Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sociological theories on suicide
Sociological theories on suicide
Suicide in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sociological theories on suicide
Many people believe that George was wrong for killing Lennie, but if you know what George was thinking in that situation you would have done the same thing.I believe George did the right thing by killing Lennie because if you think about the situation they were already in if he would have let him live in that situation would have got even worse than it was. Let's say he didn't kill him does that mean that Curly and the other guy wasn't going to? No, so that means that they would have to go on the run again, find new guys again and that dream that they both share would be even harder to reach because of an event that keeps occurring. This novel gives the reader a chance to see an event that happens in the world today, no i'm not saying it's …show more content…
okay to go kill your best friend but if your friend was slow or couldn't function on his own and you saw that they were suffering and breaking down what would you try to do? Help them right, so if they didn't want to live anymore, but they couldn't do anything about it because of their condition you are helping them out by doing it for them. I agree with george's decision to go ahead and killing Lennie because you knew what the risk of keeping him alive would be and him as a person couldn't see his struggling anymore so he made the decision to go ahead and kill him.It was for his own good to be honest, so really George was helping Lennie out, for example, when candy let Carson kill his dog candy didn't talk to anyone but George what he told George was ¨ It should have been me to kill my own dog¨ his best friend since he was little.
Instead of letting a stranger kill him, that was an example that lead up to George killing Lennie instead of letting curly and everyone else kills him with his friend. I as a person would rather have that friend , I would rather let my friend kill me if he/she cared about me and saw I was struggling and suffering everyday I would let them kill me other than some stranger that I don't even …show more content…
know. My idea on mercy killing is that I am for it, I understand why some say that it was wrong and they a right to do so.
But if it was one of your love ones that had a disease that brought them pain everyday and everyday they were suffering and some of you wouldn't think about what they wanted because you love them and want them to live but that person want to die and you can take that away from them that's a decision for that person to make if they can. Example is Heather Davidson, who smothered churchgoing 81-year-old cancer patient with a pillow, she was trying to go ahead and kill him hours before he was going to die, the guy was 81 old and had cancer, there was no chance of him going to live and even if he did he would be living for long he would have died of age. I think we should accept it and see that they have made their choice . All we are doing is carrying out their decision out with
love. Others would be against mercy killing and those that do it should be punished for doing so. They think that just because individual freedom and rights, that people still shouldn't have the right to decide when that want their life to end or not. If they choose not to live anymore and request to die, then they could be wrong. No one should take their life, others would say let life take its course and let them die on their own. No one knows the future, so they should not just die when anything could happen. In conclusion, I am for mercy killing because you are really helping that person out not as a stranger but as a friend. You are making the decision for that person who can't function and think for himself and you see them suffering and in pain so you give them that relief. That's why I feel that George was right for killing Lennie, Lennie couldn't function on his on he needed George with him to be able to do so. George killing him was saving them both from further event that could occur. Them first getting away, then finding somewhere else to live, and a way to make money so by killing Lennie, he took care of the whole problem, not saying if he didn't kill him he wasn't going to die, but if you remember what Candy said about his dog that was his friend and it should have been him to kill his friend not a stranger. That stopped that problem from ever happening again, yeah, that was his friend, but if you see you friend suffering and in pain you will try to help them relief it would you not.
C/R: It is true that George was only trying to save Lennie from a horrible punishment that the boys were going to bring upon him however, there were other options than killing Lennie. George didn’t have to kill Lennie, they could have run away from the mob that was chasing them, for George got to Lennie before anyone else did. They had time to escape. Therefore, George is at fault for Lennie’s death; if George really thought of Lennie as family, he would have thought of another way to get out of the problem.
Just as looking after each other is important, another component of a healthy relationship is being able to make each other better people. With no surprise, George and Lennie are able to do this for each other constantly. The first way that George and Lennie make each other better people is because they have common goals between each other. George and Lennie explain to readers how their goal is to own a farm with each other. Their farm will take up an acre of land, and it will have a shack on that land that they can live in. They will own chickens, pigs, cows, and rabbits that Lennie will be able to tend. (Steinbeck 105-106)
George shoots Lennie because he sees what the other people on the ranch would do to Lennie. After asking Curley if he could not shoot Lennie, Curley tells George that, "'I’m gonna shoot the guts outa that big bastard myself, even if I only got one hand. I’m gonna get ‘im'" (50). This shows that the others on the ranch weren't going to consider that Lennie was disabled, and Curley would try to make his death very painful. This gives George a motivation to kill Lennie: so he could make his death as painless as possible. This makes the reader have sympathy towards George. Additionally, the result of George killed Lennie, who would be the closest person to George to die at his hands, leaves George devastated that he had to do something like that to his best friend. Even though it is the best option and if I were in that scenario, the thing I would do, it understandably still makes his feel heart-broken. Ultimately, the whole book has made me feel sympathy towards George, but the ending makes me feel so much
George and Lennie were lifelong friends and had varying personalities even from the start. Lennie thought about how his Aunt Clara said he should have been more like George. At the time when the story took place, the two men were travelling together, and had been for some time, working and then moving on to search for the next job they could find. They were like many other men in search for work, except it was rare for men to travel together. George felt a need to take care of Lennie because he was somewhat slow. George was an average man of the time. He was a good size, nice, but firm, and he had aspirations to be more than just a nomadic laborer. Lennie, on the other hand, had always been a little different. He was big, goofy, clumsy, but sweet. They were also both good workers. George was concerned with working and getting his money before they got into trouble and had to leave camp. Lennie was the one who normally started the trouble. He was a hard worker and lived to appease George, but he got distracted easily which angered George. George told about how they would own a house and a farm together and work for themselves. Lennie loved to hear the story and think about the possibilities, even though nobody knew if any of it was a possibility. George and Lennie's differences in part led to George's inclination to kill Lennie. Despite their dissimilarity, the two men needed each other probably more than they realized.
Killing someone is never right. No one pointed a single finger to George for killing Lennie. They all thought it was ok since Lennie killed Curley’s wife, it is not ok to kill a person. All of them went out to drink after Lennie was dead. George did not even care, Lennie trusted George with everything. Lennie would probably be arrested for killing Curley’s wife, but he did not deserve to be killed. Lennie was a special person, he did not know his own strength. He never meant to kill Curley’s wife. George knew that but decided to kill Lennie anyways. That is not the definition of a true friend. No one accused George of anything, but instead were happy that Lennie ended up being
“I killed my best friend,” was the exact thought that hovered in George as he watched his best friend, Lennie, recumbent, cold, and still, on the grass by the riverbanks. In the book of Mice and Men, George faced the dilemma of knowing that he had killed the one he loved the most. Though it was no accident, it was for the good of Lennie. If Lennie had been allowed to live, he would only face the worst of what life has to offer. So instead of having to watch his best friend in pain, George took the initiative to end all of the cruelty of the world and send Lennie to a better place. Therefore, George was justified in killing Lennie.
How would you feel if one of your close friends killed one of their friends, but had a reason for doing it? Would you see them as a murderer? As my class is discussing the book ¨Of Mice and Men¨ George shot Lennie and most people believe that George had a justification as to murdering Lennie. I personally don’t agree with that; I believe George murdering Lennie wasn’t justified because it goes against The Bible, the law, and it was premeditated.
That ain’t no good, George.’”(Steinbeck 97). Because Lennie killed Curley’s wife, he committed a felony. George wanted Lennie to be thrown in jail at first. He wanted Lennie to be arrested because he thought it was the best thing for Lennie but then Slim told him it would not be good for Lennie. It would be bad for Lennie because Lennie would not understand his rights because he’s mentally challenged and locking him up in a cage would just hurt Lennie. George then realized he needed to kill Lennie so nobody would mistreat him. George is protecting others from Lennie.”’Lennie-if you jus’ happen to get in trouble like you always done before…’”(Steinbeck 15). George has been with Lennie for many years and he knows how Lennie will never learn and he will keep committing bad stuff. George knew something was going to happen at the ranch because Lennie has always done something wrong. George tried to prevent something from going wrong but he couldn’t. As a result he had to put down Lennie so he would not hurt anyone ever again. George felt the hard choice of killing Lennie was the right decision for George because Curley wanted to get his revenge, Lennie would be mistreated in prison and he was
This can be identify George as a good friend or a bad friend to Lennie. In my personal opinion I think that George is a good friend to lennie. Because that I think that george need to kill Lennie, the first reason is that if Lennie get caught by Curly and the others he will still died but he will be torture to death by them. Another reason is that Lennie kills a person so he will get caught eventually and he will end up the same way as he get caught now. So George kills lennie out of caring, out of the relation that they had. that is why I think that George is a good friend to Lennie
George realizes in the end of the book Lennie has done too much harm and needs to essentially go away. George then shoots Lennie in the back of the head because Lennie couldn't live on his own if he were to run away from Curly and the rest of the gang of workers coming after him. George did the right thing
George kills Lennie because he did not want to witness Lennie being hurt or killed carelessly, run off by in his own and not being able to take care for himself, and Lennie’s mental disorder will never change how Lennie reacts to certain situations. Many believe taking the life of another without consent is unacceptable but in certain situations like George’s, he has to decide due to Lennie’s mental disorder that was leading him into unpleasant situations. George is an admirable character who choose to protect and do justice to his distressed friend,
George shouldn’t go to jail for killing Lennie, even though Lennie was completely innocent. Lennie is illiterate and ill-informed. He killed Curley's wife and many animals and to keep people safe from him would be hard. He might of had to just stay in one place all day alone, that isn't good for a human. Lennie's death could save many lives.
Lennie’s unintentional mistakes resulted in the sudden end for him, but was done in the best way possible. As Lennie would’ve been subjected to a life of loss, running and suffering, George correctly made the decision in euthanizing him. While contemplating whether or not to euthanize him, George knew he very well could but it wasn’t the easiest decision to make on his part. If George wouldn’t of made the decision he did, Lennie would’ve had to run for the rest of his life with no account of what happened or what to do due to his mental illness. He would’ve been seen as a criminal and hunted down like animal which is inhumane and cruel. Although his mishaps weren’t meant to be as extreme as they were, the consequences were foreshadowed throughout
In conclusion, George killing Lennie was a murder because of lack of consent and Lennie was not suffering physically. In this society, people are scared of the unknown, and that is how they lived. No one realized what they were doing was wrong. But Lennie was just like everyone else, only different because of a small, mental setback. The characters did not seem to realize that Lennie believed in a future ahead of him, and that he had hopes and dreams just like them. Life is incredibly short, and no one should deserve
Should George have shot his friend Lennie? George probably did the right thing by shooting Lennie. How can we condemn George for sparing his friend Lennie the pain and fear of being killed by someone else? He did something society sees as wrong, but he did it for a good reason. Lennie didn’t deserve to die, but there was no other alternative. Curley wanted to kill Lennie, and since George cared for Lennie, he figured the best thing would be for him to put Lennie out of his misery.