Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Liquidity ratio explanation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Liquidity Rondo's Current Ratio is a steady at 2.0 compared to the industry average of 1.4. This indicates the company will not have a problem covering its current liabilities. Rondo's quick ratio is also steady at 1.4. The company can cover its short-term debt 1.4 times over without selling off its inventory. Rondo's performance is good in this area. Asset Management Rondo's Inventory Ratio declined to 9.5 in 2005, down from a ratio of 10 in 2003 and 2004. Rondo's sales improved year-over-year and the decline in inventory turns may be the result of carrying more inventory in response to increased sales. However, Rondo is still carrying too much inventory or the company may have excess obsolete inventory. Rondo needs to utilize just-in-time methods to improve inventory turn over. (Nice catch.) Carrying fewer inventories is required to improve efficiency and reduce cost. Rondo's performance is poor in this area. The Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) ratio for Rondo is showing improvement, but 71 days is too long to have cash due tied up, assuming that Rondo has extended Net30 or Net35 credit terms to their customers. Much more effort needs to be put into collections since it seems some customers are not paying their bills on time. Rondo's performance is poor in this area. (Could there be other issues here? Are they selling to customers who have no intention of paying them back? Will they have to write-off some receivables?) Rondo is showing steady improvement in its Fixed Assets Turnover ratio. Total Assets Turnover ratio is a measure of all assets measured against sales. Rondo is showing improvement in this area at 1.0, but is still below the industry average of 1.1. Rondo's performance is fair in this ar... ... middle of paper ... ...ant improvement. The decline in property, plant, and equipment may be hurting Rondo and contributing to overall inefficiencies. Sales are growing but profits are not. Rondo's costs are too high and need to be reduced. In addition, inventory turns are degrading and inventory reduction strategies need to be investigated. A major problem for Rondo is the number of days it takes to collect accounts receivable. Significant focus is required in this area to free up cash, which can then be used to invest in property, plant, and equipment. These problems areas contribute significantly to an inefficient operation. This inefficiency inhibits profitability at Rondo and has led to a loss of investor confidence. Rondo's sales and net income have grown year over year and if the company can improve its efficiency in the areas noted above, investor confidence can be recaptured.
From 2010 to 2011 there has been a 23.8% increase in gross fixed assets value. The raised funds through long term debts would have been used to enhance assets base of Speedster. This is a very positive sigh of future profitability and capacity of the company. Higher assets should be able to generate more cash inflow...
Sales growth after 2000 were only 9%, which the average annual sale growth rates range from 10% to 30% in their industry. The lack of cash is explained by the current liquidity ratio
Return on sales is decreasing and is below the industry average, but the goods news is that sales and profits have been increasing each year. However, costs of goods are increasing and more inventory is left over each year causing the return on sales to decrease. For 1995, it was 1.7% which is less than the average of 2.44% but is a lot higher than the bottom 25% of companies as seen in exhibit 3, which actually have negative sales return of 0.7%. Return on equity is increasing each year and at a higher rate than industry average. In 1995, it was 20.7%, greater than the average of 18.25% and close to the highest companies in exhibit 3, of 22.1% showing that the return in investment in the company is increasing, which is good for the owner.
Analyzing Wal-Mart's annual report provides a positive outlook on Wal-Mart's financial health. Given the specific ratios and its comparison to other companies in the same industry, Wal-Mart is leading and more than likely continue its dominance. Though Wal-Mart did not lead in all numbers, its leadership and strong presence of the market cements the ongoing success. The review of the current ratio, quick ratio, inventory turnover ratio, debt ratio, net profit margin ratio, ROI, ROE, and P/E ratio all indicate an upbeat future for the company. The current ratio, which is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, is a measure of how much liabilities a company has compared to its assets. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a current ratio of .90, and as of January 2008 it had a current ratio of .81. The quick ratio, which is defined as current assets minus inventory divided by current liabilities, is a measure of a company's ability pay short term obligations. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a quick ratio of .25, and as of January 2008 it had a ratio of .21. Both the current ratio and quick ratio are a measure of liquidity. Wal-Mart is not as liquid as its competitors such as Costco or Family Dollar Stores Inc. I believe the reason why Wal-Mart is not too liquid is because they are heavily investing their profits for expansion and growth. Management claims in their financial report that holding their liquid reserves in other currencies have helped Wal-Mart hedge against inflationary pressures of the US dollar. The next ratio to look at is the inventory ratio which is defined as the cost of sales divided by average inventory. In the year of 2007, Wal-Mart’s inventory ratio was 7.68, and as of January 2008 it was 7.96. Wal-Mart has a lot of sales therefore it doesn’t have too much a problem of holding too much inventory. Its competitors have similar ratios though they don’t have as much sales as Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart’s ability to sell at lower prices for same quality, gives them the edge against its competition. As of the year 2007, Wal-Mart had a debt ratio of .58, and as of January 2008, it had a debt ratio of .59. The debt ratio is calculated by dividing the total debt by its total assets. Wal-Mart has a lot more assets than it does debt so Wal-Mart is not overleveraged.
This decrease may be an indication that the company’s credit policies have become more lenient and could, in turn, increase the likelihood of not collecting receivables. While the 2015 turnover is not as efficient as 2013, the change is small and there is no need for concern at this time. The accounts receivable should be reviewed in more detail to determine if longer terms have been extended to key customers, or if there are accounts with deteriorating credit
.... In addition, inventory turnover shows a consistent increase from 2.16 in 2011 to 2.38 and 2.49 for 2012 and 2013 respectively.
The return on total assets (ROA) is an overall measure of profitability which measures the total effectiveness of management in generating profits with its available assets. This ratio indicates the amount of net income generated by each dollar invested in assets. The higher the firm's return on total assets, the better. Harley Davidson's return on total assets was 14.04% for 2001, 14.27% for 2000. These percentages are high and show an upward trend, this shows strong performance in this area for the past two years.
Financial Strength (mrq) -. Quick Ratio 0.49 Current Ratio 1.46 LT Debt/Equity 110.07 Total Debt/Equity 118.25 Mgt. Effectiveness (ttm) - a. Return on Investment % 13.23%. Return on Assets % 9.09%. Return on Equity % 25.77%.
As higher investors generally expect higher returns for a more leveraged firm (Arnold 2013 p 697) there would appear to be very little scope for the RM to increase its debt capital unless it can convince investors profits are likely to profit significantly. Unfortunately the annual report does not suggest such growth is likely short term, due to increased parcel competition and falling letter sales (RM 2015).
The Table 2, above, shows a current ratio CR of 1.2215 and a quick ratio QR of 1.04545. Further, one could notice a DSO 40 times and a DSI of 4 times. Moreover, the current rate is superior to one; therefore, it reveals that Verizon has sufficient financial resources to cover its obligations. It can take care of its short-term obligations with its present existing liquid assets. Further, its quick ratio is more than one. Thus, Verizon has enough cash and receivables to cover its current liabilities. The DSO of 40 times shows that Verizon spends 40 days to collect on its outstanding accounts. This number is less than 90 days; therefore the company presents an expansionary credit policy. Impressively, Verizon spends only four days on selling
Currently Azalea's average ROA is at 68%. As compared with industry norms this is wonderful. However, debt for the company is at 87% and needs to be much less. This too can be corrected with time and effort. The quick ratio is at 1 and short-term credit remains safe. Cash flow will also need to be improved by implementing a gradual price increase and initiating key retail locations.
...rs, setting a good trend for the corporation. They also have a very low debt-to-equity ratio, indicating that they have enough equity to easily pay off any funds acquired from creditors. As a creditor I would feel safe in lending them funds for any future projects or endeavors.
Their effectiveness in collecting debt is poor; therefore, they are losing money from their credit sales. The inventory turnover ratio for Kodak is also low. It has decreased from 2012 to 2014, sitting at 4.66. When this number is compared to HP and Sony (13.23 and 8.10 respectively), it shows that Kodak has poor sales and excess inventory. Kodak is also not getting much revenue per dollar from assets.
The inventory turnover decreased from 3.8 to 3.59. This is explained by the higher increase in the average inventory (37%) than the increase in cost of sales (29%) during 2005. This means that the rate at which inventory is sold is dropping
A benchmarking analysis against competitors is provided in excel. These data indicate that Primo was performing poorly against its three competitors in terms of day’s receivable and day’s inventory. The fact that day’s payable was 40 days versus 30 days for the credit terms offered by its suppliers, and much higher than for its competitors, helps explain much of the reason for complaints from the company’s suppliers about late payments. In the future, Primo might have limited access to supplier credit, and suppliers might ultimately refuse to sell to the company unless payment is made up front in cash. The data also indicate that the company was performing poorly against its competitors in every profitability metric displayed.