George Mann Case

1.In either paragraph form or as a list of points, develop the argument you would be advancing if you were in George Mann’s position.

The argument I would be advancing if I were in George Manns position would be: George Mann permitted for one of his workers an hour or two of company time to pick up the parts required for his department. The worker who would have been compensated if he took a company automobile to pick up the lawnmower parts, and eventually somebody would have to go and get the needed parts needed. Consequently George, in reality traded the employee taking his own automobile to pick up the parts in exchange for the time spent collecting the parts, give-and-take the time spent picking up the parts and the employee conducting some private business of their own while out away for the company’s facility.

2.In similar fashion, thoroughly

Document your decision in whatever detail may be necessary, complete with explanation of why you decided in this fashion.

Considering if I were a CEO my ultimate decision on this issue would be this case is not a typical matter for Jane Arnold to perceive if the worker had left the premises to handle personal business then George Mann was certainly wrong for allowing his employed to leave without clocking out, however there is more to the position than what Sally Carter was aware of and with that additional info it changes the complete situation in the particular case.

Though company policy states for employees to clock out if going for personal business off the premise, it does not entirely clarify the entire situation of this minor issue of an employees two hours of pay or not when leaving work beneficial to the department. I side with George Mann and his verdict of permitting his worker of remaining on the clock to pick up the lawnmower parts for the department and managing some minor private business at the same time or in the same