Habeas Corpus Thesis

899 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Lincoln's abuse of power

Reagan Hood

The Suspension of Habeas Corpus

Word Count:

9/15/16

Habeas Corpus is a writ requiring a person under arrest be brought before a judge into court to secure the person’s release, unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention. On April 27, 1861 Abraham Lincoln suspended this writ during the American Civil War. habeas corpus is a very important legal principle. It being included in the main body of the Constitution shows how important this was to the framers of this country. Getting rid of it means that anyone can be arrested and not get a chance to go before a judge. The suspension…. Thesis Statement.
The suspension of habeas corpus is addressed in Article I, Section 9 clause 2. From this, Lincoln assumes that
In Article I , Section IX of the U.S Constitution it says, “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it”(). They argue that the president was fearful for the American people’s safety, so he suspended the writ. This argument is incorrect because the Constitution does not specify whether the congress or the president holds this power. He over ruled the legislative branch and exceeded his powers. Many believe that the constitution in many places gives the power to the congress. It was wrong for President Lincoln to assume that it was in his power to suspend the writ without the consideration of the
His assumption that the Constitution “is silent as to which, or who, is to exercise the power” of suspending habeas corpus is contradicted and it is proved that President Lincoln was in complete error.

Works Cited
"Article I." LII / Legal Information Institute. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2016. .
"Civil War Era." Teaching American History. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2016. .
Costly, Andrew. "Lincoln and the Writ of Liberty - Constitutional Rights Foundation." Lincoln and the Writ of Liberty - Constitutional Rights Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2016. .
"Lincoln's Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus: An Historical and Constitutional Analysis." Dueholm, James A. Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2016. .
"A Proclamation on the Suspension of Habeas Corpus, 1862." The Gilder Lehrman Institute of
American History. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2016. .

"The Withered Writ." The American Prospect. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Nov. 2016.

Show More
Related

  • James S. Hirsch’s Book, Hurricane

    1825 Words  | 4 Pages

    The book raises the importance of, and questions, the writ of habeas corpus. Carter used a writ of habeas corpus to get a federal trial. Many question the legality of Carter going into federal jurisdiction, when his case should have been heard before the Supreme Court of New Jersey. It was a gamble, but the federal judge gave fair justice to Carter and Artis. The State of New Jersey appealed the case all the way to the United States Supreme Court, which upheld the District Court’s ruling.

    Read More

  • Lincoln's Suspension Of Habeas Corpus Analysis

    1451 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of President Lincoln’s most notable infringements was his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. Within months of taking the presidential oath, Lincoln ordered the suspension of habeas corpus, citing “supra-constitutional reasons for taking unilateral executive action.” Attorney General Edward Bates’ defense of Lincoln’s actions regarding habeas corpus in which he refers to it as a privilege rather than a guaranteed civil liberty serves as basis for proving the illegitimacy of this act. If the writ of habeas corpus, which protects citizens from unlawful imprisonment, is viewed in the manner that Bates (and Lincoln for that matter) refers to it, one of the most basic constitutional liberties of a right to trial can easily be deprived and can very well devolve into despotism later

    Read More

  • Comparison of US Bill of Rights and The Canadian Charter of Rights

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American Civil War had a very profound effect upon the American Constitution and upon American constitutionalism generally. The Civil war had indeed been fought over a question of states’ rights, among other things, and the states’ rights interpretation had actually lost and was, to a degree, a casualty of the wartime period. Further, that casualty was swiftly hammered into its coffin by three amendments which were enacted in 1865, 1868 and 1870 – the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The Fourteenth Amendment ultimately became the heart and soul of the modern American Constitution. Most of the legal battle’s surrounding the United States Bill of Rights have been to make it a truly national document – such that states may not violate its provisions. The Fourteenth Amendment finally made this possible.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Japanese Internment

    2436 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Constitution guarantees that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without being taken to court for a fair trial, but that means nothing if the people are not willing to uphold it (Fifth Amendment).

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln and the Kansas-Nebraska Act

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln’s original views on slavery were formed through the way he was raised and the American customs of the period. Throughout Lincoln’s influential years, slavery was a recognized and a legal institution in the United States of America. Even though Lincoln began his career by declaring that he was “anti-slavery,” he was not likely to agree to instant emancipation. However, although Lincoln did not begin as a radical anti-slavery Republican, he eventually issued his Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves and in his last speech, even recommended extending voting to blacks. Although Lincoln’s feeling about blacks and slavery was quite constant over time, the evidence found between his debate with Stephen A. Douglas and his Gettysburg Address, proves that his political position and actions towards slavery have changed profoundly.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The 14th Amendment

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    This amendment was created during the reconstruction phase attempting to reunite this country after the brutal battles of the Civil War. Henretta and Brody emphasize how the Republicans were progressing in a direction to sanctify the civil rights of the black community. These authors contend the vital organ of the document was the wording in the first section. It said “all persons born or naturalized in the United States were citizens.” No state could abridge “the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States”; deprive “any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”; or deny anyone “the equal protection of the laws.”2 Imagine the problems that could arise in the country if repeal were to come to a realization. Henretta and Brody point out how the wording in section 1 of the document was written in a way that could be construed as inexplicit. The reason for this was for the judicial system and Congress could set an example for balance in due process here in the

    Read More

  • Narrative Of The Life Of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave

    1560 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The law on the side of freedom is of great advantage only when there is power to make that law respected”. This quote comes from Fredrick Douglas’ book, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, written in 1845. Fredrick Douglas who was born into slavery in 1818 had no understanding of freedom. However, his words shed light on the state of our country from the time he made this statement, but can be traced back fifty-eight years earlier to when the Constitution was drafted and debated over by fifty-five delegates in an attempt to create a document to found the laws of a new country upon. However, to eradicate the antiquated and barbaric system of slaver would be a bold step to set the nation apart, but it would take a strong argument and a courageous move by someone or a group to abolish what had enslaved thousands of innocent people within the borders of America for centuries. There was an opportunity for the law to be written within the Constitution, which would support this freedom Fredrick Douglas alluded to. However, the power, which controlled this law, would as Douglas stated, “make that law respected”.

    Read More

  • Hamilton Argues Against A Bill Of Rights

    994 Words  | 2 Pages

    Therefore Hamilton states that bills of rights “have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people,” and that under the constitution “the people surrender nothing, and as they retain everything of the state constitutions do not contain one either. He believes that the Constitution, as it is, effectively includes a bill of rights. The constitution contained various provisions in favor of particular privileges and rights. Provisions such as the power to impeach, writ of habeas corpus, the allowance for no bill of attainder or ex post facto law, no granting of title of nobility, trials that shall be by a jury in the state in which the crime was committed, and that punishment for treason will not extend to family members of the person convicted of that crime. To Hamilton, these privileges and rights amount to a bill of rights.

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    Tindall, G.B. & Shi, D.E. (2010). America a narrative history 8th edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. p.205-212.

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln: The Great Emancipation

    1764 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ator.’ Rather than to view Lincoln as a man who sought emancipation as a primary goal, which is misleading, we should remember him as a man who rose above the prevailing prejudices of his time to cast away a morally corrupt institution

    Read More

  • The Espionage Act and The Sedition Act

    2058 Words  | 5 Pages

    "Treason, Sedition and Civil Rights in the U. S. Law." Congressional Digest 14.10 (1935): 227-

    Read More

  • Lincoln the Tyrant

    2247 Words  | 5 Pages

    In his work, The Real Lincoln, economic historian Thomas J. DiLorenzo tells quite the different tale. Daring to criticize this beloved president, DiLorenzo defends his antithetical statements with several key points: Lincoln was more similar to a dictator than an American President. Arguing that the War Between the States was wholly unconstitutional, DiLorenzo corrects the popular misconception that Lincoln’s war was one of abolition. War was not necessary to end slavery, but it was necessary to fulfill Lincoln’s true agenda – to destroy the most significant check on the powers of the central government: the right of secession.1

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Emancipation Proclamation Speech

    1324 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gross, Terry. “Lincoln’s Evolving Thoughts on Slavery, and Freedom.” eLibrary. Proquest LLC, n.d. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln's Abuse of Power

    741 Words  | 2 Pages

    The most blatant abuse of Lincoln's power was his suspension of habeas corpus. The suspension of this constitutional guarantee, by which a person could not be imprisoned indefinitely without being charges with some specific crime, around much opposition throughout the country. Although Lincoln himself made no concentrated efforts to suppress political oppositions, the repeal of habeas corpus enabled overzealous civil and military authorities to imprison thousands of people who were vocal in their opposition to the war against the South. During the war, in the case Ex parte Merryman, Chief Justice Taney ordered Lincoln to grant a writ of habeas corpus to a Southern agitator who had been arbitrarily jailed by military authorities in Maryland. Lincoln ignored the order. After the war, in the case Ex parte Milligan, the Supreme Court ruled that president could not suspend habeas corpus without the consent of Congress.

    Read More

  • The Constitution

    670 Words  | 2 Pages

    Of the 55 delegates sent to the Constitutional Convention, only 39 signed the completed document. Some did not even stay through the entire event because they felt it was headed in a direction that they could not support. These men had different reasons for their objections, some of which are discussed in this paper, but most importantly, they felt that the Constitution would threaten Liberty rather than secure it. The ratification of the Constitution was an essential first step to secure and stabilize this new national, but the voices and views of the Anti-Federalist were also very important. The first amendments to the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, were due in much part to satisfy those voices and established many of the rights that we still hold dear today.

    Read More

More about Habeas Corpus Thesis

Open Document