Google Inc.: The Organizational Analysis Of Google's Success

965 Words2 Pages

Effective organisational structure and organizational culture together with innovation are key factors for Google’s success. Constant change and innovation linking with many direct social contacts are instilled among stakeholders. The three main characteristics of Google’s cross-functional multi-layered organisation are function-based definition, product based-definition and flatness.Other than this, the organisational culture is open, innovative, smart, hands-on and supports small-company-family rapport (Smithson, 2012).
Google’s working environment is unique. Although with fast-paced environment that requires employees to work hard, it allows employees to have fun. That is why the environment or internal set-up of the working environment …show more content…

Considering the young leaders that Google Inc. had with some undergraduates and inexperience leaders especially in terms of handling managerial tasks, these pitfalls were presumed to happen. These identified pitfalls served as possible problems that would likely occur that these young leaders should take notice of. The first pitfall is the difficulty in transitioning to become a team leader. There will be a tendency that team leaders cannot perform well because they are promoted being such for their competent skills even without leadership training. This might not be understood by outsiders of the company but said concerns or issues should not discourage managers to perform better. The second is there isinconsistency in approach for performance management and career development. Some managers may just wait for employees to come to them without reaching out and helping employees to achieve success or improve in their careers. This is a pitfall that must be avoided to gain cooperation from everyone. The third is spending too little time on managing and communicating.” There will be a tendency that leaders and managers will just delegate tasks to the secretaries and the secretaries in return will inform or send instructions for employees. This will bring a negative effect on people especially if miscommunication will happen. It needs extra effort for leaders to manage, communicate and reach out to everyone (Phillips & Phillips,

Open Document