Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of political globalization
Globalization and its impact
Introduction to globalisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of political globalization
Introduction
In This article Prempeh tries to interrogates the grassroots counter hegemonic process of "globalization-from-below," as captured in the work of Richard Falk, and questions the extent to which this process incorporates the marginalized voices in African civil society. We see that according to him globalization has an uneven nature that has motivated resistance and political counter movements aimed at challenging its alienating practices, its silencing of the voices of the people, and its undemocratic or even anti-democratic tendencies (Falk, 1999; Gill, 1995).
Globalization in this article has been described in many way As both a description of wide- spread, era-defining developments and a prescription for action, that has achieved a virtual hegemony and so is presented with an air of inevitability that disarms the imagination and prevents thought of and action towards a systemic alternative-towards another, more just social and economic order.(p. 8) Globalization, has also been described as the current restructuring and reshaping of the contemporary global economy, is a powerful transformative process that has acquired hegemonic status as a result of its operative logic and ideological connotation.
A hegemonic process in its own right, globalization has had economic, political, social, cultural, and technological effects and called into question the sustainability of the existing architecture of the contemporary world system. Globalization, thus understood, has become, to borrow Paul Hirst and Grahame Thompson's (1996) words, "a fashionable concept in the social sciences, a core maxim in the prescriptions of management gurus, and a catch-phrase for journalists and politicians of every stripe" (p.
Prem...
... middle of paper ...
...lte's (1996) point that "rural Africa hardly has a voice in global intergovernmental agencies, for example, and global civil society, inasmuch as one has developed, has tended so far to be drawn disproportionately from urban, Northern, white, (computer) literate, propertied classes" (p.111). This should entail the participation and representation of African and Third World voices, a necessary condition for an inclusive global civil society.
Conclusion
This grassrootsresistancelocated in global civil society seeks to chal- lenge the exclusionary practicesof globalization-from-above and its tendency to silence the voices of the people mostaffectedby this process.The article has argued thatalthoughthis critical discourse of globalization-from-below holds much promise, it is important that we do not overemphasize its revolutionary and emancipatory credentials.
In the face of media campaigns and political sanctions, the question about whether we owe the global poor assistance and rectification is an appropriate one. Despite television advertisements displaying the condition of the poor and news articles explaining it, the reality is the majority of us, especially in the Western world, are far removed from the poverty that still affects a lot of lives. The debate between Thomas Pogge and Mathias Risse regarding our obligation to the poor questions the very institution we live in. Pogge created a new framework in which the debate developed. He introduced a focus on the design of the institutional global order, and the role it plays in inflicting or at least continuing the severe poverty people are exposed to. Whilst both Mathias Risse and Thomas Pogge believe that the “global order is imperfectly developed. It needs reform rather than revolutionary overthrow”, they differ on whether or not it is just and entitles the global poor to assistance. Pogge believes that the global order is unjust as it “helps to perpetuate extreme poverty, violating our negative duty not to harm others unduly”. Risse believes that the institution is only incompletely just and can be credited to improving lives of the global poor. According to him, these improvements contribute to its justifiability and negate any further obligation we have to the poor. Through assessing their debate, it seems that one’s obligation to the poor depends on one’s conception of duty, their unit of analysis, and whether improvement rectifies injustice. On balance, it seems that we do indeed owe the poor, only we may lack the means to settle it.
As Americans we have to start to comprehend that the world around us is changing technologically, politically, and economically. In “The Last Superpower” an excerpt from the book The Post American World by Fareed Zakaria published in 2008. Zakaria emphasizes on these changes. Thomas Friedman the author of “The World is Flat” a piece from the book The World is Flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century published in 2005 also emphasizes on the same changes currently happening in the world. Zakaria and Friedman define these changes as globalization. The obvious common ground shared by both authors is their representation of globalization and the effects that it has and will continue to have on modern life. In contrast to sharing the same main topic both authors take a drastically different approach on how the relay their information to the audience. The differences displayed are mainly due to their personal and educational backgrounds, definitions of globalization as well as the individual writing styles of each author.
Taylor, Rupert. 2004. Creating a Better World: Interpreting Global Civil Society. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, Inc.
When the term “Globalization” is discussed, most academics, scholars, professionals and intellectuals attempt to define and interpret it in a summarized fashion. My main concern with this approach is that one cannot and should not define a process that altered decades of history and continues to, in less than 30 words. Global Shift is a book with remarkable insight. Peter Dicken rather than attempting to define the commonly misused word, explains Globalization in a clear and logical fashion, which interconnects numerous views. Dicken takes full advantage of his position to write and identify the imperative changes of political, economic, social, and technological dimensions of globalization.
Globalization is a broad concept and the angle taken to define it can lead us to interpret the idea in many different ways. There is much controversy about what globalization actually means and many definitions fail to encompass social, cultural and technological exchanges between world systems. John Pilger suggests that "it is a jargon term which journalists and politicians have made fashionable which is often used in a positive sense to denote a 'Global village' of free trade, hi-tech marvels and all kinds of possibilities that transcend class, historical experience and ideology." (J.Pilger 1998:63). Taking a broader point of view, Bilton et al defines globalization as "The process whereby political, social, economic and cultural relations increasingly take on a global scale, and which has profound consequences for individuals, local experiences and everyday lives."
Moreover, aside from the typical exploitation argument seen throughout history, chapter one also provides an example of a religious argument for why this inequality in countries exists; that is to say, those that are unequally better off believe that they are superior. Since Africa has been unable to develop properly they rely on foreign forces for most of their needs and as such this keeps funneling money out the continent and into foreign countries. This cycle leads to “ownership of production in one country by the citizens of another” (Rodney 22). Rodney explains that exploitation has always existed in humans, ranging from exploitation of the environment to exploitation of man, however, the greatest misfortune is the exploitation of nations by other nations. He ends the chapter by discussing the issues that have befallen Africa due to its underdevelopment including coups resulting from political instability.
After the cold war, word ‘globalization’ was commonly used at a time of unprecedented interconnectedness when advanced nations experienced a ruthless development by exploiting energy resources and stressing culture forms in developing countries. To identify the definition of ‘globalization’, it is significant to clarify its appearance as well as implication.
Globalization, the acceleration and strengthening of worldwide interactions among people, companies and governments, has taken a huge toll on the world, both culturally and economically. It’s generating a fast-paced, increasingly tied world and also praising individualism. It has been a massive subject of matter amongst scientists, politicians, government bureaucrats and the normal, average human population. Globalization promoted the independence of nations and people, relying on organizations such as the World Bank and also regional organizations such as the BRICs that encourage “a world free of poverty” (World Bank). Despite the fact that critics can argue that globalization is an overall positive trend, globalization has had a rather negative cultural and economic effect such as the gigantic wealth gaps and the widespread of American culture, “Americanization”; globalization had good intentions but bad results.
The term ‘Globalization’ refers to the integration of economies, industries, markets, cultures and policy-making around the globe. It explains a progression by which both national and regional economies, societies, and cultures have become incorporated through the universal system of commerce, communication, migration and transportation. Globalization can be explained in economic and sociological contexts. Malcolm Waters, in his book– ‘Globalization’ writes that “Globalization is a social process in which the constraints of geography on economic, political, social and cultural arrangements recede, in which people become increasingly aware that they are receding and in which people act accordingly.” Whereas, Nobel laureate and economist Joseph Stiglitz in his book ‘Globalization and Its Discontents’ says that ”Globalization is the closer integration of the countries and peoples of the world.brought about by the enormous reduction of costs of transportation and communication, and the breaking down of people across the borders."
But just as Friedman must address the concerns in the 1990s of those who are late entrants into the global economy, so we must address the concerns of those who represent the Olive Tree in South Africa; namely, the Boers and the native black Africans. While Friedman insists that globalization ultimately empowers individuals through the democratization of technology, political processes, finance, and information, Boers and Blacks seem, in different ways, to be very limited in their empowerment in the short term. Friedm...
Globalization can briefly be defined as ‘something’ that affects and changes the traditional arrangements of the state system. It is a term that directly implies change and therefore is a continuos process over a long period of time as compared to quickly changing into a wanted or desir...
Globalization is the new notion that has come to rule the world since the nineties of the last century with the end of the cold war. The frontlines of the state with increased reliance on the market economy and renewed belief in the private capital and assets, a process of structural alteration encouraged by the studies and influences of the World Bank and other International organisations have started in many of countries. Also Globalisation has brought in new avenues to developing countries. Greater access to developed country markets and technology transfer hold out promise improved productivity and higher living standard.
According to Peter Kaufman, globalization is the process in which products, ideas and cultures are exchanged around the world. Globalization is found everywhere. Each individual might be from a certain part of the world, but the products in its house might not; for instance, an individual’s laptop might be made in China. Ultimately, the increase of globalization in the last few decades has had a powerful impact in the world, and will likely to continue in the future.
In this paper, we would compare and contrast two countries Turkey and U.S.A according to practices of organizational behavior. First of all, I would to speak about globalization because globalization has affected organizational behavior. We speak over fifty years about globalization. What is it globalization and what is the relationship between globalization and organizational behavior? Globalization is the integration of international market and other cultures with global economy. There is no board and businesses are across the world so that the relationship between cultures, society, politics and business are affected each other. Therefore, globalization has changed the element of management, leadership, communication, motivation, diversity and teams that demonstrate the relationship between organizational behavior and globalization. Of course, all countries are not affected by globalization same size. Some countries have main differences such as culture, religion, region and other beliefs. An analyze of organizational behavior practices between America and Turkey will be interest because there is very limited resemblance. Although we can be considered more collectivist, American have a more individualism that is why we have the most important
In the recent years globalization has begun to appear as one of the most predominant issues in the world. The term ‘is generally used when discussing the technology and advances in an assortment of areas including, but not limited to, everything from technology to capital. The main aspects that comprise globalization are debatable. Throughout this essay, globalization will be explored as a recent social change in our society as it relates to incorporating economic relations and incorporations political relations around the world, despite the fact that this change is often portrayed as a problematic and unequal one of the restrictions of mobile subjects and connectivity. To begin my segment, I’ll begin to discuss on some of the most important definitions of globalization. Lastly, I’ll begin to investigate the imbalanced and difficult practices that make up globalization.