Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Solving poverty essays
Strengths and limitations of development theory
Solving poverty essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Solving poverty essays
The Crisis of Development Discourse
The rise of development theory has been an interesting phenomenon. In the latter half of the 20th century, many theorists have tried to explain the origins of "under-development." The debate over the idea of development has been intense, and has led to the emergence of two contending paradigms: Modernization theory and dependency theory. Upon close investigation, one realizes that both theories are problematic. This paper is based on readings of Escobar, Martinussen, Cruise O'Brien, and Pieterse. The purpose of this paper is to chronicle the origins and growth of development discourse, and to show how both paradigms share three flaws: an economist approach to social change, and an ethnocentric and teleological worldview of development, and the perceived universal application of the West's development experience throughout the developing world.
As Escobar points out in The Problematization of Poverty, one of the many changes in the post-WW2 era was the "discovery" of mass poverty throughout the world. This "discovery" had massive implications for development discourse. Prior to WW2, development discourse was limited to the colonial experience. But with the end of colonial rule lurking on the horizon, western academics began to formulate theories of economic growth and "modernization." As a result, an entire genre of academic research emerged: the development discourse. The aim of development discourse was to chart out patterns of growth (which were based on the historical successes of the West) that newly independent countries could use, primarily to escape vicious cycles of poverty, famine, etc.
The birth of development discourse was inherently one-sid...
... middle of paper ...
...979
Pieterse, Jan. "Dilemmas of Development Discourse: The Crisis of Developmentalism and the Comparative Method" in Development and Change 22 (1991)
Notes
1 Escobar, Arturo. Encountering Development. Princeton University Press, 1995. P. 24
2 Ibid. Pp. 23-24
3 Emphasis added by author
4 Ibid. Pp. 52-54
5 Martinussen, John. Society, State and Market. Zed Books, 1997. P. 57
6 Ibid. Pp. 59-60
7 Ibid. Pp. 61-65
8 Ibid. Pp. 88-91
9 Pieterse, Jan Nederveen. Dilemmas of Development Discourse: The Crisis of Developmentalism and the
Comparative Method. P. 15
10 Ibid. P. 15
11 Ibid. P. 15
12 Ibid. P. 17
13 Escobar, Arturo. Encountering Development. Princeton University Press, 1995. P. 25
14 Ibid. P. 44
15 Pieterse, Jan Nederveen. Dilemmas of Development Discourse. P. 18
In chapter three Isbister explains that social scientists wrestled to justify conditions in the third world, as a result, a mixture of indefinite theories developed. A point often overlooked, by social scientists is that the struggle and growth of Asia, Africa, and Latin America cannot be measured “in statistics, nor in treatises of social scientists and historians.” After reading the chapter, an obvious conclusion stood out poverty is tangible for most of the world’s people and nations. Why is this and who is to blame? Are the poor people to be blamed for their own poverty? The answers are arranged into three different groups: mod¬ernization, dependency, and Marxism.
International Development and the Social Sciences, pp. 259-290. University of California Press,. Rostow, W.W. (1960) “The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto.” pp.
Coles, Clifton. "Mapping poverty: researchers strive to delineate the world's wealth gaps. (Demography)." The Futurist May-June 2003: 16. Student Resources in Context. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.
Poverty is not just an issue reserved for third world countries. Instead, poverty is a multifaceted issue that even the most developed nations must battle
In the ever-changing field of international development, buzzwords play an important role in framing the current agendas that are of interest to the international communities. These buzzwords, which can be globally circulating ideas for change or methods of practice, can be adopted for several reasons. It can be thought that framing the issue in this way may resonate more with potential supporters and more effectively help in the pursuit of the goals. Or it can be a password for potential funding, or a way of bringing together a diverse set of practitioners and beneficiaries and make it easier to build networks and partnerships with other international organizations (Cornwall & Eade
There are many socially constructed beliefs that help feed gender inequality. One of the primitive and initial source that influences gender inequality is tradition developed by religion.
The next term is conflict theory. This is a rather harsh subject for poverty. For instance, it describes how more powerful groups use their material and power to exploit the groups of less power. In the minds of many people, this would be seen as ‘unfair’, but nowadays people will do whatever it takes to gain power and status. This has occurred generation after generation. The more powerful groups deprive the lesser powerful of many benefits, which causes them to fall farther into poverty then they already
Shah Anup, (2013) Structural Adjustment: A major cause of poverty. Philosophy and Theory, Vol.43, No.S1, 2011, USA. http://www.globalissues.org/article/3/structural-adjustment-a-major-cause-of-poverty
The 2008 documentary The End of Poverty? is a film that focuses around global poverty and how it became the tragedy that it is today. Poverty was created by acts of military conquest, slavery and colonization that led to the confiscation of individual’s property and forced labor. However, today the problem remains because wealthy countries who take advantage of developing third world countries. The film interviews several activists who discuss how the issues became and several ways in which they could be eliminated, as well as interviews from individuals who are experiencing it firsthand.
First, Ferguson argues that the development discourse produces and sustains the invented “less-developed country”– mainly, the “Third World” concept. Second, the author explains how the “development fantasy’s” detachment from what is really occurring in a particular locale (reality on the ground) often causes projects to fail at their specified goals. Last, Ferguson explains why the development community has produced the almost constant growth and underpinning of bureaucratic state power. The central claim here, and the greatest takeaway, is that the development discourse should be considered a form of knowledge that is (often) institutionally created to support the actions of development agencies via a forced reconstruction of social, cultural, and economic realities at the local
McMichael, Philip, ed 2012. Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective, 5th ed. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Gender Issues in Religion Amongst the world religions are many different attitudes towards gender issues and sexuality issues. A hundred years ago, or even a lot less. these different perspectives did not exist, as they were often. considered unimportant, as King noted until recently little attention.
This essay will detail will examine how development is defined and the relative inaccuracies which surround it. Good, you define terms and introduce the purpose of the essay. As mentioned above, many economists use GNP or GDP to measure. development. The. GNP may be defined as the total value, or output of goods.
Modernization is defined as the conversion from the former civilizations in society to contemporary society; as it is establish today in the West. It models a perspective of economic, social, and cultural progress that enlightens the global disparity in terms of modifying levels of scientific improvement between societies. By presenting modern approaches in underdeveloped countries, societies will be knowledgeable of solidifications in their economies. This dominant theory refers to a variety of believers of Karl Marx’s perspectives that encourage the explanation of improvement or underdevelopment of countries. Everyone isn’t a fan of Karl Marx’s perspective. The mutual features between Max Weber and Emile Durkheim also interpret the developmental illustration of this theory. Development implies the bridging of these gaps by an imitative process, occurring in stages, such that traditional sectors and/or countries gradually assume the qualities of the 'modern' western. Max Weber observed that with modern civilization the societies would only profit from rationality. The title of Durkheim’s book, Division of Labor in Society, basically summarizes how he views modernization. Durkheim’s believes that with modernization will be the creation of a growing division of labor. He expects the flop of modern social unions in modernization might lead to anomie. Elevation in anomie will eventually cause a growth in crime rates. The theory is in fact a unilinear, ethnocentric theory and it is with all its shortcomings which one can conclude that it provides an unworkable guide to Caribbean development.
To explore issues of modernization theory, the essay will first attempt to highlight the meaning of the term modernization from different perspectives, which is then followed by a discussion of the context in which the theory developed. The main aim of this paper is discuss the limitations of modernization theory. Then it will focus on some basic objections embedded in the theory that offer critiques from many development studies scholars. This will be done by focusing on the key points which are social, and cultural significances. The last step of the essay will be the idea of the writer about modernization theory.