Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A summary of the book of Habakkuk
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A summary of the book of Habakkuk
Habakkuk wrote this book in the middle of one of the darkest periods of Israel’s history. According to Habakkuk 1:3-4, the way of the people lives were really messed up and wronged, where all the things that Habakkuk can see are injustice, violence, and conflict. Furthermore, all these conditions affect every parts of life and it causes the law losing its strength and justice is perverted. According to the passage’s flow, this book can be divided into two parts (1:1-2:20; 3:1-19) where each part, contains a different settings and Habakkuk’s conditions in dealing with the moral dilemma that he had about God’s holiness and God’s sovereignty over injustice. If we looked closely, the particular passages that I picked (Habakkuk 2:1-8), played such …show more content…
an important role in understanding the meaning of the whole book. Before this verses, we see how Habakkuk dealt with all the wicked things that happening around him.
Mostly, chapter 1 of this book covers Habakkuk’s complaints to God. In this chapter, he also brings up the first’ Lord answer to his first’ complaint that because of the people have sinned, God is going to use the Chaldeans people to judge and punish them (1:6-9). Habakkuk’s complaint continues to the next part of chapter 1, where his object of complaint started to shift, where at the beginning, Habakkuk bothered by the injustice and wicked things that happened, to questioning the fact that how a holy God can use the more wicked nations to discipline His people? At this moment, Habakkuk was not sure about God’s true character by asking: “Are your eyes too pure to look on evil, but why it seems like you are silent and tolerate the treacherous (1:13)?” However, Habakkuk’s doubts to God’s holiness got answered in the chapter 2 of this …show more content…
book. After I had discussing about the context in the previous chapter before the particular verses that I picked (Habakkuk 2:1-8), now I will switch the focus by looking at the settings/context that used by Habakkuk in writing the rest of this book (2:9-3:19) which followed after my text.
I noticed that at this moment, Habakkuk had a new perspective to all His complaints and questions to God. In chapter 2:9-20, Habakkuk record the Lord’s second answer to his second’s complaint where God was clearly answering Habakkuk’s question through significant and unfathomable revelations about His position regarding injustice and His righteousness without holding it back anything. In this chapter, Habakkuk used the phrase “woe” for multiple times (2:6, 9, 12, 15, 19) that indicates that God was really serious and will not decreasing the standard when it comes to the matter of His holiness. In all His ways, God will always do justice by punishing the wicked and bring deliverance to the righteous (2:6-19). The last chapter of this book ended with an eye-opening revelation where Habakkuk realized how great and sovereign God is (3:2-16) and all Habakkuk can do is to worship God with a grateful heart and amazement of who God really is (3:18-19). I believe the significance things that will happen if the text that I chose was missing is: 1). We will never know God’s answers to Habakkuk’s second complaint that focused on the unchangeable characters and position of God when it comes to His
holiness, righteousness, and dealing with injustice and 2). We will never know this fascinating revelation that laid in Habakkuk 2:4 that said: “the righteous will live by his faith.” I believe this truth really matters because it helps the reader of this book understanding the connections between Habakkuk’s complaints and God’s answers that become the main features of this book. In conclusion, the text that I chose is really important in looking the relations of each chapter in the book.
Foreboding and dreadful describe the tone of “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”. Edwards makes the tone very clear by saying “The God that holds you over the pit of Hell, much as one holds a spider or some loathsome insect over the fire” (154). He tries to convey the wrath of god that will come upon them if they do not devoted themselves to Christ by saying “Thus all you that never passed under a great change of heart, by the mighty power of the Spirit of God upon souls, all you that were never born again, and made new creatures, and raised from being dead in sin, to a state of new, and before altogether unexperienced light and life, are in the hands of an angry God.” (154).
In his book, The Good Book, Peter J. Gomes attempts to convince his readers the proper way to read and interpret the Bible, takes an analytical standpoint on past (and current) controversial topics such as racism, women, Jews, and homosexuality. Along with these two things, he explains to his readers how the Bible interacts with several topics people typically have questions on in regards to how they relate to the Bible.. The main point of his novel, as I see it, is to inform the readers of two things. The first being that there is both a right and wrong way to read the Bible, while the second is that people in general want to read the Bible but are biblically illiterate and do not know how to approach it.
Arguably, throughout history, the most influential book ever written has been “The Holy Bible.” Whether it is a historical document, a children’s story, a fable, a story of moral lessons, or a multitude of novels; “The Holy Bible” and its themes have been passed down through generations. If one were to look at “The Holy Bible” as a whole then one could say that the themes of the Bible are all about freedom and how one has a responsibility to keep that freedom. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail” King relates to several themes mentioned in “The Holy Bible.” Themes such as justice, non-violence, equality, and freedom in King’s work greatly reflect what freedom and responsibility really mean.
In paragraph 11, King declares, “freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed,” but he feels that negroes tend to “wait” for change to happen. He then juxtaposes how Asia and Africa are eager to gain political independence and we linger around wanting change, but we will not take direct action. King uses biblical allusion in paragraph 17 when he analogizes civil disobedience to the refusal of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego to obey laws of higher morality. Biblical allusion is demonstrated in paragraph 20 when he compares the statement of his peaceful actions precipitating violence and should be condemned to Jesus being condemned because his never-ceasing devotion to his will precipitated the evil act of crucifixion. King challenges the use of unjust laws in paragraph 18 by commenting on how Hitler’s actions in Germany were considered legal which exemplifies historical allusion. Although there were different types of allusions administered, I felt that King magnified biblical allusion more because he, indeed, is a preacher and his audience was a group of
Slave-owners forced a perverse form of Christianity, one that condoned slavery, upon slaves. According to this false Christianity the enslavement of “black Africans is justified because they are the descendants of Ham, one of Noah's sons; in one Biblical story, Noah cursed Ham's descendants to be slaves” (Tolson 272). Slavery was further validated by the numerous examples of it within the bible. It was reasoned that these examples were confirmation that God condoned slavery. Douglass’s master...
In the first chapter of God Behaving Badly, David Lamb argues that God is unfairly given a bad reputation. He claims these negative perceptions are fueled by pop culture and lead many to believe the lie that the God of the Old Testament is angry, sexist, racist, violent, legalistic, rigid, and distant. These negative perceptions, in turn, affect our faith. Ultimately, Lamb seeks to demonstrate that historical context disproves the presumptuous aforementioned. In addition, he defends his position by citing patterns of descriptions that characterize God throughout the Old Testament. “Our image of God will directly affect how we either pursue or avoid God. If we believe that the God of the Old Testament is really harsh, unfair and cruel, we won’t want anything to do with him” (Lamb 22). Clearly, they way Christians choose to see God will shape their relationship with Him.
The story starts off in Chapter 5, pg 76 where Bilbo regains consciousness from the fight with the goblins. He finds a ring on the floor and decides to keep it in his pocket. Lost, he decides to keep going onward in hopes of finding an exit, but instead finds an underground river. Bilbo keeps going until suddenly he hears a hiss sound from behind him. Scared, he thrusts his dagger in front of him and asks who it is. Gollum does not want to face the hobbit with the sword, so he offers a riddle game. If Bilbo can’t answer Gollum’s riddle, he will devour Bilbo, but if Gollum can’t answer Bilbo’s riddle, Gollum will show Bilbo out of the mountain. Bilbo who is eager to get out of the mountain, agrees to the riddle game and they commence making
This chapter specifically addresses how the people would say that they would do one thing, and go about their live and do the complete opposite. God called the prophet to address this and to help the people of Israel see that what they were doing was not right. God was angry toward the His chosen people and that anger is displayed throughout the beginning of the chapter, but we see God’s benevolent nature displayed at the end of this chapter. The Lord makes his anger known to the people, however he also urges them to remember that blessed are those who live their lives in a manner pleasing to the
For those who believe in a God who is living and active and who believe in the sanctity of the scriptures, the question of God's justice in the Bible does seem a contradiction at times. As Neiman observed, The Book of Proverbs presents a formula for life, promising blessings to the man who lives a moral life (436). But is The Book of Proverbs a collection of promises or is it the wise man's observations of probabilities? One can see the unpleasant consequences of poor choices, as well as the good fortunes of those who have lived a "clean" life, but sometimes this moral law breaks down. As Neiman states, "experience has led men to realize that ...
After conquering northern Israel in 722 B.C.E., the Assyrians engendered centuries of political intrigue and laid the foundation for future unscrupulous kingdoms and idolatrous people.1 Once the Babylonian empire overthrew Josiah, the King of Judah, Habakkuk began to compose a prophetic book, questioning the ways of God. Above all, Habakkuk could not comprehend why “the evil circumvented the just”2; he thought that the impiety of the world did not correlate with a supposedly just God.3 Throughout his narrative, this biblical prophet came to understand that “the just man, because of his faith, shall live” (Hb 2,4). Eventually discovering that righteousness and faith in God lead to justice, Habakkuk cried out to the people of Judah through his prophetic words, assuring that divine intervention would eradicate the wickedness and oppression.
Every author depicts information in light of purposes and themes. Sometimes these themes are moral issues, emotions, or existential concepts. In the case of the Old Testament, the authors wrote books that highlighted various ideas such as love, obedience, and suffering. Despite various subtopics, the Old Testament clearly demonstrates the theme of God’s faithfulness to his followers.
Among the complaints and questions that Habakkuk brings to God, the most prevalent is this: How can God allow evil to triumph over good? How can God use an evil nation to punish a good nation? Habakkuk feels as if God cannot, or will not hear his pleas and cries. Habakkuk sees strife in the world around him and it bothers him, because he doesn't understand why God would allow these things to happen to His own people. He wondered if God would ever allow justice to rule the world, and if so, when it would. This book is different than any of the other minor prophet books, as it is not God addressing His people through a prophet, but rather the prophet represents the people, and addresses (even challenges) God.
2- Because if injustice happens somewhere once it can be justified in a second incident somewhere else. As a christian he believes it is his moral obligation to stop injustice.
The author of the book Habakkuk is the prophet Habakkuk. There is not sufficient information about the prophet only that he mentions that he is a prophet. The prophet Habakkuk lived during the last days of Judah. Which is why it is believed the prophet Habakkuk “began his ministry before 605 BC” (p.449). The occasion the prophet Habakkuk wrote this book was because “Habakkuk could not understand why God worked the way He did” (p. 449). The purpose why Habakkuk wrote this book was to give words against Babylonia. Also, another purpose why the prophet wrote this book was because he wanted to show the people the importance of having faith in God no matter what. Some major themes found in the book of Habakkuk are, “God’s judgment and mercy, to
God wanted what was best for man. As the creator, He knows what is best for His creation. Some of His consequences may seem harsh, but as a father, He was trying to teach His children how to live holy. He uses promises and consequences to teach His children, much as we do to teach our children. The only way to have a relationship with Him is to remain holy. These two chapters helper the reader to understand holiness and the importance of it.