Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of peer pressure
Peer pressure and its effects
The effects of peer pressure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Habitus is defined as “A set of acquired dispositions of thought, behaviour and taste.” (Scott and Marshall, 2009). The concept was created by Pierre Bourdieu and was first used in his book Outline of Theory and Practice in 1977. His theory of habitus derives from the philosophy of Aristotle. Bourdieu looked at how society can influence a person’s self and whether certain aspects of society can be aesthetically seen on the individual. These choices are influenced by many factors. “The position into which we are born as an individual – our family, neighbourhood, social contacts, social class, gender, ethnicity, and the beliefs and values in which we are educated – will put a sizable imprint on the self we become.” (Burkitt, I, 2008, p. 3) The quote above demonstrates how many different factors all input into the person that we become. A person’s habitus is all of those factors within them. Not only does the habitus concern a person’s behaviour and morals, the habitus also affects the choices a person makes about their body. “Through the habitus, society is impressed on the individual, not only in mental habits, but even more in corporeal ones.” (Hanks, 2005) The habitus is formed from the collective structure of the group the individual is part of, such as social class sub-groups. It is also formed from the individual experiences that the person goes through. In relation to the relationship between social class and the self, part of the habitus is the attitudes towards body. It is believed that the attitude a person has towards their body is an indication of social class and is defined by the person’s habitus. “Working-class attitudes to bodies are marked by the demands of getting by in life and the temporary release from the dem... ... middle of paper ... ... such as furniture and clothes. Therefore there is no longer any individuality in the choices, behaviour and morals a person has due to the major influences. Peer pressure, negative and positive influences from other people that the individual knows is different to what they would choose to do also means that the habitus is no longer a useful or reliable indicator of the self. Thus, no longer a strong indicator of the social class a person is from. Therefore it is to be concluded that the concept of habitus does still play an important role in understanding the relationship between social classes and the self but as technology and society progresses the choices we make, which is down to habitus, are not necessarily due to the social class that an individual is in. We are all becoming more and more similar as the years progress and individualism is becoming clouded.
Whether they are positive or negative, our habits are an integral part of our lives. Because of this, when Professor James VanderMey addressed the 33rd annual Honors Convocation at Mid Michigan Community College, he decided to speak on the topic of habit. In his speech, entitled “Remarks on Habit,” VanderMey (argues against Sartre’s point of view by) discusses the advantages of having good habits, especially the habits represented by the Diploma Qualification Profile, a series of proficiencies that students learn as they are educated at Mid Michigan Community College. First, he shows that good habits lead to creative problem solving. Then, he argues that our habits make us who we are. Finally, he shows how good habits may grow and multiply. Habits, especially DQP habits, are positive and useful, because they allow one to think creatively, become a better person, and find innovative ways of doing.
Family, education and a person’s opportunities are significant elements that collectively define an individual, as demonstrated by both Wes Moore’s. Depending on the opportunities offered to you and whether you decide to take advantage of them through hard work and persistence will result in your success or failure in the end. Wes Moore explains “The chilling truth is that his story could have been mine. The tragedy is that my story could have been his” goes to show that certain factors affect how you will be as an adult regardless of similar or differentiating backgrounds. (Moore xi).
People often have the similar opinions on same one thing if they from one community. For example, most the American believe god and call themselves “Christian”, however, most the Chinese believe the Buddha and call themselves “Buddhist”. In the article “What Makes Up Your Identity?” Tyra Marieza states, “The way that the adults in your family, in your neighborhood, church and school behave are the reason why you are the way you are, according to the nurture theory.” The author is trying to explain that the environment can shape of who you are. For instance, children in my village in China don’t study hard because everyone have no dream and don’t worry about their future; they consider that they will be farmers like their parents. In contrast, children in the city in China study hard for their different dreams, like being doctors, pilots, etc; they have no doubt that they will have the same job as their parents or
Throughout SOCIO 211, Professor Sanderson has repeatedly stated that the things we do every day are not natural. Instead these things are constructed by society. He has repeatedly reminded us that we don’t “see” sociology or culture and that we need to “teach ourselves how to see again.” This has been the main take home point of this class for me. I’ve never realized how much I am shaped by my friends, family, teachers, and others around me. That being said, three sociological concepts have improved my understanding of my relationship with society: socialization, gender, and family. These three concepts have been the most important to me because they all are concepts I’ve related to my everyday life, that I am influenced by, and have been molded into. These concepts have made me realize that I cannot necessarily be whoever I want to be or do whatever I want to do. Because of these three main points, I understand my roles and expectations better in life. I have noticed that I act the way I do because I have been socially constructed to do so through socialization, expectations of gender and gender roles, and by how my family has influenced my view of society.
What do body modifications signify in people's culture? Some cultures force body modifications as a right of passage into a new stage in a person's life. Body modifications are associated with many things, for example, commitment, social rank, and ways to control people's lives. Waris Dirie, Tepilit Ole Saitoti, and Enid Schildkrout talk about body modifications and what they mean in different cultures. Cultures have different forms of body modifications with their own meaning and background. Men and women must take on specific roles set upon by their culture from the body modifications they endure.
There he stands atop the stairs of the Lincoln Memorial, in the nations’ capital, at a podium, speaking to the world. The crowds faces full of hope. Ears opened wide and clear, for the Dr. is speaking today. He is speaking from the heart and telling the nation that he has a “DREAM.” Dr. King had a dream and as most people think that it is geared towards blacks and whites, it’s not. Dr. King wanted equality between everybody. He wanted freedom from racism and prejudice throughout the nation. He was very good in getting the emotional perspective of persuasion across to his audience. King was a very inspirational man; his words were so true and full of meaning. He spoke to everyone and got everybody involved. This is why people followed him and why I think this is the most persuasive piece we have read. He not only implies his wants but he carries along with him the wants and needs of every man or woman ever treated poorly because of the color of their skin or their beliefs. There is a certain unexplainable meaning and feeling when a man like King steps up in front of the world and says, “I have a Dream.”
The education system and the peer group within the school system are important socialisation agents in an individual’s life. Children from an early age absorb the values, attitudes and beliefs of the society in which they participate (Ashman & Elkins, 2009).
Griffin begins her exploration of these external factors through her interconnected “matrix” that connects all individuals to each other and world around them. Griffin states that each individual “is a part of a large matrix of relationship and society…all the lives that surround [them] are in [them]” (Griffin 371). Griffin indicates that there are societal circumstances that a person does not have a choice in at birth, such as military or political presence, cultural and ethnic background, and socio-economic status; these external factors of the “matrix” are molded into the lives of each individual, shaping them to match their surroundings (Griffin 371). At the same time, the influence of relationships on an individual is also a crucial component to the “matrix.” An individual does not get to choose their biological parents or the family that they are born into. The actions exhibited by a person’s family and the treatment they receive from those individuals provides an influential model for behavior; all the lives that “surround [them] are in [them]” as Gr...
Marcel Mauss in his work Techniques of the Body (1934) is regarded as the first piece of work to outline a systematic anthropology of the body (Synnott 1993). It aims to show evidence that most everyday body techniques differ between people raised in different environments, as they have a different way of life that requires a different set of skills. According to Mauss all ordinary activities such as walking, running, swimming, resting are not just techniques we are naturally equipped with but are instead culturally acquired. The aim of this paper is to critically assess Mauss’ argument that techniques of the body constitute culture. This will be done by looking at what is defined as culture in the context that Mauss refers to. An analysis of Mauss’ examples of “body techniques” given in his paper will then begin, whilst also drawing on current examples. Mauss’ work will then be compared to other writers in the field of ‘the body’ such as Elias and Goffman.
Society is not consisted of innate behaviors, but instead learned interactions and knowledge through symbolic changes. Through these exchanges, habitus is formed. Habitus is the result of practiced exchanges that have been inadvertently taught through past exchanges of culture, language, and knowledge. One cannot escape the way the world imposes these practices, and the practices are constantly occurring and changing, reflecting society. The actions of society are in a way regular, normal, and regulated without any type of law and rules, and does not need to be explicitly stated. Sometimes, however, Habitus can be a calculated operation, in which a practice learned by another is now teaching another the normality and expectations of the culture.
A habit of mind is a way of thinking that one acquires over time. It is a type of thought that involves thinking beyond what society considers right or wrong, but acknowledging through complex thought, what is morally right. It is not easily achieved and is somewhat like a muscle, in that you have to build it up over time through intellectual work and hardship. Not everyone can achieve a strong habit of mind, in fact most don’t. The habit is a way of thinking that allows one to communicate with knowledge when the answer is not initially apparent. In order to think in this complex manner a person has to be well educated in all subjects of intelligence. Having a good education goes hand in hand with having good habits of mind, because in order to have positive functioning habits, a person has to be well rounded enough to considered every possible solution to the problems or questions posed. Being able to use a habit of mind also requires a type of thinking where others nor any outside force constrains any ideas or solutions . This by definition is a habit of mind.
Adrienne Rich once wrote an open letter titled “Politics of Location” that profoundly opened my eyes to a relevantly obvious concept of self-identity. More often than not, one fails to see the truth that sits right before his or her own eyes. However, it is still the responsibility of the individual to be accountable for that truth. The concept of politics of location is simply that one’s life experiences affects one’s perspective. Unintentionally, individuals make themselves the center of reality. When, in actuality, one is only the center of his or her own reality. Rich also goes on to explain that people are different; yet, individuals have an uncanny since of imagined community. That being, the feeling that
The purpose of this paper is to try and explain how outside influences help and sometimes hinder your development as a person. Influences such as family, media, and individual peer groups have a great impact on the particular type of person you will become. Socialization does not stop when you reach a certain age, but is a lifelong process which helps us become aware of one’s self identity.
Class has no doubt been critical in affecting our life chances. According to Weber (as cited in Henslin, 2010, P. 238), class position can determine life chances in the sense that an individual’s life will follow a certain ...
The importance of body image and the idealisation of the ideal body have become more dominant in society today.