Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of urban crime
Link between poverty and urban crime
Link between poverty and urban crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of urban crime
Many people believe that the larger the city is, the more danger there is. In most cases that is true, but not all. There have been a great amount of gruesome murders in large towns, but there have been a few gruesome murders in small towns as well. Some killers will be mentioned, such as Ed Gein, John Wayne Gacy, and Patrick Tracy Burris. When they had struck their town with fear, each killer had claimed at least two lives. Does the population of a city affect its homicide rate?
First, Ed Gein had murdered people in Plainfield, Wisconsin, although they think the body count is higher, they know for sure that he had killed at least two people. He murdered the two girls and had performed necrophilia, he also robbed graves after his mother had died. Gein had loved to feel powerful, he loved being dominant and that is why he had killed the girls, because he was attracted to them and they feared him and he felt an excitement at the thought of
…show more content…
that, and the fact knowing he was dominant. The homicides took place between the years 1954 and 1957. The population of Wisconsin in 1954 was 3.608 million people, the population in 1955 was 3.679 million, the population in 1956 was 3.742 million, and the population in 1957 was 3.791 million. Gein killed in a highly populated area of Wisconsin; that may lead to people thinking that the larger the population in a city the more murders happen. That may not be the case. In fact, it doesn’t matter if the city had three thousand people or if the city has three hundred people if there is a killer living in the city the killer is going to kill. The larger the city is, though, the higher the chances there are of a murder taking place. Secondly, another cold hearted killer is John Wayne Gacy, he was a serial killer in Chicago, Illinois between 1972- 1976.
The population in Chicago in the 1970’s was 3,366,957. Gacy had killed 33 boys and young men. He would lure his victims to his home by either by offering them a job, or dressing as Pogo the Clown. After Gacy had gotten his victims to his house, he would convince them to let him tie them up, which he then murdered him. Gacy also had a gruesome killing spree in a large city, but did the population of the city drive him to do what he did? No, psychologists think that he had fallen over the edge. They said that Gacy he would have killed people, no matter the population. It didn’t matter if he was in Chicago with a lot of citizens, or if he were in Bristol where it is a small community, either way, he would have killed people. Unlike other killers, Gacy had performed more than a minority of the killings that year in Chicago. He is known as one of the ghastliest, horrendous serial assassins in
history. An additional murderer is Patrick Tracy Burris. He had killed five people in Gaffney, South Carolina in 2009. He murdered them all in a matter of days, he would go to stores and shoot the workers and anyone who was in view of the door, and he had a clear shot at. The population was 13,126, but he still killed people. The number of citizens in a community does not drive people to kill others, something in their brains makes them kill others. Statistics show that in Chicago in 2013, the homicide rate, per 100,000, of 414, and in 2013 Chicago had a population of 2.713 million people. That is a lot of murders that have happened. In Miami, in 2013, the homicide rate, per 100,000, of 71, and the population at that time was 417,650 people. San Francisco, in 2013, had an assassination rate, per 100,000, of 48, with a population of 837,442 people. Finally, the examples of some murders, in large and small states, shows that the amount of population in a city does not affect the patricide rate. The population could, but might not, impact the body count of a killer, but it also depends on how sharp and dedicated the police department of that city is to find out who the killer is. According to the statistics, it shows that just because the city is larger doesn’t mean that the homicide rate is higher. San Francisco had a low rate in 2013 compared to Miami. In 2013, Miami had fewer people than San Francisco, but had more murders than San Francisco. Therefore, the percentage of homicides do not depend on population. So, in the end, a scourge does not care if the community is overcrowded. Some of them feel suffuse in the presence of a ton of people, but that doesn’t excuse the actions these grisly executioners had acted upon. Human slaughter can be found in any town, no matter how giant or bijou the town is.
John Wayne Gacy was an American serial killer and rapist. He tortured and killed thirty-three young boys between 1972 and 1978 in Cook County, Illinois. He was executed by lethal injection, however this act of execution was wrong.
There have been many horrific and disturbing murders in Illinois. There have also been gangs that have been born and destroyed in Illinois. Two of these terrible happened to take place in little Skidmore. One of the gangs in Illinois was Charlie Birger and his Boys. A dreadful and unfortunate murder happened on the famous Chain of Rocks Bridge. The last murder took place in a young woman’s house. Many of these murders and gangs were terrible and scarred the state of Illinois.
The Murder Book describes three things that are required in order to commit a crime. These three things are “a motivated offender, the availability of a suitable target, and the absence of effective guardians” (page 92). First, John Wayne Gacy was obviously a motivated offender. Not only did he keep the bodies of the victims underneath his home, he killed at least 33 young men, if not more, and only stopped because he was caught. If he had not been motivated, he would not have been able to kill so many young men before being caught. Second, he had an abundance of suitable victims. As stated earlier in my paper, he became a well-known figure in his community. He held neighborhood parties and was incredibly active with those people around him; people thought that he was a caring, respectable man. There would be no reason to hide from him. Not to mention, he ran a successful construction company that of course young men would work for because it was a job they could get. He basically had an endless supply of young men that he could have taken advantage of and murdered. Third, being a respectable member of his community allowed people to let their guards down around him. Of course there was an absence of an effective guardian. He literally killed at least 33 people, in order to do that there obviously was not an effective enough guardian for these victims. He was able to kill these people for years without detection. He buried them underneath his house without anyone noticing anything suspicious. So, while it may not be exactly what the Routine Activity Theory had in mind, I think it completely fits John Wayne Gacy’s
One of the most horrendous serial killers in modern history would have to be John Wayne Gacy, Jr. He was the second of three children and born in 1942. He lived in Chicago and attended catholic schools, and wasn't a very popular boy in school. Gacy seemed to live a very normal childhood, with exception to his relationship with his father, and series of accidents that effected him. No one could have known what the future held for John, not even his father.
Sometimes in life there are events that happen so horrific that it shocks the whole nation. Sometimes individuals that commit murderous sprees gain the attention of a whole community or country with a common unanswered question of why? John Wayne Gacy was one of those individuals that gained the attention of the Midwest of our nation just outside of Chicago Illinois, with the murders of 33 young men and boys. Looking at the life of Gacy as a killer we do not see any one incident that clicked the serial killer inside. Gacy did however have many smaller issues in life as a young child that could have led him down the wrong path.
In 1982, police received a call about a body floating in the Green River in Salt Lake City, Utah. It was just one of many bodies that they were going to find. Police were stunned when they started receiving more calls about bodies found in parks, playgrounds, and near highways. When police learned that all of the victims were prostitutes, they knew this was a key piece of evidence in their investigation. No one could have ever known that Gary Ridgway just started one of the largest killing sprees in American history.
What are the root causes of a person becoming a serial killer? There have been many different serial killers over the past years, but only one is the infamous “Green River Killer.” Gary Ridgway was dubbed the “Green River Killer” because many of his first victims were found near the Green River in Washington. There are many factors which contribute as to why a person turns and takes their anger out on other people. Some people have a normal childhood with a loving family, while some are not so lucky. A loving family is built around the parents, but if the parents choose violence over love, then that is what the child will grow up only knowing. Gary Ridgway is an American serial killer who killed over sixty women within a twenty year period.
When horrific crimes occur in large cities, many of them can be chalked up to gang violence or to the larger population of that specific city. But when horrific crimes happen in small cities like Lincoln, Nebraska, people begin to ask questions like who did this and why. In 1958, a nineteen year old man named Charles Starkweather put the entire state of Nebraska and possibly the entire nation in a state of terror. With his murder spree taking only three days, Starkweather had collected a body count of ten bodies, including two teenagers and a young child. Understanding Starkweather’s past and state of mind begins to answer the second question of why.
Throughout all of American history there have been those who are well known for committing what are classified as deviant or criminal acts. Most of those who are well known by the public for their actions have committed deeds seen as extremely controversial such as being cult leaders, gang or mafia members, terrorists, rapists, or killers. The lists of members for each topic is numerous, however, there are a certain few that are more prominent than others. One criminal that stands out when speaking of killers in particular is Gary Ridgway, or as he is better known, the Green River Killer. Gary Ridgway is the nation’s most abundant serial killer, with the highest murder rate in America’s history (Gibson).
The sentencing of underage criminals has remained a logistical and moral issue in the world for a very long time. The issue is brought to our perspective in the documentary Making a Murderer and the audio podcast Serial. When trying to overcome this issue, we ask ourselves, “When should juveniles receive life sentences?” or “Should young inmates be housed with adults?” or “Was the Supreme Court right to make it illegal to sentence a minor to death?”. There are multiple answers to these questions, and it’s necessary to either take a moral or logical approach to the problem.
This semester we talked about a variety of serial killers. The first one we discussed was John Wayne Gacy. Gacy was an American serial killer who was responsible for the killing of at least 33 men and boys. He lived in Cook County, Illinois, at the time of his killings. He buried his victims’ bodies under his home.
John Wayne Gacy was a U.S. serial killer who was found guilty of killing 33 boys and young men (McCormick, 1998). Gacy was born on March 17, 1942, in Chicago, Illinois (Sullivan, 2013). John Wayne Gacy had two sisters, Joanne and Karen and had a difficult relationship with his father. His father was an auto repair machanic and World War I veteran (Jones, 2012). Whenever his father came home from work, he would go to the basement and drink. His father was an alcoholic and used physical punishment on all of his children (Jones, 2012). He would even beat the children with a razor strap if they misbehaved (Sullivan, 2013). Gacy’s mother tried her best to protect the children, but Gacy’s father physically assaulted her as well (Jones, 2012). Additionally,
The life story of Ed Gein depicts his numerous brutal acts as illustrations of his insanity and madness. His deranged childhood, especially his relation to his domineering mother led to his psychosis and ultimately to the horrible killings we still fears today. He is the killer whose fiendish fantasies inspired many movies such as, PSYCHO, Silence of the Lambs, and Texas Chainsaw Massacre all of which focused on gruesome and bizarre acts beyond all imagining. Ed Gein was evidently guilty as all the evidence obviously pointed to him. Yet I believe the psychiatrists were without a doubt in my mind, accurate in declaring Ed Gein insane at the time he committed the perverse and evil acts.
Is it a coincidence that highly urbanized areas are full of crime and always statistically higher than small towns and rural areas? A child that is being brought up in a metropolitan area that is full of violent crimes is flooded in a sense and has nothing to do but to breath in some of the negative influences that go on around him. Therefore, I believe that the most influential scene in a child’s life is the neighborhood that he grows up in. Parents cannot constantly watch over their children, ask about whom they are hanging out with, constantly check where they are, and find out what they are getting themselves into? (Statistics p348)
Michael Sanders, a Professor at Harvard University, gave a lecture titled “Justice: What’s The Right Thing To Do? The Moral Side of Murder” to nearly a thousand student’s in attendance. The lecture touched on two contrasting philosophies of morality. The first philosophy of morality discussed in the lecture is called Consequentialism. This is the view that "the consequences of one 's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.” (Consequentialism) This type of moral thinking became known as utilitarianism and was formulated by Jeremy Bentham who basically argues that the most moral thing to do is to bring the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest number of people possible.