Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Politics and the English language summary
Orwell essay politics english language
Orwell literary criticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Politics and the English language summary
George Orwell’s 1946 piece “Politics and the English Language” acts as a critique towards the development of written English. The essay begins by stating that the expected decline in the intricacy of a language, will always have political and economic causes, although, the degeneration is accelerated due to the imitation of poor writing habits. Orwell then asserts that in order to control this slump, writers must be wary and conscious of the words they use and why they use them. The failure to do so, as Orwell notes, can lead to a lack of substance, and in place, unnecessary long-winded phrases, clichés, and insignificant wording. Five passages are presented each containing “staleness of imagery” and “vagueness” which are used to prove Orwell’s …show more content…
The passage first establishes that metaphors are used to create a vivid images and to be thought provoking, but the use of one that is so common can invoke a staleness in the phrase. Hackneyed metaphors lose their original influence and are, as Orwell notes, used to save writers from the difficulty of creating a unique phrase themselves. As a result, he states that many writers use metaphors without knowing their meaning and are applied incorrectly. The second cause Orwell lists is named “operators or verbal false limbs” where Orwell describes the negative effects of unnecessary verbs and nouns. He states that although extra syllables can give the appearance of symmetry, it takes away from the overall impact of the phrase. Furthermore, the use of a passive voice rather than an active one cuts down on the effect of a phrase as well. The next reason is called “pretentious diction”. In this section Orwell states that the use of overcomplicated nouns and adjectives in place of simpler ones, unnecessarily dress up a statement. Additionally, Orwell believes the use of foreign words are commonly thought to give the impression of elegance, but are in reality, pointless. The consequence of these unneeded words are an “increase in slovenliness and …show more content…
This paragraph highlights commonly used words that can convey a different meaning to every reader or writer as they have no concrete definition. Many words have an assumed connotation that in reality might not agree to what the author intends to communicate. To summarize the effect of Orwell’s four points, he creates a parody of a passage from Ecclesiastes. He describes the multiple redundancies and irrelevant points, and how he as a writer would avoid them. Subsequently, Orwell describes the evident decline of the English prose in political language. Orwell states that when writing politically one is so consumed by the act of keeping a passive voice that their end result just seems vague. He indicates that one shouldn’t hide their main message behind glitz and glamour in order to appeal to someone with different views. Orwell concludes his passage by expressing his desire to change the bag habits of writers. As a result, he establishes six elementary rules in order to avoid the common mistakes he acknowledged earlier. 1. Cut out all unnecessary words. 2. Never use a long word when a shorter one can convey the same meaning. 3. Avoid technical and foreign
This essay is distinctly about how life experiences alter the way in which your writings travel. The ups and downs of life will determine the perspective you see of your life, in turn, determining how you feel or express yourself. Orwell states, “his subject matter will be determined by the age he lives in – at least this is true in tumultuous, revolutionary ages like our own” (265). This statement proves how writing develops with age and how through different time periods, has evolved. Orwell's essay focuses on the indirect wants.
George Orwell uses strong, noticebly-patterned diction to highlight his argument, that choosing human imperfection is better in some situations
Orwell, George. “Politics and the English Language.” George Orwell: Critical Essays. London: Harvill Secker: 2009. 270-286. Print.
The time frame of this article is in 1946, a year after World War 2 has ended. Orwell takes the current situation into consideration when he appeals to his audience. Therefore, he addresses areas of politics in combination with recent events to try to persuade his audience while inducing a connection between the reader and his article. Orwell writes, “Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face…”. The reader makes a connection with the article because they can remember the previous experience of the topics in their time frame. However, Orwell uses pathos to finally convince the audience of his argument when he writes “Defenseless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine-gunned, and the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets”. This technique is highly effective because readers automatically feel a sense of pity and sadness which in turn persuades the audience of the argument and convinces them to agree with Orwell’s
George Orwell, author of 1984, summons visions of an ominous society and the descent into a spiralling abyss of hopelessness. Tone expresses how the author feels about a subject. Often mistaken with tone, mood depicts how the author perceives and conveys an event to the audience. Situational irony occurs when the audience expects an event to happen that does not actually occur within the timeline. Whereas, dramatic irony occurs when the audience knows of an event the character does not. In the book, the dark tone of the novel conveys the numbing of society while the irony demonstrates how trusting others affects views and relationships. However, paradox suggests something contradictory to logical reasoning. Doublethink contributes to the hopelessness by illustrating a paradox within society. Therefore, Orwell illustrates tone, paradox, and irony through how the government controls emotions, time, thoughts, and trust in order to
This is an important example of the foolishness of writers that do not understand the metaphors, similes, and symbolic expressions to help the reader understand their ideas in the writing. I also agree that writers do not use words “precisely”, which can confuse the reader. Many writers are not fully aware of the meaning of the words they choose, which Orwell breaks down in the writings he is analyzing. Clarity in the writing process is conveyed with great accuracy by Orwell to make this second point.
Howe, Tom. "George Orwell." British Writers Volume VII. Ed. Ian Scott-Kilvert. New York: Scribner, 1984. 273-287.
Orwell argues that society is completely oblivious to the constraint that is involved in every day life. There is no individual in society and that everyone remains the same. “Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?” (46) Not only does a limiting of words show society that by controlling methods of co...
The tone of Orwell’s essay is formal. Throughout the entire essay, Orwell is informative and professional to achieve ethos. Orwell stays professional even when he is expressing his feelings, for example, in this passage, “In our time it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing. Where it is not true, it will generally be found that the writer is some kind of rebel, expressing his private opinions and not a ‘party line’. Orthodoxy, of whatever colour, seems to demand a lifeless, imitative style. The political dialects to be found in pamphlets, leading articles, manifestos, white papers and the speeches of undersecretaries do, of course, vary from party to party, but they are all alike in that one almost never finds in them a fresh, vivid, homemade turn of speech.” Orwell does not veer off topic and continues to be
George Orwell’s intent in the novel 1984 is to warn society about the results of a controlling and manipulative government by employing mood, conflict, and imagery.
The writers and political speakers use “pretentious diction” to try and make boring or repugnant statements captivating or rational. Orwell felt political writing was the foe of simple, direct
George Orwell’s essay, Politics and the English Language, first published in 1946, talks about some “bad habits”, which have driven the English language in the wrong direction, that is, away from communicating ideas. In his essay he quotes five passages, each from a different author, which embody the faults he is talking about. He lists dying metaphors, operators, pretentious diction, and meaningless words as things to look out for in your own writing and the writing of others (593-595). He talks about political uses of the English language. Our language has become ugly and the ugliness impedes upon communication. Ugly uses of language have been reinforced and passed down in the population “even among people who should and do know better,” (598). Ugly language has been gaining ground in our population by a positive feedback mechanism.
Based on the two essays, George Orwell is a vivid writer who uses a unique point of view and strong themes of pride and role playing to convey his messages. His writings are easy to pick out because of the strengths of these messages. Just like politicians in government, people with power turn corrupt to stay in power and keep their reputations. Anyone who takes on power must be prepared to live with the consequences of his actions. Orwell knows this challenge well and conveys this principle in his writing. After all, his narration is based on real life experiences and not fictional fantasies.
This essay will identify and analyze the key themes in the novel, as well as discuss its warning to the readers as society progresses. The main theme in this novel is the dangers of totalitarianism. In 1984, Orwell presents a dystopia, or in other words, the perfect totalitarian state; a state in which government monitors and controls every aspect of human life to the extent that even having a disloyal thought is against the law. Orwell goes to great lengths in order to inform the readers of the terrifying degree of power and control a totalitarian regime can acquire.
This is because the language of politics is engaged in maintaining orthodoxy and defending actions on the part of governments, which are often indefensible. Euphemisms are more mild words substituted for other words that are considered to be too harsh. Orwell asserts that these are commonplace in political speech. He offers some examples: the destruction of villages is called 'pacification', the forced eviction of peasants is 'transfer of population', and the unlawful imprisonment and execution of political dissidents is 'elimination of unreliable elements'. In short, Orwell asserts that when the real goals of a political body differ from the stated goals of the party, language is used to mask the difference and mislead the populace.