Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
George Orwell 1984 literary analysis
George orwell 1984 literary analysis essay
George Orwell 1984 literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: George Orwell 1984 literary analysis
Orwell believes that the language which is vague or meaningless hides the truth rather than express it. Orwell encourages concreteness and clarity instead of vagueness, and individuality over political conformity. Moreover Orwell argues on the fact that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.”He argues that these result from bad writing habits which are spread by imitation, and that writers need to rid themselves of these habits by thinking more carefully about the words they use and their meaning. Orwell notices that modern prose lack concreteness. Instead, writers use assembles of hackneyed clichés, phrases in …show more content…
This is because the language of politics is engaged in maintaining orthodoxy and defending actions on the part of governments, which are often indefensible. Euphemisms are more mild words substituted for other words that are considered to be too harsh. Orwell asserts that these are commonplace in political speech. He offers some examples: the destruction of villages is called 'pacification', the forced eviction of peasants is 'transfer of population', and the unlawful imprisonment and execution of political dissidents is 'elimination of unreliable elements'. In short, Orwell asserts that when the real goals of a political body differ from the stated goals of the party, language is used to mask the difference and mislead the populace. An important feature of Orwell's argument is that, once this soft, hazy language is adopted by the population, the ability to fully comprehend the actions of governments is lessened, and through this process the population can be tricked and resistance
Diction: While George Orwell used fairly simple and uncomplicated diction to tell the story many of his words still have a very powerful diction. In the first chapter the protagonist Winston is attack by the smell of “boiled cabbage and old rag mats”. This is the first indication to the nature of the living conditions of our protagonist. However, Orwell also uses his diction to create the atmosphere of Oceania with lines like “the world looked cold. Down in the street little eddies of wind were whirling dust and torn paper into spirals, and though the sun was shining and the sky a harsh blue, there seemed to be no colour in anything”. These lines contain powerful words like cold, torn, and harsh and these worlds help paint the picture of what kind of story we are reading.
George Orwell uses strong, noticebly-patterned diction to highlight his argument, that choosing human imperfection is better in some situations
Orwell, George. “Politics and the English Language.” George Orwell: Critical Essays. London: Harvill Secker: 2009. 270-286. Print.
1) The device Orwell uses to introduce his thesis are chiasmi. The first chiasmus is “A man may take to drink because he feels himself to be a failure, and then fail all the more completely because he drinks” and the second chiasmus is “It becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” Both sentences are examples of chiasmus since they reverse key terms in their clauses, the key terms being “drinking” and “failure” in the first, and the state of the language and “foolish thoughts” in the second sentence. 2)
The time frame of this article is in 1946, a year after World War 2 has ended. Orwell takes the current situation into consideration when he appeals to his audience. Therefore, he addresses areas of politics in combination with recent events to try to persuade his audience while inducing a connection between the reader and his article. Orwell writes, “Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face…”. The reader makes a connection with the article because they can remember the previous experience of the topics in their time frame. However, Orwell uses pathos to finally convince the audience of his argument when he writes “Defenseless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine-gunned, and the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets”. This technique is highly effective because readers automatically feel a sense of pity and sadness which in turn persuades the audience of the argument and convinces them to agree with Orwell’s
This is an important example of the foolishness of writers that do not understand the metaphors, similes, and symbolic expressions to help the reader understand their ideas in the writing. I also agree that writers do not use words “precisely”, which can confuse the reader. Many writers are not fully aware of the meaning of the words they choose, which Orwell breaks down in the writings he is analyzing. Clarity in the writing process is conveyed with great accuracy by Orwell to make this second point.
Howe, Tom. "George Orwell." British Writers Volume VII. Ed. Ian Scott-Kilvert. New York: Scribner, 1984. 273-287.
Orwell argues that society is completely oblivious to the constraint that is involved in every day life. There is no individual in society and that everyone remains the same. “Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?” (46) Not only does a limiting of words show society that by controlling methods of co...
Structuralism, developed in the early decades of the 20th century by Saussure, focuses on the “underlying system of language” and its ability to “govern the individual and thus determine meaning” (Metzker 2010). Saussure’s development of semiotics, the study of the relationships between words and their meanings, can be applied to the Inner Party’s political agenda to create a ‘stable’ society. Ultimately, 1984 explores the ontological uncertainty of whether or not the construction of political reality and free human expression is tied up with our existing system of language – and if a social institution were to alter this system of language to execute a political ideology, would they be successful? The Party’s use of language, or Newspeak , enables them to eradicate any possibility of Thoughtcrime by erasing any words – and their subsidiaries - that may lead to or even infer political anarchy. Newspeak contains no negative terms. For instance, instead of saying “bad”, one would express their feelings through the word “ungood”. Orwell conceded that the purpose of Newspeak was “not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc (English Socialism), but to make all other modes of thought impossible”, thus confirming the power of language as an instrument of political discourse
In George Orwell’s novel, “1984”, the setting is in a place called Oceania, a dystopia. A dystopia is a usually imagined place that is far worse from reality, and its opposite being a utopia, an ideal place.Orwell imagined a world with new advanced technology, such as a telescreen, a TV that observes the ones watching and a world that consists of three megastates rather than hundreds of countries.In 1984, Orwell comes up with a new form of English called Newspeak, which the totalitarian government uses to discourage free thinking, without words to express an idea, the idea itself would be impossible to achieve, the government can control people through their words.
The Life and Works of George Orwell Zach Garrett English 12 Diane Leazer April 11, 2014. The Life and Works of George Orwell Thesis Statement: Financial struggles in the first half of George Orwell's life greatly affected how he lived and influenced his writings. l. Childhood George Orwell A. Grade School B. College ll. Life after college A. Moving away from home and joining the workforce B. Moving back home to try to find new work, lll. Literary works A. Animal Farm B. Nineteen Eighty Four.
Making a decision requires an input of whatever information you have and analyzing it to determine the choice that will be made. George Orwell, had to face a decision whether or not to kill an elephant. The elephant was a tame one that had broken its chain the night before and escaped. The elephant went a “must” and ended up killing an Indian when it caught him with his trunk and ground him into the earth. Ultimately, the elephant was found and shot by Orwell in a paddy field while it was eating brush. To determine if he is justified in killing the elephant, take a look at what led him to his decision. Things to consider while determining if he is justified are: the environment in which he is in, the role in which he must fulfill as an officer, and his morals. He was faced with a difficult decision and in the end he justified his choice.
The writers and political speakers use “pretentious diction” to try and make boring or repugnant statements captivating or rational. Orwell felt political writing was the foe of simple, direct
George Orwell’s essay, Politics and the English Language, first published in 1946, talks about some “bad habits”, which have driven the English language in the wrong direction, that is, away from communicating ideas. In his essay he quotes five passages, each from a different author, which embody the faults he is talking about. He lists dying metaphors, operators, pretentious diction, and meaningless words as things to look out for in your own writing and the writing of others (593-595). He talks about political uses of the English language. Our language has become ugly and the ugliness impedes upon communication. Ugly uses of language have been reinforced and passed down in the population “even among people who should and do know better,” (598). Ugly language has been gaining ground in our population by a positive feedback mechanism.
George Orwell’s Creativity in terms of Using Metaphors Introduction Creativity, which means “the human capacity regulary to solve problems or to fashion products in a domain, in a way that is initially novel, but ultimately acceptable in culture (Gardner 14)”, is one of the most significant features of mankind. Individuals are likely to explain their ideas by using their creativity in many different ways. For instance, in literature, using such kinds of metaphors which means a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to a person, idea or object to which it is not literally applicable, is an effective way for the transfer of ideas since metaphors provide selective comparisons that can offer new perspectives on a problem, highlight