Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of Genetically modified Organism
Advantages of genetic engineering
Advantages of genetic engineering
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of Genetically modified Organism
What’s with GMOs? Are they good? Are they bad? Why do so many people hate them, fear them no matter the fact that scientists say we should cherish them? Let me say this one thing, they will not kill you. Not convincing? That’s fine, you can hate them, but hear me out because I have some reasoning that may change your view of the issue. GMOs are safe and beneficial to our life.
A GMO is an organism that has been genetically modified. If the thing has DNA, you can alter it. Both plants and animals have been genetically modified in some sort of way. GMOs are nothing new. The early 70’s first introduced modern GMOs with the E. coli insulin. By the 90’s, genetically modified foods and crops were being sold in market. Yet any corn you eat today,
…show more content…
He then brought up genetically modified organisms. He quoted Peter H. Raven with this quote, “ Any effort to deny access to technologies that are demonstrably helpful in feeding the people of the world must...be judged from a moral and ethical point of view in relation to its real, not imagined, effects on human welfare.” Kerr went on about the potential of modified crops a lot in this passage as well. On his show, Eyes of Nye, Bill Nye himself talked everything GMO on GM foods. He brought up a comparison with two fruits. The first one was naturall and was carrying a disease. The modified one had a bit of that disease virus built in, causing it to be immune. Nye compared them, saying.”Which one do you eat? The natural one with lots of ringspot virus DNA, or the modified but just with a little bit of that very same DNA?”
Now, how about those who cringe at the idea of GMOs? You hear, It’s not natural or they are deadly. Yes, they are not natural and they could be made to be deadly. The big fear of a genetically modified food being released that would show immense health risks will steer many away from buying them. Although over 40 years have passed since they were first introduced with no side effects, people still stay
"The Good, Bad and Ugly about GMOs." Natural Revolution. Natural Revolution , n.d. Web. 16 May 2014. .
Do you know what you're really voting for? Iowan farmer Reg Clause suggests you may not in his column, “Say ‘no’ to GMO labeling.” Reminding readers that general election day has come, he attempts to convince us that a certain law should be voted against. The proposed legislation would mandate all foods that contain genetically modified organisms, also know as GMOs, to display a warning label on their packaging. He argues that this would be detrimental to the good name of these types of foods when they do not deserve to be shamed. I agree that the genetically engineered crops should not be labeled, but not because that would tarnish their name. However, the reasoning for my opinion comes from the perspective that it would not only be impractical
Anyone hearing about change for the first time likes to have an understanding of what is actually happening in order to accept it. Ronald backs up her argument by illustrating how “golden rice was produced to make more vitamin A to decrease the possibility of blindness.” Reducing the risk of kids becoming blind does not seem like a bad thing. Ronald also points out that with genetic modification farmers where able to stop using insecticide spray, avoiding more possible illnesses towards health. Insecticide spray is more harmful then anything to human health, and without that genetic makeup those insects would eat away at our source of plants. These two example alone should be a huge eye opener, because by a genetic make up scientist where able to create something in plants that kept pests away. Now because of this genetic makeup that
In other words, Nye is saying that GMOs could potentially be dangerous, because the affects of GMOs on our planet are hard to pinpoint since the variables in our environment are always changing. Emily Glass, author of “The Environmental Impact of GMOs”, presents one of the main issues with genetically engineered farming. Glass writes that “GMOs may be toxic to non-target organisms” such as bees and butterflies. The American Museum of Natural History reports that bees have been undergoing a “rapid and recent population collapse” and Katie Valentine also reveals that the population of monarch butterflies has “declined by 90 percent over the last two decades” due to the loss of plant biodiversity as well as the pesticides that harm insect pollinators. Since Monsanto creates their seeds in a lab, biodiversity is lost because all of the crops are identical copies created in mass-production. This monoculture farming style makes it harder for pollinating bees and butterflies and even some pollinating species of birds, like hummingbirds. Modern-day agriculture is affecting every living creature, including humans, because “the irrigation used to grow GM foods naturally carries all of these problems into water sources and into
Smith, Jeffrey M. "GMO Researchers Attacked, Evidence Denied, and a Population at Risk." SOTT.net. Sott.net, 01 Nov. 2011. Web. 08 May 2014. .
GMOs has been around for nearly 50 years. It is something that has emerged itself within our lifestyles and become something that appear in our daily lives, whether it’s on the shelf in grocery shops or on your plate right know; GMOs can be found almost anywhere. However, although the production of GMOs have certainly increased over the years, opinions on it has differed. Some people have come to believe it is dangerous for our health, while other people has stated the exact opposite. Something that
How many of you hear the words “genetically modified food” and immediately think “BAD”? How many of you scorn the idea that genetically modified foods are useful? How many of you have been manipulated by the media to think that all biotechnology is evil? Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are organisms that have been genetically spliced to achieve a certain trait. As the demand for a larger food supply is increasing due to population growth, the benefits that GMO foods provide are being hailed as the only solution to the food crisis. However, many people are making inadequately informed decisions, and are pushing them to the back shelf. I will inform you on why genetically modified organisms may be the only way to a stable, safe future for the less fortunate.
Have you ever asked yourself what is Genetic modified organism(GMO)? Will in this paper I am going to tell you about GMO. Gmo is any foods or animals that have been modified genetically. There is too much Gmo in our food. We could cut down on how much foods have GM. We could also make more job for farming. We Should make more food with no GMO so we can all be healthy.
Stop and think about your food before letting it enter your body. Is it safe? Is it good for me? Well, if you find yourself stuck in one of those situations where you can’t decide whether GM foods are good for you or bad, you’ve come to the right place. GM crops can be dangerous for you because the allergies it can give you. These GM crops are organisms that have been inserted with genes to make them look better for you, but remember, you can’t judge a book by its cover. These “delicious” looking crops can look like the best crops you ever laid eyes on, but on the inside it can cause you to get allergies that can cause you to rethink, is this really good for me? Research shows in the article, “GMOs and Genetically Modified Foods Risks and Dangers of GMOs”, that, “This can create an overproduction of allergens, toxins, carcinogens, or antinutrients.” This disseminates with clarity that GM crops can create many different allergens a...
Genetically modified foods are developed by combining genes from two different organisms which alters it's DNA and do not occur naturally. Biotechnology is relatively new so like most people, I turned to research to argue this issue with facts. In my opinion, genetically modifying foods have more harmful effects than they do beneficial. I am against their use because it creates safety risks for our health and animals, it can damage the environment and we have to deal with the total costs.
Considering an argument as valid requires critical analysis of several aspects and providing strong evidence. Robin Mather, a journalist who “has passion for food and its sources, has worked at major metropolitan newspapers (the Detroit News, the Chicago Tribune)”(86), argues that GMOs have risks and hazards to human health and threats to wildlife and environment in her article “The Threats from Genetically Modified Foods”, whereas Entine, a colleague at the Genetic Literacy Project, and Wendel, a science writer(82), claim that GMOs are safe to eat and no harm to people or animals in their article “2000+Reasons Why GMOs are Safe to Eat and Environmentally Sustainable” Both articles’ authors state their ideas clearly for whether GMOs could be eaten or not. However, Mather provides more solid
The term GM foods or GMO (genetically-modified organisms) is most commonly used to refer to crop plants created for human or animal consumption using the latest molecular biology techniques (Whitman, 2000). These plants have been modified in the laboratory to offer desired traits such as increased resistance to herbicides or improved nutritional content. Also, genetic engineering techniques have been applied to create plants with the exact desired trait very rapidly and accurately. For example, this is done by the geneticist isolating the gene responsible for drought tolerance and inserts it into another plant. The new genetically-modified plant will now have gained drought tolerance as well.
In this day and age Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have become a topic of large interest in the media. GMOs are defined as an organism whose genetic structure has been altered by incorporating a gene that will express a desirable trait (Dresbach et. al 2013). Often times these traits that are selected are either beneficial to the consumer or producer. Currently, GMOs are being created at a higher rate than ever before and are being used in the foods that we eat. This has created a large amount of debate on local, national, and international levels about the safety of genetically modified foods to human health. There are many angles that have been taken from different groups about this issue. Some believe it is harmful to our health with one source stating that, “mice eating GMO corn had fewer and smaller babies (Jagelio 2013).” Without testing on humans how are we to know these harmful effects aren’t impacting our health and reproduction. Other groups see GMOs as being both beneficial and having no impact on human health. These individuals site that , “Since GMOs were introduced into the food supply almost 20 years ago, there has not been one documented case of any health problem in humans, not even so much as a sniffle, linked to GMOs (Entine 2013).” They have also found GMOs to be beneficial to human health. Dresbach et. al(2013) found, “The biotechnology of gene splicing allows for the opportunity of creating plants that will produce food that is more nutrient dense.” With so many different views that all cite different information about GMO’s impact on human well-being, the question remains how GMOs affect human health?
The cons are, since many GMOs are modified using bacteria and viruses, there is a fear that new diseases will be created. Many people wonder if GMOs are safe, but since they are a relatively new development, long term effects are limited. GMOs can pose significant allergy risks. Genetic enhancements often combine proteins not contained in the original organism, which can cause allergic reactions in humans” (Mandel).
...sed by ignorant assumptions. It is fine, even good, to be skeptical of this technology, but at least do some research to be able to intelligently express valid reasons for being against it. I also think the public needs to be much better informed about GMO. I don’t see how public opinion can be trusted when an astonishingly high percentage of the population can’t even adequately describe what a chromosome is. The more one knows about this subject, the more likely I think he or she will be supportive of the technology. In conclusion, I would advise to not let irrational fears cloud one’s judgment concerning the wonderfully powerful possibilities of agricultural biotechnology. I am among many people who wholeheartedly advocate exploration of the amazing potentials of GMO, and I think with time, many others will change their minds and embrace this technology as I have.