Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Marxist theory of capitalism
Introduction to globalisation
Marxist theory of capitalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Marxist theory of capitalism
Due to the multidimensionality of the notion of globalisation, its economic, social, political and cultural impacts are often debated across sociologists around the globe. The litmus test for each emerging theory is a set of domain questions which will reveal the sphere and boundaries of each theory. Domain questions include ‘When did globalisation begin?”, “Does globalization refer to a process?’ and the relevance of modernity and post modernity with Globalisation process. How different theorist will approach these domain questions will depict various ways in which the social phenomena is understood and explained amongst the sociologist (Chirot and D. Hall, 1982). The essay will focus on two largely recognised theories of Globalisation that propose the thesis that Globalization is understood and explained differently across time and space by theorist who believe their perspective answer all the world’s curiosity, however each theory has its own limitations and disadvantages. The notion of globalisation could be put into many perspectives, underlined by sociologist’s theories. Although recently there have been extended contribution to the notion of Globalisation, ultimately, the history plays an important role in many of the works today. Some of the earliest sociologists based their perspective of globalisation around the ideology of modernity which is currently seen today. Moreover, internationalism or the universalisation of the existing nation states was also a highly popularised ideology, as the primary investigation remained within the boundaries of nation-states (Krieken, 2014). Nevertheless, despite the emergence of new and creative ways in which modern sociologist theory put their understanding of Globalisation into pers... ... middle of paper ... ... world uniformity allows room for cultural diversity as we become more accustomed to the change, this is evident as we are openly accepting to each other’s cultural values without any worries. Across time we unconsciously integrate this into our everyday life as the global culture becomes a normal phenomenon. We can now consume products from other countries and have alternate meanings for them, as cultures become disembodied from their locality, allowing for new cultures to be formed, resulting in heterogeneity. Finally, globalisation as a social phenomenon can be understood and explained from multiple perspective such as Marxists theory, Weber theory, world- system theory and global society theory. It can be then concluded that there is not a single way to deconstruct globalisation, but rather that every sociologists has a different take on the complex notion.
“The dawn of the 21st century is replete with discourses of globalization.” (Brah 31). Such is the opening of Avtar Brah’s introduction to her critical article “Global Mobilities, Local Predicaments: Globalization and the Critical Imagination”. And it is within this very context of incredibly varied discourse that she presents her own analysis of ‘globalization’ within the ‘global’ and ‘local’ arenas, guiding readers through brief historical deconstructions of such terms. In doing so, Brah presents a carefully constructed argument asserting the necessity of applying perspectives of intersectionality and critically driven imaginations as the means to answering the “question of the global” (Brah 44), which she addresses through proposing the
Isolationism by definition is a form of a policy for remaining neutral from other political affairs of other nations. United States’ foreign policy (1865-1914) was the national policy for dealing with both political and economic relations with other countries. On George Washington’s farewell speech he explain the importance of maintain this national policy and why the United States should avoid alliances. As Washington has once stated in his resolution in his farewell address, he issued the Proclamation of Neutrality, in which it led to the Neutrality Act of 1794. This is George Washington farewell address that is representing or the symbol of traditional idea of American non-interventionism. “The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must b...
To begin, this critical response paper will provide a detailed explanation for the significant merit of globalization in context with work or services implementing the dominant western society of the world from other countries that have fewer resources compared to the first world countries. According to Ravelli and Webber (2015) in the textbook “Exploring Sociology,” Globalization initially emerged from Europe when the booming economic industries prepared colonies to transport cheap materials from global south countries to incorporate them with their own resources. This is known as eurocentrism and the help of European globalization has affected the working class or the bourgeois class in the entire world. Furthermore, globalization refers
Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its Discontents. In G. Bridge, & S. Watson (Ed.). The Blackwell City Reader (pp. 161-170). Oxford, U: Blackwell Publishing.
When the term “Globalization” is discussed, most academics, scholars, professionals and intellectuals attempt to define and interpret it in a summarized fashion. My main concern with this approach is that one cannot and should not define a process that altered decades of history and continues to, in less than 30 words. Global Shift is a book with remarkable insight. Peter Dicken rather than attempting to define the commonly misused word, explains Globalization in a clear and logical fashion, which interconnects numerous views. Dicken takes full advantage of his position to write and identify the imperative changes of political, economic, social, and technological dimensions of globalization.
In this essay I will give a detailed explanation of what sociologists mean by the term ‘globalisation’ and how they have tried to explain it.
Raewyn Connell’s journal article ‘The Northern Theory of Globalization’ (2007) demonstrates that our current understanding of globalisation is limited to a ‘Northern’ theory as it has predominantly been cultivated from a metropolitan standing point, thus proving somewhat paradoxical as the concept of globalisation is one, Connell feels (2007:368), who’s focus is on the ‘world-as-a-whole’. This is evident as Connell (2007:368) states in his opening that ‘If we want a genuinely global analysis of globalization we must reconstruct sociological theory as a markedly more inclusive dialogue.’ Connell divulges into this field by examining first the rising of the theory of globalisation and the historicity that surrounds it, secondly the current theories regarding globalisation and the antimonies within them and then present
Globalization is defined as “the historical process involving a fundamental shift or transformation in the spatial scale of human social organization that links distant communities and expands the reach of power relations across regions and continents (Baylis, 2014).”
Despite the international system being anarchical, it is not in a state of total chaos due to a number of significant factors such as those above. It is obvious that the current international system is highly influenced by many significant factors and some are more prominent than others. With the continued existence of international anarchy it is up to the States and the International Organisations to continue to make the decisions that are in their own best interest and to maintain order and an ever-improving way of life.
In explaining the world in which we find ourselves today, globalisation has come to remain as the term of reference—it is the defining terms in contemporary society . In technical sense it is viewed as an “increase in cross-border economic interaction and resource flows, producing a qualitative shift in the relations between national economies and between national states”. This in abstract is what we currently experience as the global order of our time. Though the contributions of globalisation are remarkable and reflect to an extent positive impacts on the day to day activities of people, it as well comes with its consequential effects, thereby leaving its remnants on the quality of livelihood and the increasing gaps of inequalities that
Is it possible to understand the nature of globalisation? This is a question that has led to fervent debates, and has confounded sociologists in their pursuit to explain the mechanics of globalisation (Machida 2012). Globalisation is the most dominant social phenomenon that has shaped social interactions around the world in the modern age (Ritzer & Ryan 2002). In an age where people socialise beyond their immediate communities, where a Japanese person can purchase an American product that’s made in China, and where government policies in Africa can be written by people in the Netherlands, it is impossible to ignore the current, globalised state of the world. Globalisation has led to the blurring of national boundaries, which allows nations around the world to communicate its ideas conveniently, at an unprecedented scale (Christou 2003). These global interactions allow for diverse cultural forms to disperse around the world, to be consumed by a wide array of people (Adams 2008). Despite the large, global impact of this phenomenon, it can be problematic to comprehend the nature of globalisation to a full extent, because of its vast nature and endless complexities (Mythen 2012). How is it that some nations have embraced the full extent of globalisation, and others are more closed off? Is it possible for cultures to maintain their traditional identities despite the influx of foreign influence? This essay attempts to explain the nature of globalisation through the discussion of various sociological concepts and perspectives that underpin the phenomenon. These key concepts and perspectives allow for globalisation to be understood in a more distinct and thorough way, as globalisation has moulded a global village that displays itself as d...
The term globalisation describes the process of becoming worldwide in scope or application, and the increasing interdependency of nation-sates. At least - that gives us one loose definition for globalisation, but as Scholte (2000) realises, globalisation is a thoroughly contested subject, with arguments extend across the issue of definition as well as measurement, chronology, explanation and normative judgement. In fact, Scholte identifies five contrasting definitions for the word 'globalisation' as used by a number of the subject's commentators and critics - internationalisation, liberalisation, universalisation, western/modernisation and deterrioralisation are (2000: 13).
Globalization affects this world and the people of this world in many ways. It is the idea of making the entire world like a single country.
Globalization in this article has been described in many way As both a description of wide- spread, era-defining developments and a prescription for action, that has achieved a virtual hegemony and so is presented with an air of inevitability that disarms the imagination and prevents thought of and action towards a systemic alternative-towards another, more just social and economic order.(p. 8) Globalization, has also been described as the current restructuring and reshaping of the contemporary global economy, is a powerful transformative process that has acquired hegemonic status as a result of its operative logic and ideological connotation.
Globalisation is a very complex term with various definitions, in business terms, “globalization describes the increasingly global nature of markets, the tendency for transnational businesses to configure their business activities on a worldwide basis, and to co-ordinate and integrate their strategies and operations across national boundaries” (Stonehouse, Campbell, Hamill and Purdie, 2004, p. 5).