Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sita's role in Ramayan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sita's role in Ramayan
In a world where most women in life and literature are objectified and powerless, Sita, the wife of Rama in the Indian epic, Ramayana, proves to be a woman who exercises control over her own destiny. By rejecting physical limitations placed upon ordinary women, speaking her mind, and proving herself to be a capable, independent mother, Princess Sita breaks free from the confines of many traditional Indian female stereotypes. Early on in the epic, Sita challenges the stereotypical expectation that Indian women should be obedient and abide by the physical restrictions placed on them for their “safety.” When King Rama is banished to the forest by his father, he warns his wife to stay in Ayodhya. Rama relates, “There is danger. Lions roar and keep pitiless watch from the mouths of their hill-caves, waterfalls crash and pain the ears, and so the wood is full of misery” (William Buck …show more content…
Sumantra, Rama’s father’s most trusted aide, tells Sita that, “Rama will live alone from now on, apart from you” (Buck 394). Sita sadly, but bravely takes on the challenge of raising her children without their father’s care and protection. Tara, King Vali’s wife, cannot bear to live without the make presence in her life and commits suicide by driving an arrow through her heart after he is shot and killed by Rama (Buck 198). In contrast, Sita resiliently raises her children beautifully on her own without the support of a man. Upon seeing his sons and hearing them sing his story, Rama calls to Sita and requests that she takes her place by his side once again. Holding Valmiki’s view that “A husband is a wife’s lord” (Buck 411), the expectation is that Sita will come back to him as if the 12 years of separation meant nothing. Instead, she rejects the embrace of her former husband to rest in the arms of Mother Earth forever. She lives on as a legendary independent
...re treated poorly but they can overcome their circumstances so that they may still contribute to society in a powerful way. Although women in the epic Sunjata, Indian and Greek society are all seen as the subordinate gender, the women in the epic Sunjata are strong people by making the best out of situations. Some could say that women control the story. In the beginning, the hunters would not have killed the buffalo woman if not instructed to. Also, if Sogolon hadn’t pressured Sunjata to stand, he wouldn’t have walked his all his life.
Changing Women's Roles in The Epic of Gilgamesh, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and The Canterbury Tales
In the Epic of Gilgamesh, gender plays a very significant role. While women were not the most powerful gods nor the strongest or wisest of humans, they still had tremendous influence. Though the main characters of the story, Gilgamesh and Enkidu, are male, women did not play a necessarily minor role. With all the women that play a role in the Epic of Gilgamesh, gender is a topic worthy of discussion.
The struggle for women to play an important role in history can be traced from the ancient Mesopotamians to the 1900’s. There has been a continuous battle for women to gain equal rights and to be treated equally in all aspects of life. The Epic of Gilgamesh is the oldest recorded account of the roles of women and their importance in a functional society. Women have been viewed as anything from goddesses to unwanted servants throughout history, regardless of a variety of changes in rulers, religions, and simply time periods. The Epic of Gilgamesh might lead one to consider the roles of women a small and insignificant part compared to the man's role.
What if women ruled the world? The question does not seem so strange today as it may have back in 2500 B.C.E., an age when people tell stories of the Great King of Uruk--Gilgamesh. Although the story of “Gilgamesh” revolves around themes of masculinity and brotherhood--with its male prerogative, its composers develop several strong female characters which suggest women have great influence in a male-dominated, Mesopotamian society.
Valmiki's Ramayana was written around 300 B.C.E. (Carrier 207). Typically, the character of Rama is seen as the hero and the character of Sita is seen as the hero's wife. In this essay, I will compare Sita's journey of capture and inner growth with the "save the kingdom" journey of Rama, show how the two correlate, and eventually connect in the influential chastity scene. I will also prove that Sita is the "hidden hero" of this epic even though she is seen as taking a secondary role to Rama and show how this reflects women's secondary roles in society today.
The Ramayana as retold by R.K. Narayan, explores the roles and duty of women and what it takes in order to be a good woman in Indian society. He explores these roles through the women through out the epic whether it is the wife of a King or some form of deity. While in general women were viewed as subpar to men and were seen as second-class citizens, the women in the book shape the men into who they become and account for much of the manipulation of the individuals and the caretaking of the individuals. Women such as Sita and Kausalya demonstrate those women that are good. These women were regarded as beautiful, not only for their physical attributes, but for their behavior in regards to the males in the epic. They are everything women should be- they are kind and respect the males in their lives above all else. However these women are also met with their opposites, those women who have much improvement to make before being recognized as good women in the Indian society. These women, like Kaikeyi and Soorpanaka go against all Indian ideals. They use their sexuality in order to attempt to manipulate the men of the epic. They do everything in their power in order to get their way, even if it is at the cost of others.
Society places ideas concerning proper behaviors regarding gender roles. Over the years, I noticed that society's rules and expectations for men and women are very different. Men have standards and specific career goals that we must live up to according to how others judge.
When the king Dasaratha claimed Rama his favorite son to be his heir, Queen Kaikeyi’s servant Manthata said that the queen’s son Bharata should be the next king. Dasaratha owes the queen his life so she only sees it fitting to have her son as the next king. From a Kantian moral ethics point of view, Manthata does not have a good moral worth. She is make her decisions based on a negative motivation, which is desire. Her actions are not morally motivated. This could also symbolize how forces in life can put pressure on the way people make their decisions. The queen had no problem with Rama becoming king until her servant had something to say about it. Rama is a character that has known his dharma and what kind of person he is throughout the myth. It seems that nothing changes the way he makes his decisions. When he was basically exiled to the forest for fourteen years, he went without a fight. “ Rama was not a bit perturbed and replied that he was only too happy to carry out his father’s promises to her”(246). Rama’s wife, Sita, and his brother are very loyal characters who also appear to know what their role is in society. They go with Rama to live out in the forest willingly because they feel it is their duty, especially for Sita
In The Iliad, the gods and goddesses have completely different roles. The females are usually the ones in the battle fighting, while the male gods are putting courage into hearts, but that isn’t to say that is all that they do. This is a completely different role than the mortals have. While the men are out in battle, the women are knitting and cooking. The women are also described so that it seems like they are property and not humans, and that they don’t have any feeling. Where the female gods act and are treated as if they are equal, if not ranked higher.
The author’s conversation with Sita was the first of many in the following months. Each conversation further altered Nanda’s opinion of the practice she once found oppressive. The author understands and agrees to an extent with arranged marriages after hearing of the benefits. Nanda explains that in India every aspect of succeeding in life is linked to your family. If someone was to go against the practice, they would be cutting their chances greatly of living a comfortable
Hess, Linda. Rejecting Sita: Indian Responses to the Ideal Man's Cruel Treatment of His Ideal Wife. Vol. 67. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. Print.
Comparatively men are not subject to gender constraints. Rama asserts that, “I am a king and my first and final dharma is toward my people”(Valmiki,649). In contrast Sita endures extreme events of calamity dependent upon Rama. Rama mentions, “Do not think of a moment Sita that I came for your sake” (Valimiki, 494). Therefore women are portrayed as secondary to honor and status of men. The role of women is predetermined to exemplify a paradigm wife, with contrastingly miniscule reciprocal behavior from the role men. Women are viewed as property of men vulnerable to suffering and hardship at the demands of the male characters. The men are liberated from gender constraints whereas women are sexually oppressed with a role dependent upon their relationship and subordinate nature to their
Many people think that boys in our culture today are brought up to define their identities through heroic individualism and competition, particularly through separation from home, friends, and family in an outdoors world of work and doing. Girls, on the other hand, are brought up to define their identities through connection, cooperation, self-sacrifice, domesticity, and community in an indoor world of love and caring. This view of different male and female roles can be seen throughout children’s literature. Treasure Island and The Secret Garden are two novels that are an excellent portrayal of the narrative pattern of “boy and girl” books.
Indisputably, roles and characteristics of opposite genders have been ubiquitous, since historical evidence proves so – dating back to when the practice of oral tradition was favored over written language. This historical evidence is especially apparent in literature from previous time periods. In these works of literature, men and women often have very different social and economic positions within society. Particular duties, or tasks, are practiced depending on the gender of these individuals. However, in the advancing world we are currently living in, these duties are beginning to intertwine in an effort to allow equal rights amongst opposite genders. This effort to break the sexist barrier, which encompasses our world, has already begun rattling the chains of politicians and the like. However, with the progressions made thus far in retaliation to sexism and unequal gender privileges, the United States of America is heading in a positive direction towards gender equality. Nonetheless, the female gender is perceived as a lesser entity in society while the male gender is dominant and controlling. The masculine individuals in literary works usually govern, or direct the feminine individuals. These characteristics are often evident in various literary works – including “Hills Like White Elephants,” and “A&P” written by Ernest Hemingway and John Updike, respectively. The slow and steady transformation from a sexist society to one that allows inferior genders to perform similar tasks, if not the same as their superior counterparts, may disturb the ideological mindset of figures with authority; however, it provides inferior genders with the opportunity to branch out socially, economically, and politically.