I was deeply disturbed as I read through some of the court cases provided by the NIAAA (“National”, 2011, p. 10-15). I never experienced or witnessed hazing during high school or college. Recently, it was revealed that the football team at Lake Zurich High School, IL had a major hazing scandal that lasted decades (Keilman, 2017). The sexual acts and violence that coaches allowed to happen is unbelievable. I remember when the story broke on the radio I was shocked to the point where I didn’t feel comfortable describing what occurred to my female teaching partners.
Hazing almost always involves a group of perpetrators because it is an initiation process into a group. According to Caudill (2014) “hazing has a tendency to be an institutionalized
…show more content…
form of harassment/intimidation centering on initiation rights connected to certain school clubs and activities.” For example, upper classman may force freshman to partake in an initiation. Even if one upper classman tells the freshman what to do, he or she is not acting alone. He or she has the support of the other upperclassman. Hazing usually involves a group whereas bullying is carried out by a single person (Jonas, 2017). Many of the famous hazing court cases, like the one in Lake Zurich, involved objects and physical abuse (Keilman, 2017).
However, hazing can occur through different means. According to Allan and Madden (2008) “Hazing is any activity expected of someone joining or participating in a group that humiliates, degrades, abuses, or endangers them regardless of a person’s willingness to participate” (p.14). The high profile cases usually involve alcohol and violent behavior but according to most definitions degrading and humiliating people is considered hazing. This could include forcing people into humiliating or embarrassing situations. Forcing students to run without clothes on would be an …show more content…
example. Hazing can occur without any spoken words. Allan and Madden (2008) provide a list of hazing practices that require no talking, including being tied up and taking to a remote location (p. 9-10). Ignoring certain group of people or giving them the silent treatment could also be another way of hazing (Allan & Madden, 2008, p. 9). This seems harmless compared to some other forms of hazing but it can still be detrimental to students. Treating your first year players differently could be a form of hazing.
If you degrade or embarrass them this would be hazing. However, allowing upperclassmen seat selection on the bus is not hazing because they earned it. Coaches need to make it clear that this privilege can be taken away. Some of the rituals in sports for first year players are fun and I believe innocent. For example, rookie pitchers carry a backpack full of candy for the veterans. We did this in college and I think it was a fun tradition. I am interested; do any of you see this as hazing?
Finally, off campus training without supervision is not wise. First, if the coaches are aware of this situation and do not supervise they may be negligent if something were to happen. I think off campus trips or camps are great but coaches need to be there to supervise. Rockford Lutheran goes on a trip to southern Illinois every year. This is a great bonding experience for the guys and a great way to start the year but we are also diligent in monitoring their behavior not only for hazing but to make sure they are respectful to
everyone. References Allan, E., & Madden, M., (2008). Hazing in view: College students at risk. Retrieved from http://www.stophazing.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/hazing_in_view_web1.pdf Caudill, K. (2014, July 24). What is hazing? Retrieved from https://www.nfhs.org/sports-resource-content/starwhat-is-hazing/ Jonas, J. (2017, September 6). Hazing in High School Athletics. Retrieved September 22, 2017, from https://www.nfhs.org/articles/hazing-in-high-school-athletics/ Keilman, J. (2017, February 02). Lawsuit: Lake Zurich High hazing included forced sex acts. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-lake-zurich-hazing-lawsuit-met-20170201-story.html National Interscholastic Athletic Administrators Association (NIAAA). (2011). Leadership training course 508 athletic administration: Legal issues III: Hazing in interscholastic programs constitutional & civil rights of student athletes Statutory law & athletics [FLSA, ADA, HIPPA, FERPA] Legal issues related to sports event security (2nd ed.). National Interscholastic Athletic Administrators Association.
This case involves a sophomore at a high school named Christine Franklin, who alleged that she was sexually harassed and abused by a teacher and sports coach by the name of Andrew Hill. These allegations were occurring from 1986-1988, a total of two years. These allegations included Hill having explicit conversations with Franklin, forcing her to kiss him, and forceful intercourse on school grounds. Franklin claimed that she let teachers and administrators know about the harassment and that other students were going through the same harassment. The result of telling the teachers and administrators was that nothing was done about the situation and even encouraged Franklin not
In recent years several high profile national cases have brought hazing to the forefront in American society as a real issue and a problematic one at that. According to recent statistics from the University of Maine, 1.5 million high school students are hazed each year. Of the athletes who have reported hazing, 40% have reported that a coach or advisor was aware of the activity. 22% report that the coach was actually involved in the activities. (Allan & Madden, 2008). Moreover, 36% of students say they would not report hazing primarily because “there’s no one to tell,” and 27% feel that officials or coaches won’t handle the situation right. In additional research a survey was conducted in which coaches were questioned about whether they believe that hazing goes on in their community; 50% responded yes, that hazing was in fact going on. Of the coaches who responded 25% admitted that they themselves were hazed in some form at a younger age (“InsideHazing”, 2010). In light of these findings, the question of who should be responsible is raised. Specifically, it brings up the legal question of “whether a coach has a valid qualified immunity defense to a student athlete’s constitutional rights violation claim when the student is involved in a hazing incident.”
When it comes to sexual assault on college campuses there is also the question of what can colleges do to decrease the amount of sexual assaults. Bradford Richardson and Jon A Shields wondered the same thing, so they conducted an ...
The general rules by the NCAA state that the activities by coaches or boosters that cause a player to become a recruited prospective student athlete are:
Also, the best way to rid of any chance of these incidents as a whole is by addressing them before they can happen. This can easily and cheaply be done with a universal program for people who are about to become a coach. This would ideally be a kind of training for coaches. For this to work, we would first have to introduce the idea to all sports programs and make it common practice to have prospective coaches go through training. Then, the administration would have the coaches go through seminars held by the administration where they go through the step-by-step to resolve issues with players as well as other useful coaching techniques.
About one in four women are victims of sexual assault in college, but there are ways to prevent this problem. The consequences of sexual assault are harmful and long-lasting and affect not only the victims but also their families and communities. Solutions to this problem _______. But, as Richard Edwards, chancellor of Rutgers-New Brunswick college said, “Regardless of the number, it’s a major problem, affecting our students and people all across the country and it has to be taken seriously” (5). If people work together, the steps can be taken to stop sexual assault in colleges.
According to a statement addressing the sexual victimization of college women The Crime and Victimization in America states that, “ One out of four women will be sexually assaulted on a college campus.” This disturbing fact has not minimized throughout the years, instead it is continuing to worsen throughout college campuses. Sexual assault is not an act to be taken lightly. Society must stop pinpointing the individuals who commit these crimes one by one, but rather look at the problem as a whole and begin to understand the main cause of sexual assault and possible methods to reduce these acts of sexual coercion.
This is a prologue to Adolescent Equity in America.Since the 1990s youth wrongdoing rates have plunged. These falling wrongdoing rates have driven numerous purviews to reconsider the corrective adolescent equity homes that ended up noticeably prevalent in the 1990s. Today, states are initiating major systemic changes intended to lessen institutional control, close old nineteenth century time change schools, and grow group based interventions.In the mid eighteenth and late nineteenth century, courts rebuffed and bound youth in prisons and prisons. Since less different choices existed , youth of all sexual orientations and ages were frequently unpredictably restricted with solidified grown-up hoodlums and rationally sick in substantial stuffed and haggard correctional organizations.
Hazing in universities across the nation has become a common tradition that develops mostly in Greek organizations. Hazing is seen in many different social groups such as schools, military units, sport teams, fraternities, and sororities. Prohibited by law for unnecessary reasons; hazing is a way to grow with friends in a closer way than independent students will ever have the chance to. Every year there are thousands of teenagers that pledge for a fraternity knowing of the possible chance of being hazed. People that join fraternities join for a sense of belonging and to meet people with similar interests. Trying to fit into a new college campus can be hard for a person to do. Almost every group pressures the new pledges to participate in hazing activities to create a sense of brotherhood. Hazing is a process that creates a sense of unity, also it teaches the one being hazed about himself and his brothers; being hazed into a group will help someone become a well-rounded person and will help them overcome struggles later in life.
According to Grayson and Meilman (2015) there are many factors that contribute to reported crimes by victims/survivors, “poorly handed or covered up when a victim/survivor does press a charge.” and even some schools “have looked the other way when groups like sports teams or fraternities are known to mistreat women, or placed institutional reputation over student welfare when sexual assault has come to light.” (p. 84) Goral (2015) also challenges the misconception that sexual violence on college campuses has an outdated definition. It isn’t just happening at frat parties that involve a lot of drugs and alcohol, but it can happen to any student, any staff, or anyone.
...ct to hazing. When someone says "I am pro-hazing" it has a negative context that they approve of the ancient methods and brandings, murders and binge drinking. A similar effect when someone says they are pro-choice it has the effect they are not religious and approve of murder. The bottom line for me is that hazing in its older forms is defiantly outdated and NOT necessary in today's society and is indeed unethical. However, I am fully in support of activities that teach teamwork, a true sense of brotherhood and education about the chapter or institution they are about to join and prepares them for the real world experience after college.
The Hazing Prohibition Act of 2003, hazing is defined as “any assumption of authority by a student whereby another student suffers or is exposed to any cruelty, intimidation, humiliation, embarrassment, hardship, or oppression, or is required to perform exercises to excess, to become sleep deprived, to commit dangerous activities, to curry favor from those in power, to submit to physical assaults, to consume offensive foods or alcohol, or the threat of bodily harm or death, or the deprivation or abridgement of any right” (Schneider, 2009, p. 194). Hazing has become a serious issue on college campuses in the last 20 years, not only in the athletic department but in fraternities and sororities as well. The justification for hazing by whoever
Hazing has a variety of similar effects as bullying but has certain things that differentiate the two. “Most say that hazing is any action or situation, with or without the consent of the participants, which recklessly, intentionally, or unintentionally endangers the mental, physical, or academic health of safety of a student.” It can start off as something so simple and then turn into a disaster. This is most commonly used in college as either ritual requirements or just something to embarrass upcoming freshman. “Regardless of consent, the rituals require individuals to engage in activities that are physically and psychologically stressful.” This would happen to new members involved in a frat or someone who wants to be involved in a club. “Some examples include physical injury, assault or battery, kidnapping or imprisonment, intentionally placing at risk of mental or emotional harm.” However, hazing does not only occur in just college, it has
Initiation is a process of which marks the acceptance of an individual into a group or organization. It is a celebration of a new beginning and is performed with rituals that promote unity and equality alongside of the new members. However, when the initiation enactments create mental or physical discomfort, embarrassment, harassment, or ridicule, hazing occurs (Pellicciotti). It is a very dangerous form of bullying that most young people in today's generation face when it comes to organizations, for example, fraternities and sports teams. Although the ultimate goal of hazing is to maintain discipline and solidarity within a group, the actions often cross the line of human dignity and result in countless ethical consequences. Despite the purpose