – fascinating – deadly – like a snake” (45). He already realizes he will have trouble transitioning into the new environment, being surrounded by what seems like death. Because Marlow grows accustomed to the urbanized streets of Brussels, the difficulty of the transition to the Congo develops exponentially. Before Marlow knows it, he travels to a land with “trees, tress, millions of trees, massive, immense, running up high” and they “made [him] feel very small, very lost” (75). Marlow, already apprehensive of the change to the Congo, shows his loss of confidence in his new environment.
In Joseph Conrad’s novel, Heart of Darkness, Marlow enters the Congo with a perception that the European there are being altruistic and bettering the lives of the natives, but as he ventures deeper into the Congolese jungle, he begins to question his views. In the sickening and morbid story, Conrad explores the nature of truth and how preconceived notions can twist the truth or alter it entirely. To get at Conrad’s deeper meaning in Heart of Darkness, a firm understanding of the historical context is need because the book itself was based on the intricacies and beliefs of the time period. He criticizes imperialism, but specifically, Belgian occupation of the Congo.
Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad is a novella that explores the inhuman treatment of African people as they were brutally enslaved by British rulers under the umbrella of colonisation. Through this novella, contemporary audience are able to recognise the immoral actions which practise corruption, discrimination and ultimately, imperialism. Joseph Conrad, has successfully illustrated to the audience the issues of colonisation and civilisation within the Victorian era. Universal relevance is valid within this book as it educates the audience on how excessive power leads to corruption.
In Joseph Conrad's novel Heart of Darkness the story of Marlow, an Englishman travelling physically up an unnamed river in Africa and psychologically into the human possibility, is related to the reader through several narrational voices. The primary first-person narrator is an Englishman aboard the yawl, the 'Nellie', who relates the story as it is told to him by Marlow. Within Marlow's narrative are several instances when Marlow relies upon others, such as the Russian, the brickmaker and the Manager at the central station, for information. Therefore, through complicated narrational structure resulting from the polyphonous account, Conrad can already represent to the reader the theme of the shifting nature of reality. As each narrator relates what is important to them, the audience must realise that each voice edits, absents information and is affected by their own experiences and the culture and ideology within which they judge and respond. Therefore the text reveals itself as non-essentialist. It is also seen through the narratorial voices, who are all significantly European males, although challenging the received view of imperial praxis as glorious and daring, a racist and patriarchal text, which eventually, through Marlow's own assimilation of the ideology of his time, reinscribes and replicates that which it attempts to criticise: European action in Africa.
“ The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much.” (Conrad 65) So stated Marlow as though this was his justification for ravaging the Congo in his search for ivory. Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness shows the disparity between the European ideal of civilization and the reality of it as is evidenced by the domination, torture, exploitation and dehumanization of the African population. Heart of Darkness is indicative of the evil and greed in humanity as personified by Kurtz and Marlow.
... to a man's soul. Marlow's journey was not only into the heart of Africa, but also into the heart of Kurtz where he realizes the truth of colonialism and the potential evil it entails.
Educated people reading Conrad's novel should understand the differences between the past and the present, and be forgiving of his language. The deeper the expedition progressed into the center of the continent, the more isolation was felt by the crew. In a sense, Central Africa IS the antithesis of Western Europe -- it lacks not only the hectic urban structures but also the Social Darwinist attitudes of the time. It is in this remote environment that man must face his true self without any illusions, and the darkness of the human soul is apparent. The uncivilized environment may mock western civilization's refinement, but this is not derogatory towards the jungle, but rather an eye-opener to the European audience.
“The offing was barred by a black bank of clouds, and the tranquil waterway leading to the uttermost ends of the earth flowed somber under an overcast sky – seemed to lead into the heart of an immense darkness.” (96)