Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of the excessive use of the internet on teenagers
The role of media in the development of childhood and youth
A family influence on children's development media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the modern world, technology makes everything easier. They make finding information easy to meeting new people. This is great for those wanting new adventures, but unfortunate to those who come across false information. Teens are most susceptible to such information, and adults are trying to combat this. Parents, have gone from asking their children, to instead monitoring or “spying” on their children. In the article, “the undercover parent”, by harlan coben, coben states how parents must monitor their children in order for them to have a healthy childhood. I disagree with his statements as it is only an invasion of privacy. It can also be a sign of bad parenting and can show an unhealthy relationship between parent and child. Not to mention …show more content…
a healthy childhood can come from different aspects and upbringing. Ellen goodman, author of “big brother meets big mother”, is also against Coben's argument.
In his article he states “but there's a moment when the two way tools of communication turn into the one way tools of surveillance” (Goodman 15). This is a clear example of how simple monitoring can turn into an invasion of privacy. However, monitoring can also invade privacy. There's a common misconception that whatever is kept private, is bad. People tend to forget, that everyone is entitled to their own privacy. Adults are guilty of doing this to their children, especially if they monitor their child's phones. Parents like to assume the worst for their children, and in response, turn to monitoring. Parents, need to understand that not everything a person does on a phone is bad. Most teens know common sense and stay away from the negative side of the …show more content…
internet. The need to monitor can also be a result of bad parenting. Parenting,, if done right, can enable children to become independent and intelligent members. However if done incorrectly, can result in bad behaviour. That being said, adolescents are encouraged to try new things, and obviously, there will be mistakes. Goodman, states in her article,”teen are never really on their own. We may be protecting them right out of the ability to make their decisions” (Goodman 12). There is no way to know for certain how decisions will play out. There is also the issue of morality. Adolescents are going through a period of time where everything is constantly changing. Some of their decisions will be wrong, but it's important to know that they aren't doing it on purpose. Its hard trying to parent a child who is constantly making mistakes, but it doesn't mean that they should be monitored of their private talk with friends. The monitoring of children can also cause a shift in the relationship.
Most times when a parent is overseeing their child's usage, the child is unaware. This can be considered many things, ranging from stalking to lying. The article also references these points in the words” ...if you are ot monitoring, you are a bad parent. Apparently were supposed to be stalking our kids” (Goodman 11). Stalking has negative connotations and it should stay that way. Many7 would try and argue that it's not stalking if they're your child, however it stays the same as they are watching over, their presence unaware. Once the child finds out, whether they did something bad or not, they may begin to suspect other forms of how their parent may monitor. It could also break the trust the child had with their parent. Many teens who found out their parent was monitoring them, often state how the paranoia has stayed with them well into their adult
lives. They say that every three months, technology advances. With technology, comes the responsibility of use of products. The internet is known as a dangerous to some, however the good largely outweighs the bad. With each generation, we as a society, become more dependant and used to the internet. Many adults see this as bad, and choose to believe that they should monitor peoples usages, more specifically their child's. However, they don't see the negative outcomes that come with it, such as the invasion of privacy, and the beginning of an unhealthy relationship. It could also show that a parent is not the best at raising a child and in turn, chooses to meddle with their child's life. There is always two sides of a story, and to only focus on the parents side, ignores the basic rights of their child's privacy.
The expansion of the Internet infrastructure across the world, has brought an increased audience. Which has provided expanded markets for businesses and exploited new opportunities. There are virtually countless social sites and media used by individuals to access and share experiences , content, insights, and perspectives. Parents today tend to believe they should spy on their kids online activity. I argue parents should respect the privacy of a child's social life and his/her internet activity.
To begin with, many parents look for a connection with the author when it comes to subjects dealing with children and privacy. Coben’s targeted audiences are parents of adolescent children. Coben says “Loving Parents are doing surveillance here, not faceless bureaucrats” to slowly unhook any minds that aren’t already on board with spyware. The mention of pedophiles, porn, and teenage drug use are emotional appeals that will reach out to parents. Coben does well with identifying his audience but fails to establish credibility. In some cases Coben was being unrealistic, take for example a “Straight A” teenage girl sleeping with her dealer and using drugs are going to get parents attention but the reaction of the father may make them falter in reasoning. Not many parents in their right minds would calmly go to their daughter and just talk, there would be more yelling and rebelling involved. People need the truth just writing it off and down playing a serious situation as an after school sitcom will cause people to los...
Harlan Coben’s essay “The Undercover Parent” attempts to enlighten readers, specifically parents, of the benefits to installing spyware onto their children’s computers in order to keep record of their child’s online activity. Whilst admitting at first he was not particularly keen on spyware himself, Coben aims to persuade his audience of the benefits by highlighting the dangers of children using the internet unsupervised and without boundaries. However, Coben fails to supply factual evidence to back up his claims, all while stating a number of contradictions within his own arguments. Coben states, “…overprotective parents fight their kids’ battles on the playground, berate coaches about playing time and fill out college applications…” (19). This is a weak argument because it inadvertently suggests that overprotectiveness
It is becoming very clear that the world is becoming overpowered with electronic devices, and it is no one but the people’s fault for the privacy loss that has and will continue to happen. The amount one spends on their phone or computer a day could be described as outrageous and to some a waste of time. People wonder why privacy is becoming an issue and it is clearly because the more technical we get with technology, the more power the government has over the people. Many people do not even realize that they are being watched. When they are on their electronic device they have no idea that the government can very easily be monitoring what they are doing. This is very similar to what happens in the
“Do you wish you’d grown up with your mom tracking your every move? If not don’t do it to your own kid.” states Lenore Skenazy in her persuasive article Tracking Kids like Felons. These words draw an immediate comparison to “the golden rule” or “treat others how you want to be treated.” In this article Skenazy evaluates a personal-tracking app called FamilySignal. As the readers we see the author’s take on this specific point in the very first sentence when she uses sarcasm on the word “safe.” Skenazy does not give too many facts but she does base most of her article off of morals, which may even be more persuasive. Even in today’s day and age tracking ones every step is definitely not ok, even with the advanced technology that we have.
Some will say that if tennagers know that they are being watched they will be more cautious. Teenagers will find other ways of communicating to their friends like text messages or cell phones and those options are better because they do not offer the anonymity and danger of the internet. Also some will say that teenagers can block the content that they are watching from their parents. If parents talked to their children about why they are installing spyware and the dangers of the internet it can prevent all of this. Installing spyware in your children’s computer is not meant to be an invasion of privacy it is just meant to help monitor what our children are
I do not agree with parents eavesdropping some private conversation between their child and their child’s friend. It invades the child’s privacy and it would make him/her feel absolutely down about it since he/she can’t be free from his/her parents. Even if the parents tell their children that they have set up the spyware on their computer, they will always find a way to talk to their Internet friends privately. In paragraph 9, Coben stated, ¨Second, everything your child types can already be seen by the world-- teachers, potential employers, friends, neighbors, future dates. Shouldn’t he learn now that the Internet is not a haven of privacy?¨ First of all, this has nothing to do with Spyware. It is a good argument, but it doesn’t have to do with the parents actually. It’s the boy’s fault to type scandalous things on the Internet and it is his decision to do that. He shouldn’t have done that in the first place to avoid getting into trouble. In paragraph 12, Coben wrote, ¨Yes. But text messages and cell phones don’t offer the anonymity and danger of the Internet.¨ I agree that it doesn’t offer the anonymity and danger of the Internet. Nevertheless, he must’ve forgotten that people have a power to cyber bully other people through texts. Above all, the people who have a great desire to upload it on the Internet, could receive the inappropriate cyber bully. Hence, it also shows the danger of being cyber bullied. In paragraph 13,
In conclusion, it is important that parents give their freedom to make sure kids learn to be independent and now days most teens spend a lot of their time in the internet so by parents not letting them have their privacy there, they are taking over all their lives without even giving them a chance to “explored their identity and the world” like Boyd mention. Parents, need to realize that by over protecting their kids is like sending them to war without weapons because they will not know how to confront the world and worst of all they will not know they things they are capable of doing by themselves.
If my parents decided to get a tracker and watched me what I was doing, I would not care about it at all. My parents has brought me up in a good way. My personal demeanors are neutral, and I do not have a concrete position about tracking their kids.
Amy Gahran, a media consultant exploring communication in the technology era, writes about how cell phones are significant. She feels that cell phones have changed our lives by providing “…vital services and human connections…offer new hope, even through simple broadcast text messages” (Gahran). Gahran is insisting that cell phones allow us to learn news quickly, connect with safety, and can even fight crime through video recordings (Gahran). In addition, she feels that the overall benefits of owning a cell phone outweigh any negatives. This somewhat challenges the ideas presented by Rosen because it points out more benefits of cell phones. In “Our Cell Phones, Ourselves” Rosen mentions that although cell phones indeed connect us with safety, they can often lead to a sense of paranoia. To expand, she writes that parents who give children a cell phone for security purposes, develop a paranoid sense of their community and lose trust in “social institutions” (Rosen). In making this comment, Rosen argues that although cell phones may be beneficial, they can change the way we view our world. Without a cell phone, many individuals feel vulnerable, as if their phone protects them from all possible dangers that they may encounter. In fact, a Rutgers University professor challenged his students to power off their phones for 48 hours and report back with their experience (Rosen). Many felt almost lost without it and one young women described the feeling “…like I was going to get raped if I didn’t have my cell phone in my hand” (Rosen). In reality, having a cell phone will not save a person’s life in all situations. Although many, including Gahran, feel a phone is a vital tool, it has changed how we feel about the world around us and how vulnerable we feel without a phone in
With the purchase of a smart phone, does not come the immediate thought that this is a personal tracking device that will let the government or anyone who wants to, know where you are at that exact moment. Timothy Lee wrote “Smartphones Have Privacy Risks” an article letting people know of hackers around the world and how easy it is to get information. This article is an immediate red flag to what information really is protected from other people. The smart phones that we use today are almost exact to what George Orwell wrote about in 1984. In Orwell's book he called these objects telescreens
The article was talking about how schools can just go into the student’s phones if they just feel that the student is doing something careless like bullying or might have something to do with drugs. (Keilman 1). Keilman writes what a school spokesman said "That 's perfectly within our rights within the school," he said. "If schools have credible evidence that cellphones are being used in some kind of trafficking...we have every right to take the phones (Keilman)." This doesn 't seem right how will school have credible evidence that a student is using their phone for some kind of trafficking without breaking the student 's privacy rights. The school would either guess and then going through their phone to get the information or to spy on the student. Plus Students like to play jokes on each other because that’s just how teen’s friendships, work and schools might think those jokes are real and blame the student’s for something they never did. Students have their own code when they are texting and some use words but make them have a different meaning than what the word really means (Keilman 1). This should make schools try not to be in a fair amount of the students privacy
However, sensitive information that may be shared might later embarrass the children as they grow older and realize what is available on the internet. Such events may result in resentment and misunderstandings on both the children and the parents’ sides. According to Steinberg (2017) in “Sharenting: Children’s Privacy in the Age of Social Media,” there have been long-term issues and conflicts regarding parental sharing and whether children have the right to control what is shared about them. Another long-term problem raised by parental sharing is the idea of data collecting. Per “Children’s Privacy in the Big Data Era: Research Opportunities,” “These trends raise serious concerns about digital dossiers that could follow young people into adulthood, affecting their access to education, employment, healthcare, and financial services. Although US privacy law provides some safeguards for children younger than 13 years old online, adolescents are afforded no such protections” (Montgomery, Chester, & Milosevic, 2017, p.
These individuals feel that it is an invasion of the teenagers’ right to privacy and the development of their trustworthiness. Kay Mathieson states “only by giving children privacy will they come to see their thoughts as something that belongs to them – to which they have an exclusive right.” In the United States and according to the law, monitoring the internet usage of a minor does not break any laws and is a moral obligation of the parent. Trustworthiness is an important development of a child to learn in order to develop genuine relationships with others in the lifetime. “Not only does monitoring have the great potential to undermine the trust of the child in the parent, and thus to undermine trust in others more generally, it also has the potential to undermine the capacity of the child to be worth of trust” (Mathieson). If the parent has not already had conversations with the teenager about monitoring internet usage and the parent is not telling the child about the monitoring, there is already an issue with the development of trustworthiness in the teenager. There was already a failure of development of this skill before the internet or internet monitoring was introduced.
One reason to consider the introduction of cell phones in learning is to promote digital etiquette, a concept that is foreign to most people. According to Liz Kolb (the author of “Toys to Tools”) Digital etiquette is “a basic set of rules you should follow in order to make the internet better for others, and better for you.” Kolb says in her book that “an educator’s job is to help students navigate and stay safe in their media world”. Students often are unaware to the consequences of their use and misuse of technology. Currently, many students do not overthink about protecting their own privacy. For example 55% of students do not care whether the digital material they use is copyrighted. Students ages 10 to 17 often do not take in appropriate cell phone use. According to Kolb “While nine out of ten 10- to 17- year olds believe that they are courteous on their cell phones, 52% admit to sending text messages at the movie theater, while 28% admit to sending texts at the dinner table.” These statistics show that teens are unaware with cell pho...