Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of good grammar
Importance of correct grammar
Importance of correct grammar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of good grammar
Grammar is important the job market, Kyle Wiens talks about some of his reasons in his article “I Won’t Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here’s Why”. Kyle mention how he won’t hire people with bad grammar one reason being “for better or worse, people judge you if you can’t tell the difference between their, there, and there”. This is true in our current society with all the email, social media and all other ways of communicating without being there personally. We tend to base our opinion about other people on the way they communicate, so why not use this as a basis for the hiring process. Grammar in the job market is very helpful, one reason begins with if you have bad grammar on your resume you will most likely not get an interview. Therefore,
In the article by Kyle Wein “I Won’t Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here’s Why.” explains reasons as to why the owner of a business only hires educated, employees. If someone cannot tell the difference between simple words such as there, their, and they’re, the manager will not hire that applicant. That’s not the only thing Wein looks for in an employee. He is looking for smart, educated, employees who use good grammar. “Yes, language is constantly changing, but that doesn’t make grammar unimportant. Good grammar is credibility, especially on the internet.” Grammar is important no matter what the job is. According to the author, without good use of grammar you will not have a job. Without a job you will have no money, no satisfaction, and/or
In the article “I won’t hire people who use poor grammar here’s why.” published in Harvard business review on managing yourself, Kyle Wiens argues that he have a zero approach which does not allow for any grammar mistake because it makes people stupid, and he believes that people who made mistake in grammar do not deserve to have a job. Further, he supports his thesis by stating that people who made an error in their writing will do error in their work and their life. In addition, he claims that language is constantly changing, but that does not ignore the importance of the grammar. Thus, this claim is supported by stating that good grammar is credibility. For example, programmers who
I do not totally agree, nor do I totally disagree, with the point about grammar that Kyle Wiens’ argues in his article. As an employer, Wiens has the right to make any of his potential employees write a grammar test and deny jobs to those with poor grammar. In my own experience, I notice that people who have poor grammar skills tend to be less meticulous in their work, just as Wiens suggests in the article. Good grammar is virtually paramount for businesses such as the ones owned by Wiens, which are heavily language based. As well, especially in the new millennium, quality workers and employees are becoming increasingly harder to find among the expanding, figurative sea of qualified post-secondary graduates. Thus, I agree with Wiens’ policy of making all of his potential employees write a grammar test. His policy seems like an effective way of determining the best possible people to hire.
According to Kyle Wiens, a person must be able to know proper grammar in order to stock shelves or labeling parts (Wiens, p. 500). Wiens is a businessman and writer who is also the founder of iFixit and Dozuki (Wiens, p. 499). He provides an abundance of claims stating why he doesn’t hire people with bad grammar. These claims include good grammar makes a good business and reduces overall mistakes at the workplace (p.500). While reading this essay, I wasn’t moved by his statements and claims that job-seekers must be proficient in grammar for their resume to be a valid applicant. By simply relating his opinions to statistical and factual information, he could’ve easily made me believe he is a credible source. Wiens lacks a credible stance in
In the article “ I Won't Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here’s Why? By Kyle Wiens, explain why he would only hire people with great grammar for his companies. Wiens believes that grammar is something essential on a daily basis.“I have a zero tolerance approach to grammar mistakes that people look stupid”1 according to Kyle Wiens, owner of iFixit or Dozuki (online repair manual companies). To look professional on any kind of job and specially on important companies like his, people should be prepared for anything. A person with great grammar would be the best eligible for a job on any important company.
When I was in grade school and high school I was taught grammar everyday no matter what the subject. That is not the case anymore. Grammar is not taught like it used to. Teachers are avoiding the fact that they are not teaching grammar. They want children to write more about what they feel then write about facts.
Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (1995) Grammar and the Spoken Language. Applied
Where does this obsession and loathing of grammar come from? This question would probably take a whole dissertation to answer, and I do not have the knowledge to write that sort of paper. So, this essay will be more narrowly focused. In most cases this misunderstanding of grammar takes place early on in ones educational career. Most students have made their position with grammar clear before they enter high school. Many of these students who detest grammar were taught grammar systematically. It is this systematic teaching of grammar that creates such fear and hatred of grammar. In this short piece, systematically taught grammar will be analyzed and discussed. It is the intention of the author to provide a critique of this method of teaching and propose alternative teaching styles. Grammar taught systematically is ineffective and should be discarded.
The job of grammar is to organize words into sentences, and there are many ways to do that or we could say that- Words can be organized into sentences in many different ways. There are hundreds of grammar rules but the basic ones refer to sentence structure and parts of speech, which are noun, pronoun, verb, adverb, adjective, preposition, conjunction and interjection. The parts of speech come in many varieties and may show up just about anywhere in a sentence. To know for sure what part of speech a word is, we have to look not only at the word itself but also at its meaning, position, and use in a sentence.
In my profession a grammatical error could be the difference between being heard in court on your requested date or having a very upset (rightly so) client. I believe by widening my vocabulary and making less grammatical errors, I would be more valuable at my firm. Furthermore, I would be known as someone who writes very well and gain more respect in my field. I would be called upon more when a attorney needs something drafted. My teachers would be more satisfied and may wan
First of all, teaching and learning English grammar in the classroom plays a fundamental role in improving the spoken English skills of the students. Many students equate being able to speak language as knowing the language, thereby taking learning language as learning how to speak a language. The students should be provided enough opportunities to communicate in English; otherwise, they would be de-motivated and lose interest in learning. To intensify the confidence level of the learners to communicate in English as a second language, teaching and learning English grammar has become an important part among the learners and the educators. Students are usually reluctant to communicate in English when they have inadequate vocabulary or are not confident of grammatical rules. Otherwise, students with a sound knowledge of grammar do not hesitate to communicate in
Grammar has two primary approaches—prescriptive and descriptive. Prescriptive grammar is the general approach of right versus wrong, and historically the kind of approach overzealous English teachers apply to their students. Popular culture has lovingly deemed the rigid prescriptive grammarian the “Grammar Nazi,” which actually refers to the grade school graduate who clings tightly to the Latin based traditional rules and enforces those rules online. Due to these perspectives and due to various studies performed in classrooms, many have been rebuffing the study of grammar in schools. Some critics suggest that understanding grammar is ineffective and harms more than it helps writing. Contrary to the backlash against grammar studies, “grammar” encompasses a broader swathe of scholarship, and although prescriptive grammar drills may not be the most effective route, grammar studies do present several potential benefits for aspiring writers. In this paper, I will provide theoretical background concerning the study of grammar; then I will apply those theories to my own writing. Although not an instantaneous solution, grammar studies do facilitate “good” writing by providing writers the tools that they need to gainfully improve and revise writing.
Susan Adams and Kyle Weins have both written articles on the importance of using good grammar in the workplace. Each article gives numerous compelling reasons why this is a good practice. Susan Adams’ article first reason for doing so is in regards to how other people would view someone who uses bad grammar. She brings out that someone’s image can be damaged when they have improper speech habits; consequently their chances of advancing at work could be limited. Second, she shows how using poor grammar could cause a manager to view an employee as unorganized or unable to perform more advanced tasks. Finally, she brings out that someone who has poor speaking habits could be perceived as not having a firm grasp on the subject they are speaking about (Adams). Kyle Weins article also brings out some important points on bad grammar in the workplace. First, he shows that in today’s world people’s intelligence is judged based on what they say or what they type. The second point relates to how a manager could perceive someone with poor grammar. A manager could see an employee who uses poor grammar as someone who struggles to concentrate on tasks and doesn’t show attention to detail. Finally, he shows that peo...
Focusing too much on grammar: - This is the most common mistake that many learners make while they are in the early phases of the English learning process. As per the researches, it has been known that grammar study hurts English speaking ability of the learners. This is because English grammar is too complex to memorize
It is not easy to explain or define what a “language” is. Every person and linguist has their own definition of a language. However, some linguists have defined “language” as a finite system of elements and principles that make it possible for speakers to construct sentences to do particular communicative jobs (Finegan and Besnier, 1989). The part of the system that grants individuals to produce and interpret grammatically correct sentences is called “Grammatical Competence” (An Introduction of Language and Linguistics, 2014 edition). And the first person to introduce it was Naom Chopsky as a section of the foundations of genitive grammar (Aspects of the theory of syntax, 1965). It was defined later on by many other linguist as “the knowledge