Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Education effect on human health essay
Relationship between education and good health
Relationship between education and good health
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Education effect on human health essay
Conceptual Framework
A person’s health is affected by a lot of factors like choice in medical care, insurance, social status, environment, diet and so on. To derive a model for health-related behaviors, I begin with a broadly used theory from Grossman (1972). Grossman introduced the concept of health capital and used the idea that each individual is a producer of health. That is, people can invest in their health and stock up their health capital by adding up medical care, food, education, etc. to get better health outcomes (Grossman, 1972).
People increase more their medical care to get better health. Grossman’s model identifies two motives to explain why people pursue more medical care: an investment incentive and a consumption incentive. From an investment point of view, people would have more healthy days to spend on work and leisure if they invest more in their health. From a consumption perspective, health increases people’s utility directly; that is, they feel better when they are healthier and good health increases their quality of work and leisure (Grossman, 1972; Dolan 2003).
Demand for health can be derived from the demand for utility, which is a utility maximization problem. Individual utility is a function of health stocks and a bunch of commodities from period 0 to period n.
U=U( Health Stock_0,…,Health Stock_n,Commodity_0,…,Commodity_n ) (1)
The main idea of Grossman’s paper (1972) is to treat health as a capital stock so that people can produce more health capital by investment in health.
Health Stock_(t+1)=Health Stock_t-δ Health Stock_t+Investment (2) δ is the depreciation rate which can be caused by aging, sickness or accidents during period t.
We also have to consider the househo...
... middle of paper ...
...arital status, father-at-home, mother-at-home, household members, household income and wealth indicator, to control for the three health-related behaviors, to control for the three health-related behaviors. To generate the household income, I sum up all the family’s earnings from farming, gardening, fishing, sales of crops and livestock and small household business. The wealth indicator is also generated as a dummy with a binary outcome, where the value is equals to 1 if a family owns a color TV, refrigerator, air conditioner, computer, telephone, cell phone and motorcycle simultaneously, and 0 otherwise.
Variables collected above are based on Grossman’s theory for inputs of health stock. To examine the effect of education on the health-related behaviors, I will use Grossman’s concept to derive the empirical model and use these variables to see the results.
I chose not to use any of the prompts provided, but instead connect the article to what I learned in my sociology class lass quarter. In class we watched part one of film series of Unnatural causes, titled Unnatural Causes: Is Inequality Making us Sick "In Sickness and in Wealth". While reading the article this reminded me about the cases studied in the film to see whether wealth inequality contributes to making people sick. In the film they focused on the social determinants of health, wealth and education. In both the article and part one of the film Unnatural Causes they focused on three different individuals and how their health are affected by they choices they make and the access they have to care.
DiClemente, R. J., Salazar, L. F., & Crosby, R. A. (2013). Health Behavior Theory for Public Health: Principles, Foundations, and Applications. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning
Miller, H. D. (2009). From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care. Health Affairs
Although very divergent in their focus, the existing theoretical models seem to have some similarities and differences. This is especially true in regard to their factors of analysis when considering social determinants of health. For example, Krieger’s ecosocial theory encompasses and acknowledges the roles of social and psychosocial processes of disease process (WHO 2010).
Ormond, B., Spillman, B., Waidmann, T., Caswell, K., & Tereshchenko, B.. (2011). Potential National and State Medical Care Savings From Primary Disease Prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 101(1), 157-64. Retrieved February 23, 2011, from ProQuest Psychology Journals. (Document ID: 2233850141).
Healthy People 2020 is a program for the promotion of health and the prevention of diseases, launched by the Department of Health and Human Services in December 2010. According to healthypeople.gov, this program has four overarching goals which are first to achieve healthy, longer lives free of preventable diseases, injuries, and premature deaths; to achieve health fairness, eliminate differences, and improve all groups’ health; also to produce social and physical environments that encourage good health; and last but not least to promote life’s quality, healthy development, and healthy behaviors through all life stages. This program has a vision of a community where people live long, healthy lives. Healthy People 2020 offers a comprehensive set of 10 years of nationwide goals and objectives that is meant to improve the health of the American population. Healthy People 2020 covers 42 topic areas with approximately 600 objectives, which include 1,200 measures. A smaller set of Healthy People 2020 objectives, has been designated to communicate high-priority health issues and actions that can be taken to address them, this objectives are called Leading Health Indicators. The program goes above and beyond these health indicators in order to provide the best care for the people of this country. These indictors cover from the access of health service, nutrition, physical activity, and obesity to substance abuse, environmental quality, injury and violence.
Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., Lewis, F.M. (2002). Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Significant health inequalities exist between different social classes. Moreover, lower social classes consistently describe their health as poorer in comparison to higher social classes [1]. Marmot’s central theory is that “the relationship between social circumstances and health is a graded one: the higher a person’s social position, the better his or her health” [2].
...an, P., Egerter, S., & Williams, D. R. (2011). The social determinants of health: coming
6. The special characteristics of the U.S. health care market are Ethical and equity considerations, asymmetric information, spillover benefits, and third-party payments: insurance. Each one of these characteristics affects health care in some way. For example, ethical and equity considerations affect health care in the way that society does not consider unjust for people to be denied to health care access. Society believes that it is the same thing as not owning a car or a computer. Asymmetric information also gives health care a boost in prices. People who buy health care have no information on what procedures and diagnostics are involved, but on the other hand sellers do. This creates an unusual situation in which the doctor (seller) tells the patient(buyer) what services he or she should consume. It seems like the patient has to buy what the doctor tells him. The topic of spillover benefits also cause a rise in prices. This meaning that immunizations for diseases benefit not only the person who buys it but the whole community as well. It reduces the risk of the whole population getting infected. And the last characteristic is third-party insurance. Which involves all the insurance money people have to pay. This causes a distortion which results in excess consumption of health care services.
Glanz, K., Rimer, B., Vixwanath, K., (2015). Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice. (5th ed.). San Francisco, Ca: Jossey-Bass.
Determinants of health extends far beyond healthcare and is influenced by social and economic determinants. Poor health is linked to poverty and all health choices depend on available resources and circumstances. The rural area is faced with more hindrances for getting quality healthcare. Those whom live in these areas are more likely to be malnourished and be exposed to unclean water and indoor smoking. These factors should be included when doing an analysis of health benefits, Health seeking behavior can be used as well and classified as family, community healthcare services and the state. Social economic status only looks at the inequalities when other factors such as lifestyle, ethnicity, and education should be included as well. The factors are not always included with health policies (Shaikh, 2008).
Nancy Milio proposed that an individual’s health and lifestyle choices are influenced by resources, availability, cost and convenience more than knowledge obtained from education. This thought provides the framework for influencing community habits by developing policies that protect and promote health (Nies & McEwan, 2015-a). In this paper, I will identify and analyze a community health problem using Milio’s framework for prevention, use Healthy People 2020 to find national goals that relate to my diagnosis and develop one long-term goal, three short-term goals, and accompanying interventions.
Dubois, Mikael. “Response to Should People with Unhealthy Lifestyles Pay Higher Health Insurance Premiums.” Journal of Primary Prevention. New York: Penguin, 2011 32-27. Print.
The cost of US health care has been steadily increasing for many years causing many Americans to face difficult choices between health care and other priorities in their lives. Health economists are bringing to light the tradeoffs which must be considered in every healthcare decision (Getzen, 2013, p. 427). Therefore, efforts must be made to incite change which constrains the cost of health care without creating adverse health consequences. As the medical field becomes more business oriented, there will be more of a shift in focus toward the costs and benefits, which will make medicine more like the rest of the economy (Getzen, 2013, p. 439).