Harnischfeger’s corporate recovery plan was a four pronged approach that involved (1) changes in top management, (2) cost reductions to lower the break-even point, (3) reorientation of the company’s business and (4) debt restructuring and recapitalization. These changes at first glance appear to have allowed Harnischfeger to improve its financial performance from a net loss of $3.49 per share in 1983 to a net gain of $1.28 per share in 1984. In addition, Harnischfeger has appeared to have achieved a majority of its desired outcomes from each of its four changes as shown below. • Harnischfeger’s desired outcomes from hiring a new COO and Vice President of Finance and Administration were to re-build investor and creditor faith in the company and show them that it is taking serious actions to improve its performance starting with a new executive team. Investors’ new interest in the company, such as Mr. Peter Roberts, and bankers willing to re-extend credit to Harnischfeger’s after not meeting its working capital, quick ratio, and net worth requirements, illustrated that Harnischfeger was able to improve its image. • The desired outcomes from cost reductions, such as reducing the workforce by almost half and eliminating management bonuses, are to reduce cost of goods and increase operating income. Although Harnischfeger’s cost of sales (COS) has increased from 1983 to 1984, the company appears to have reduced COS in comparison to sales from 81% to 79%. In addition, it has increased its Operating Income from $62 million in 1983 to $90 million in 1984. • The desired outcomes from reorientation of the company’s business were to reduce risk of increasing prices, decrease costs and increase sales. These desired outcomes have ap... ... middle of paper ... ...o renegotiate credit agreements with banks. However, the liquidity was a result of structural changes and would not bring significant effect to the company because it is unusual and infrequent (the extraordinary credits of $15 million fall in this category also). The financial report must be consistent year-by-year. A company should do the same or similar activities, especially operating activities, to generate “money” every year and recognize “money” as its profit. However, this is not the case for Harnischfeger. We are doubtful that the company will perform well in the future. The company recorded modest profit this year because it reduced operating cost not because it increased operating revenue. Since Harnischfeger did not generate its profit by operating activity, it would be too risky to predict if its stock price will reach $6.00 per share in the 1986-87.
Rocket-Blast, LLC, a beverage maker, has seen its profit margins reduced which presents a real problem for the company going forward (Precord & Macdonald, nd). Management has decided that operating costs must be reduced in order to increase profit margins to
By lowering selling prices across the board, Opossumtown, Inc. reduced its inventory turnover ratio, cutting the number of days to sell inventory from 174 days to 104 days; that is a 40% improvement. Opossumtown, Inc. also cut the number of days it takes to collect its credit accounts from 68 to 44 days, again that is 35% better than the previous year. The company is able to do this while cutting its debt ratio by 10% and increasing its current ratio by 25%, making it appear more favorable in terms of liquidity. As promising as this may look, this is not the whole picture. Opossumtown, Inc. shows an 11% decline in gross profit as well as operating income ratios, and a 3% decrease on the profit margin ratio. The decline of these ratios is a result of the company’s new strategy of decreasing the selling price and increasing its marketing and selling expenses. Opossumtown, Inc. made some noteworthy advancements with the implementation of its new plan for 2014. However, based on the assessment of the balance sheet, income statement and the ratios, the corporation did not achieve its goal to increase operating income by 6% and net income by 4%. Opossumtown, Inc. was only able to grow its operating income by a little more than half of one percent and net income by
The founhder of the company, Godfrey Keebler, started with jus a small bakery in Philadelphia, PA in 1853. During the next two generations, local bakeries popped up around the country, including Strietmann, Hekman, Supreme and Bowman. With the introduction of cars and trucks (carrying the Keebler logo), bakery goods could be distributed beyond the neighborhood and regional distribution began.
This short report aims to give a brief overview of Deutsche Bank’s alarming situation and describe the sharp decrease of its profitability. It will briefly introduce the context of this crisis and aim to explain it through an analysis of one of the most used indicators of performance for banks, the return on equity (ROE).
Kroger was also an inventor, of food products. What was born in his mother’s kitchen, of just a tangy German sauerkraut has grown into over 30 facilities that manufacture the Kroger brand. Just another example this company meeting its objective to serve and please its customer base. Kroger understood from the very beginning, the value of the customer base, which according to the text Managing Customer Relationships is simply put, is to get, keep, and grow customers and is the very objective of the Kroger brand. Mr. Kroger was a natural born leader and servant and built this concept into the very framework of the company. Every step he took, focused on this premise, and soon he built a successful model that many other merchants fervently attempted to duplicate. The modern supermarket owes it roots to this early adventure in
While Coors was initially the leader in proactive innovation in the industry, the period of 1975-1985 was filled with business model decisions that were thoughtful and controlled, but they were too slow to implement in comparison to their competitors. They started this decade of turmoil with a volume drop of 4% in 1975 by selling only 11.9 million barrels as opposed to the previous year’s 12.3 million barrels. For a company that started with exponential growth in the brewing business, Coors surprisingly fell behind entering markets that their competitors were dominating in the meantime. The longer they took to enter the sector, the light beer market for example, the more market share they lost. Their nationwide expansion took far longer than their competitors as well. All major beer brewery distributors in the industry reached 50 states by 1985 except for Coors. The overall loss in the U.S. market from their slow expansion was totaled to 21%. This was not promising especially for a company who used the cost-leadership approach according to Porters Generic
Organizational changes that reduce cost. The M&S reduced its management levels to reduce the cost.
When the 1980’s rolled around, it was a thriving company, in the Seattle area. However, the co-founders began to have other interests and were involved in other careers simultaneously. Despite that, the company was about to undergo a major turnaround. A man by the name of Howard Schultz started to pursue an interest in the company. He noticed that the coffee shop had a wonderful environment.
...ant improvement. The decline in property, plant, and equipment may be hurting Rondo and contributing to overall inefficiencies. Sales are growing but profits are not. Rondo's costs are too high and need to be reduced. In addition, inventory turns are degrading and inventory reduction strategies need to be investigated. A major problem for Rondo is the number of days it takes to collect accounts receivable. Significant focus is required in this area to free up cash, which can then be used to invest in property, plant, and equipment. These problems areas contribute significantly to an inefficient operation. This inefficiency inhibits profitability at Rondo and has led to a loss of investor confidence. Rondo's sales and net income have grown year over year and if the company can improve its efficiency in the areas noted above, investor confidence can be recaptured.
Monitor and adjust strategies in response to problems in the revitalization process. Every firm has to know how to continually monitor its behavior, in order to be able to learn how to learn.
of a firm to attain new forms of competitive advantage (Müller, 2011). It is due to these
Most companies have their portfolio of businesses scattered through all four quadrants of the matrix. The success is to achieve balance. The goal of the company must be to maintain position in the cows , but also to remember not to reinvest in them too much. The cash generated by the cash cows should be used as a first priority to maintain or consolidate position in those stars which are not self sustaining.
The key aspect of a market orientation is listening to customers by including their desires and concerns into the company’s decisions. While businesses have varying degrees of interaction with their customers, all create a product or service to market to a customer. Consequentially, this business orientation can lead to multiple benefits for an organization to include “increased customer satisfaction and loyalty, higher finical performance, and improved new product creativity” (Reed, Goolsby, & Johnston, 2016b, p. 3591). Ultimately, the goal of a market orientation is to gain a competitive advantage over competitors, A market orientation has been proven to lead to a higher
...llenging to the organization is undeniable thus the organizations really have to come out with competitive transformation strategies so that they are strong enough to compete with their business competitors (Tonono, 2008).
Financial communications involves financial reporting, McCarty’s engages in financial reporting which involves communication, several individuals and firms alike hold an interest in how McCarty’s performs as a company, these individuals or firms can be called stakeholders. Stakeholders can learn about a company’s performance, in this case, McCarty’s, by reviewing the yearly published financial statements. Stakeholders can use the income statement to find out the company’s profitability, the balance sheet communicates the company’s ability to obtain and invest its resources. The statement of cash flows communicates McCarty’s ability to manage its cash, whereas; financial results are communicated through published financi...