Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing books and movies
Essay on grendel character development
Comparing books and movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing books and movies
eowulf and Grendel
Beowulf and Grendel from the book are significantly different from Beowulf and Grendel(Gunnarsson,2005) from the movie.(Heaney,2000) Beowulf and Grendel from the book are one dimensional characters, and the Beowulf and Grendel from the movie act more complex than in the book. The Beowulf from the movie expresses the cultural belief of morality when he changes throughout the movie of how he feels about Grendel while Grendel from the movie shows the cultural belief of prejudice.
Beowulf from the book is one dimensional and not changing at all during the course of the book. Sticking by Hrothgar never questioning why Grendel is attacking or what Grendel is. Also viewing Grendel as an evil that he just needs to kill for instance,”Then news of Grendel, hard to ignore, reached me at home...”. As well as beliefs in cultural value that something is either good or evil. He starts as a hero looking to save the day and boasting about other triumphs such as,”I battled and bound five beasts,raided a troll-nest and in
…show more content…
the night-sea slaughtered sea-brutes. I have suffered extremes and avenged the Geats”(Heaney,2000). Beowulf has the strength of thirty men which make him seem almost like a God, but just a little less than a God. He is just this noble person that people look up to. Beowulf is so one dimensional it's tough to relate to him. Anglo-Saxon culture is more relatable to that type of hero than heroes we have today in our culture whereas their Gods were basically their heroes. They wanted a character like Beowulf in Anglo-Saxon culture because he basically had no flaws which, if he did the Geats and Danes would have seen that as a weakness. When they have gods like Thor, Odin, Loki, and Malekith it makes him seem equal to them. Beowulf from the movie was more relatable with our culture. Not the perfect hero of the epic, or the enormous hulking figure of the epic that has the strength of thirty men. It's something our culture is more likable to the general audience. If Beowulf of the epic was present in the movie the audience would regard him as dull and uninteresting. He starts as the Beowulf and in the epic, however, changes to find out why Grendel does what he does. At first he identifies Grendel as some evil troll that he needs to rid the world of then he realized that Grendel can talk and has a name. Grendel also doesn't attack Beowulf, which causes Beowulf to question. The point where Beowulf starts to question the events transpiring is when Hrothgar doesn't tell Beowulf anything about Grendel. Hrothgar acts in a way rude about giving Beowulf information, he basically goes around the question. By the end of the movie Beowulf finds that Grendel has a son and Grendel isn't as bad as people thought him to be. He just held the people responsible for killing his dad. Beowulf also builds a shrine to commemorate Grendel. Our culture believes heroes should have good values expressed through Beowulf Grendel on the other hand is more one dimensional in the epic than Beowulf. Grendel doesn’t give a reason to attack the mead hall, but just an arbitrary reason to have a villain. There is not any real sympathy to find and the author probably didn’t want you to. Anglo-Saxon culture was either good or bad. If a creature was imperfect they wanted to be prejudice towards the creature.Grendel is not a character in the epic that gets as much time as other characters.With Beowulf he tells all these stories that give some backstory. The only true backstory that is presented about Grendel is that he is a descendent of Cain,”Grendel was the name of this grim demon haunting the marches, marauding round the heath and the desolate fens; he had dwelt for a time in misery among the banished monsters, Cain's clan”. In Anglo-Saxon culture not knowing about the villain of the story was good . The Grendel from the movie has more backstory than in the epic.
You find out he is dad died when he was just a child. That gives him his reason to attack the mead hall. He also doesn't try and harm Hrothgar. Maybe it's due to when he spared him when he was a child and remembers him. We also find out he has a child with the witch. That could be why they added his son so when Grendel dies, you feel sorry for his kid not having a father. In the epic he is dignified as a monster, but in the movie he's actually smarter than you'd think in that he only attacks people that have done him wrong.
The epic and the movie Beowulf and Grendel have many cultural differences. These differences are major differences from what our culture's view as entertainment are unquestionably different. The two Beowulf and Grendel are great examples of this. They give us two different ways of looking at the characters. One for our culture and another for
theirs
After reading the epic poem Beowulf and watching the movie The 13th Warrior, I find that the differences greatly outnumber the similarities. However, the theme of good versus evil reflects the values of the Anglo-Saxon people in both the poem and the movie. Numerous differences exist in the poem and the movie including the characters, the bloody battles, and the deaths of the heroes.
Our first character, Grendel, is an exceptionally diverse character. It is implied that in both book and poem, Grendel is a blood-thirsty monster. All Grendel does is go through meadhalls and kill the drunk, often asleep people. But when narrated through the eyes of Grendel, the true nature of this beast is discovered. The author of Grendel entails that Grendel is a depressed and misunderstood monster, restrained to the confinements of his own underwater cave. He is a lot like the monster in the book Frankenstein. Both Grendel and Frankenstein are born with no real purpose to life, going off of what they hear other people say and taking it as the truth. Both monsters, knowing that everyone detests them for being unattractive and different, retaliate by way of murder and mayhem. From the perspective of the people in the stories itself, Grendel is exactly how the narrator in the poem Beowulf makes him out to be. The people, or the thanes, of Hrothgar’s kingdom see Grendel as a demon from hell, representing all that’s evil in the world. He’s a supernatural creature and in this time period anything supernatural that wasn’t human was considered a spirit, a god, evil or, in Grendel...
Even though, the values of Beowulf and Grendel are similar to the ones that I and my entire generation have grown up learning, both of the epic and movie have qualities that make me unable to come to a conclusion as to which of the works recounts the story of Beowulf and Grendel in a more exceptional way. Therefore, I give the forthcoming generations the responsibility of making that
The differences and similarities between the traditional version of the Epic Beowulf and the modern version, Beowulf and Grendel, makes passages for characters such as Grendel to be changed due to the time frame in between the film and the epic.There are several characters that stood out from the film, as they are portrayed in the epic as something completely different than in the movie. Grendel is one of the few that stood out the most.
When compared the Movie and the Epic have the same story arc (Beowulf and Grendel, Beowulf and Grendel’s Mother and Beowulf and the Dragon). Starting out similarly with Grendel's slaughter of the Danes through Beowulf’s defeat of Grendel. However, turning in the opposite direction when Grendel’s Mother is introduced. Thus interpreting and changing the finer details of said story.
In both John Gardner’s Grendel, and the poem Beowulf, there are significant differences between characters, and the way they are portrayed in each of the tellings. The interpretation of a hero is usually altered in order to fit the audience, such as, Saddam Hussein in America is made out to be this monster whereas, in his home country Iraq, he is looked at as a hero and idolized by some. In each telling, Grendel and Beowulf have many similarities in how they are described in each writing, but each character is also shown in a different light in each of the writings.
There are many similarities and differences between the movie "Beowulf and Grendel", to the poem. Major differences between the movie and the poem would be Grendel himself. In the poem, he is described as an evil monster born from two demons. In the movie, Grendel is actually human, but known as a troll to the warriors and Danes. The poem doesn’t give the background of Grendel or show how the Danes killed his father and the possible reason of his revenge, like in the movie. If the witch, Selma, was not included in the storyline of the movie, the audience would not have known key information that she was used to show from more flashbacks. The witch gives more of an idea about Grendel’s past life that could have been the possibility to reasons for his actions. Some major similarities are the battles. Both epics include the battles between Beowulf and Grendel, as well as Beowulf and Grendel’s mother. The end results are the same, leading to their death, but the journey and process to the two tales are different.
Beowulf’s characteristics seen on screen are very different compared to Beowulf’s characteristics in the Anglo-Saxon poem. Beowulf in the film Beowulf
“In my youth I engaged in many wars”, Beowulf boasts to his warriors, which is certainly true. Throughout his life, he faces many deadly foes, all of which he handily defeats, save one. His story focuses on the most challenging, as well as morally significant of foes, Grendel and the dragon. These creatures reveal much about society as well as Christian virtue at the time. Even after Grendel and the dragon are defeated physically, the two monsters pose a new threat to the hero on a higher plane. Beowulf is not only at risk of losing his life, but his humanity, virtue, and even spirituality.
The story is told from Grendel’s point of view. From his perspective you can gather that he is not the horrible, violent monster that everybody makes him out to be. He is actually just as scared as the humans are. On page 30 of Grendel, Grendel states that it wasn’t because he threw that battle-ax that he turned on Hrothgar. He said that was mere midnight foolishness and he dismissed it. This shows that Grendel is not out there to harm them, he is an innocent being.
From this novel, the audience is able to get into the mind of this monster and feel his pain, loneliness, and misunderstanding as well as come to realize that Grendel is no monster at all, but rather he represents a reflection of man. Although you could argue that man is a monster himself in this story through the merciless and barbaric actions of the humans, especially Beowulf. Beowulf is represented minimally throughout the story, whereas in “Beowulf” he is shown with much more valor. However, In Gardner's Grendel, Beowulf is depicted as a cruel and narcissistic man. For example, Grendel describes Beowulf as a irrational and greedy man, “He’s crazy. I understand him all right, make no mistake. Understand his lunatic theory of matter and mind, the chilly intellect, the hot imagination, blocks and builder, reality as stress”(Gardner 172). Beowulf does not possess the same qualities in Grendel has he does in the epic poem, “Beowulf.” This is due to the contrasting perspectives of the same character in each book. Like the narrator in Beowulf, Grendel is biased because of his intuitive dislike for humans as well as Grendel’s knowledge that Beowulf is seeking to destroy him. Grendel is also an outcast and monitors the day-to-day lives of the Danish people. His opinions of the people are formed based off of what he observes, sees, and hears. This gives Grendel’s opinions of the
Grendal is known as a monster and portrays one of the many villains in the poem. He is referred to as the "guardian of his sins". Grendal depicts a heathen the physical image of man estranged from God. Basically, Grendal reflects a physical monster, an ogre who is hostile to humanity. Grendal’s constant visits to Hrothgar’s mead hall for bloody feasts made him feel powerful over God’s humanity. Unfortunately, the night Beowulf lies in wait for him, he assumes that his bloody feasts will continue and Grendal gives no attention to his method of attack. Grendal is then killed.
The story of Beowulf contrasted a mix of characters that range from good to evil. Throughout the story Beowulf, the focus was heroism. He was young and heroic representing the “good” in every one of his endeavors. Beowulf was the knight and shining and armor by showing leadership, bravery, and respectful to all. His first renowned battle was with a creature that goes by the name of Grendel. Grendel embodied the darker side of humanity specifically because Grendel is a decedent from the Biblical Cain. The authors used Grendel as a metaphor which is why he displayed so corruptly, he is portrayed as the “evil”. Both Beowulf and Grendel embodied what they were destined for in the book. It vividly highlighted their role in the story readers know that Beowulf is good and Grendel is bad. While Beowulf and Grendel seem to cut from two different clothes they share similarities.
The story of Beowulf is a heroic epic chronicling the illustrious deeds of the great Geatish warrior Beowulf, who voyages across the seas to rid the Danes of an evil monster, Grendel, who has been wreaking havoc and terrorizing the kingdom. Beowulf is glorified for his heroic deeds of ridding the land of a fiendish monster and halting its scourge of evil while the monster is portrayed as a repugnant creature who deserves to die because of its evil actions. In the epic poem, Beowulf the authors portrays Grendel as a cold-hearted beast who thrives on the pain of others. Many have disagreed with such a simplistic and biased representation of Grendel and his role in the epic poem. John Gardner in his book, Grendel set out to change the reader’s perception of Grendel and his role in Beowulf by narrating the story through Grendel’s point of view. John Gardner transforms the perceived terrible evil fiend who is Grendel into a lonely but intelligent outcast who bears a striking resemblance to his human adversaries. In Grendel, John Gardner portrays Grendel as an intelligent being capable of rational thought as well as displaying outbursts of emotion. He portrays Grendel as a hurt individual and as a victim of oppression ostracized from civilization. The author of Beowulf portrays Grendel as the typical monster archetype as compared to John Gardner’s representation of Grendel as an outcast archetype.
One aspect that was the most apparent was the fact that he was such an outcast. In Beowulf, Grendel was “…living down in the darkness, growl[ing] in pain…” because he knew that he did not belong with the Danes and other human beings at all (Raffel 6). Similarly, in Grendel, as interested as he was with the humans and their way of life, he still found himself “…back[ing] away till the honeysweet lure of the harp no longer mocked [him]” (Gardner 4). Grendel was constantly distancing himself from the human beings because he knew he did not belong and they were not willing to give him the gift of acceptance into their group. However, this outlook carried through with Grendel between the two stories to portray just how monstrous and estranged he