Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Epic of Gilgamesh analysis
Gilgamesh the epic summary
The epic of gilgamesh, the dramatic confrontation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Epic of Gilgamesh analysis
“Knowledge is power. Power to do evil...or power to do good. Power itself is not evil. So knowledge itself is not evil.” - Veronica Roth, Allegiant
This quote references the age old theme of power versus knowledge. In The Epic of Gilgamesh, a young king named Gilgamesh strives for immortality. Gilgamesh acted for his own glory, and was a tyrant over his own people. This made him act less like a person, and his greed was his hubris. Gilgamesh was power hungry, never straying from his hoarding habits, even in the wake of a friend’s death. Gilgamesh was an example of human corruption through power. some texts from ancient times, such as the Bible, have many common themes, such as how to rule, and what kind of choices one should make. Like Ebeneezer
…show more content…
Scrooge in Dickens' A Christmas Carol, Gilgamesh gets a glimpse at his present and future and has an opportunity to change his ways. However, Gilgamesh's journey to improve himself does not finish so lightheartedly, and he ends in is the same state as before, still on track to his original fate. In the beginning of the epic, Gilgamesh is antagonistic in the way he runs the city of Uruk.
This early Gilgamesh is the example of his poor past actions, and how his greed turned him into a monster. “The young men of Uruk he harries without warrant, / Gilgamesh lets no son go free to his father. / By day and by night his tyranny grows harsher, / Gilgamesh, [the guide of the teeming people!] / It is he who is shepherd of Uruk-the-Sheepfold, / [but Gilgamesh] lets no [daughter go free to her] mother.” (67-72, Gilgamesh) Gilgamesh is a warrior of his people. He uses threats and brutality to control his citizens. He rapes the young women of the town, and abuses the boys. This king is abusively powerful and greedy, a hoarder of power. His form of ruling is very similar to the type of tyrants warned about in Proverbs 29:4. "By justice a king gives a country stability, /but those who are greedy for[a] bribes tear it down." Even in ancient times people knew how a malicious king rules, and that people like Gilgamesh define that with their ideas of power. Sumerian society was power centric with a definite hierarchy, and the leaders at the time did have a familiar relationship with the gods. This did not guarantee, however, the common people had no pull with the gods. Gilgamesh may be related to figures in their religion, but gods still worked with the …show more content…
people. Gilgamesh is in mourning in the second half of the story for his friend Enkidu. With his freind's death, Gilgamesh realizes he is mortal, and will eventually die. He fears this, and consults the wise man Uta-Napishti, for he was the only man to ever gain immortality. Uta-Napishti is an example of the the positive life Gilgamesh could leave if he made the correct choices. Uta-Napishti is a god who earned his immortality by surviving a great flood. He tells Gilgamesh of the failures the greedy King has made so far, and ridicules Gilgamesh for not helping others. He called Gilgamesh a fool. "Said Uta-napishti to him, to [Gilgamesh:] / 'Why, Gilgamesh, do you ever [chase] sorrow? / You, who are [built] from / gods' flesh and human, / who the [gods did fashion] like your father and mother? / 'Did you ever, Gilgamesh, [compare your lot] with the fool? / They placed a throne in the assembly, and [told you,] "Sit!" / The fool gets left-over yeast instead of [fresh] ghee, / bran and gist instead of [best flour] / he is clad in a rag, instead of [fine garments,] / instead of a belt, he is girt [with old rope,] / Because he has no advisers [to guide him,] / his affairs lack counsel . . . . . ." (lines 270-277) Gilgamesh's idol calls him a fool for not making better choices. Gilgamesh's seeking power made him a pawn that could be easily used. This focus on choice references the idea of a path to wickedness that will cause evil. It indicates that Gilgamesh is stuck on a path to tragedy, a fall from grace that is destined. This theme of fate is present in parts of the Bible, specifically Romans 6: 19 - 20, "(19) I am using an example from everyday life because of your human limitations. Just as you used to offer yourselves as slaves to impurity and to ever-increasing wickedness, so now offer yourselves as slaves to righteousness leading to holiness. (20) When you were slaves to sin, you were free from the control of righteousness.” Here an idea of moral balance is presented, where people eventually fall to fate. This shows the destiny centric beliefs in ancient cultures, and presents the idea that all are destined for certain fates. Gilgamesh is admonished, so he chooses to not follow the "righteous" path and gain honor. He is a slave for the power he craves. Gilgamesh likened himself to a god, even when many gods of the time were greedy and spiteful.
His idea of a god is akin to the character or Ishtar, a goddess who takes whatever she wants from others. “You loved the speckled allallu-bird, but struck him down and broke his wing: / now he stands in the woods crying, "My wing!" / You loved the lion, perfect in strength, / but for him dug seven pits and seven / You loved the horse, so famed in battle, / but you made his destiny whip, spur, and lash. / You made his destiny a seven league gallop, / you made his destiny to drink muddy water, / and doomed Silili his mother to perpetual weeping." Ishtar was a homewrecker of a goddess; finding love and then crushing that person she adores. Like Gilgamesh and his narcissism, Ishtar only cares about her needs and takes pleasure in other's suffering. Ishtar makes the mothers of the men she loves weep as much as the mothers of the brides Gilgamesh defiles. The only difference between those two events is how the woman in Gilgmesh’s town still had enough ability to call on the gods for help. The men Ishtar woos are doomed to their fate the moment Ishtar sees them. In their time together, Gilgamesh sees his own future in the best way possible; someone who has already headed too far down the same road he’s on. He does not realize that in its own way, Ishtar's appearance was a warning that he did not heed. Ishtar gained more greed and evil by being immortal and not choosing to help
humanity with her abilities. This shows the downfalls of immortality. For every bit of humanity that someone loses, the person tends to lose their love as well. Much like James 1:23. "(21) Very similar to the foreshadowing that one's actions tend to have when looking back. (22) Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says. (23) Anyone who listens to the word but does not do what it says is like someone who looks at his face in a mirror (24) and, after looking at himself, goes away and immediately forgets what he looks like." This shows just how Gilgamesh defeated a person who was very much like himself, but did not realize she was his future if he continued on this path to godhood. It also gives away how dense humanity can be. Ignorance is a human trait now as much as then. We see warnings all around us, but think that could never happen to us. Ancient Sumerians believed it was all up to fate, no matter what happened. In summary, The Epic of Gilgamesh is a tragic story about the manifestation of one man's greed. He goes a deranged quest to find immortality, a gift that was warned against finding. He encounters people akin to his possible futures, and both heed of what kind of life he has to choose from. His failures ultimately describe humanity's compulsion to turn a blind eye on very real problems, no matter how many warning signs there may be. Gilgamesh's story follows proves ignorance can really be bliss.
Respecting the gods was one of the most important, and there was retribution for those who didn’t. After killing the Bull of Heaven, the gods punish Gilgamesh and his friend, Enkidu, by sentencing Enkidu to a slow, painful death by disease. Merikare writes that a Pharaoh must, “make ample the daily offerings, it profits him who does it.” In both instances, the gods are where the kings derive their claim to the throne. Respecting them is of utmost importance because they believed that punishment could come if one did not obey. In addition, both kings needed to conquer or secure trade routes to gain access to valuable luxury resources. Both require Cedar, as evidenced when Merikare writes, “I pacified the West…it gives cedar wood,” and when Gilgamesh kills Humbaba so he can build a great Cedar gate at the entrance of Uruk. Both cultures recognized the best way to have constant access to an important commodity was to control the supply and the roads. These works both exemplify this, as both used military force to secure Cedar, which both needed for their monumental architecture. Kings also needed to be accountable to the people. In the beginning of the epic, Gilgamesh is a cruel ruler, and the people hate him. The gods decide, therefore, to give him a rival who can dethrone him. The Pharaoh also writes to his son, “Don 't be evil, kindness is good, Make your memorial last
The Epic of Gilgamesh is generally regarded as the greatest literature about tales of a great king. The Epic of Gilgamesh served to show us a lot of things. The time period of BCE is very blurry, and this story attempts to describe many different things in not only Sumerian beliefs, but also Sumerian's culture as a whole. Like many stories from BCE the truth itself is questionable, even though a lot of the information is fact. The factual information that Gilgamesh teaches us about Sumerian Civilization is that had had many craftsman and artistic skills, and also a strong belief in Gods.
Moreover, He deems himself an equal by establishing friendship with Enkidu who is just a commoner but calls him a ‘brother’ and grieves at his death. This shows that he has a human compassionate heart. However, Gilgamesh, who is more divine than human, uses his powers as if he was a god where his actions had no consequences. He turns into a tyranny more by the passing day, becomes abusive, exploits newly-weds sexually, insults the goddess, kills a forest guardian who is divinely appointed for the role, which is responsible for the death of Enkidu, his warrior
When asked about The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, critic Harold Clurman claims that the play is “chiefly a study in mass hysteria in which superstition conspires with self-interest to incite a society to destructiveness” (handout). This quote accurately portrays the message of revenge and greed serving as common characteristics in times of uncertainty that echoes throughout the play, clearly exemplified through Mr. Putnam, Reverend Parris, and Abigail Williams. During this time, land lust and revenge were common incentives to accuse a person of being a witch, and these three characters clearly exemplify these common reasons. As static characters, Mr. Putnam, Reverend Parris, and Abigail Williams remain constant in their motives throughout the play. Through Mr. Putnam’s lust for land and desire for revenge, Reverend Parris’s obsession over self-image, and Abigail’s jealously of Elizabeth and love for Proctor, The Crucible supports Clurman’s claim of Salem being a society driven by people with characteristics of greed and revenge rather than principle.1
Gilgamesh is the king of Uruk, one who is macho, irresponsible, and simply not fit to be in the position that his blood status has put him in. His decisions are constantly making the people of Uruk
Gilgamesh was a very self confident and at times that self confidence led to him to have little compassion for the people of Uruk at he beginning of the story. He was their king, but not their protector; he kills their sons and rapes their daughters. He felt like he was superior to others due to the fact that he was two-thirds god, his mother was a goddess Ninsun and one third human. This fact is the key to all of his actions. This is also what sets him apart from the hero Odysseus.
He worked his people to death and took what he wanted from them. He used the women as he pleases and killed the men at will. The people of Uruk cried out to the gods so they can have peace. After his return, and after neglecting people for a very long time, Gilgamesh returns and acts like the king he wanted to
Albert Einstein once said “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot.” Knowledge can be good because it makes one successful. Then, it can also be very bad such as a criminal being too smart for the police, he or she can keep committing crime. Too much knowledge is dangerous because it may harm many, which means that many die or get scarred for life because of one simple guy with an excess of knowledge.
He takes on the aspects of outward uncivility that matches his inside. Since Gilgamesh is not civilized, he doesn’t function as well in or outside of society. When he’s looking for immortality, he relies on his strength and his uncivilized nature rather than allowing civilization to lead him to immortality. If he had allowed himself to listen to the gods who were trying to help him, the perhaps he would have achieved immortality rather than “hindering his own progress by smashing the Stone Ones” (George, 75) who were planning on helping him. Some would argue that Gilgamesh’s civility does, however, grow immensely through the epic. Since he starts off as a king and is able to do anything he wishes due to not having anyone trying to usurp him. Even when Enkidu comes into the story to stop Gilgamesh, he never succeeds. Instead they join forces, yet Gilgamesh does not gain civility and instead stays incredibly savage and fights together with Enkidu, battling demons like Humbaba and killing him for glory. It’s not till Enkidu dies and Gilgamesh realizes that he can in fact be affected by death and the gods despite being two thirds god himself. There’s no real evidence that Gilgamesh truly change. While the epic ends with Gilgamesh wearing his royal robes “fitting his dignity” (George, 97) and eventually accepting that not only will he not be granted
He feels that he is superior to others, due to the fact that he is two-thirds god, and one-third man. This arrogance leads to his being cruel at the beginning of the story. Gilgamesh is described as, two-thirds of him divine, one-third human. Gilgamesh does not allow the son to go with his father; day and night he oppresses the weak. Gilgamesh does not let the young woman go to her mother, the girl to the warrior, the bride to the young groomä (tablet I, column ii, 1, 12-13, 27-28).
Gilgamesh is an example of someone who had many flaws and faced many struggles but, in the end, changed his attitude and became a better person. In the beginning of Gilgamesh, he is described as doing whatever he wants and being juvenile in a way. For example, in the text it says, “he was their shepherd, yet powerful, superb, knowledgeable and expert, Gilgamesh would not leave young girls alone, the daughters of warriors, the brides of young men.” With his second half, Enkidu, they entered into the first step in becoming a hero according to Campbell, the separation, by going on an adventure. At this point in the story, Gilgamesh is very arrogant. While traveling to Cedar Forest, Gilgamesh tells Enkidu, “let me go in front of you, and your voice call out: ‘Go close, don’t be afraid!’ If I should fall, I should have won fame. People will say, Gilgamesh grappled in combat with ferocious Humbaba… ensure fame that will last forever.” Next is stage two, the initiation, of the Campbell’s hero journey. Gilgamesh undergoes a trail to begin his transformation, he must fight the Bull of Heaven. Gilgamesh’s supportive side is starting to show when he tells Enkidu that they will win if they fight together. After killing the Bull of Heaven, Gilgamesh’s confident attitude is shown once again. The next trial he faces is the death of Enkidu. He starts to show emotion when he says, “for you Enkidu, I, like your mother, your father, will weep on your plains… I will lay you to rest on a bed of loving care… and I myself will neglect my appearance after your death.” At this point his character has been greedy and then he showed his fear and supportive side. The last stage in the hero’s journey is the return. Enkidu’s death sent Gilgamesh on an adventure to fight death. From this adventure he learned his biggest lesson from Utnapishtim. He learns to appreciate life, and
The free dictionary online defines knowledge as “an awareness, consciousness, or familiarity gained by experience or learning”. Power, on the other hand, means “the ability or official capacity of a person, group or nation to exercise great influence or control and authority over others”. In Voltaire’s “Candide”, Goethe’s “Faust”, and Shelley’s Frankenstein, the quest for more knowledge and power sets the stage for the story yet the characters, Candide, Frankenstein, and Faust remain unhappy after acquiring the much desired knowledge and power. It can be said, therefore, that knowledge, and even money, often times twists and corrupts the mind because of the control (power) it gives people over others.
Some of Gilgamesh’s qualities are that he had a “beauty… surpassing all others” and was “two thirds… god and one third man” (13). Before Enkidu, Gilgamesh acted horribly. He was a terrible ruler and a terrible man. Gilgamesh was not all good, for example, “his lust leaves no virgin to her lover, neither the warrior’s daughter nor the wife of the noble…” (13). He was a terrible ruler. Gilgamesh was arrogant, but very powerful in his country. His people had no choice but to listen to him. They were forced to go along with his unlawfulness and stubbornness.
What constitutes a good hero, leader, or person? What does it even mean to be good? Sure there is a textbook definition of what good means and according to Meriam-Webster Dictionary good means, “to be of a good character or tendency” (Meriam-Webster) but does good mean the same thing to every person? Is it the same cross culturally? What if one person’s good is another person’s bad? Will leaders be viewed differently? In an excerpt from Education and the Humanities, the author whom is not named states, “while studying the humanities, the student comes directly in contact with minds greater than his own, and he cannot comprehend anything of their greatness without expanding his power of comprehension” (1947). This quote informs and allows a
The story itself reflects an image of the cultural situation in which it was conceived. One major difference between this ancient society and our own is the way in which we sustain our leaders. Gilgamesh's character, whether based on an actual person or not, is portrayed as a very powerful and proud person. He was created to be better and stronger than common man and he is favored by the gods. This portrayal of a super-human king indicates a deep respect for leadership by those who told this story. Likely, these people lived under the rule of a monarchy in which the King was the all powerful leader and lawmaker. In today's society though, it is not common for one person to have unlimited power. Our governments are designed to divide ruling power between numerous parties; in order to keep any one person from becoming all powerful. Today's society would not tolerate a king who could do as he pleases, even if he were a noble and just man. In the story, Gilgamesh's super-human strength and power are not always convenient to his subjects. "His arrogance has no bounds", and "his lust leaves no virgin to her lover," yet the people respect his authority. The supremacy of Gilgamesh in the story reflects the feelings toward leadership held by that society which created the story. The respect they had for an all powerful monarch is hard for us to understand today. Our society looks down on those who rule as dictators and labels them tyrants and enemies. It is odd to imagine living in a society where a king is to be respected.