Reward Management (RM) has been defined as the distribution of monetary and non-monetary rewards to employees in an effort to align the interests of the employees, the organisation, and its shareholders (O’Neil, 1998). In addition O’Neil (1998) also suggests that a RM system can serve the purpose of attracting prospective job applicants, retaining valuable employees, motivating employees, ensuring legal requirements relating to direct and indirect rewards are not violated, assisting the company in achieving human resource and business objectives, and ultimately assisting the organisation in obtaining a competitive advantage.
Various conflicts in the RM system can affect the benefits that can be obtained. It has been argued that performance management systems only provide superficial motivations and have little effect on underlying behaviours and attitudes. Although the RM system can have some limitations, there is strong argument for the benefits, and logic also deems it as a credible strategy to assist in improving employee performance.
The implementation and application of RM within the subject organisation has provided many opportunities for increased performance. Limitations and inequities have been recognised in the system employed, mainly due to the lack of assessment and changes to the system in order to align it with organisational objectives.
Reward Management Theory
Reward management involves defining, facilitating, and encouraging performance. The positive effects a successful RM system can provide to employee performance and in turn organisational success and competitive advantage are clear. This appeal has driven many organisations to take up RM as part of their performance management stratagem.
The RM system falls into the broader process of the performance management model within the organisation, as stated by Clark (as cited in Human Resource Management, 2000). This involves the continual process of setting performance objectives, measuring outcomes, providing feedback on the results, providing rewards which are linked to desired outcomes and finally evaluating and making amendments to objectives and activities of the system.
When developing an effective RM procedure as part of organisational strategy many considerations must be addressed. O’Neil (1998) suggests the following key methods of linking pay to performance; ascerta...
... middle of paper ...
...e “ The reward system of the organisation guides the actions that generally have the greatest impact on the motivation and performance of individual employees”. Similarly, Wah (2000) argues that companies which treat their high-performing employees significantly better than those that don't are the best-performing companies around and they reside in the upper quartile of shareholder returns. In addition Lawler (as cited in, Readings In Contemporary Employment Relations, 1998) states that if all the psychological rewards are removed employees will grudgingly remain at work, however if all the financial rewards are removed they would most likely leave.
As most of the literature suggests, employee performance is a vital element in organisational survival and success. The systems developed and applied to facilitate the management of employee performance are therefore major contributors to the overall success of performance management. To remain effective the RM process should not be isolated from other HRM functions, in addition the process must be dynamic and constantly aligned to organisational strategy. In these instances long term benefits for all stakeholders can be realised.
Mujtaba, B. G., & Shuaib, S. (2010). An Equitable Total Rewards Approach to Pay for Performance Management. Journal of Management Policy and Practice vol. II (4), 111-121.
The total rewards approach challenges the human resources (HR) professional to look at the entirety of the work experience, not just the traditional compensation and benefits packages, when developing strategies to recruit, retain, and motivate employees (Giancola, 2009; Pregnolato, Bussin, & Schlechter, 2017; Stoskopf, 2004). Total rewards approach has five components – base compensation, benefits, performance and recognition (Giancola, 2009; Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2016; Pregnolato, et al., 2017; Stoskopf, 2004), work-life balance, and development and career opportunities (Giancola, 2009; Pregnolato, et al., 2017; Stoskopf, 2004). These components, when integrated into a comprehensive total rewards
A number of motivational theories explain how rewards affect the behavior of individuals and teams. Performance related pay can have a motivational effect. Employees are motivated to increase prod...
“Using PM System doesn’t improve the performance of an organization. PM system incorporates of not only evaluating performance appraisals but also rewards. As quoted by Sheridan (2009) and Latham (2005), “the cultural maturation of performance based can take decades to implement and requires the organizations to allocate the required resources”. Technology plays a pivotal role in future of PM systems where e-monitoring of performance of employees in Hilton and other entities respectively can change the evolution of performance management thus bringing necessary and important changes to stay competitive in the market as well increasing an individual’s productivity in the company (Sheridan & Latham, 2005)”.
Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMMARY 2 3.0APPROPRIATE OF RESPONSE TO THE BUSINESS CONTEXCT( Internal and external) 4 3.1 INTERNAL FACTORS 4 3.2 EXTERNAL FACTORS 4 4.0 PROS and CONS OF PERFORMANCE RELATED PAY 6 6 4.1 Pros of Performance related pay 6 4.2 Cons of Performance related pay 6 5.0 EXTENT TO WHICH PERFORMANCE RELATED PAY CAN IMPROVE ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE 8 6. O ALTERNATIVE REWARD APPROCHES 10 7. O STUMBLING BLOCKS FRONT LINE MANAGERS EXPERIENCE IMPLEMENTING REWARD STRATEGIES AND HOW THEY MAY OVERCOME THESE 11 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 13 9.0 CONCLUSION 14 10.0 REFERENCES 15 People Management and Performance 15 The 7 Biggest Challenges of a Manager 15 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMMARY Strategic approach to reward management recognises that
Introduction This paper will analyze methods a Human Resource (HR) professional could use to determine incentive pay taking individual group and company performance into consideration. Additionally, the paper will examine the core legal requirements affecting employee benefits in today’s competitive environment and determine the legally mandated benefits that the company must currently offer to its employees. The paper will follow with a recommendation on additional benefits that the organization should consider providing to its employees and two important concepts that a company must consider when designing benefit plans. The paper will assess the efficiency of common techniques for effectively communicating compensation and benefit plans
Performance Management Systems is the systematic process which involves its employees, as individuals and members of a group, in improving organizational effectiveness in the accomplishment of the organization’s mission and goals. Likewise, the unknown link to achieving greater organizational success is strong performance management, which is the processes put in place to measure and reward the abilities of the workforce to meet and exceed goals. Thereby, this helps with improving self esteem, confidence, and morale, creating loyalty, and increasing overall productivity in your employees through performance management is the key to your company outperforming the competition (Performance Management, 2017). Moreover, an effective performance
In conclusion, each segment of the performance management process holds a vital link to the next. Not unlike knocking over one domino in a series, it has an effect on the next domino. If one portion in the process is dysfunctional, the next may be identical in its dysfunction – and on and on.
Reward systems in the work place are not a new idea in the workplace, but they are the key to having happy employees and happy employees mean better output. Reward systems are systems used by companies where employees who achieve particular results are paid more or get other advantages. Some employers offer pay as incentives, while others offer benefits, some use a combination of both types. Employees within a company want recognition for the time and effort that they have put into a task required of their job. The use of reward systems not only enhances the company but it gives the employee a feeling of personal connection and investment into the company. Building a reward system can be a great asset to the company, by allowing the employees to feel that they are a part of the company. Reward systems are an important tool and key concept to managing an organization effectively.
Management spends a huge amount of time to design incentive systems and schemes to motivate their workers and to ensure they work in their best possible manner. Motivating workers by giving them decent pay helps in winning employees heart to make the work done efficiently, significantly and effectively. The most effective way to motivate people to work productively is through individual incentive compensation (Pfeffer, 1998). An attraction of getting more is a powerful incentive to people for high performance. While most people agree that money plays a major role in motivating people, in organizations there is a widespread belief that money may also have some undesirable effects on morale.
When implementing a new performance management system in an organization there are both advantages and disadvantages that need to be taken into consideration by the design team. However, one of the best ways to know if a performance management system is effective is by implementing the system within the organization and then continuously monitor and reevaluate if the system is still relevant to the organizational
Performance management is a management tool used to value, monitor and measure a company’s strategies that ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of its product delivery. This management tool does not focus on the organisation and on its employees as well as stakeholders. It is a continuous process that entails that managers make sure that organisational and employee values are corresponding (Aguinis, 2005,p.1/2-1/5). Performance Management brings about the competencies in the employees, increases self-esteem by giving feedback to employees, there is a low number of lawsuits because it helps understand the company better (eThekwini Municipality, 2008,p.10-11). According to Pride, Hughes and Kapoor (2011, p.288) performance management creates motivation for employees; one theory of motivation is of Expectancy, which stipulates that employees satisfaction is driven by expectations of what an organisation will offer in return.
In large organisation, competition is not only in the market for goods and services but also for the quality of employees. As such, a large organization can only become attractive to the most skilled and high quality workers if it has an effective compensation and benefit plan. The key purpose of an effective compensation and benefit system is to provide employees with the right rewards for their work and right behavior in the workplace. Typically, organizational success is determined by the quality of employees an organization has. In turn, the organization can only attract such quality workers and maintain them through effective compensation and benefit
Performance management is used for the basis of promotion, reduction in force purposes (talent management), gives transparency of what an organization is looking for, merit increases, and lastly it provides protection against lawsuits for unlawful termination by keeping written documentation. Performance evaluations are advantageous to both the organization and the employee. A leading advantage of performance evaluations is it gives the employee an opportunity to create and achieve smart goals. Although performance evaluations primary function is to measure whether an employee is a good fit or a bad fit for the organization, its function is so much a broader. Performance management is tool purposely used to motivate employees to examine themselves and determine if they have selected the profession that is best for them; consequently the feedback an employee receives from their superior supports them with increase their knowledge and
Performance management is a continuous process that creates a working culture to encourage employees to improve their work performance and reach their full potential during their stay of employment. Performance Management also provides strategic direction, develop competency in employees and instill organization value. This paper will identify methods and affects that performance management plan has on the organization and their employees.