Government Intervention In Social Work

717 Words2 Pages

Policies and interventions can be made after identifying social problems through system’s perspective. The example above covered government’s policies that disadvantage certain groups, poverty, family violence and interactions between those problems. The problems further arise from incompetent policies and systems that support children in foster care. For the issue of child protection from abuse, social workers would need to be skilled in areas of case management, advocacy, counselling, group work and providing family education and support. It is practitioner’s responsibility to investigate abuse and neglect, undertake risk assessments, write reports, act as witness at court, coordinate family support and secure alternative care. (Chenoweth …show more content…

Social work at the time appeared to take more direct actions to reduce social injustice. However, by the end of this course, I was confronted with possible systematic abuses that social workers themselves may perpetuate. For example, when children are removed from their families, it rarely has positive outcomes because they become more vulnerable to systemic abuse (Beckett, 2007). From the social worker’s perspective, regardless of the reason for separating children from their families, there is inevitable tension and conflict (Chenoweth & McAuliffe, 2015). While this may be true, Beckett (2007) described that child protection workers require courage, or else there is risk of becoming a bystander. Many practitioners are disinclined to make painful decisions, such as placing children in a care or allow the child to live with their parents despite underlying risks. Those workers are more likely to make excuses and put of decisions. There were actually cases of social workers knocking on the door few times and hurrying back to their office to record, “Visited. No answer” (Beckett, 2007, p. 9). That being the case, there was a sense of disappointment. Nevertheless, it made me more determined to become a social worker that the service user needs and not reproduce systematic …show more content…

If the social workers are overloaded with high caseloads and documentations, it becomes harder for them to frequently contact the child in the care (Chenoweth & McAuliffe, 2015). The inflexible bureaucratic system prevents the workers from communicating with the child. Moreover, it increases the risk of making poor decisions. Children who are perceived to be not in immediate risks may often be ignored or given less attention. On the other hand, social workers rush to solve problems of children in immediate risks without considering their underlying problems and long term consequences, as if the problems are fires that need to be put out. Likewise, the shortage of practitioners and high turnover in staff result in children being passed from one stranger to another, which reduces a sense of stability. The problems arise from workers prioritising the agency, their reputations more than the child. The characteristics of bureaucracy are that workers follow impersonal rules and maintain impersonal relationships (McTaggart, 2015). Consequently, it may result in depersonalisation and avoidance of reality. An example of depersonalisation is depicted in the relationship between nurse and patient. For an example, nurses often label their patients by their bed numbers or by their condition (Beckett, 2007). Most organisations require bureaucracy due to its efficiency. Weber

Open Document