Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hamlet elements of drama
Modern and traditional criticism on Hamlet
Characters and characterisation in hamlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I choose to analyze William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Hamlet which is a classic revenge tragedy. The Tragedy of Hamlet which is often shortened to Hamlet was originally published in 1603. Although being one of Shakespeare longest plays, it has been influential to English Tragic literature throughout the century. This play revolves around the revenge of the late King Hamlet who was murdered by his brother Claudius.
A revenge tragedy has a basic plot, and a thirst or quest for vengeance and will typically feature numerous scenes or acts of murder and mutilation. As the drama unfolds, Shakespeare presents the ghost of King Hamlet, instructing his son, Prince Hamlet to avenge his death: “If thou didst ever thy dear father love ... Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder” (Act 1 Scene 5). As the only son of the King, this should be an
…show more content…
expected request, but young Hamlet is man at odds with himself and he wants to do as his Father asks, but he is also aware of the moral implications and associated complications that murder can entail. Therefore, Hamlet is not so hasty to make a decision. He at first appears eager to get his father's requested revenge when he tells the ghost “Haste me to know ’t, that I, with wings as swift / As meditation or the thoughts of love, / May sweep to my revenge” (Act 1 Scene 5). Hamlet is skeptic and seems to be a procrastinator about this because he wants and needs proof that his father was murdered by Claudius. Hamlet is also not keen on killing anyone and even thinks about killing himself so he does not have to commit murder in his speech: “To be, or not to be- that is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer”(Act 3 Scene 1). In an endeavor to roust out his Father's killer, Hamlet gets more than he bargained for. Through the staging of the play within the play, which Hamlet presents as entertainment, but that is really his perception of the reenactment of his father's murder. Hamlet states “I’ll have these players. Play something like the murder of my father/ Before my uncle: I'll observe his looks; I'll tent him to the quick: if he but blench, I know my course (Act 2 Scene 2). He quickly loses control of the contrived situation, and as is expected in a revenge tragedy, more murders occur, including the tragic death of his own mother, Gertrude. As the bodies pile up, it seems that Hamlet is in a bad place, both mentally and physically and he is not the only character seeking revenge. Hamlet inadvertently killed Polonius who was the father of Laertes and Ophelia, believing it was Claudius hiding in Gertrude's closet eavesdropping on their conversation. Laertes wants to avenge his father's death as well as get revenge for his sister Ophelia, who has been hurt by the rejection of Hamlet. Unlike Hamlet who seems to ponder a bit too much on the why's and how's of exacting revenge, Laertes has no such barriers to committing murder. He is more of an act now, ask questions later kind of guy, literally storming the castle and demanding retribution. Ironically, he teams up with Claudius to finalize the plan for getting rid of Hamlet. Claudius convinces Laertes to do his dirty work by telling him: “Now must your conscience my acquaintance seal, and you must put me in your heart for friend, Sith you have heard, and with a knowing ear, That he which hath your noble father slain Pursued my life” (Act 4 Scene 7). Claudius and Laertes join forces and plan to use Claudius's go-to murder method – poison, as well as to entice Hamlet to duel with Laertes ; the two men have an ongoing rivalry, but Laertes plans to use a sharpened sword as opposed to a dull blade for the proposed duel which will literally become a duel-to-the-death.
This in which leads to the climax of the tragedy play in which Hamlet and Laertes are coming face to face in Act V. The burial of Ophelia who has perhaps killed herself by drowning after the rejection of love and marriage by Hamlet and the unintentional death of her father Polonius at the hands of Hamlet. Laertes is overcome and overwrought, throwing himself into his sister's grave, screaming “O, treble woe. Fall ten times treble on that cursed head. Whose wicked deed thy most ingenious sense.” Depriv'd thee of! Hold off the earth awhile, Till I have caught her once more in mine arms” while Hamlet speaks and asks: “What is he whose grief Bears such an emphasis? Whose phrase of sorrow conjures the wand ‘ring stars, and makes them stand like wonder-wounded hearers? This is I, Hamlet the Dane “(Act 5 Scene
1). Hamlet goes on to tell Horatio that “There’s a divinity that shapes our ends” (Act 5 Scene 2), almost as if he has a premonition of his own death. The deaths of Guildenstern and Rosencrantz are easily explained away by Hamlet as their traitorous acts came to light when he tells Horatio “Why, man, they did make love to this employment! They are not near my conscience; their defeat. Does by their own insinuation grow” (Act 5 Scene 2), more or less meaning that the two men got what they deserved by betraying Hamlet. The carnage of the revenge tragedy hearkens to an end as Scene V continues and the deaths of Hamlet, Claudius, Gertrude, and Laertes all occur. All of them die by poison which ironically is death by the same means as King Hamlet. It reads pretty much like a comedy of errors, Gertrude unknowingly drinks the poisoned wine meant for her son Hamlet, even though Claudius cautions her not to drink; Laertes and Hamlet duel with the foils, one sharpened and tinged with poison, exchanging swords: “Laertes wounds Hamlet; then in scuffling, they change rapiers, and Hamlet wounds Laertes. Both men have been mortally wounded. Laertes cries out “Why, as a woodcock to mine own springe, Osric I am justly killed with mine own treachery” where Gertrude screams “No, no! The drink, the drink! O my dear Hamlet! The drink, the drink! I am poisoned (Act 5 Scene 2). As poor Laertes who was used by Claudius to further his control of the kingdom and rid the country of Hamlet, falls, dying, he informs Hamlet, that he too shall die. The blame was mostly on the shoulders of Claudius. Hamlet finally fulfills his promise to King Hamlet to seek revenge for his death by forcing Claudius to drink the poison. “Here, thou incestuous, murd'rous, damned Dane,/ Drink off this potion! Is thy union here? / Follow my mother. King dies” (Act 5 Scene 2). In conclusion, revenge is not the way to settle disputes as the cast of Hamlet learned. It brings dishonor and death to those who avenge and to their loved ones, both living and dead. Fortinbras, Prince of Norway as Hamlet was Prince of Denmark sees beyond Hamlets discord and the promise to his father as well as his own. After the ill-fated deaths, Fortinbras prepares the court and the men to give Hamlet a hero's procession and armed salute for his fallen comrade and friend. As Hamlet once stated to Fortinbras, “To be great, is not to stir without great argument but greatly to find quarrel in a straw / when honor's at the stake" (Act 4 Scene 4). Family honor is the driving force that negated the acts of revenge that led to the tragedies that befell Shakespeare's characters in Hamlet. When a man has honor he will face his own mortality willingly and will not fear death. Hamlet knew that Laertes would get the better of him, yet he fought knowingly and accepted the hand that fate dealt. Overall he did King Hamlet and the family name proud.
In Elizabethan drama, the revenge tragedy was already a favorite genre by the time Shakespeare penned Hamlet. The basic structure guaranteed that one killed at the beginning of the play, usually a father, would somehow call for a younger relative, usually a son, to avenge his murder (Encyclopedia Britannica). Based on the traditional values of the time, the son would then confront and kill his father’s murderer, restoring honor to both his father’s death and the family as a whole. Yet Hamlet, unlike the typical hero of a revenge tragedy, ...
Somewhere between the years of 1599 and 1602, William Shakespeare wrote his longest, most influential and powerful tragedy, The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Set in the Kingdom of Denmark, the play stages the revenge that a young prince seeks against his uncle for murdering his father, inheriting the throne, and subsequently marrying his mother.
"Hamlet" is a revenge tragedy written by William Shakespeare. The setting of the story is in the middle ages around the 14th or 15th century. The play is mainly set in the royal palace in Elsinore, a city in Denmark. The story features plenty of deaths and a grueling revenge plot set by our main protagonist, Hamlet. What made "Hamlet" famous was not only it 's classic murderous story line, but also the way that Shakespeare puts together complex scenes. Act III, scene ii was a particular scene in "Hamlet" that captured Shakespeare 's literary genius because he used this scene to advance the play even further. What made this scene stand out are a couple of reasons. First, in this scene, hamlet appears to be more in control of his behavior than other scenes which proves that his sanity is still intact and showing that his insanity is just a decoy for his true plans. Second, this is the scene where Shakespeare revealed to the audience that the ghost
Many characters and people even with very few appearances or interactions with others can leave a lasting effect on someone or can impact the overall mood and message of a body of work. In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, King Hamlet’s ghost or afterlife form makes a few appearances through the course of the tragedy but leaves a persisting effect that weighs heavily on the decisions and actions of Prince Hamlet that result in further deaths, adds depth and establishes the theme of revenge, and overall assists in the development of Prince Hamlet’s character as a person.
Through previous years, philosopher’s have tested numerous theories that help us in defining the nature of our being, often these are stalled by the nuanced thought behind our heart and mind. Philosophers often believed that we were slaves to our passions despite our reasoning, even now this could be proven by acts of love, but more than often proven it can be seen through our desire for revenge. Unlike it’s counterpart [avenge], revenge is both a verb and a noun that can be not only acted upon but attained. Revenge is what one seeks after being wronged and often an action never thought through by reason, but a fight of a person’s passions towards a self declared justice. Portrayed in a copious amount of movies, songs, and art, the theme of revenge has been held iconically within Shakespeare's most famous play, Hamlet. Centered around corruption of the mind, body and soul, Hamlet is seen by many as the embodiment of revenge through it’s characters (Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras); it is within their actions and development that each character portrays the dichotomy of their passion and reason to prove that we are slaves to our passions until reason catches up.
Moving forward, rather than lagging behind, a truly noteworthy concept of revenge can be seen in the Shakespearean tragedy: “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.” It is within this particular tragedy that prince Hamlet is enlightened, by the ghost of his father, to the murder of his father by his uncle, Claudius, an incestuous, adulterous beast who greedily claimed the throne and Hamlet's mother as his wife. (Hamlet 1.5.45-46, 49-53) Nevertheless, it is through this enlightenment that Hamlet sets off toward avenging his father's death, but along the way he is pitted against misfortune as the downward-...
Imagine a play in which a prince is seeking revenge of his father’s murder and ultimately succeeds. Now, imagine a play with the same plot, but with young love, dramatic scenes denying this love, and true madness that leads to suicide. Which sounds better? Which would hold your attention longer? Odds are that the second play described is the choice you have chosen or unknowingly chosen in your thoughts. If it is not, then you would be missing out on one of the most famous plays written by William Shakespeare. Both plays described have the fundamental plot of this Shakespeare’s Hamlet, but only the second is the true play that Shakespeare intended to be performed. Only the second play includes the young, lovesick and distraught Ophelia who separates the first described play from the second. Ophelia may not be the star of the play like Hamlet, but through her transformation into a state of madness along with her role in the only true romance in the play, we learn more about several characters and remain intrigued in the play.
Revenge is a major theme throughout William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet. This theme provides motivation for characters to murder each other throughout the play, whether or not characters seek revenge for themselves. Because Laertes and Hamlet are so absorbed with wanting to exact revenge upon certain people, they ultimately cause the deaths of all of the main characters in the play. Revenge is the main root of evil in this play.
Revenge almost always has the makings of an intriguing and tragic story. William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a perfect example of how revenge unfolds and what it unveils. The play tells the story of Hamlet, the prince of Denmark. Claudius, Hamlet’s uncle, marries his mother soon after his father’s death. Hamlet greatly disapproves of the hasty marriage and suspects foul play. His suspicions are confirmed when the ghost of his father appears and tells him that Claudius murdered him. Hamlet’s father asks him to take revenge upon Claudius, and soon everything takes a drastic change. The courses of revenge throughout Hamlet surround each character with corruption, obsession, and fatality.
Revenge has caused the downfall of many a person. Its consuming nature causes one to act recklessly through anger rather than reason. Revenge is an emotion easily rationalized; one turn deserves another. However, this is a very dangerous theory to live by. Throughout Hamlet, revenge is a dominant theme. Fortinbras, Laertes, and Hamlet all seek to avenge the deaths of their fathers. But in so doing, all three rely more on emotion than thought, and take a very big gamble, a gamble which eventually leads to the downfall and death of all but one of them. King Fortinbras was slain by King Hamlet in a sword battle. This entitled King Hamlet to the land that was possessed by Fortinbras because it was written in a seal'd compact. "…our valiant Hamlet-for so this side of our known world esteem'd him-did slay this Fortinbras." Young Fortinbras was enraged by his father’s murder and sought revenge against Denmark. He wanted to reclaim the land that had been lost to Denmark when his father was killed. "…Now sir, young Fortinbras…as it doth well appear unto our state-but to recover of us, by strong hand and terms compulsative, those foresaid lands so by his father lost…" Claudius becomes aware of Fortinbras’ plans, and in an evasive move, sends a message to the new King of Norway, Fortinbras’ uncle.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is full of revenge between multiple characters in the play. After seeing the ghost of his father, Hamlet was determined to get his revenge on his uncle, Claudius, for murdering his father and marrying his mother. Hamlet had multiple chances for revenge but was not willing to let his uncle go to Heaven after the crimes he committed. He used schemes and was able to avoid being killed by Claudius. Hamlet’s revenge did not go as planned, seeing that he killed more people than intended and was also killed himself. After the duel between Hamlet and Laertes, Hamlet was finally able to kill his uncle for the wrong actions that he committed.
”(153) It becomes clear that the parallels presented throughout the play are there to further illuminate the flaws of Hamlet’s character. Laertes is a hot-headed man looking for revenge. His father was killed by Hamlet and his sister was driven insane due to the series of events that took place because of Hamlet. Like Hamlet, Laertes wants to avenge his father by killing the man who killed Polonius.
In this essay I will be writing about whether Hamlet is a revenge tragedy or not, I will have an introduction which will introduce the meaning of a revenge tragedy, then I will have a main body of text in which I will explain why Hamlet is a true revenge tragedy and finally I will have a conclusion. “What is a revenge tragedy?” Well, a revenge tragedy is when a character takes vengeance for a murdered victim, the character is usually a family member of the avenged victim. A Revenge tragedy conventionally results in the death of both the murderer and the avenger. This type of play was very popular during the Elizabethan and Jacobean eras.
To call 'Hamlet' merely a revenge tragedy is to look at a single aspect of this multi-faceted drama. In most revenge tragedies the revenger is a fairly simple character but in 'Hamlet' we find a depressed man, a philosopher and a character who is heavily religious presented with a dilemma in which his duty conflicts with his qualms. Hamlet is the character who makes this play what it is. The central character who should be cold and devious is one who longs for death and debates which is worse, killing himself or killing Claudius.
Hamlet is one of Shakespeare’s most well-known tragedies. At first glance, it holds all of the common occurrences in a revenge tragedy which include plotting, ghosts, and madness, but its complexity as a story far transcends its functionality as a revenge tragedy. Revenge tragedies are often closely tied to the real or feigned madness in the play. Hamlet is such a complex revenge tragedy because there truly is a question about the sanity of the main character Prince Hamlet. Interestingly enough, this deepens the psychology of his character and affects the way that the revenge tragedy takes place. An evaluation of Hamlet’s actions and words over the course of the play can be determined to see that his ‘outsider’ outlook on society, coupled with his innate tendency to over-think his actions, leads to an unfocused mission of vengeance that brings about not only his own death, but also the unnecessary deaths of nearly all of the other main characters in the revenge tragedy.