More handpicked essays just for you.
Implications Of Reward Management
Effect of peer pressure and parental pressure on academic performance
Implications Of Reward Management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Implications Of Reward Management
This article responds to the idea of a “participation trophy” culture and whether or not it is healthy to give every child a trophy. Comparing the situation to grade inflation, both issues strongly rely on how both parents and children look at the intent and the reasons behind getting the rewards in the first place. Kelly Wallace’s article quotes the author, Ashley Merryman, by saying, "The idea was if we give kids trophies… if we tell them they're special, they'll sort of develop a sense of fearlessness … and actually we now have about 20 years of research that shows that's not true." Merryman also says, "That if you tell a kid they're wonderful and they believe you, then it just confirms their belief and that's not about healthy self-esteem,
Stuart Rojstaczer talks about how higher education in the United States has decreased substantially these days. High grades are very common among college students when they should not be that high. Schools are handing out easy A’s to those who do not deserve them, decreasing the quality of education. Even more astonishing is the fact that students are spending less time studying and more time drinking and partying, students are consuming more alcohol than ever and degrade in a really fast way. Also Stuart Rojstaczer talk about that in private schools grades are much higher than in public schools, but virtually everyone was experiencing grade inflation. In addition to that one more scientific evidence is high GPA of American students, because
In the op-ed, “Grade Inflation Gone Wild,” Stuart Rojstaczer addresses the concern of grade inflation and its effects on students. Rojstaczer uses several different methods to prove his point of view to the reader. Rojstaczer links grade inflation to the sinking quality of education, as well as the rise of college alcoholics. While this op-ed does a satisfactory job appealing to the reader on a person-person basis, many of Rojstaczer’s main claims do not hold any scholarly evidence. This analysis over “Grade Inflation Gone Wild” will discuss whether Rojstaczer has written this editorial solely to convince readers of his opinion, or does Rojstaczer present a credible claim in higher education’s grade inflation.
L. Hefferman’s article “ In Defense of Participation Trophies: Why they really do teach the right values?” it states “ An award is not really an award if everyone gets it.” (Today.com) In another article by Ashley Merryman called “Losing is Good For You” it says “Awards can be a powerful motivators but nonstop recognition does not inspire children to succeed. Instead, it can cause them to underachieve.” (New York Times Sept. 2013) It is clear, by not giving participation awards it make the children who do get awarded feel more special than if everyone gets one. Obviously, not giving participation awards to everyone gives more of a boost of self-esteem to the people who do get
Our society has shifted its beliefs in how we should treat competition in young people. The question is asked, should all kids get a participation trophy? As it may seem to be an unanswerable question, it honestly isn’t. Thought that the participation trophies may send the message that “coaches” value the kids’ efforts despite their abilities, trophies do not need to be given out. Your words mean just as much when you remind an athlete that you value them in more ways than one. Some may think trophies are a great idea because it shows that everyone’s a “winner.” However, I disagree with that idea. I believe that kids should know that they need to work their hardest in order to be rewarded and understand that not
To illustrate, Ashley Merryman, the author of the article “Losing is Good for You” states, “ However, when it comes to rewards, people argue that kids must be treated identically: everyone must always win. That is misguided. And there are negative outcomes. Not for just specific children, but for society as a whole.” This explains that when kids get trophies, they think that they are always going to win, no matter how poorly they did their job. This can cause major problems in the society, such as companies not improving. In addition, Ashley Merryman also states, “ Having studied recent increases in narcissism [having an excessive interest in oneself; an over inflated ego often due to parents’ overvaluation] and entitlement among college students, she [Jean Twenge, author of Generation Me] warns that when living rooms are filled with participation trophies, it’s part of a larger cultural message: to succeed, you just have to show up.” This shows that even young kids are starting to be egoistic, and that can stick with them their entire life. When kids will go into the real world, it would be too late to realize that winning is not important. As a result, narcissism increases in the kids and makes them
Some argue that participation trophies are going to be the downfall of society and human life in general. That is not the case but, there are many downsides of these awards, in this essay a few of these will be brought to attention. Participation trophies do not teach children valuable lessons.
Determining whether to award participation trophies or not is a controversial issue in America today. Surprisingly, most people are in favor of not awarding participation trophies to children because of the negative outcomes. A solution that is suggested to solving the problem is to ensure both the winning and losing team a trophy. Conversely, when both teams receive a trophy this defeats the purpose of even playing the game. Children are smart enough to know if they won or lost a game, and by letting each team receive a trophy it creates confusion for children. If a child is rewarded with a plaque after a loss, this could cause confusion for a child because he or she might not understand the purpose of the plaque. Several children understand that while competing there is only one true winner, and by giving both teams awards this creates a false sense of how sports actually maneuver. As children grow old enough to play for their school’s team, they will quickly learn that only teams who win are awarded trophies. Teaching children how a sport operates at a young age could help children comprehend sports better and sooner. Children should not be given participation trophies because the winning effort should be awarded, each sport is a competition, and children deserve proper feedback.
Merryman, an author of two books pertaining to her objective somewhat promoting an ethos appeal, is against the use of participation trophies. Her objective is to rid the role these objects have in a child’s life in regards to how they might view losing. The audience she reaches out toward is any adult who is affiliated with children. To
If you grew up in this generation, then more than likely you grew up watching the Nickelodeon show “The Fairly Odd Parent’s.” The show is about a ten-year-old boy named Timmy Turner. His parents barely parented him and were always gone, therefore they hired a babysitter who seems to be an angle to the parents, but behind closed doors she torments Timmy. One day, he is blessed with the opportunity to be given fairy godparents, Wanda and Cosmo, and they have magical powers and grants Timmy’s wishes. The cartoon show is unpredictable, but after watching it over the years I found one thing that I could predict that happens every time. Timmy’s teacher, Mr. Crocker, always failed Timmy with a grade of an F, and he always gave a character named AJ a letter grade of an A. Some could argue that Timmy simply didn’t study or do his homework, but the show portrays it as the teacher mistreating him. At the end of the day the teacher is the one that plugs the grades into the computer and they solely give you your grade.
The Consequences of Grade Inflation When students arrive at university, professors expect them to understand the material to an exceptional standard. The problem is that grade inflation is occurring more regularly in secondary schools and universities across the country and when these students’ marks are sent to universities or colleges, the student may be given multiple scholarships for something that he/she should not have earned. Grade inflation is conceived between both students and teachers, meaning that the students are given higher grades when they have inadequate learning, reading, and verbal skills, while the teachers do not have to grade as many papers as they should in the real curriculum. There have been multiple examinations that have confirmed that grade inflation is very real and still occurs today. Students seem to think that they do not need to put forth much effort in school to do well, and grade inflation encourages this thought.
First of all, children need to learn that life isn't fair and that's ok. If bill gates makes 1 billion dollars for making a new product that doesn't mean that you will get 1 billion dollars for doing the same thing. Also if your friend gets new shoes that doesn't mean you will get new shoes.My point is that kids need to know that life is not fair. Then if kids got trophies for losing and participating they would not know that life is not fair.
There are numerous reasons why participation trophies are harmful to young children’s well-being. As said by NFL linebacker James Harrison, “When children get participation trophies they think that they are always entitled to an award for doing your best.” (Website #2). Sometimes a child’s best effort isn’t always enough and they should always want to get better. Kids learn to believe
Today, many sports teams hand out awards to everyone who participated. This is said to encourage participation but an outcome of this is that it devalues the talented kids’ awards, and gives no incentive for other players to try hard which does a poor job of preparing our children for the real world.
This may result in the child expecting a reward for jobs that are not done, or that are subpar to his best ability. The superior weakness to handing out participation trophies is that the child that works harder, works longer, and works every day to get better recieves not more recognition than the child who simply shows up for games. The hardworking child deserves to be recognized for more than just
First, Ashley Merryman states, “In June, an Oklahoma Little League canceled participation trophies because of a budget shortfall. A furious parent complained to a local reporter,”’My look forward to their trophy as much as playing the game.’” This expresses how much a trophy is worth for an athlete, but usually it is playing the game that matters and not getting the trophies. In addition, Jean Twenge, author of “Generation Me” also states,“Having studied recent increases in narcissism (having an excessive interest in oneself; an over-inflated ego often due to parents’ overvaluation) and entitlement among college students, she warns that when living rooms are filled with participation trophies, it is part of a larger cultural message...” This fabricates narcissism in young athletes as well as college students. In short, narcissism and selfishness can affect